No CrossRef data available.
The Emergence of a Hybrid Public Sphere in Myanmar: Implications for Democratisation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2021
Abstract
Myanmar was under a military government for almost six decades, during which time the state maintained an ‘authoritarian public sphere’ that limited independent civil society, mass media and the population's access to information. In 2010, Myanmar held flawed elections that installed a semi-civilian government and established a hybrid governance regime, within which civil, political and media freedoms expanded while the military's influence remained significant. In this paper, we examine ‘hybrid governance at work’ in the ‘hybrid public sphere’, that holds in tension elements of an authoritarian and democratic public sphere. The boundaries of these spheres are demarcated through legal means, including the 2008 military-created Constitution, associated judicial and administrative state structures and the actions of civil society and community movements toward political, military and bureaucratic elite actors. We develop our analysis first through an assessment of Myanmar's political transition at the national level and, then, in an empirical case of subnational politics in Dawei City regarding the planning of the electricity supply. We suggest that the hybrid public sphere enables discourses—associated with authoritarian popularist politics in Myanmar—that build legitimacy amongst the majority while limiting the circulation of critical discourses of marginalized groups and others challenging government policies. We conclude that for substantive democracy to deepen in Myanmar, civil society and media must actively reinforce the opportunity to produce and circulate critical discourse while also facilitating inclusive debates and consolidating legislated civil, political and media freedoms. On 1 February 2021, shortly after this article was finalized, a military coup d’état detained elected leaders and contracted the post-2010 hybrid public sphere, including constraining access to information via control of the internet and mass media and severely limiting civil and political rights.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , May 2021 , pp. 45 - 64
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Institute of East Asian Studies, Sogang University
References
Athan. 2019a. 2019 Mid-year Report on Status of Freedom of Expression in Myanmar. Yangon, Myanmar: Athan. Available at: https://www.athanmyanmar.org/2019-mid-year-report/ (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Athan. 2019b. “Number of cases under the Telecommunications Law Rise to 210.-” 4 November. Available at: https://www.athanmyanmar.org/update/ (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Aung, San Yamin. 2019. “Tanintharyi Chief Minister arrested on bribery, corruption charges,” The Irrawaddy, 11 March. Available at: https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/tanintharyi-chief-minister-arrested-bribery-corruption-charges.html (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Badgley, John H., and Holliday, Ian. 2018. “Democracy.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 35–42. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC News. 2020. “Former Chief Minister is charged with 30 years’ imprisonment for corruption” (In Burmese), 22 May. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/burmese/burma-52761144 (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Bruff, Ian. 2014. “The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism.” Rethinking Marxism 26(1): 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillaud, Romain, and Jaquet, Carine. 2011. “Civil society in Myanmar.” In An ASEAN Community for All: Exploring the Scope of Civil Society Engagement, edited by Chong, Terence, and Elies, Stephanie, 86–96. Singapore and Copenhagen: ISEAS and NIAS Press.Google Scholar
Crispin, Shawn W. 2019. From conflict zones to courtrooms, Myanmar's media under fire. Committee to Protect Journalists, 31 July. Available at: https://cpj.org/blog/2019/07/myanmar-press-freedom-restricted-laws-conflict.php (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Dale, John, and Samuel-Nakka, Samantha. 2018. “International non-governmental organisations and advocacy.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 335–346. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dawei Watch. 2019. “Uncertainty of the Dawei region electricity issue” (In Burmese), 13 September. Available at: http://www.daweiwatch.com/2019/09/13/news/19904/ (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry Jay. 2002. “Thinking about hybrid regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 21–35. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukalskis, Alexander. 2017. The Authoritarian Public Sphere: Legitimation and Autocratic Power in North Korea, Burma, and China. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egreteau, Renaud, and Robinne, François. 2016. “Introduction.” In Metamorphosis: Studies in Social and Political Change in Myanmar, edited by Egreteau, Renaud, and Robinne, François, 1–11. Singapore: National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Nicholas, Holliday, Ian, and Simpson, Adam. 2018. “Explaining Myanmar in flux and transition.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 3–12. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fink, Christina and Simpson, Adam. 2018. “Civil society.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 257–267. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1990 “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.” Social Text 25(26): 56–80. doi:10.2307/466240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2007. “Transnational public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world.” Theory, Culture & Society 24(4): 7–30. doi: 10.1177/0263276407080090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2000. “Freedom in the world 1992–2000.” Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Freedom_in_the_World_1999-2000_complete_book.pdf (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Han, Naw Betty. 2018. “Civil society groups lament NLD govt's cold shoulder.” The Myanmar Times, 19 September. Available at: https://www.mmtimes.com/news/civil-society-groups-lament-nld-govts-cold-shoulder.html (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Hlaing, Kyaw Yin. 2004. “Burma. Civil society skirting regime rules.” In Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space, edited by Alagappa, Muthiah, 389–418. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hlaing, Kyaw Yin. 2012. “Understanding recent political changes in Myanmar.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 34(2): 197–216. doi:10.1355/cs34-2c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HRW. 2008. Vote to Nowhere: The May 2008 Constitutional Referendum in Burma. New York: Human Rights Watch (HRW). Available at: https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/burma0508webwcover.pdf (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
HRW. 2021. Myanmar: Events of 2020. New York: Human Rights Watch (HRW). Available at: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2021/country-chapters/myanmar-burma (accessed 16 February 2021).Google Scholar
Htun, Htun. 2020. “Myanmar journalists furious as govt blocks over 200 websites including news pages,” The Irrawaddy, 1 April. Available at: https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-journalists-furious-govt-blocks-200-websites-including-news-pages.html (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Human Rights Documentation Unit [HRDU]. 2008. Burma. Human Rights Yearbook 2007. Violation against the Dignity, Livelihoods, and Fundamental Rights of the People of Burma. Mae Sot, Tak, Thailand: HRDU.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, Oklahoma, United States: University of Oklahoma press.Google Scholar
Irrawaddy. 2021a. “Myanmar military bans use of ‘Regime’, ‘Junta’ by media,” 13 February. Available at: https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-military-bans-use-regime-junta-media.html (accessed 16 February 2021).Google Scholar
Irrawaddy. 2021b. “Myanmar ruling council amends treason, sedition laws to protect coup makers,” 16 February. Available at: https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-ruling-council-amends-treason-sedition-laws-protect-coup-makers.html (accessed 16 February 2021).Google Scholar
Irrawaddy. 2021c. “Myanmar military junta suspends laws protecting citizens’ privacy to crack down on opposition,” 14 February. Available at: https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-military-junta-suspends-laws-protecting-citizens-privacy-crack-opposition.html (accessed 16 February 2021).Google Scholar
Jolliffe, Kim. 2018. “Peace and reconciliation.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 359–370. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Lee. 2014. “The political economy of Myanmar's transition.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 44(1): 144–170. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2013.764143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kean, Tom. 2018. “Public discourse.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 146–157. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney-Lazar, Miles. 2019. “Neoliberalizing authoritarian environmental governance in (post)socialist Laos.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109(2): 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khine, Min Aung. 2018. “Western border on high alert as ARSA attack anniversary nears,” The Irrawaddy, 23 August. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/western-border-high-alert-arsa-attack-anniversary-nears.html (accessed 28 November 2020)Google Scholar
Khine, Nwet Kay. 2020. “Myanmar: Media fragility and space for authoritarianism during COVID-19.” International Research Group on Authoritarianism and Counter-Strategies. 22 August. Available at: http://www.irgac.org/2020/07/22/myanmar-media-fragility-and-space-for-authoritarianism-during-covid-19/ (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Koçan, Gürcan. 2008. Models of Public Sphere in Political Philosophy. Eurosphere working paper series (EWP) 2. Eurospheres project.Google Scholar
Kramer, Tom. 2011. Civil Society Gaining Ground: Opportunities for Change and Development in Burma. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Kruse, Lisa. Dawn, M.. Norris, R., and Flinchum, Jonathan. R.. 2018. “Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media.” The Sociological Quarterly 59(1), 62–84. doi: 10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labbé, Brett R. 2016. “Towards a Re-discovery of the Public Sphere: Myanmar/Burma's' Exile Media's' Counter-hegemonic Potential and the US News Media's Re-framing of American Foreign Policy.” PhD diss., Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. “Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 2013. “Civil society and the authoritarian state: Cooperation, contestation and discourse.” Journal of Civil Society 9(3): 325–340. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2013.818767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lwin, Min. 2009. “Abuses rampant along gas pipeline: Rights group,” The Irrawaddy, 7 May. Available at: http://www2.irrawaddy.com/article.php?art_id=15603 (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Mangshang, Yaw Bawm. 2018. “Myanmar's freedom of expression as a broken promise of the NLD.” Tea Circle, 30 May. Available at: https://teacircleoxford.com/2018/05/30/myanmars-freedom-of-expression-as-broken-promise-of-nld/ (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Mann, Zarni. 2020. “Myanmar doctor jailed for online criticism of monks who oppose sex education,” The Irrawaddy, 3 June. Available at: https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-doctor-jailed-online-criticism-monks-oppose-sex-education.html (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Mark, SiuSue. 2016. “Are the odds of justice ‘stacked’ against them? Challenges and opportunities for securing land claims by smallholder farmers in Myanmar.” Critical Asian Studies 48(3): 443–460. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2016.1196888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, James. 2019. “Authoritarianism, populism, and the environment: Comparative experiences, insights, and perspectives.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109(2): 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Gerard. 2018. “Cyber-spaces.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 92–105. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten. B. 2011. “The politics of Burma's ‘democratic’ transition.” Critical Asian Studies 43(1): 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Morten. B. 2018. “Democracy and human rights.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 371–380. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2016. “The populism that is not to be found.” In What is a People?, edited by Badiou, Alain, Bourdieu, Pierre, Butler, Judith, Didi-Huberman, Georges, Khiari, Sadri, and Rancière, Jacques, 100–106. New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rauchfleisch, Adrian. 2017. “The public sphere as an essentially contested concept: A co-citation analysis of the last 20 years of public sphere research.” Communication and the Public 2(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1177/2057047317691054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters. 2021. “Myanmar businesses criticise junta cyber law plans,” 12 February. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/myanmar-politics-internet/myanmar-businesses-criticise-junta-cyber-law-plans-idUSL8N2KI4ZC (accessed 16 February 2021).Google Scholar
RFA(Radio Free Asia). 2021. “News stations still closed in Myanmar, some other channels reopen,” 2 February. Available at: https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/stations-02022021181731.html (accessed 16 February 2021).Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, ed. 2013. Governance without a State? Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
South, Ashley. 2018. “Hybrid governance and the politics of legitimacy in the Myanmar peace process.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 48(1): 50–66. doi:10.1080/00472336.2017.1387280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoones, Ian, Edelman, Marc, Borras, Saturnino M. Jr., Hall, Ruth, Wolford, Wendy, and Ben, White. 2018. “Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 45(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, Simon. 2017. “Klepto-neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and patronage in Cambodia.” In States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order, edited by Tansel, Cemal Burak, 235–254. London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Steinberg, David. 1997. “A void in Myanmar: Civil society in Burma.” Paper presented at the international conference on ‘Strengthening Civil Society in Burma. Possibilities and Dilemmas for International NGOs’ organized by the Transnational Institute and the Burma Centrum Nederland. The Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 4–5 December.Google Scholar
Stokke, Kristian, and Aung, Soe Myint. 2019. “Transition to democracy or hybrid regime? The dynamics and outcomes of democratization in Myanmar.” The European Journal of Development Research 48(1): 50–66. doi: 10.1057/s41287-019-00247-x.Google Scholar
Stokke, Kristian, Vakulchuk, Roman Vakulchuk, and Indra Øverland, . 2018. Myanmar: A Political Economy Analysis. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for International Affairs (NIPI).Google Scholar
Suhardiman, Diana, Kenney-Lazar, Miles, and Meinzen-Dick, Ruth. 2019. “The contested terrain of land governance reform in Myanmar.” Critical Asian Studies 51(3): 368–385. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2019.1630845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansel, Cemal Burak. 2017. “Authoritarian neoliberalism: Towards a new research agenda.” In States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order, edited by Tansel, Cemal Burak, 1–28. London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Walton, Matthew J. 2018. “Nation-building.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Myanmar, edited by Simpson, Adam, Farrelly, Nicholas, and Holliday, Ian, 393–403. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Win, Su Phyo. 2017. “Protest for electricity in Dawei.” Myanmar Times, 13 July. Available at: https://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/26780-protest-for-electricity-in-dawei.html (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar