Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:32:28.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scientific Results of U.S. Space Probe Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2021

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The survey nature of rocket study of cosmic hydromagnetics suggests that space-probe data be considered chronologically. In short, the experiments consist primarily of verification or denial of hitherto postulated models, substantiation of surface observations, and findings in some cases implying so great a deviation from current ideas that repetition of the experiment is suggested.

Type
Part 4: Reports of Meetings of Commissions: Comptes Rendus des Seances des Commissions
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 1976 1962 

References

1. Sonett, C. P., Sims, A. R. and Smith, E. J. Rocket Surveys of Distant Magnetic Fields, Space Research, Ed. Kallman-Bijl, H. K., N. Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1960.Google Scholar
2. Sonett, C. P. Coupling of the Solar Wind and the Exosphere, Phys. Rev. Letters 5, 46, 1960.Google Scholar
3. Coleman, P. J., Sonett, C. P., Judge, D. L. and Smith, E. J. Some Preliminary Results of the Pioneer V Magnetometer Experiment, J. geophys. Res. 65, 1856, 1960.Google Scholar
4. Van Allen, J. A. and Frank, L. A. Radiation Measurements to 658 300 km with Pioneer IV, Nature, Lond. 184, 219, 1959.Google Scholar
5. Davis, , Leverett, Jr., Private communication.Google Scholar
6. Sonett, C. P. Hyperwaves, Shock-like Phenomena in the Outer Exosphere, Proc. of International Symposium on the Earth Storm and Cosmic Rays, Kyoto, Japan, 1961; J. phys. Soc. Japan. 17, Suppl. A-II, p. 528.Google Scholar
7. Sonett, C. P., Sims, A. R. and Abrams, I. J. The Distant Geomagnetic Field I: Infinitesimal Waves in the Magnetosphere; in draft.Google Scholar
8. Fan, C. Y., Meyer, P. and Simpson, J. A. Dynamics and Structure of the Outer Radiation Belt, J. geophys. Res. 66, 2607, 1961.Google Scholar
9. Smith, E. J. and Sonett, C. P. Satellite Observations of the Distant Field During Magnetic Storms: Explorer VI, Proc. of the International Symposium on the Earth Storm and Cosmic Rays, Kyoto, Japan, 1961; J.phys.Soc. Japan, 17, Suppl. AII.Google Scholar
10. Sonett, C. P., Smith, E. J., Judge, D. L. and Coleman, P. J. Jr., Current Systems in the Vestigial Geomagnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 161, 1960.Google Scholar
11. Johnson, F. S. The Gross Character of the Geomagnetic Field in the Solar Wind, J. geophys. Res. 65, 3049, 1960.Google Scholar
12. Farley, T. A. and Rosen, A. Charged Particle Variations in the Outer Van Allen Zone during a Geomagnetic Storm, J. geophys. Res. 65, 3494, 1960.Google Scholar
13. Fan, C. Y., Meyer, P. and Simpson, J. A. Phys. Rev. Letters 5, 269 and 272, 1960.Google Scholar
14. Coleman, P. J. Jr., Sonett, C. P. and Levereti, Davis Jr., On the Interplanetary Magnetic Storm: Pioneer V, J. geophys. Res. 66, 2043, 1961.Google Scholar
15. Coleman, P. J. Jr., Leverett, Davis Jr., and Sonett, C. P. The Steady Component of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Letters 5, 43, 1960.Google Scholar
16. Heppner, J. P., Ness, N. F., Skillman, T. L. and Scearce, C. W. Magnetic Field Measurements with the Explorer X Satellite. Proc. International Symposium on the Earth Storm and Cosmic Rays, Kyoto, Japan 1961; J. phys. Soc. Japan, 17, Suppl. A-II, p. 546.Google Scholar
17. Bridge, H. S., Dilworth, C., Lazarus, A. J., Lyon, E. F., Rossi, B. and Scherb, F. Direct Observations of the Interplanetary Plasma, Proc. of International Symposium on the Earth Storm and Cosmic Rays, Kyoto, Japan, 1961.Google Scholar
18. Rossi, B. From remarks at Plenary Session on Explorer X. Proc. of International Symposium on the Earth Storm and Cosmic Rays, Kyoto, Japan, 1961. J. phys. Soc. Japan, Suppl. AII.Google Scholar
19. Gringauz, , Bezrukikh, , Ozerov, , and Rybinsky, . C.R.Acad.Sci. U.R.S.S., 131, 1301, 1960.Google Scholar