No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 April 2016
The president calls attention to the large and increasing membership of Commission 12 and the policy of concentrating in it all matters relating to the sun. The result makes it comparable in breadth of field and in membership to the former Union for Co-operation in Solar Research. The main point in favour of this policy is the increased interest in the meetings of the Commission and the larger number of individuals reached compared with the meetings of small committees. One recalls the general sessions of the Solar Union in which each one present felt himself a part of the Union and in real touch with the work of different sections and after the discussions went away with fuller knowledge of what it was all about. This was a valuable result not attained to the same degree from the general sessions of the present Union, but in a measure it does follow from the meetings of the Solar Physics Committee. On the other hand the question may be raised whether or not the merging of independent commissions into subdivisions of a large commission lessens their interest to an extent not balanced by the advantages. If the present policy holds, it seems to the president that a re-organisation of Commission 12 is advisable by which more responsibility is laid upon the directors of centres. The basis of membership in the Commission may well be considered and recommendations formulated for transmission to the Executive Committee.
page no 39 note * Co-operation under the I.A.U. was begun in 1923 but the number of days of observation in that year was notably less than for succeeding years.
page no 39 note † Perepelkin, , Zeits. f. Phys. 49, 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page no 39 note ‡ Minnaert, and Slob, , B.A.N. No. 187, 176, 1930Google Scholar.
page no 39 note § Slob, , B.A.N. No. 218, 120, 1931Google Scholar.
page no 39 note ‖ Pettit, , Publ. A.S. Pacific, 63, 207, 1931Google Scholar.
page no 40 note * M.N. R.A.S. 89, 255, 1929.
page no 40 note † Perepelkin, C.R. Acad. Sci. URSS, Dec. 19, 1929.
page no 50 note * Ap. J. 23, 284,1906.
page no 50 note † Ap. J. 54, 318, 1921.
page no 50 note ‡ M.N. R.A.S. 89, 197, 1928.
page no 50 note § Ap. J. 74, 122, 1931.
page no 51 note * Phys. Rev. 19, 390, 1922.
page no 51 note † Verh. Akad. Amst. 30, 257, 1921.
page no 52 note * Minnaert, M. and Mulders, G. F. W., Ztschr, f. Astroph. 2, 180, 1931Google Scholar.
page no 52 note † Minnaert, Cf. M., Ztschr. f. Astroph. 1, 209, 1930Google Scholar.