No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
The history of the Trent bridges at Nottingham is particularly interesting. Their early history is clouded in the mists of antiquity. The site of these bridges has for many hundred years been the crossing place of the Trent, between the south of England and the north. During the excavations for the foundations of the new bridges, to which we shall refer subsequently, traces of what we may infer to have been a landingstage have been brought to light. These consist of some “cross-braced framing, formed of black oak beams trenailed, together with oak pins, the whole resting upon large unhewn blocks of stone.”
page 212 note * Trans, by Rev. J. Ingram, B.D., late Professor of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford, 1823, 4to, p. 138.
page 212 note † 921 according to Florentius.
page 212 note § Nottingham.
page 212 note ¶ Orange's, “History of Nottingham,” p. 82Google Scholar.
page 212 note ‡ Probably West Bridgford.
page 212 note ∥ Chronicle (1569), ed. 1809, i. 116.
page 213 note * Strutt's, “Horda-Angel Cynnan,” 1774–5–6, ii. 46Google Scholar.
page 213 note † Valor. Eccle., v. 157.
page 213 note § Thoroton says one chaplain.
page 213 note ¶ Thoroton's, “Antiquities of Nottinghamshire,” 1699, p. 492, c. 2Google Scholar.
page 213 note ** Nash's, “Collections for the History of Worcestershire,” i. 329Google Scholar.
page 213 note ‡ Thoroton gives £6, 13s. 5d.
page 213 note ∥ Inq. post mort., i. 177.
page 214 note * Sutton's, “Date Book of Nottingham,” 401Google Scholar.
page 214 note † Bailey's, “Annals of Nottinghamshire,” i. 206Google Scholar.
page 214 note ‡ Ab. Rot. Orig., ii. 273.
page 214 note § Bailey's, “Annals of Nottinghamshire,” i. 261Google Scholar.
page 214 note ∥ Deering's, “Nottinghamia vetus et Nova,” 1751, p. 337, 338Google Scholar.
page 215 note * Orange's, “History of Nottingham,” p. 644Google Scholar.
page 215 note ‡ Inq. ad quod Dam., 127.
page 215 note ¶ Bailey, 572.
page 215 note § Bailey, i. 412.
page 215 note † Deering, p. 315.
page 215 note ∥ Ibid. i. 432, 433.
page 215 note ** Ibid. p. 589.
page 216 note * Bailey, 633.
page 216 note ‡ Hutchinson, 164.
page 216 note ¶ Ibid. 189.
page 216 note † Memoirs of Colonel Hutchinson, 1806, p. 154.
page 216 note § Ibid. 165.
page 216 note ** Ibid. 197.
page 216 note ∥ Ibid. 190.
page 217 note * Hutchinson, 247.
page 217 note ‡ Throsby's, “Thoroton,” ii. 57Google Scholar.
page 217 note ∥ Hutchison, 276.
page 217 note † Ibid. 248.
page 217 note § Hutchinson, 281.
page 217 note ¶ In Bromley House Library, Nottingham.
page 218 note * Deering, 164.
page 218 note † Bailey, 1009.
page 218 note ‡ Antiquities of Nottinghamshire, 1699, p. 492.
page 219 note * Bailey, 1146.
page 219 note ‡ P. 113.
page 219 note ∥ Deering MSS. in Bromley House Library, p. 11.
page 219 note ¶ Blackner's, “History of Nottingham,” 1815, p. 19Google Scholar.
page 219 note †† Sutton, 401.
page 219 note † Parkyns', “Queries and Reasons,” &c., 3d ed., 1724, p. 9Google Scholar.
page 219 note § Edited by Ll. Jewitt, p. 36.
page 219 note ‡‡ White's, “Notts,” 190Google Scholar.
page 219 note ** Ibid. 19.
page 219 note §§ Sutton, 401.
page 220 note * Orange, 88, 89.
page 220 note † Bailey, 417.
page 220 note ‡ Wylie's, “Nottingham Hand-Book,” 57Google Scholar.
page 220 note § Wylie's, “Old and New Nottingham,” 277Google Scholar.
page 221 note * Tarbotton's, “Short History of the Old Trent Bridge,” 1871, pp. 8, 9Google Scholar.