Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:44:59.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narratives of Triumph and Rituals of Submission: Charlemagne's Mastering of Bavaria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Stuart Airlie
Stuart Airlie
Affiliation:
The University of East Anglia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Among the more striking literary creations of Herman Melville is a short story entitiled ‘Bartleby’. The eponymous hero is a law-clerk who gradually withdraws from his employer's power, and ultimately from the world, by meeting all requests – to copy texts, to quit the premises, to co-operate with the authorities of the prison to which his intransigence finally leads him – with the phrase, ‘I would prefer not to.’ Melville's existential fable is disquieting on all sorts of levels and it has, perhaps, a special resonance for historians. The story's narrator is Bartleby's employer, a tranquil elderly man baffled by the latter's stubbornness. One of the problems the narrator faces is the shortage of sources: ‘this man … was one of these beings of whom nothing is ascertainable, except trom the original sources and … those are very small’. After Bartleby's death, the narrator learns that he had worked in the Dead Letter Office in Washington, and the story ends with a vision of piles of lost ‘dead’ documents and artefacts whose texts and meanings remain unread and beyond recall. As a text haunted by notions of unknowability and by the crushing weight of dead letters, ‘Bartleby’ seems to speak directly to some of the pre-occupations of historians in a post-modernist era.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 9 , December 1999 , pp. 93 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Bartleby’ is a product of the 1850s and is available in a variety of editions; see Melville, Herman, Billy Budd, Sailor & Other Stories, ed. Beaver, H. (Harmondsworth, 1970)Google Scholar.

2 The sneeringly hostile remarks on Charlemagne and the Franks ascribed to an abbot of San Vincenzo al Volturno in the 780s may be an isolated survival but cannot have been an isolated phenomenon: ‘Codex Carolinus’, no. 67, ed. Gundlach, W., Monumenta Germaniae Historica [hereafter MGH], Epistolae, iii, Epistolae Merowingici et Karolini Aevi, 1, 595Google Scholar; see McCormick, M., ‘The Liturgy of War in the Early Middle Ages’, Viator, 15 (1984), 1–23, at 3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 For the resources of Christian culture in Bavaria, see, for example, Bischoff, B., Die südostdeutschen Schreibschulen und Bibliotheken der Karolingerzeit (2 vols, Wiesbaden, 1974 and 1980)Google Scholar, and Garrison, M., ‘The Collectanea and medieval florilegia’, in Collectanea Pseudo-Bedae, ed. Bayless, M. and Lapidge, M. (Dublin, 1998), 42–83Google Scholar. The text of the Raffelstet toll ordinance is in Inquisitio e Theloneis Rqffelstettensis , ed. Boretius, A. and Krause, V., MGH, Capitularia regum Francorum, ii (Hanover, 1897), 249–52Google Scholar; see also Innes, M., ‘Franks and Slavs c. 700–1000: the problem of European expansion before the millennium’, Early Medieval Europe, 6 (1997), 201–16, at 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Bavarians: Losek, F., Die Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum und der Brief des Erzbischofs Theotmar von Salzburg, MGH, Studien und Texte, 15 (Hanover, 1997)Google Scholar; Saxons, : Poeta Saxo, ed. von Winterfeld, P., MGH, Poetae Latini Aevi Carolini, IV (Berlin, 1899), 1–71Google Scholar, and cf. Leyser, K., Rule and Conflict in an Early Medieval Society (1979), 5–6Google Scholar. By the seventeenth century, Bavarian writers saw the struggle between Tassilo and Charlemagne as a moral drama in which the latter's piety triumphed, according to A. Kraus, ‘Tassilo und Karl der Grosse in der bayerischen Geschichtsschreibung des 17. Jahrhunderts’, in idem, Bayerische Geschichtswissenschaft in drei Jahrhunderten (Munich, 1979), 34–53; for the rather more regional views of Tassilo in Bavaria in this century, see Kolmer, L., ‘Zur Kommendation und Absetzung Tassilos III’, Zeitschrift für bayerische Landesgeschichte, 43 (1980), 291–327, at 291, n. 2, and 327, n. 219Google Scholar.

5 Roth, P., Geschichte des Beneficialwesens von den älteren Zeiten bis ins zehnte Jahrhundert (Erlangen, 1850), 388–9Google Scholar; Krawinkel, H., Untersuchungen zum Fränkischen Benefizialrecht (Weimar, 1937), 48–65Google Scholar; such references could be multiplied. See also n. 7 below.

6 Annales Regni Francorum, ed. Kurze, F., MGH, Scriptores rerum germanicarum (Hanover, 1895)Google Scholar; Reindel, K., ‘Bayern im Karolingerreich’, in Karl der Grosse, I, Persönlichkeit und Geschichte, ed. Beumann, H. (Düsseldorf, 1965), 220–4Google Scholar; Reindel, K., ‘Die politische Entwicklung’, in Handbuch der Bayerischen Geschichte, ed. Spindler, M. (Munich, 1967), 127Google Scholar.

7 Classen, Peter, ‘Bayern und die politischen Mächte im Zeitalter Karls des Grossen und Tassilos’, most conveniently available in P. Classen, Ausgewählte Aufsätze, ed. Fleckenstein, J. (Sigmaringen, 1983)Google Scholar; Kolmer, , ‘Zur Kommendation und Absetzung Tassilos’; Becher, Matthias, Eid und Herrschaft. Untersuchungenzum Herrscherethos Karls des Grossen (Sigmaringen, 1993), 21–77Google Scholar; McKitterick, Rosamond, ‘Constructing the Past in the Early Middle Ages: The Case of the Royal Frankish Annals, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, sixth series, 7 (1997), 109–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the ‘feudal’ debate: Reynolds, Susan, Fiefs and Vassals (Oxford, 1994), 84–105Google Scholar, together with the exchange on this book between Fried, Johannes and Reynolds, Susan in German Historical Institute, London: Bulletin, 19.1 (1997), 28–41, and 19.2 (1997), 30–40Google Scholar. For alternative perspectives on both debates, see Depreux, P., ‘Tassilon III et le roi des Francs: examen d'une vassalité controversée’, Revue Historique, 293 (1995), 23–73Google Scholar; and Barthélemy, D., ‘La théorie féodale à l'épreuve de l'anthropologie’, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 52 (1997), 321–41Google Scholar.

8 Edward, Said, Culture and Imperialism (1993), xiii, 1Google Scholar.

9 Einhard, , Vita Karoli, c. 2, ed. Halphen, L., La Vie de Charlemagne (Paris, 1938), 10Google Scholar; The Fourth Book of the Chronicle of Fredegar with its continuations, trans, and ed. Wallace-Hadrill, J. M. (London and Edinburgh, 1960)Google Scholar, continuationes, c. 13, 90–1, with Collins, Roger, ‘Deception and misrepresentation in early eighth century Frankish historiography’, in Karl Martell in seiner Zeit, ed. Jarnut, J., Nonn, U. and Richter, M. (Sigmaringen, 1994), 239Google Scholar; on the general situation, see Reuter, Timothy, Germany in the Early Middle Ages c. 800–1056 (1991), 54–60Google Scholar, and Wood, Ian, The Merovingian Kingdoms 450–751 (1994), 273–92Google Scholar.

10 Good surveys, with extensive bibliographies and notes that render more extensive references here redundant, are Jahn, J., Ducalaus Baiuvariorum. Das bairische Herzogtum der Agilolfinger (Stuttgart, 1991)Google Scholar [hereafter Jahn, Ducatus Baiuvariorum] and Wolfram, H., Osterreichische Geschichte 378–907. Grenzen und Räume (Vienna, 1995Google Scholar) [hereafter Wolfram, Grenzen und Räume]; Wolfram's, monograph can be supplemented by the essays contained in his Salzburg, Bayern, Osterreich: die Conversio Bagoariorum und die Quellen ihrer Zeit, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Osterreichische Geschichtsforschung, Ergänzungsband 31 (Vienna, 1993)Google Scholar. An important study by C. Hammer is forthcoming; I am grateful to him for letting me see a copy of ‘Those Wicked Men, Odib and Our Cousin Tassilo’: Two Studies in Eighth-Century Rule in advance of publication.

11 Lex Baiwariorum, Titulus in, ed. von Schwind, E., MGH, Legum Sectio I, Legum nationum Germanicarum, v.ii (Hanover, 1928), 313Google Scholar.

12 Einhard, , Vita Karoli, c. i, 8Google Scholar.

13 Siems, H., ‘Lex Baiuvariorum’, in Handwörterbuch zur Deutschen Rechtsgeschichte, II, ed. Erler, A. and Kaufman, E. (Berlin, 1978), cols 1887–8 and 1894–5Google Scholar; Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 1–3Google Scholar. The anqituity and depth of Agilolfing—Carolingian rivalry are stressed by Jarnut, J., ‘Genealogie und politische Bedeutung der agilolfingischen Herzöge’, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Osterreichische Geschichtsforschung, 99 (1991), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Lex Baiwariorum, Tituli 11. I, 11.8a, 11.9 and in, 291, 302–3 and 313.

15 Wanderwitz, H., ‘Quellenkritische Studien zu den bayerischen Besitzlisten des 8. Jahrhunderts’, Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters, 39 (1983), 27–84, esp. 68–77Google Scholar; Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 221–54Google Scholar.

16 Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 125–32, 172–8Google Scholar, and see below.

17 Haselbach, I., Aufstieg und Henschqft der Karlinger in der Darstellung der sogenannten Annales Mettenses priores (Lübeck and Hamburg, 1970), 87–102, 107–11Google Scholar; Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 172–92, 277–82Google Scholar.

18 Becher, , Eid und Herrschaft, 25–35Google Scholar, and Depreux, , ‘Tassilon III et le roi des Francs’, 28–37Google Scholar, review the evidence.

19 Wolfram, H., Intitulatio I. Lateinische Königs- und Fürstentitel bis zum Ende des 8. Jahrhunderts, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Osterreichische Geschichtsforschung, Ergänzungsband 21 (Vienna, 1967), 155–84, esp. at 181–2Google Scholar; see also Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 132Google Scholar.

20 Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 89Google Scholar.

21 Letter of Clemens, peregrinus, ed. Dümmler, E., MGH, Epistolae, IV, Epistolae Karolini Aevi, 11 (Berlin, 1895), 496–7Google Scholar.

22 Cathwulf's letter is edited by Dümmler, E. in MGH, Epistolae, IV, Epistolae Karolini Aevi, II, 501–5Google Scholar; for comment, Wallace-Hadrill, J. M., Early Germanic Kingship in England and on the Continent (Oxford, 1971), 100–2Google Scholar, and Garrison, M., ‘The English and the Irish at the Court of Charlemagne’, in Karl der Grosse und sein Nachwirken: 1200 Jahre Kultur und Wissenschaft in Europa, ed. Butzer, P. L., Kerner, M. and Oberschelp, W. (Turnholt, 1997), 102Google Scholar. On Clemens and Freising, see Bischoff, , Die südostdeutschen Screibschulen, 1, 61–2, and 11, 264Google Scholar.

23 Garrison, , ‘English and the Irish’, 102, 116Google Scholar; cf. the references to Gideon, , Moses, and Aaron, in the sacramentaries of Gellone and Angoulême: Liber Sacramentorum Gelbnensis, at, e.g., no. 2091 and no. 2755Google Scholar, ed. Dumas, A. and Deshusses, J., Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina, vol. 159 (Turnholt, 1981), 296, 432Google Scholar; Liber Sacramentorum Engolismensis, at, e.g., no. 2308, ed. Saint-Roch, P., Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina, vol. 159C (Turnholt, 1987), 358Google Scholar, and see McCormick, M., Eternal Victory (Cambridge, 1986), 347–62Google Scholar. The Sacramentary of Angoulême's reference to ‘tyrants’ (loc. cit.) is worth juxtaposing with Einhard's use of this term, as cited at n. 9 above.

24 Clemens, peregrinus, 496Google Scholar; cf. Judges 18.1 and Nelson, J.L., ‘Kingship and empire in the Carolingian world’, in Carolingian Culture: emulation and innovation, ed. McKitterick, R. (Cambridge, 1994), 57Google Scholar.

25 Clemens, peregrinus, 497Google Scholar.

26 Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 120, 135Google Scholar.

27 Nelson, J. L., ‘The Siting of the Council at Frankfort: Some Reflections on Family and Polities’, in Das Frankfurter Konzil von 794, ed. Berndt, R. (Mainz, 1997), 155Google Scholar.

28 Hasdenteufel, M., ‘Das Salzburger Erintrudis-Kloster und die Agilolfinger, Mitteilungen des Institute für Osterreichische Geschichtsforschung, 93 (1985), 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 130–6Google Scholar; Bowlus, C., Franks, Moravians and Magyars (Philadelphia, 1995), 37–8Google Scholar; valuable surveys of Salzburg, Agilolfing in Virgil von Salzburg Missionar und Gekhrter, ed. Dopsch, H. and Juffinger, R. (Salzburg, 1985)Google Scholar.

30 Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 125–31, 172–3, 248–59Google Scholar. In general, see Störmer, W., Früher Adel. Studien zur politischen Führungsschicht im Fränkisch-Deutschen Reich vom 8. bis II. Jahrhundert, 2 vols (Stuttgart, 1973)Google Scholar, and Wanderwitz, , ‘Quellenkritische Studien zu den bayerischen Besitzlisten’; see also n. 31Google Scholar.

31 Prinz, F., ‘Herzog und Adel im agilulfingischen Bayern’, Zeitschrift für bayerische Landesgeschichte, 25 (1962), 283–311Google Scholar, and reprinted in Zur Geschichte der Bayern, ed. Bosl, K., Wege der Forschung, 60 (Darmstadt, 1965), 225–63Google Scholar, from which citations are taken; contrast Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, e.g. 319–34, 349–56Google Scholar. A variety of views can be consulted in Früh- und hochmittelalterlicher Adel in Schwaben und Bayern, ed. Eberl, I., Hartung, W. and Jahn, J., REGIO. Forschungen zur schwäbischen Regionalgeschichte, 1 (Sigmaringendorf, 1988)Google Scholar, and there is a brief summary in English in Bowlus, , Franks, Moravians and Magyars, 34Google Scholar.

32 Prinz, , ‘Herzog und Adel’, 235Google Scholar; for more nuanced views, see Diepolder, G., ‘Schäftlarn: Nachlese in den Traditionen der Gründerzeit’, in Früh- und hochmittelalterlicher Adel in Schwaben und Bayern, 180–2Google Scholar; Störmer, W., ‘Die bayerische Herzogskirche’, in Der hl. Willibald – Klosterbischoff oder Bistumsgründer?, ed. Dickerhof, H., Reiter, E. and Weinfurter, S. (Regensburg, 1990), 134–6Google Scholar; Becher, , Eid und Herrschqft, 42–4Google Scholar; Depreux, , ‘Tassilon III et le roi des Francs’, 46Google Scholar. On some problems of identification concerning the founders’ family, Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 137Google Scholar; the monastery of Scharnitz-Schlehdorf also repays examination in this context, see Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 407–48Google Scholar.

33 Die Traditional des Hochstifts Freising, ed. Bitterauf, T., 2 vols (Munich, 1905, 1909), 1, no. 193(b)Google Scholar; this is trusted by Nelson, , ‘Siting of the Council at Frankfort’, 155Google Scholar, and see also Enright, M.J., ‘Iona, Tara and Soissons (Berlin and New York, 1985), 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Bowlus, , Franks, Moravians and Magyars, 33, 37Google Scholar; a more sceptical view in Jahn, J., ‘Bischof Arbeo von Freising und die Politik seiner Zeit’, in Ethnogenese und Uberlieferung: angewandte Methoden der Frühmittelalterforschung, ed. Brunner, K. and Merta, B. (Vienna and Munich, 1994) 157–8Google Scholar.

34 Compare Arbeo's, Vita Corbiniani, c. 24Google Scholar, in Arbeonis Episcopi Frisingensis Vitae Sanctorum Haimhrammi et Corbiniani, ed. Krusch, B., MGH, Scriptores rerum germanicarum (Hanover, 1920), 215Google Scholar, with Radbertus, Paschasius, Vita Sancti Adalhardi Corbeiensis Abbatis, c. 7, ed. Migne, J. P., Patrobgia Latina, 112 (Paris, 1852), cols 1511–12Google Scholar; on Adalhard's response to the ending of Charlemagne's Lombard marriage, see Kasten, B., Adalhard von Corbie (Düsseldorf, 1985), 18–35Google Scholar. On Arbeo's Vitae, see Bosl, K., ‘Der Adelsheilige’, in Speculum Historiale. Festschrift für Johannes Spörl, ed. Bauer, C., Boehm, L. and Müller, M. (Freiburg and Munich, 1965). 167–87Google Scholar.

35 Das Verbrüderungsbuch von St. Peter in Salzburg. Vollständige Faksimik-Ausgabe im Originalformat der Handschrift AI aus dem Archiv von St. Peter in Salzburg, ed. Forstner, K. (Graz, 1974), pag. 10 and pag. 20Google Scholar; Nelson, , ‘Siting of the Council at Frankfort’, 155Google Scholar; on hostility to Liutpirga in Frankish sources, Kolmer, , ‘Kommendation und Absetzung Tassilos’, 315Google Scholar.

36 Das Verbrüderungsbuch von St. Peter in Salzburg, pag. 10 and pag. 20; Semmler, J., ‘Geistiges Leben in Salzburg (5.–10. Jahrhundert)’, in Virgil von Salzburg, 367Google Scholar; H. Wolfram, ‘Virgil als Abt und Bischof, ibid., 345; Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 117–18Google Scholar. Family membership could, however, have a bearing on how names were entered into an ordo: see Schmid, K., ‘Uber das Verhältnis von Person und Gemeinschaft im fruheren Mittelalter’, Fruïhmittelalterliche Studien, 1 (1967), 225–49, esp. at 242–6Google Scholar.

37 Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 170–2Google Scholar.

38 Semmler, J., ‘Zu den bayrisch-westfränkischen Beziehungen in karolingischer Zeit’, Zeitschrift für bqyerische Landesgeschkhte, 29 (1966), 344–424Google Scholar; Störmer, , ‘Die bayerische Hezogskirche’, 134–6Google Scholar.

39 For Arn, as envoy, Annales Regni Francorum, a. 787, 74Google Scholar; on Arn's, being given to Freising in 758, Traditional des Hochstifis Freising, 1, no. nGoogle Scholar, with Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 170–1Google Scholar; judicious summing-up in Störmer, ‘Die bayerische Herzogskirche’, esp. at 136.

40 Reindel, , ‘Bayern im Karolingerreich’, 221–2Google Scholar; Wanderwitz, , ‘Quellenkritische Studien zu den bayerischen Besitzlisten’, 78Google Scholar; Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 175–6Google Scholar.

41 W. Hartung, ‘Bertolde in Baiern’, in Früh- und hochmittelaterlicher Adel, though this should be compared with J. Jahn, ‘Bayerische Pfalzgrafen im 8. Jahrhundert?’, ibid.

42 Diepolder, G., ‘Freisinger Traditionen und Memorialeinträge im Salzburger liber Vitae und im Reichenauer Verbrüderungsbuch’, Zeitschrift für bayerische Landesgeschichte, 58 (1995), 147–89, esp. at 180–8Google Scholar.

43 ‘Codex Carolinus’, nos 80, 82, 611–14, 615–16 ; Collins, R., Charlemagne (Basingstoke and London, 1998), 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 The Fourth Book of the Chronicle of Fredegar, ‘continuationes’, c. 12, 90; Schieffer, R., ‘Karl Martell und seine Familie’, in Karl Martell und seiner Zeit, 303–15Google Scholar.

46 Das Verbrüderungsbuch von St. Peter in Salzburg, pag. 20; Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 83, 117Google Scholar.

47 The Fourth Book of the Chronicle of Fredegar, ‘continuationes’, c. 25, 98; Astronomus, , Vita Hludowici Imperatoris, c. 21Google Scholar, ed. Tremp, E., MGH, Scriptores rerum germanicarum (Hanover, 1995), 348Google Scholar; relevant discussion in Becher, M., ‘Zum Geburtsjahr Tassilos IIP, Zeitschrif für bayerische Landesgeschichte, 52 (1989), 3–12Google Scholar, and Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 176–8Google Scholar.

47 Nelson, J. L., The Frankish World 750–900 (London and Rio Grande, 1996), xxv, 232Google Scholar.

48 Wanderwitz, , ‘Quellenkritische Studien zu den bayerischen Besitzlisten’, 55Google Scholar; Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 184Google Scholar; Becher, , Eid und Herrschaft, 29Google Scholar. On Hildegarde, Airlie, S., ‘Semper Fideles? Loyauté envers les Carolingiens comme constituant de l'identite aristocratique’, in La Royautée et les Elites dans l'Europe carolingienne, ed. Jan, R. Le (Lille, 1998), 131Google Scholar.

49 On events of 781, see Annales Regni Francorum, a. 781, 58, and Becher, , Eid und Herrschaft, 51–8Google Scholar; on Theodo's, prominence, see Traditional des Hochstifts Freising, 1, no. 106 (a. 782)Google Scholar and Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 531–2Google Scholar; on the clash at Bolzano, Jahn, ibid.

50 Bullough, D., The Age of Charlemagne, 2nd edn (1980), 59–67Google Scholar.

51 Annales Regni Francorum, a. 787, 72–8; for the English translation of this and many other relevant texts, see King, P. D., Charlemagne: Translated Sources (Kendal, 1987)Google Scholar.

52 Kolmer, , ‘Zur Kommendation und Absetzung Tassilos III’, 306–11Google Scholar; Becher, , Eid und Herrschaft, 59–63Google Scholar, and see nn. 56 and 59 below.

53 Schramm, P. E.Kaiser, Kónige und Päpste, IV.i (Stuttgart, 1978), 212Google Scholar.

54 S. Reynolds's response to J. Fried, as above at n. 7, 38.

55 Becher, , Eid und Herrschaft, 78–87 and 144–212Google Scholar.

56 Annales Laureshamenses, a. 787 , ed. Pertz, G. H., MGH, Scriptores, 1 (Hanover, 1826), 33Google Scholar; Becher, , Eid und Herrschaft, 62Google Scholar; Innes, M., ‘Kings, Monks and Patrons: Political Identities and the Abbey of Lorsch’, in La Royauté et les Elites dans l'Europe carolingienne, 315–16Google Scholar.

57 Depreux, , ‘Tassilon III et le roi des Francs’, 69, 73Google Scholar, though Depreux follows other writers in seeing the ceremonies of 787 as humiliating for Tassilo, see art. cit., 28, nn. 40 and 57.

58 Tassilo, : Annales Regni Francorum, a.781, 58Google Scholar, and Collins, , Charlemagne, 84Google Scholar; Widukind, : Annales Regni Francorum, a. 785, 70Google Scholar, and Althoff, G., Spielregeln der Politik im Mittelalter (Darmstadt, 1997), 174Google Scholar; Benevento, : Annales Regni Francorum (revised), a. 786, 75Google Scholar, and one should juxtapose this with the taking of hostages from still recalcitrant Lombards, , Annales Nazariani, a. 787Google Scholar, ed. Pertz, G. H., MGH, Scriptores, 1, 43Google Scholar, and Bullough, , Age of Charlemagne, 59Google Scholar

59 Annales Nazariani, a. 786, 41–2; Brunner, K., ‘Auf den Spuren verlorener Traditionen’, Peritia, 2 (1983), 1–22, at 6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Innes, , ‘Kings, Monks and Patrons‘, 313–16Google Scholar.

60 McCormick, , Eternal Victory, 359–60Google Scholar; Althoff, , Spielregeln der Politik, 99–125Google Scholar.

61 Annales Nazariani, a. 787, 43; Brunner, ‘Auf den Spuren’; Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 537–8 with 182–4Google Scholar on the Lech as part of a border zone; Becher, , Eid und Herrschaft, 61–3Google Scholar.

62 K. Leyser, ‘Ritual, Ceremony and Gesture: Ottonian Germany’, in idem, Communications and Power in Medieval Europe: the Carolingian and Ottonian Centuries (London and Rio Grande, 1994), 189, citing A. van Gennep.

63 Blanning, T. C. W., ‘Frederick the Great and German culture’, inRoyal and Republican Sovereignty in Early Modern Europe. Essays in memory of Ragnhild Hatton, ed. Oresko, R., Gibbs, G. C. and Scott, H. M. (Cambridge, 1997), 529–30Google Scholar.

64 Althoff, , Spielregeln der Politik, 229–32Google Scholar. Such rituals mattered even in the relatively text-based societies of the Carolingian world though they may have possessed greater intensity in the more oral society of the Ottonian Reich; see Leyser, , ‘Ritual, Ceremony and Gesture’, 192–6Google Scholar, and Mayr-Harting, H., Ottonian Book Illumination, 2 vols (1991), 1, 62Google Scholar. In general, Nelson, J. L., Politics and Ritual in Early Medieval Europe (1986)Google Scholar remains indispensable.

65 Nuanced views of the Sutton Hoo ‘sceptre’ can be found in Campbell, J., ‘The Impact of the Sutton Hoo Discoveries on the Study of Anglo-Saxon History’, in Voyage to the Other World, ed. Kendall, C.B. and Wells, P.S. (Minneapolis, 1992), 84Google Scholar, and S. Keynes, ‘Raedwald the Bretwalda’, ibid., 116 (from where the quotation is taken); Ryan, M., ‘The Sutton Hoo Ship Burial and Ireland: Some Celtic Perspectives’, in Sutton Hoo – Fifty Years After, ed. Farrell, R. and De Vegvar, C. N. (Oxford, Ohio), 85–90Google Scholar. Tassilo's staff is placed in a broad context by Waitz, G., Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte, III (Kiel, 1883), 111–12, 249—51Google Scholar; Schramm, P. E., Herrschaftszeichen und Staatssymbolik, Schriften der MGH 13, 3 vols (Stuttgart, 1954–1956), 11, 192—210, 286–7Google Scholar; Gauert, A., ‘Das Zepter Tassilos III.’, Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters, 18 (1962), 214–23Google Scholar.

66 Annales Nazariani, a. 787, 43 Schramm, , Herrschaftszeichen und Staatssymbolik, II, 209Google Scholar; Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 91Google Scholar. Among other contemporary objects that connected holiness with a dynastic sense, one might point to the Tassilo chalice itself, and it is possible that the ring of St Arnulf, holy ancestor of the Carolingians, was preserved at Metz; it certainly featured in a story that Charlemagne recounted: see Hauck, K., ‘Die Ausbreitung des Glaubens in Sachsen und die Verteidigung der römische Kirche als konkurriende Herrschaftsaufgaben Karls des Grossen’, Frühmittelalterliche Studien, 4 (1970), 138–72Google Scholar. Breton leaders yielded their swords to Charlemagne when they surrendered to him in 799 : Nelson, J. L., ‘Kingship and Royal Government’, in The New Cambridge Medieval History II c.700–c.900, ed. McKitterick, R. (Cambridge, 1995), 428Google Scholar.

67 Annales Nazariani, a. 788, 43–4; Brunner, , ‘Auf den Spuren verlorener Traditionen’, 15–16Google Scholar.

68 Keller, H., ‘Die Investitur, Frühmittelalterliche Studien, 27 (1993), 51–86, at 56, 67–8Google Scholar.

69 Tassilo surrendered on 3 October at the Lechfeld; see Böhmer, J. F., Die Regesten des Kaiserreichs unter den Karolingern, revised by Mühlbacher, E. and Lechner, J. (Innsbruck, 1908), 290g and 290hGoogle Scholar. The feast of St Denis is 9 October; for the importance of such dates in Carolingian political life, see Sierck, M., Festtag und Politik (Cologne, Weimar and Vienna, 1995)Google Scholar. On Carolingian victory on the banks of the Lech in 743, Fourth Book of the Chronicle of Fredegar, continuationes', c. 26, 99. Charlemagne's seemingly surprising failure to crush Tassilo is noted in Becher, , Eid und Herrschaft, 61Google Scholar.

70 Koziol, G., Begging Pardon and Favor: Ritual and Political Order in Early Medieval France (Ithaca and London, 1992), 7–8, 316Google Scholar.

71 The text of Hibernicus Exul is edited by Dümmler, E. in MGH, Poetae Latini Aevi Carolini, 1 (Berlin, 1881), 396–9Google Scholar; there is a partial English translation in Godman, P., Poetry of the Carolingian Renaissance (1985), 174–9Google Scholar. For the serpent and Tassilo's sin, see Hibernicus Exul, lines 62–8, p. 397; on the poem's moral concerns, see Godman, P., Poets and Emperors (Oxford, 1987), 62Google Scholar, and Ratkowitsch, C., Karolus Magnus – Alter Aeneas, Alter Martinus, Alter Iustinus (Vienna, 1997), 41Google Scholar.

72 Hibernicus Exul, lines 94–103, p. 399; on such gestures, Gaucrt, , ‘Das Zepter Herzog Tassilos III’, 221Google Scholar, and, for broader context, Nelson, J. L., ‘The Lord's anointed and the people's choice: Carolingian royal ritual’, in Rituals of Royalty, ed. Cannadine, D. and Price, S. (Cambridge, 1987), 168Google Scholar.

73 Garrison, M., ‘The emergence of Carolingian Latin literature and the court of Charlemagne (780–814)’, in Carolingian Culture, ed. McKitterick, , 128Google Scholar; see also her ‘English and the Irish’, 100, and, for daring and context, Ebenbauer, A., Carmen Historicum: Untersuchungen zur historischen Dichtung im karolingischen Europa (Vienna, 1978), 18–29, esP. at 28–9Google Scholar.

74 Said, E., The World, the Text and the Critic (1984), 4, 31–53Google Scholar; on the ‘active’ nature of ninth-century Carolingian historical writing, see Nelson, J. L., ‘History-writing at the courts of Louis the Pious and Charles the Bald’, in Hisloriographie im frühen Mittelalter, ed. Scharer, A. and Scheibelreiter, G. (Vienna and Munich, 1994), 435–42Google Scholar.

75 Riezler, S., ‘Ein verlorenes bairisches Geschichtswerk des achten Jahrhunderts’, Sitzungsberichte der königlichen bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschqften, Philosophisch-Philologisch-Historische Klasse, I (1881), 247–91Google Scholar; cited in the translation of King, , Charlemagne: Translated Sources, 342Google Scholar.

76 Annales Regni Francorum, a. 788, 80–4; Becher, , Eid und Herrschqft, 64–71Google Scholar, provides a clear guide to events, but cf. Schieffer, R., ‘Ein politischer Prozess des 8. Jahrhunderts im Vexierspiegel der Quellen’, in Das Frankfurter Konzil von 794, 179–82Google Scholar. On the accusations of colluding with the Avars, see Kolmer, , ‘Zur Kommendation und Absetzung Tassilos III’, 323–5Google Scholar, and Pohl, W., Die Awaren: Ein Steppenvolk in Mitteleuropa 567–822 n. Chr. (Munich, 1988) 313–14Google Scholar.

77 Annales Regni Francorum, a.745, a.772, a.775, a.778, a.787, a.788, 4, 34, 40–2, 50, 76–8, 80.

78 Lex Baiwariorum, Titulus II.9, 302–3. On Einhard's description of wars, Wallace-Hadrill, J. M., Early Medieval History (Oxford, 1975), 30–1Google Scholar.

79 Annales Regni Francorum, a. 788, 80; Schieffer, , ‘Ein politischer Prozess’, 175Google Scholar.

80 Annales Regni Francorum, a.788, 80; cf. n. 87 below.

81 See Charlemagne's charter no. 162, ed. Mühlbacher, E., MGH, Diplomata Karolinorum, 1 (Hanover, 1906)Google Scholar.

82 Annales Nazariani, a.788, 44; Brunner, , ‘Auf den Spuren verlorener Traditionen’, 15–16Google Scholar; Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 542Google Scholar; Nelson, J.L., The Frankish World, 236Google Scholar.

83 Wanderwitz, , ‘Quellenkritische Studien zu den bayerischen Besitzlisten’, 81–4Google Scholar.

84 Annales Regni Francorum, a.788, 82, reports the exiling of supporters of Tassilo; testimony of such supporters is preserved in the texts collected in Bischoff, B., Salzburger Formelbücher und Briefe aus Tassilonischer und Karolingischer Zeit, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, Sitzungsberkhte Jahrgang 1973, part 4 (Munich, 1973)Google Scholar. For church concerns, see the Notitia Arnonis and Breves Notitiae drawn up by the church of Salzburg in Salzburger Urkundenbuch, ed. Hauthaler, W., 1 (Salzburg, 1910), no. I.A and no. I.BGoogle Scholar; Charlemagne's confirmation is his charter no. 168 (to be dated to 793; see Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 72–3)Google Scholar. On Gerold, see Borgolte, M., Die Grafen Alemanniens in Merowingischer und Karolingischer Zeit. Eine Prosopographie (Sigmaringen, 1986), 119–21Google Scholar. In general, Jahn, , Ducatus Baiuvariorum, 545–8Google Scholar.

85 Krah, A., Absetzungsverfahren als Spiegelbild von Königsmacht (Aalen, 1987), 36–8Google Scholar; Kolmer, , ‘Zur Kommendation und Absetzung Tassilos’, 316Google Scholar, and Becher, , Eid und Herrschqft, 73Google Scholar, see the connection between Bavarian unrest and Pippin's revolt; a rather different perspective in Nelson, , ‘Siting of the Council at Frankfort’;, 160–3Google Scholar. I intend to discuss Pippin's conspiracy more fully elsewhere.

86 Synod of Frankfurt, c. 3, ed. Boretius, A., MGH, Capitularia Regum Francorum, 1 (Hanover, 1885), 74Google Scholar; contemporary texts dealing with Charlemagne's activities at Frankfurt in 794 are conveniendy gathered together in Orth, E., ‘Frankfurt’, in Die deutschen Königspfalzen, ed. Zotz, T., vol. I, Hessen, parts 2, 3 and 4 (Göttingen, 1985–1996)Google Scholar. Comprehensive treatment of the council in Das Frankfurter Konzil von 794.

87 de Jong, M., ‘What was public about public penance? Paenitentia publica and justice in the Carolingian world’, in La Giustizia nell'alto Medioeveo (secoli IX–XI), Settimane di Studio del Centro Italiano di Studi sull'alto Medioevo, 45 (Spoleto, 1997), 880–1Google Scholar.

88 Synod of Frankfurt, c. 3, 74; translation in King, , Charlemagne; Translated Sources, 224Google Scholar; my emphasis.

89 Synod of Frankfurt, c.3, 74; Wolfram, , Grenzen und Räume, 92–3Google Scholar; Schieffer, , ‘Ein politischer Prozess des 8. Jahrhunderts’, 167–9Google Scholar.

90 Saxons, : ‘Indiculus Obsidum Saxonum Moguntium Deducendorum’, ed. Boretius, A., MGH, Capitularia, I, 233–4Google Scholar; Lombards and Beneventans: as above at n. 58; Avar treasure: Einhard, , Vita Karoli, c. 13, 38–40Google Scholar; pope and envoys from Jerusalem, : Annales Regni Francorum, a. 799, 106–8Google Scholar.

91 Annales Regni Francorum, a. 788, 80; on the political creativity necessitated by acquisition of empire, see Mayr-Harting, H., ‘Charlemagne, the Saxons and the Imperial Coronation of 800’, English Historical Review, III (1996), 1113–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Orth, , ‘Frankfurt’, 178–82Google Scholar; cf. Bullough, D., ‘Aula Renovata: the Carolingian Court before the Aachen Palace’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 71 (1985), 267–301, esp. at 295–301Google Scholar.

93 Einhard, , Vita Karoli, c. 11, 34–6Google Scholar; later in the ninth century Tassilo's dangerous Carolingian connections were neutralised in a haze of benevolent nostalgia: see Vita S. Hugonis, c. 1, c. 2, ed. van der Straeten, J., ‘Vie Inédite de S. Hugues Evêque de Rouen’, Analecta Bollandiana, 87 (1969), 235–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Bischoff, , Salzburger Formelbücher und Briefe, 111.23, p. 57Google Scholar, and cf. p. 25. My own text has been assembled in more positive circumstances; versions of this paper were presented to research seminars in the University of Glasgow and All Souls College, Oxford, and I am grateful to the participants on these occasions for comment and advice as I am to the audience who attended the final version at the University of East Anglia. For advice on particular points I am grateful to Simon Dixon, Mary Garrison and Sarah Hamilton.