Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:07:23.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living with Giants: ASEAN and the Evolution of Asian Regionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2013

Mark Beeson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From its inception, ASEAN has been shaped by the evolving structure of the international system and the activities of more powerful external actors. This is still the case. What is different now is that the nature of the region of which ASEAN is a part has changed in significant ways. Indeed, the entire structure of the international system has undergone a number of profoundly important changes which have forced ASEAN to adjust and recalibrate its own policies. This paper explores this adjustment process and maps the most important forces and actors that are compelling change. By placing the ASEAN experience in a comparative conceptual framework, it becomes possible to identify the key drivers of change and to speculate about their future impact on an organisation that has proved remarkably resilient thus far. The nature of contemporary regional developments and the continuing evolution of the wider international system mean that ASEAN is currently facing major new challenges and questions about its relevance in an era when other regional organisations are emerging to challenge its authority and role.

Keywords

ASEANregionalismgeopoliticshistorysecurityinterdependence
Type
Articles
Information
TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia , Volume 1 , Special Issue 2: Redefining and Recontextualising Politics in Southeast Asia , July 2013 , pp. 303 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Institute of East Asian Studies, Sogang University 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2007. Regional institutions and security in the Asia-Pacific: evolution, adaptation, and prospects for transformation. In Acharya, Amitav and Goh, Evelyn (eds.), Reassessing Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific: Competition, Congruence, and Transformation, pp. 20–40. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2009. Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, Peter. 2011. Beijing's maritime push irks ASEAN, The Australian, 25 July.Google Scholar
Anderlini, Jamil and Dickie, Mure. 2010. Beijing steps up dispute with Tokyo, Financial Times, 19 September.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-first Century. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ba, Alice D. 2009. (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Regions, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Beeson, Mark. 2003. ASEAN Plus Three and the rise of reactionary regionalism. Contemporary Southeast Asia 25(2), 251–268.Google Scholar
Beeson, Mark. 2005. Re-thinking regionalism: Europe and East Asia in comparative historical perspective. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (6), 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, Mark. 2007. Regionalism and Globalization in East Asia: Politics, Security, and Economic Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beeson, Mark. 2008. The United States and East Asia: the decline of long-distance leadership? In Dent, Christopher M. (ed.), China, Japan and Regional Leadership in East Asia, pp. 229–246. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Beeson, Mark. 2009a. Institutions of the Asia-Pacific: ASEAN, APEC and Beyond, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beeson, Mark. 2009b. Hegemonic transition in East Asia? The dynamics of Chinese and American power. Review of International Studies 35(1), 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, Mark. 2012. Democracy, development, and authoritarianism. In Beeson, Mark and Stubbs, Richard (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, pp. 236–247. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, Mark and Li, Fujian. 2012. Charmed or alarmed? Reading China's regional relations. Journal of Contemporary China 21 (73), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslin, Shaun. 2005. Power and production: rethinking China's global economic role. Review of International Studies 31(4), 735–753.Google Scholar
Cha, Victor D. 2010. Powerplay: origins of the U.S. alliance system in Asia. International Security 34(3), 158–196.Google Scholar
Chan, Steve. 2008. China, the US, and the Power-Transition Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International Organization 55(3), 553–588.Google Scholar
Chin, Gregory and Stubbs, Richard. 2011. China, regional institution-building and the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area. Review of International Political Economy 18(3), 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Wai-Keung and Hamilton, Gary G. 2009. Getting rich and staying connected: the organizational medium of Chinese capitalists. Journal of Contemporary China 18(58), 47–67.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 1999. Globalization and International Relations Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Alan. 2003. Security and Southeast Asia: Domestic, Regional, and Global Issues. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Corning, Gregory P. 2009. Between bilateralism and regionalism in East Asia: the ASEAN-Japan comprehensive economic partnership. The Pacific Review 22(5), 639–665.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1987. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Das, Dilip K. 2009. A Chinese renaissance in an unremittingly integrating Asian economy. Journal of Contemporary China 18(59), 321–338.Google Scholar
Dent, Christopher M. 2008. East Asian Regionalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diez, Thomas. 2005. Constructing the self and changing others: reconsidering ‘normative power Europe’. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 33(3), 613–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupont, Alan. 2001. East Asia Imperilled: Transnational Challenges to Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emmers, Ralf. 2003. Cooperative Security and the Balance of Power in ASEAN and the ARF. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Ernst, Dieter. 2006. Searching for a new role in East Asian regionalisation: Japanese production networks in the electronics industry. In Katzenstein, Peter J. and Shiraishi, Takashi (eds.), Beyond Japan: The Dynamics of East Asian Regionalism, pp. 161–187. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fravel, M. Taylor. 2008. Power shifts and escalation: explaining China's use of force in territorial disputes. International Security 32(3), 44–83.Google Scholar
Gaulier, Guillaume, Lemoine, Françoise and Ünal-Kesenci, Deniz. 2006. China's Emergence and the Reorganisation of Trade Flows in Asia. Paris: CEPPI.Google Scholar
Goh, Evelyn. 2008. Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia: analyzing regional security strategies. International Security 32(3), 113–157.Google Scholar
Haacke, Jürgen. 2003. ASEAN's Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origins, Developments and Prospects. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Hartcher, Peter. 2010. Full steam ahead for China's territorial ambitions, The Age, 13 July.Google Scholar
Hatch, Walter and Yamamura, Kozo. 1996. Asia in Japan's Embrace: Building a Regional Production Alliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hille, Katherine and Johnston, Tim. 2010. China's arms purchases fuel fears of clashes, Financial Times, 14 March.Google Scholar
Hookway, James and Koh, Yoree. 2011. Japan, Philippines seek tighter ties to counter China, Wall Street Journal, 27 September.Google Scholar
Jasparro, Christopher and Taylor, Jonathan. 2008. Climate change and regional vulnerability to transnational security threats in Southeast Asia. Geopolitics 13(2): 232–256.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair. 2003. Socialization in international institutions: the ASEAN way and international relations theory. In Ikenberry, G. John and Mastanduno, Michael (eds.), International Relations and the Asia-Pacific, pp. 107–162. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, David and Smith, Michael. 2006. ASEAN and East Asian International Relations: Regional Delusion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Jones, David and Smith, Michael. 2007. Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian regional order. International Security 32(1), 148–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Lee. 2010. ASEAN's unchanged melody? The theory and practice of ‘non-interference’ in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review 23(4), 479–502.Google Scholar
Katsumata, Hiro. 2009. ASEAN's Cooperative Security Enterprise: Norms and Interests in the ASEAN Regional Forum. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Andrew B. 2010. China's new energy-security debate. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 52(3), 137–158.Google Scholar
Kivimaki, Timo. 2001. The long peace of ASEAN. Journal of Peace Research 38(1), 5–25.Google Scholar
Kuhonta, Erik M. 2006. Walking a tightrope: democracy versus sovereignty in ASEAN's illiberal peace. The Pacific Review 19(3), 337–358.Google Scholar
Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2007a. Charm Offensive: How China's Soft Power is Transforming the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2007b. Pax Asia-Pacifica? East Asian integration and its implications for the United States. Washington Quarterly 30(3), 67–77.Google Scholar
Lee, Yong Wook. 2008. The Japanese challenge to neoliberalism: who and what is ‘normal’ in the history of the world economy? Review of International Political Economy 15(4), 506–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahbubani, Kishore. 2008. The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Evan S. 2005/06. Strategic hedging and the future of Asia-Pacific stability. Washington Quarterly 29(1), 145–167.Google Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1989. Retreat From Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Myers, Steve and Fuller, Thomas. 2011. Detecting a thaw in Myanmar, U.S. aims to encourage change, New York Times, 6 October.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. 2010. Soft balancing, hedging, and institutional Darwinism: the economic-security nexus and East Asian Regionalism. Journal of East Asian Studies 10(2), 209–238.Google Scholar
Pomfret, John. 2010a. Concerned about China's rise, Southeast Asian nations build up militaries, Washington Post, 9 August.Google Scholar
Pomfret, John. 2010b. U.S. takes a tougher tone with China, Washington Post, 30 July.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John. 2006. Is China an economic threat to Southeast Asia? Asian Survey 46(5), 653–674.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John and Yang, Jiang. 2009. China's move to preferential trading: a new direction in China's diplomacy. Journal of Contemporary China 18(58), 27–46.Google Scholar
Rozman, Gilbert. 2012. East Asian regionalism. In Beeson, Mark and Stubbs, Richard (eds.), Handbook of Asian Regionalism, pp. 22–32. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1993. Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization 47(1), 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, Michael. 1982. Securing the Great Crescent: occupied Japan and the origins of containment in Southeast Asia. Journal of American History 69(2), 392–414.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Richard. 2008. The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge to “global” governance. The Pacific Review 21(4), 451–468.Google Scholar
Studwell, Joe. 2007. Asian Godfathers: Money and Power in Hong Kong and Southeast Asia. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Terada, Takashi. 2010. The origins of ASEAN + 6 and Japan's initiatives: China's rise and the agent-structure analysis. The Pacific Review 23(1), 71–92.Google Scholar
Tow, William and Taylor, Brendan. 2010. What is Asian security architecture? Review of International Studies 36(01), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Väyrynen, Raimo. 2006. Introduction: contending views. In Väyrynen, Raimo (ed.), The Waning of Major War: Theories and Debates, pp. 1–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webber, Douglas. 2001. Two funerals and a wedding? The ups and downs of regionalism in East Asia and Asia-Pacific after the Asian crisis. The Pacific Review 14(3), 339–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hugh. 2008. Why war in Asia remains thinkable. Survival 50(6), 85–103.Google Scholar
Wines, Michael. 2009. China's economic power unsettles the neighbours. New York Times, 10 December.Google Scholar
Xinbo, Wo. 2009. Chinese perspectives on building an East Asian community in the twenty-first century. In Green, Michael and Gill, Bates (eds.), Asia's New Multilateralism: Cooperation, Competition, and the Search for Community, pp. 55–77. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Yuzawa, Takeshi. 2012. The ASEAN Regional Forum: challenges and prospects. In Beeson, Mark and Stubbs, Richard (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, pp. 338–349. London: Routledge.Google Scholar