Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
Robert Parsons, the Jesuit, compiled his account of the transition of English Catholicism from monopoly to minority status in 1599–1600, and called it ‘A story of domestical difficulties which the Catholic cause and promoters thereof hath had in defending the same, not only against the violence and persecution of the heretics but also by sundry other impediments among themselves, of faction, emulation, sedition and division, since the change of religion in England’. This version of Tudor ecclesiastical history supplements Nicholas Sander's attention to evil Protestants and politicians by an examination of the Catholic response to the Reformation. The Parsons story has two groups of villains, the bishops and the parish clergy, who betrayed their faith to hold on to their livings; it has two groups of heroes, who rescued the faith by their self-sacrifice, the Jesuits and the seminary priests they inspired, and the Elizabethan Catholic gentry; and it goes something like this. The early Tudor monopolistic Church was weakened by spiritual decadence and mere conformism, and its leadership divided by ambition and faction, so it could not resist the challenge of heresy.
1 ‘The Memoirs of Father Robert Persons’, ed. Pollen, J. H., C[atholic] R[ecord S[ociety], ii (1906), pp. 48–63Google Scholar; Parsons, R., A Briefe Apologie or Defence of the Catholike Ecciesiastical Hierarchic (n.p., 1601), fos. 1–4Google Scholar; The Jesuit's Memorial for the Intended Reformation of England, ed. Gee, H. (London, 1690), pp. 2, 4, 20–2, 49–51Google Scholar.
2 Ely, H., Certaine Briefe Notes upon a Briefe Apologie (Paris, 1603), pp. 65–8Google Scholar.
3 Houlbrooke, R., Church Courts and the People during the English Reformation, 1520–1570 (Oxford, 1979), pp. 10–11, 21–2, 30–1, 175–9, 185, 210, 222–7Google Scholar.
4 Kelly, M. J., ‘The Submission of the Clergy’, T. R. Hist. S., Fifth Series, xv (1965), 109–17Google Scholar. For Longland, I am grateful to Margaret Bowker for allowing me to read the typescript of her forthcoming book on the diocese of Lincoln 1521–1547.
5 Loades, D. M., The Reign of Mary Tudor (London, 1979), pp. 329–31, 341–7, 351–2Google Scholar;Hughes, P., ‘A Hierarchy that Fought, 1554–1559’, Clergy Review, xviii (1940), 25–39Google Scholar;Alexander, G., ‘Bonner and the Marian Persecutions’, History, lx (1975), 384–8Google Scholar;Bartholomew, A., ‘Lay Piety in the Reign of Mary Tudor’ (unpublished University of Manchester M.A. thesis, 1979), especially pp. 1–42Google Scholar.
6 Morey, A., The Catholic Subjects of Elizabeth I (London, 1978), pp. 27, 99–102Google Scholar; Bossy, J., The English Catholic Community, 1570–7850 (London, 1975), pp. 12–19Google Scholar.
7 Letters and Papers of Henry VIII, xviii (2), no. 546, pp. 292–7, 299–309; Price, F. D., ‘Gloucester Diocese under Bishop Hooper, 1551–3'Google Scholar, Trans. Bristol and Glouc. Arch. Soc., lx (1938), 119–21, 123–5, 133–Google Scholar.
8 C. Haigh, ‘The Continuity of Catholicism in the English Reformation', Past & Present (forthcoming), and references in notes 8–15 therein.
9 Ibid.; Haigh, C., Reformation and Resistance in Tudor Lancashire (Cambridge, 1975), pp. 247–59–Google Scholar.
10 Haigh, ‘Continuity of Catholicism', and references in notes 47–66 therein.
11 have set out some of the evidence for this view in my ‘Continuity of Catholicism'.
12 First and Second Diaries ed. T. F. Knox (London, 1878), passimGoogle Scholar; Anstruther, G., The Seminary Priests, i (Ware, n.d.), passimGoogle Scholar; ii (Great Wakering, 1975), passim; Bossy, J., ‘Rome and the Elizabethan Catholics: a Question of Geography’, Historical Journal, vii (1964), 136–7Google Scholar; Unpublished Documents relating to the English Martyrs, ed. Pollen, J. H. (C.R.S., v, 1908), pp. 21, 33, 123, 124, 173Google Scholar; Parsons, R., ‘Of the life and Martyrdom of Father Edmund Campion’, Letters and Notices, xii (1878–1879), pp. 16–17Google Scholar.
13 The distribution of priests is calculated from Anstruther, , Seminary Priests, i, passimGoogle Scholar, omitting those arrested on or soon after arrival; the distribution of recusants is drawn from a conflation of returns of 1577 (Miscellanea XII, C. R.S., xxii (1921), pp. 6–9)Google Scholar and 1582 (P.R.O., SP 12/156, fo. 78).
14 Letters and Memorials of Father Robert Persons, ed. Hicks, L. (C.R.S., xxxix, 1942), p. 108Google Scholar; Unpublished Documents relating to the English Martyrs, ed. Pollen, , p. 309Google Scholar; Foley, H., Records of the English Province of the Society of Jesus (7 vols., London, 1877–1884), iii, pp. 435–8, 449, 451Google Scholar.
15 Foley, , Records, iii, pp. 439–40, 449Google Scholar; Wark, K. R., Elizabethan Recusancy in Cheshire (Chetham Society, 1971), pp. 42–4Google Scholar; Aveling, J. C. H., Northern Catholics (London, 1966), p. 191Google Scholar.
16 Parsons, , ‘Life and Martyrdom of Father Edmund Campion’, Letters and Notices, xii, p. 38Google Scholar; Letters and Memorials of Father Robert Persons, ed. Hicks, , p. 108Google Scholar; Caraman, P., Henry Garnet, 1555–1606, and the Gunpowder Plot (London, 1964), p. 45Google Scholar.
17 Bossy, , ‘Rome and the Elizabethan Catholics’, 138–40Google Scholar; Aveling, , Northern Catholics, pp. 159–60Google Scholar; Foley, , Records, iii, pp. 2, 5–6Google Scholar.
18 Bossy, , ‘Rome and the Elizabethan Catholics’, 138–9, 141–2Google Scholar; Davidson, A., ‘Roman Catholicism in Oxfordshire, c. 1580–C.1640’ (unpublished University of Bristol Ph.D. thesis, 1970), pp. 416–17Google Scholar.
19 The distributions for 1603 are calculated from Anstruther, , Seminary Priests, i, passimGoogle Scholar, and Magee, B., The English Recusants (London, 1938), p. 83Google Scholar; those for 1635 are from Anstruther, , Seminary Priests, i and ii, passimGoogle Scholar, and Foley, , Records, vii (1), analytical catalogueGoogle Scholar.
20 Stapleton, B., A History of the Post-Reformation Catholic Missions in Oxfordshire (London, 1906), p. 127Google Scholar; Anstruther, , Seminary Priests, ii, 203Google Scholar; Bossy, , English Catholic Community, pp. 210, 220–1Google Scholar; Hughes, P., Rome and the Counter-Reformation in England (London, 1942), p. 410Google Scholar.
21 Anstruther, , Seminary Priests, i, and ii, passimGoogle Scholar;Aveling, , Northern Catholics, pp. 236–7Google Scholar; Lunn, D., The English Benedictines, 1540–1688 (London, 1980), p. 155Google Scholar.
22 Cleary, M., ‘The Catholic Resistance in Wales, 1568–1678’, Blackfriars, xxxviii (1957), 116, 122Google Scholar; The Welsh Elizabethan Catholic Martyrs, ed. Thomas, D. A. (Liverpool, 1971), pp. 32, 36–9Google Scholar; Pugh, F., ‘Monmouthshire Recusants in the Reigns of Elizabeth and James I’, South Wales and Monmouth Rec. Soc. Publ., iv (1957), p. 64Google Scholar; Burke, V., ‘Catholic Recusants in Elizabethan Worcestershire’ (unpublished University of Birmingham M.A. thesis, 1972), p. 90Google Scholar.
23 Aveling, , Northern Catholics, p. 244Google Scholar; Challoner, R., Memoirs of Missionary Priests, ed. Pollen, J. H. (London, 1924), pp. 321–2Google Scholar; Welsh Elizabethan Catholic Martyrs, ed. Thomas, , P. 45Google Scholar.
24 Challoner, , Memoirs, p. 79Google Scholar; Unpublished Documents relating to the English Martyrs, ed. Pollen, , p. 290Google Scholar; Aveling, , Northern Catholics, p. 156Google Scholar; Anstruther, , Seminary Priests, i, p. 215Google Scholar. See also Southwell's comment at London Bridge: ‘Oh, my Lord, if God grants it you will see my head sometimes on one of those’ (C. Devlin, The Life of Robert Southwell, Poet and Martyr, London, 1956, p. 235)Google Scholar.
25 Haigh, , Reformation and Resistance, pp. 254–9Google Scholar; Aveling, , Northern Catholics, pp. 34, 40–5Google Scholar; Paul, J. E., ‘The Hampshire Recusants in the Reign of Elizabeth I’ (unpublished University of Southampton Ph.D. thesis, 1958), pp. 171–2Google Scholar; Burke, , ‘Catholic Recusants in Elizabethan Worcestershire', pp. 37–9Google Scholar.
26 Anstruther, , Seminary Priests, i, pp. 147–8, 225, 266, 331, 345Google Scholar;Foley, , Records, iii, p. 27Google Scholar.
27 Letters and Memorials of Father Robert Persons, ed. Hicks, p. 320Google Scholar; Gerard, J., Autobiography of an Elizabethan, ed. Caraman, P. (London, 1951), p. 33Google Scholar.
28 ‘Some correspondence of Cardinal Allen', ed. Ryan, P., Miscellanea VII, C.R.S., ix (1911), pp. 65, 67Google Scholar; Parsons, , ‘Life and Martyrdom of Father Edmund Campion', Letters andNotices, xi (1876–1877), p. 325Google Scholar; xii (1878–9), pp. 21, 29, 51; ‘Memoirs of Father Robert Persons', pp. 27, 29–30; Letters and Memorials of Father Robert Persons, ed. Hicks, , pp. 59, 61, 67, 83–4, 331, 335Google Scholar; Waugh, E., Edmund Campion (London, 1947), pp. 136–7Google Scholar.
29 Gerard, , Autobiography, pp. 39–40, 175–88Google Scholar; ‘Annual Letters of the Vice-Province of England, 1619’, Letters and Notices, xi (1876–1877), pp. 274–88Google Scholar; Foley, , Records, vii (2), pp. 985–6, 1095Google Scholar.
30 Letters and Memorials of Father Robert Persons, ed. Hicks, , p. 86Google Scholar; Weston, W., Autobiography of an Elizabethan, ed. Caraman, P. (London, 1955), p. 28Google Scholar; Devlin, , Robert Southwell, p. 181Google Scholar; Gerard, , Autobiogaphy, pp. 15–16, 22–3, 29, 146Google Scholar.
31 Unpublished Documents relating to the English Martyrs, ed. Pollen, pp. 33–4, 345, 347–8.
32 Gerard, Autobiography, pp. 28–32, 150, 168–9; The Chronicle of the English Augustinian Canonesses Regular of the Lateran, at St. Monica's in Louvain, ed. A. Hamilto n (London, 1904, 1906), i, p. 80; Troubles of our Catholic Forefathers, ed.J. Morris (London, 1872–7), iii, p. 468; Foley, Records, vii (2), p. 1111.
33 Gerard, Autobiography, pp. 32–3.
34 Douai Diaries, ed. Knox, pp. 24–7; Anstruther, Seminary Priests, i, passim; Letters and Memorials of Father Robert Persons, ed. Hicks, p. 230; Bossy, English Catholic Community, P- 4'5–
35 Unpublished Documents relating to the English Martyrs, ed. Pollen, p. 338; Challoner, Memoirs, p. 232; Anstruther, Seminary Priests, i, p. 9.
36 Ely, Certaine Briefe Notes, pp. 209–13; A. C. F. Beales, Education under Penalty (Lon don, 1963), p. 120; Bossy, English Catholic Community, pp. 198–201, 220–1, 415.
37 Dodd's Church History of England, ed. M. A. Tierney (London, 1839–43), iii, 136n~7n.
38 Letters and Memorials of Father Robert Persons, ed. Hicks, pp. 223, 235–6, 243; Weston, Autobiography, pp. 28, 71–2, 77; Caraman, Henry Garnet, pp. 32–6, 45–6; Devlin, Robert Southwell, pp. 114, 116, 161, 220–1; Gerard, Autobiography, p. 82.
39 Devlin, Robert Southwell, pp. 11, 114, 129; M. Hodgetts, ‘Elizabethan Priest-Holes', Recusant History, xi (1972), 280, 286; xii (1973), 100.
40 Devlin, Robert Southwell, pp. 225–6; Troubles, ed. Morris, i, pp. 177–9, ‘8i, 207.
41 Caraman, Henry Garnet, p. 45; The Wisbech Stirs, ed. P. Renold (C.R.S., li, 1958), p. 289; Gerard, Autobiography, pp. 82, 161, 168–9; The Condition of the Catholics under James I: Father Gerard's Narrative of the Gunpowder Plot, ed. J. Morris (London, 1872), p. 283.
42 Letters and Memorials of Father Robert Persons, ed. Hicks, p. 332.
43 Caraman, Henry Garnet, pp. 215–16; Foley, Records, iv, pp. 210–13; Condition of the Catholics, ed. Morris, pp. 283–4;w- M - Brady, The Episcopal Succession in England, Scotland and Ireland (3 vols., Rome, 1876–7), iii, pp. 83–4.
44 J. A. Williams, Catholic Recusancy in Wiltshire, 1660–1791 (C.R.S., Monograph Series, i, 1968), p. 103; Gerard, Autobiography, pp. 39–40; Foley, Records, iii, pp. 449, 451.
45 Challoner, Memoirs, p. 595; Troubles, ed. Morris, iii, p. 467; Hodgett, ‘Elizabethan Priest-Holes', Recusant History, xii, 193–4; Gerard, Autobiography, pp. 31, 33, 194–5; Foley, Records, iii, p. 444; An Elizabethan Recusant House: the Life of Lady Magdalen, Viscountess Montagu, ed. A. C. Southern (London, 1954), pp- 39, 42–3.
46 Caraman, Henry Garnet, pp. 215–16.
47 T. G. Law, A Historical Sketch of the Conflicts between Jesuits and Seculars in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth (London, 1889), pp. 97–8, 105*6; The Archpriest Controversy, ed. T. G. Law (Camden Society, n.s., lvi, lviii, 1896, 1898), i, 205–6; Wisbech Stirs, ed. Renold, PP- 289–95.
48 Westminster Cathedral Archives, A.6, no. 77, pp. 274–5 (I a m grateful to Miss Elizabeth Poyser for a transcript of this document); Dodd's Church History, ed. Tierney, iii, 45n; J. Colleton, A Just Defence of the Slandered Priests (n.p., 1602), pp. 122–3.
49 Letters of Thomas Fitzherbert, ed. L. Hicks (C.R.S., xli, 1948), pp. 53, 100, 121–2, 135–6, 144–5. 50 G. Anstruther, A Hundred Homeless Tears: English Dominicans, 1558–1658(London, 1958), p. 70; J. A. Hilton, ‘Catholicism in Jacobean Durham', Recusant History, xiv (1977), 80, 81.
51 Challoner, Memoirs, pp. 595–6; M. C. E. Chambers, The Life of Mary Ward(2 vols., London, 1882, 1885), ii, pp. 28, 35.
52 Foley, Records, vii (2), p. 1101; Anstruther, Seminary Priests, ii, p. 55.
53 Haigh, ‘Continuity of Catholicism'; J. A. Hilton, ‘The Cumbrian Catholics', Northern History, xvi (1980), pp. 41–7; Calendar of Slate Papers, Domestic 1998–1601, p. 362.
54 Challoner, Memoirs, pp. 299–300, 275.
55 Foley, Records, vii (2), p. 1108; ‘The Apostolical Life of Ambrose Barlow', ed. W. E. Rhodes, Chetham Miscellanies II (Chetham Society, n.s., lxiii, 1909), pp. 4–5, 6,
56 Foley, Records, iii, pp. 70, 91, 92, 93, 122, 253; vii (2), pp. 1111–12; Hilton, ‘Catholicism in Jacobean Durham', 80; P. Caraman, Henry Morse, Priest of the Plague (London, 1957), p. 161. There was also a more populist approach in Wales at this time (Foley, Records, iv, pp. 441, 447).
57 Challoner, Memoirs, pp. 232, 275, 300, 322, 359, 394, 596; G. Anstruther, ‘Lancashire Clergy in 1639', Recusant History, iv (1958), 38–46; Anstruther, Seminary Priests, ii, p. 250; Aveling, Northern Catholics, p. 348.
58 Foley, Records, iv, pp. 385–6; ii, p. 6; Brady, Episcopal Succession, iii, pp. 83 4; M. J. Havran, The Catholics in Caroline England (London, 1962), p. 78; Williams, Catholic Recusancy in Wiltshire, p. 103; Bossy, English Catholic Community, pp. 55–6, 229–30, 233, 235-
59 Troubles, ed. Morris, iii, pp. 453–4; Westminster Cathedral Archives, A. 8, no. 160.
60 A Petition Apologetically presented to the Kinges Most Excellent Maiesty by the Lay Catholikes of England (Douai, 1604), pp. 34–5; The Supplication ofCertaine Masse-Priests falsely called Catholics (London, 1604), pp. 2–3, 49; Bossy, English Catholic Community, p. 38 & n.
61 Hughes, Rome and the Counter-Reformation, pp. 410–12, 41 7, 419, 426–7; Bossy, English Catholic Community, pp. 210, 220–1; G. Albion, Charles I and the Court of Rome (Louvain, •935). PP- 111–14.