Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:41:39.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

England in the Ninth Century: the Crucible of Defeat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

N. P. Brooks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians, particularly medieval historians, are vulnerable to the charge that they concentrate their attention upon success—on the successful dynasties, institutions and ideas—and that they thereby misrepresent the past. Thus the political historian sees the ninth century as the crucial period in the evolution of a unitary English kingdom. The four powerful and independent Anglo-Saxon kingdoms existing in 800—Northumbria, Mercia, East Anglia and Wessex—had been reduced by the end of the century to one, Wessex. But this was achieved not through the assertion of West Saxon supremacy—the overlordship that Egbert won in 829 lastedbut a year—but by the destruction of the other kingdoms by Viking conquest and their partial replacement by new Viking states. Though it is clear to us with hindsight that Alfred's claim to be the ruler of all the English not under Danish rule was the germ of the unification of England under his descendants, no one can have known, when Alfred died in 899, that new Viking armies were not being raised in the Scandinavian homelands to crush the remaining English kingdom. At that time, for most Englishmen, the deepest impression must have been of the defeat and destruction of the English polity and culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 29 , December 1979 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, s.a. 886; Two of the Saxon Chronicles Parallel, ed. Earle, J. and Plummer, C. (Oxford, 1892), i, pp. 80–1Google Scholar. About the same time the regnal style in Alfred's charters seems to have changed from ‘rex Saxonum’ to ‘rex Anglorum Saxonum’ or Angulsaxonum’. See Birch, W. de Gray, Cartularium Saxonicum (London, 1885–1899)Google Scholar [hereafter cited as.B.C.S.] nos. 564, 567–8, 581, none of which is of certain authenticity. Thesestyles are also found in Asser's Life of Alfred, ed. Stevenson, W. H. (Oxford, 1904)Google Scholar, which was written in 893. The style rex A. is already found on coins of c. 875– c. 885. See Anglo-Saxon Coins: Studies presented to F. M. Stenton, ed. Dolley, R. H. M. (London, 1961), pp. 80–1Google Scholar.

2 Whitelock, D., ‘Fact and fiction in the legend of St Edmund’, Proc. Suffolk Inst. Archaeol., xxxi (1969), 217–33Google Scholar; Smyth, A. P., Scandinavian Kings in the British Isles, 850–880 (Oxford, 1977), pp. 201–13.Google Scholar

3 Sawyer, P. H., ‘The density of the Danish settlement in England’, University of Birmingham Historical Journal, vi (1957), 1–17Google Scholar; Sawyer, , The Age of the Vikings (London, 1962), pp. 117–28.Google Scholar

4 Les Invasions normandes en Belgique au ixe siécle (Louvain, 1967), pp. 69–72.Google Scholar

5 Cameron, K., Scandinavian Settlement in the Territory of the Five Boroughs: The Place-name Evidence (Nottingham, 1965), p. 1Google Scholar; Fellows-Jensen, G., ‘The Vikings in England: a review’, Anglo-Saxon England, iv (1975), 181–206Google Scholar; Loyn, H. R., Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest (London, 1962), p. 54Google Scholar; Wallace-Hadrill, J. M., Early Medieval History (Oxford, 1975), p. 219.Google Scholar

6 Sawyer, , Age of Vikings (2nd ed., London 1971), pp. 125–6.Google Scholar

7 Ibid. p. 128.

8 ‘Les forces militaires d'apres la guerre gothique de Procope’, Classica et Mediaevalia, xxi (1960), 136–183Google Scholar. I owe this reference to the kindness of Prof. D. A. Bullough. See alsoWallace-Hadrill, , Early Medieval History, p. 219.Google Scholar

9 Whitelock, D., ‘The Prose of Alfred's Reign’, Continuations and Beginnings, ed. Stanley, E. G. (London 1966), p. 74, and cf. p. 97Google Scholar; The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, ed. White-lock, D. (London 1961), pp. xxii ffGoogle Scholar.; Parkes, M. B., ‘The palaeography of the Parker manu-script of the Chronicle, Laws and Sedulius, and historiography at Winchester’, Anglo-Saxon England, v (1976), 149–71.Google Scholar

10 Annales Fuldenses, ed. Kurze, F. (SS. Rer. Ger., Hannover, 1891), p. 96Google Scholar; Reginonis Abbatis Prumiensis Chronicon, ed. Kurze, F. (SS. Rer. Ger., Hannover, 1890), p. 120Google Scholar. The fullest account of the Viking raids of the ninth century on the continent remains Vogel, W., Die Normannen und das frankische Reich (Heidelberg, 1906).Google Scholar

11 Abbon, , Le siège de Paris pat les normands, ed. Wacquet, H. (Les Classiques de l'histoire de France au moyen âge, Paris, 1964), p. 24.Google Scholar

12 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, s.a. 866, 871, 893, ed. Earle, and Plummer, , pp. 68Google Scholar, 72 and 84.

13 Ibid., pp. 74–6. The awkward phrasing may indicate that a phrase or apassage has been omitted from the archetype of the Chronicle.

14 ‘The navigation of Viking ships round the British Isles in Old English and Old Norse sources’, The Fifth Viking Congress, ed. Niclasen, B. (Tórshavn, 1968), pp. 107–108Google Scholar.

15 Annals of Ulster ed. Hennesy, W. M. (Rolls Series, 1887), s.a. 836, 848, 851, 870Google Scholar; Annals of Inisfalien, ed. Best, R. I. and MacNeill, E. (London, 1933), s.a. 836, 849, 852, 871Google Scholar.

16 Hughes, K., Early Christian Ireland: Introduction to the Sources (London, 1972), pp. 148–59Google Scholar.

17 Annales de Saint-Bertin, ed. Grat, F., Vieillard, J. and Clemencet, S. (Paris, 1964)Google Scholar, s.a. The precise figure of 252 ships for the year 852 is probably an error for 250, by attraction of the date which the scribe had written immediately before.

18 Ermenlarii Translatio S. Filiierti, ed. Holder-Egger, O. (M.G.H. Scriptores, XV(i), Hannover, 1887), p. 301.Google Scholar

19 The Moslem sources, especially Ibn-Adhari, are conveniently translated by Dozy, R., Recherches sur l'histoirt et la littérature de I'Espagne, ii (3rd ed., Leyden 1881), 256–58, 279–80.Google Scholar

20 Le Siège de Paris, p. 14.

21 Wallace-Hadrill, , Early Medieval History, p. 219.Google Scholar

22 Annals of Ulster, s.a. 870. For Ivarr's career, see Smyth, , Scandinavian Kings, especially pp. 224–39Google Scholar. Dr Smyth has established a very strong case for identifying Ivarr with the Imhar of the Irish annals.

23 Annales Fuldenses, s.a. 882, p. 99. For Godefrid's death, see ibid., p. 102; for Sigefrid, see ibid., s.a. 891, p. 120, which should be preferred to the vaguestatement in Annales Vedastini, ed. de Simson, B. (SS. Rer. Ger., Hannover, 1909), s.a. 887, p. 63.Google Scholar

24 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle ‘A’, ‘E’, ‘F’: 250 ships, ‘B’, ‘C’, ‘D’: 200 ships, (ed. Earle, and Plummer, , i, pp. 84–5.Google Scholar

25 Libellus Miraculonon S. Bertini, ed. Holder-Egger, O. [M.G.H. Scriptores, XV(i)] (Hannover, 1887), p. 511Google Scholar: ‘ab ilia classica perplurima quae pro sui numerositate… magnus exercitus ab omnibus dicebatur’.

26 Annales de S. Berlin, s.a. 855, 865. For the size of the fleet in 843, see above, p. 6, and n. 18. It was probably largely the same Loire Vikings under Bjorn and Hásteinn who operated inSpain and the Mediterranean from 859 to 861, initially with sixty-two ships. See above, p. 6, and n. 19.

27 Annales de S. Berlin, s.a. 866, pp. 130–31.

28 Stenton, F. M., Anglo-Saxon England (3rd ed., Oxford, 1971), p. 243, n. 1.Google Scholar

29 McTurk, R. W., ‘Ragnarr Lothbrok in the Irish annals’, Seventh Viking Congress, ed. Almquist, B. and Greene, D. (Dublin, 1976), pp. 93–124Google Scholar; Smyth, Scandinavian Kings, passim.

30 Annales Fuldenses, s.a. 873, p. 78.

31 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, s.a. 879.

32 Annales Engolismenses, ed. Pertz, G. H. (M.G.H. Scriptores, XVI, Hannover, 1859), s.a. 843, p. 486Google Scholar: ‘Nametis civitas a Westfaldingis capitur.’ However the Scandinavian saga tradition suggests that Ragnarr Lothbrók and his descendants also had links and connections with the Vestfold area in southern Norway. See Smyth, , Scandinavian Kings, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar

33 Smyth, (Scandinavian Kings, pp. 240–5)Google Scholarsuggests that this force was led by Anwend, Oscetel and Guthrum, and that it remained in England thereafter. Butas argued, Plummer (Two Saxon Chronicles, ii, 88)Google Scholarthe phrase ‘summer force’ suggests a distinction in the Chronicler's mind between armies that remained in England throughout the year and those that stayed only for the summer campaigning season.

34 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, s.a. 866–880.

35 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, ed. Earle, and Plummer, , i, 70–1.Google Scholar

36 Life of Alfred, ed. Stevenson, , p. 36.Google Scholar

37 For the date of the primary ramparts, see ‘Wareham West Walls’, Mediaeval Archaeology, iii (1959), 125–6, 130, 137Google Scholar, and Hinton, D., Alfred's Kingdom: Wessex and the South 800–1500 (London 1977), pp. 33—5.Google Scholar

38 Brooks, N. P., ‘The Development of Military Obligations in Eighth and Ninth Century England’, England before the Conquest: Studies presented to D. Whitelock, ed. Clemoes, P. and Hughes, K. (Cambridge 1971), pp. 69–84.Google Scholar

39 Life of Alfred, ed. Stevenson, , p. 27.Google Scholar

40 For the length of the ramparts at Wareham, see Anglo-Saxon Charters, ed. Robertson, A. J. (Cambridge, 1956), p. 495Google Scholar; for Exeter, Burrow, I., ‘The Town Defences of Exeter’, Transactions of the DevonshireAssociation, cix (1977), 13–40Google Scholar; for London, Wacher, J. S., The Towns of Roman Britain (London, 1974), p. 94.Google Scholar

41 Annales de St Berlin, s.a. 873, pp. 192–5.

42 Braat, W. C., ‘Les Vikings au pays de Frise’, Annales de Normandie, iv (1957), 219–227.Google Scholar

43 But note the limitations of our sources for the earlier raids, below p. 14, n. 55.

44 Life of Alfred, ed. Stevenson, , pp. 80–1Google Scholar.Alfred's own explanation is quoted by Fulk of Rheims in a letter to the king (B.C.S., 555 (for 556), translated in English Historical Documents 500–1042, ed. Whitelock, D. (London, 1955), p. 814)Google Scholar; for the Ludwigslied, see Althochdeutsches Lesebuch, ed. Braune, W., (15th rev. ed. by Ebbinghaus, E. A., Tübingen, 1968), pp. 136–8.Google Scholar

45 Historia S. Cutthberti, ed. Arnold, T., Symeonis Monachi Opera Omnia, i (Rolls Series, 1882), 196–214.Google Scholar

46 O'Donovan, M. A., ‘An Interim revision of episcopal dates for the province of Canterbury, 850–950: part I’, Anglo-Saxon England, i (1972), 39–40Google Scholar;D. Whitelock, ‘The pre-Viking age church in East Anglia’, ibid., 18–22, has an important caveat about the limits of our knowledge.

47 Harmer, F. E., Select English Historical Documents of the 9th and 10th Centuries (Cambridge, 1913), no. VI, pp. 9–10Google Scholar. For the Kentish monasteries and their demise, see my forthcoming work, The Early History of the Church of Canterbury.

48 King Alfred's WestSaxon Versionof Gregory's PastoralCare, ed. Sweet, H. (Early English TextSoc., o.s., xlv, 1871). p. 4Google Scholar; translated in Engl. Hist. Docs, i, p. 818; Hadrill, Wallace, Early Medieval History, pp. 217–36.Google Scholar

49 Whitelock, D., ‘The Conversion of the Eastern Danelaw’, Saga-Book of the Viking Society for Northern Research, xii (1941), 159–76Google Scholar; Wilson, D. M. ‘The Viking relationship with Christianity in northern England’, Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 3rd ser., xxx (1967), 437–47.Google Scholar

50 The Canterbury charter is B.C.S., 414. The charters preserved at Peterborough areB.C.S., 271, 454, 840–3 and Robertson Anglo-Saxon Charters, no. 7; they were discussed by Stenton, F. M., ‘Medeshamstede and its colonies’, Historical Essays in Honour of James Tail, ed. Edwards, J. G., Galbraith, V. H. and Jacob, E. F. (Manchester, 1933), pp. 313–26.Google Scholar

51 Scandinavian Kings, pp. 189–94 and 201–13.

52 B.C.S., 272–3, 289, 351, 360, 396, 406, 428, 434, 454, 495, 518 and 519 which cover the years 793x6–868. The argument that the clause precedes the Viking incursions depends upon the spurious B.C.S., 231, and the uncertain B.C.S., 236 of the year 780. There are too few authentic charters of Alfred's reign to attach any significance to the absence of the clause after 868.

53 There is a valuable discussion of the translator's methods and motives in White-lock, D., ‘Prose of Alfred's Reign’, pp. 89–93Google Scholar. On the problem of the identity of the translator, see Bately, J. M., ‘King Alfred and the Old English Translation of Orosius’, Anglia, lxxxviii (1970), 433–60.Google Scholar

54 B.C.S., 573. This papal letter was only preserved amongst the Canterbury primacy forgeries, but as ProfessorWhitelock, has argued (Eng. Hist. Docs, i, p. 820)Google Scholarthe early part seems to be acceptable as a letter of Formosus.

55 Stenton, F. M., Latin Charters of the Anglo-Saxon Period (Oxford, 1955), p. 40Google Scholar, citing B.C.S., 370, of the year 822. Evidence for the activity of ‘pagans’, that is Vikings in Kent in the late-eighth and early-ninth centuries drawn from B.C.S., 848, 332, 335, 348 and 380, is discussed in Brooks, , ‘Military Obligations’, pp. 79–80.Google Scholar

56 ed. H. Sweet, p. 2; translated in Eng. Hist. Docs, i, p. 818.

57 The evidence on which this paragraph is based was presented in my unpublished Oxford D. Phil, thesis The Pre-conquest Charters of Christ Church, Canterbury (1969), chapter 3. The charters from the Christ Church archives are B.C.S., 310, 312, 318–19, 321, 326, 332, 335, 341, 348, 353, 370, 373, 378, 380–81, 384, 400, 406, 421, 442, 448–9, 467, 496–7, 507, 515–16, 519, 536, 539, 562 and 576; Harmer, Select English Historical Documents, nos. 1–5, 7, 9–10; Robertson, Anglo-Saxon Charters, nos. 3 and 6. The charters from other archives are B.C.S., 152 (confirmation ofc. 845), 339, 343, 416, 451, 480, 502 and 506.

58 This scribe wrote the following charters:— B.S.C., 467, 496–7, 507 and 536, and Harmer, Select English Historical Documents, nos. 4 (Lufu's confirmation only) and 5.

59 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, s.a.; AnnalesdeSt Berlin, s.a. 850, pp. 59–60. But since Prudentius here reports the English victory (i.e. Acleah) under the year 850, it may be that the whole of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle's annal for 851 belongs to the earlier year.

60 B.C.S., 536 (British Library, Stowe Ch. 19; Sanders, W. B., Facsimiles of Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts, iii [Ordnance Survey, Southampton, 1884], no. 19).Google Scholar

61 Whitelock, D., ‘Prose of Alfred's Reign’, pp. 68–9Google Scholar; Bullough, D., ‘The educational tradition from Alfred to Ælfric: teaching utriusque linguae’, Settimane di studio del Centra italiano di studi sull'alto medioevo, xix (1972), 455–60.Google Scholar

62 Life of Alfred, ed. Stevenson, , pp. 77–8.Google Scholar

63 Brooks, , ‘Military Obligations’, 69–84.Google Scholar

64 ‘Alfredian’ dating for these forts is asserted by Radford, C. C. Ralegh, ‘The later pre-conquest boroughs and their defences’, Medieval Archaeology, xiv (1970), 81–102Google Scholar, and by Wilson, D. M., ‘Defence in the Viking age’, Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology, ed. Sieveking, G., Longworth, I. H. and Wilson, K. E., (London, 1976), pp. 439–40Google Scholar. But at Lydford the only terminus post quern is provided by a sherd of imported mediterranean pottery ofthe sixth century, and at Wallingford and Wareham by a handful of body sherds that may as well be Dark Age as Middle Saxon.

65 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, ‘A’ s.a. 894, ed. Earle, and Plummer, , i, 84.Google Scholar

66 Anglo-Saxon Charters, ed. Robertson, , pp. 246–8Google Scholar.The variations in the hidage figures attributed to different boroughs in the different manuscripts are discussed in Hill, D., ‘The Burghal Hidage: the establishment of a text’, Medieval Archaeology, xiii (1969), 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

67 My figures, which include all the shires south of the Thames (except Kent) plus Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire, are drawn from Darby, H. C. and Finn, R. Welldon, The Domesday Geography of South-West England (Cambridge, 1967)Google Scholar, and Darby, H. C. and Campbell, E. M. J., The Domesday Geography of South-East England (Cambridge, 1962)Google Scholar. For the problems of estimating total populations from Domesday evidence, see Darby, H. C., Domesday England, (Cambridge 1977), pp. 87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and the works there cited. Postan, M. (The Medieval Economy and Society, (London, 1972), pp. 27–9)Google Scholarhas suggested that all these estimates may seriously underestimate the English population in the late-eleventh century.

68 British armed forced in 1940 totalled 2,273,000 and rose to a peak of 5,098,100 in 1945, i.e. from 1 in 5 to 1 in 2.5 of the able-bodied adult male population. See Butler, D. and Sloman, A., British Political Facts 1900–1975 (4th ed., London, 1975), p. 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69 Biddle, M. and Hill, D., ‘Late Saxon planned towns’, Antiquaries Journal, li (1971), 70–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Biddle, M., ‘Towns’, The Archaeology of Anglo-Saxon England, ed. Wilson, D. M. (London, 1976), pp. 124–34.Google Scholar

70 Biddle, and Hill, , ‘Planned Towns’, p. 82–5Google Scholar. There is a more recent review of the evidence in Biddle, ‘Towns’ (see note 69 above).

71 Werweke, H. van, ‘De oudste burchten aan de vlaamse en de zeeuwse kust’, Mededelingen van de kon. vlaamse Acad. voor Lett, en Schone Kunsten van Belgie (kl. Letteren), xxvii (1965)Google Scholar, fasc.i; D'Haenens, , Invasions normandes en Belgique, pp. 116–24.Google Scholar