Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:10:52.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Every War must end: War-time Planning for post-war Security, in Britain and America in the Wars of 1914–18 and 1939–45. the Roles of Historical Example and of Professional Historians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

D. C. Watt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Any historical contrast between the manner in which the two major wars fought in the first half of the twentieth century came to an end has to start from the same sets of reference points. Neither the war of 1914–18 nor that of 1939–45 was a single war. Each comprised and interrelated set of wars. Their endingsfound the victors unready and surprised, their preparations for the processes of peace-making unrehearsed and unconcerted. The processes of peace-making themselves were therefore long drawn out in time and overtaken by subsequent events.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 28 , December 1978 , pp. 159 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 P.R.O., FO 371/46306, F 1031/11/61, Memorandum of 16 April 1945.

2 A subject as yet insufficiently explored by historians; but see Feis, H., 1933, Characters in Crisis (Boston, Mass., 1966)Google Scholar.

3 As, for example, Mr. Harold Wilson did of his meeting in 1963 with President John F. Kennedy.

4 Davis, V., Post-war defence policy and the U.S. Navy, 1943–46 (Chapel Hill, 1962)Google Scholar; Smith, P. McC., The Air Force Plans for Peace, 1943–45 (Baltimore, 1970)Google Scholar; Sherry, M. S., Preparing for the next war. American plans for post-war defence, 1941–45 (New Haven, 1977)Google Scholar; Blum, J. M., V was for victory; politics and American culture during World War II (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; Woodward, E. L., British foreign policy in the Second World War, V (London, 1976)Google Scholar; Headlam-Morley, J., A memoir of the Paris peace conference, 1919, ed. Headlam-Morley, A., Bryant, R. and Cienciala, A. (London 1972)Google Scholar; Reynolds, P. A. and Hughes, E. J., The Historian as diplomat; Charles Kingsley Webster and the United Nations, 1939–1946 (London, 1977)Google Scholar. See also Humphreys, R., ‘The “official” Scholar. A survey of certain research in American foreign policy’, Essays in Honor of Conyers Read, ed. Downes, N. (Chicago, 1953)Google Scholar.

5 Gelfand, L. E., The Enquiry (New Haven, 1963)Google Scholar.

6 May, E. R., ‘Lessons’ of the Past; the use and misuse of history in American foreign policy (New York, 1973)Google Scholar.

7 Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939, ed. Woodward, E. L. and Butler, R., 3rd Series, VII (London, 1954), nos. 145, 207Google Scholar.

8 Notter, H., Post-war foreign policy preparation, 1939–1945 (Washington, D.C., 1949)Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., pp. 109–66.

10 Reynolds, and Hughes, , Historian as diplomat, p. 20Google Scholar; P.R.O., PREM 4/30/2 and CAB 66/37, WP(43)233.

11 P.R.O., CAB 66/30, WP(42)516 of 8 November 1942; CAB 66/33, WP(43)31 of 16 January 1943.

12 Reynolds, and Hughes, , Historian as diplomat, pp. 20–5Google Scholar; see also Woodward, , British foreign policy, V., pp. 50–62Google Scholar; Gladwyn, Lord, The Memoirs of Lord Gladwyn (London, 1972), pp. 120, 128Google Scholar.

13 Minute by G. F. Hudson on report by Sir Eric Teichmann (P.R.O., FO 371/35780, F 5511/74/10).

14 Cf. P.R.O., FO 371/46232, F 1331/409/10 of 2 March 1945 and FO 371/ 46211, F 4171/186/10 of July 7 1945.

15 As, for example, in the work of W. H. Dawson or Sir Raymond Beazley.

16 Butler, R., The Roots of National Socialism, 1783–1933 (London, 1941)Google Scholar; Taylor, A. J. P., The Course of German History: a survey of the development of Germany since 1815 (London, 1945)Google Scholar; Vermeil, E. J., Germany's three Reichs; their history and culture, translated by Dickens, E. W. (London, 1944)Google Scholar.

17 Freidel, F., Franklin D. Roosevelt, The Apprenticeship (Boston, Mass., 1952), p. 58Google Scholar. See also Roosevelt's correspondence of 1939–40 with Col. the Hon. George Murray, later Lord Murray of Elibank (Elibank papers, National library of Scotland).

18 Roosevelt to Churchill, 10 March 1942, (Foreign Relations of the United States, 1942, i, General, The British Commonwealth, The Far East Washington, D.C., 1960), pp. 615–16)Google Scholar; Roosevelt to Chiang Kai-Shek, 12 August 1942 (ibid., i, pp. 715–17); Bajpal, , Indian Agent-General in Washington, to the Viceroy of India, 12 April 1942 (Constitutional Relations between Britain and India: The Transfer of Power, 1942–1947, ed. Mansergh, N., i (London, 1970), No. 656)Google Scholar.

19 Churchill, W. S., The Second World War, vi (London, 1954), p. 308Google Scholar; for the British record of the first plenary session of the Yalta conference, at which Roosevelt is recorded asmaking these comments, see P.R.O. WP(45)157, 1st Plenary.

20 Sherry, , Preparing for the next war, pp. 159–66Google Scholar.

21 Davis, , Post-war defence policy, pp. 101–02, 105, 107–08Google Scholar.

22 Reynolds, and Hughes, , Historian as diplomat, p. 43 (Webster diaries, 18 08 1944)Google Scholar.

23 Curiously, there has as yet been no collective study of the views of this faction among Roosevelt's advisers, possibly because of the contention, advanced by the leading American ‘revisionist’ historians, that their views represented the main stream in American foreign policy at this time.

24 On Patrick J. Hurley, see Buhite, R. D., Patrick J. Hurley and American Foreign Policy (Ithaca, New York, 1973)Google Scholar.

25 On these views see Kolko, G. L., The Politics of War: the world and United States foreign policy, 1943–45 (New York, 1968), pp. 280–2, 293, 490–6Google Scholar; Gardner, L. C., Economic Aspects of New Deal Diplomacy (Madison, Wisconsin, 1964), pp. 261, 263–4, 276–8, 282–5Google Scholar; the same, Architects of Illusion. Men and Ideas in American Foreign Policy, 1941—1949 (Chicago, 1970), pp. 113–16, 118–21Google Scholar. See also Kimball, W. F., ‘Lend-lease and the Open Door: the temptation of British opulence, 1937–1942’, Political Science Quarterly, LXXXVI, no. 2 (1971), 232–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Reynold, and Hughes, , Historian as diplomat, p. 43, (Webster diaries, 18 08 1944)Google Scholar.

27 Smith, B. F., Reaching Judgment in Nuremberg (New York, 1977), pp. 26–7, 65–7Google Scholar.

28 For a revealing account of the preparation of the U.S. case, see the memoirs of the prosecuting counsel, Dubois, J. E. Jr, Generals in Grey Suits (London, 1953)Google Scholar.

29 A History of the Paris Peace Conference, ed. Temperley, H. V., i–vi (London, 1921–1924)Google Scholar.

30 The Congress of Vienna, 1814–15, Handbooks prepared under the direction of the Historical Section of the Foreign Office, Nos. 165 and 165a, December 1918.

31 Reynolds, and Hughes, , Historian as diplomat, p. 92Google Scholar.