Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:17:34.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perinatal Outcomes in Preterm Growth-Restricted Twins: Effects of Gestational Age and Fetal Condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2013

Sebastián Manzanares*
Affiliation:
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
Mar Sanchez-Gila
Affiliation:
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
María D. Moreno-Martinez
Affiliation:
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
Alejandro Ramirez-Arredondo
Affiliation:
Neonatology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
Alicia Pineda
Affiliation:
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
*
address for correspondence: Sebastián Manzanares, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Fuerzas Armadas Av. 18014, Granada, Spain. E-mail: sebastian.manzanares.galan@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the perinatal outcome of intrauterine growth-restricted preterm twins and contribution of prematurity to morbidity and mortality. Study design: A case–control study of 211 preterm twins: 108 growth-restricted twins matched with 103 normal growth twins of the same gestational age. Mortality and morbidity rates were compared between groups. Result: Fetal and overall perinatal mortality rates of growth-restricted fetuses were higher than normal growth ones. Respiratory distress syndrome incidence was lower and neurologic sequelae incidence higher in growth-restricted twins. No differences were observed between groups with respect to neonatal mortality, low Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, periventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, jaundice, and hematologic or metabolic disorders. Conclusion: Adverse perinatal outcomes of preterm twins complicated with intrauterine growth restriction are represented by a higher antepartum mortality rate, but once born alive, neonatal outcomes seem to be associated only with gestational age at birth, excluding a protective effect on lung maturation and a higher risk of long-term neurologic sequelae.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Twin pregnancies are increasing in incidence in developed countries, partly due to the increased use of artificial reproductive technologies and, to a lesser extent, due to the increase in mean maternal age (Blondel et al., Reference Blondel, Kogan, Alexander, Dattani, Kramer, Macfarlane and Wen2002). Twin pregnancies have higher perinatal mortality and morbidity rates than singletons (Amaru et al., Reference Amaru, Bush, Berkowitz, Lapinski and Gaddipati2004; Hawrylyshyn et al., Reference Hawrylyshyn, Barkin, Bernstein and Papsin1982; Spellacy et al., Reference Spellacy, Handler and Ferre1990) and this is largely associated with the increased rates of preterm birth and delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) babies (Ghai & Vidyasagar, Reference Ghai and Vidyasagar1988; Kiely, Reference Kiely1990). Reports on the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes attributable to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in twins have been conflicting, and there is no consensus about the contribution of prematurity to morbidity and mortality (Baker et al., Reference Baker, Beach, Craigo, Harvey-Wilkes and D'Alton1997; Buekens & Wilcox, Reference Buekens and Wilcox1993; Kilpatrick et al., Reference Kilpatrick, Jackson and Croughan-Minihane1996; Yinon et al., Reference Yinon, Mazkereth, Rosentzweig, Jarus-Hakak, Schiff and Simchen2005).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of an IUGR pre-term twins group compared with a matched group of normal growth twins of the same gestational age in order to assess whether prematurity or fetal condition is the main risk factor associated with higher morbidity and mortality.

Subjects and Methods

Perinatal outcomes in a group of 108 IUGR preterm twins (from 24th to 36th week of gestation) were evaluated and compared with a group of 103 normal growth twins, matched for gestational age at delivery, included as the next normal growth twin born. All deliveries were attended at the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain, between January 2003 and June 2011. The local ethics committee approved the study design.

We defined IUGR as birth weight below the 10th centile for gestational age, according to specific growth charts for twins (Voigt et al., Reference Voigt, Schneider and Jährig1996). Pregnancies with major fetal anomalies, aneuploidies, or findings consistent with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome were excluded.

Maternal characteristics (age and parity), pregnancy data (chorionicity, antenatal steroid therapy, and gestational age at delivery), and delivery data (route of delivery, birth order, and birth weight) were compared between the two groups in order to consider possible confounding variables. Gestational age was assessed during the first trimester of pregnancy by considering the date of the last menstrual period, the date of ovum pick-up in in vitro fertilization cases and first trimester ultrasound biometry. Chorionicity was also assessed by first trimester ultrasound and confirmed with post-delivery placental examination.

The primary outcome for the study was perinatal mortality rate (PMR), defined as stillbirths or neonatal deaths occurring within 4 weeks of delivery. Secondary perinatal outcomes evaluated included rates of low Apgar score (below 5 at 1 minute or below 7 at 5 minutes), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), clinical sepsis, jaundice (serum bilirubin > 15 mg/dl), hematologic disorder (anemia as serum hemoglobin < 10 g/dl, thrombocytopenia as platelet count < 150,000/μl, or polycythemia as hematocrit > 60%), metabolic disorder (hypoglycemia as serum glucose < 40 mg/dl, hypocalcaemia as serum ionic calcium < 1 mmol/L), and neurologic sequelae (as any kind of psychomotor impairment or sensorial deficit). Furthermore, the rate of survival with any neonatal complication or sequelae was studied.

Sample size was determined assuming a 30% incidence of at least one perinatal death or neonatal morbidity in IUGR preterm twins and 10% in normal preterm twins, and a 10% incidence of lost cases. As such, a global sample of at least 180 fetuses provides 90% power for a two-sided test and a type 1 error of 0.05.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 19. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t test and dichotomous variables using the χ2 Pearson test with continuity correction and Fisher's exact test in cases in which expected frequencies less than 5 were more than 20%. Odds ratios (OR), as estimate of the relative risk of an event, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported for each mortality rate. A 95% CI from which 1.0 is excluded indicated an OR statistically significant. A p value of <.05 was considered significant in all tests.

Results

Summary maternal, pregnancy, and delivery descriptive data are displayed in Table 1. Groups were similar with regard to maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, chorionicity, antenatal steroid administration, birth order, fetal gender, or cesarean section rates. As expected, the groups were different with respect to mean birth-weight, with the IUGR group being lighter.

TABLE 1 Maternal and Delivery Data

aMean +SD; bproportion ns (not significant). IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction.

Perinatal mortality data are displayed in Table 2. A higher fetal mortality (102 per 1,000 vs. no cases) was observed in IUGR preterm twins versus normal growth ones of similar gestational age (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.78–2.36). Overall perinatal mortality rate was also higher (162 per 1,000 vs. 29 per 1,000, OR 5.79, 95% CI 1.63–2.05). However, no significant differences were observed in neonatal mortality.

TABLE 2 Perinatal Mortality

ns = not significant. IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction.

The data on neonatal morbidity in born-alive fetuses are displayed in Table 3. IUGR fetuses showed a lower incidence of RDS and a higher incidence of neurologic sequelae (Table 4). All the other conditions studied demonstrated no significant difference between IUGR preterm twins versus normal growth ones, neither any condition alone nor for survival rate without any morbidity in the neonatal period, nor low Apgar score or NICU admission rates.

TABLE 3 Neonatal Morbidity

ns = not significant.

IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction; IVH = intraventricular hemorrhage; NICU = neonatal intensive care unit; RDS = respiratory distress syndrome.

TABLE 4 Neurologic Sequelae

IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction.

Discussion

Perinatal outcomes in twins attributable to IUGR are not clear. IUGR, a term describing infants who have failed to reach their intrauterine growth potential secondary to a pathological cause (Muhlhausler et al., Reference Muhlhausler, Hancock, Bloomfield and Harding2011), is a well-established risk factor for fetal demise (Bryan, Reference Bryan1986; Grobman & Peaceman, Reference Grobman and Peaceman1998). However, some studies have reported reduced PMRs in low-birth-weight twins (Bleker et al., Reference Bleker, Breur and Huidekoper1979; McCarthy et al., Reference McCarthy, Sachs, Layde, Burton, Terry and Rochat1981; Williams et al., Reference Williams, Creasy, Cunningham, Hawes, Norris and Tashiro1982), and others find a similar outcome when adjusting for gestational age (Baker et al., Reference Baker, Beach, Craigo, Harvey-Wilkes and D'Alton1997; Buekens & Wilcox, Reference Buekens and Wilcox1993; Haimovich et al., Reference Haimovich, Ascher-Landsberg, Azem, Mandel, Mimouni and Many2011; Kilpatrick et al., Reference Kilpatrick, Jackson and Croughan-Minihane1996). Nevertheless, most studies that examined the effect of IUGR on morbidity and mortality in preterm infants were carried out among newborn populations from singleton pregnancies (McIntire et al., Reference McIntire, Bloom, Casey and Leveno1999; Tyson et al., Reference Tyson, Kennedy, Broyles and Rosenfeld1995), and very few have addressed the issue of twinning. Of these, most of them have focused on the fact of discordant twins (Amaru et al., Reference Amaru, Bush, Berkowitz, Lapinski and Gaddipati2004; Blickstein & Keith, Reference Blickstein and Keith2004; Demissie et al., Reference Demissie, Anath, Martin, Hanley, Macdorman and Rhoads2002; Fraser et al., Reference Fraser, Picard, Picard and Leiberman1994; Yinon et al., Reference Yinon, Mazkereth, Rosentzweig, Jarus-Hakak, Schiff and Simchen2005).

Moreover, twins are born lighter than singletons, with the normal distribution of birth weight for these infants shifted to the left of the normal singleton distribution (Alexander et al., Reference Alexander, Kogan, Martin and Papiernik1998). So, despite the use of singleton nomograms among various investigators, we believe, as others do (Yinon et al., Reference Yinon, Mazkereth, Rosentzweig, Jarus-Hakak, Schiff and Simchen2005), that to evaluate the intrauterine growth of twins it is more appropriate to use twin-specific growth curves, because these specific curves tend to show decreased growth velocity compared with singletons starting at 30–32 weeks, and its use avoids including small but appropriately grown twins.

In this study, using these specific charts, after matching for gestational age and excluding confounding variables, we found that perinatal mortality in IUGR twins was higher than in normal growth twins. Nevertheless, in our data as in other studies (Fraser et al., Reference Fraser, Picard, Picard and Leiberman1994), the increase in perinatal mortality is restricted to the risk of dying in utero, probably due to chronic deprivation of nutrients and oxygen related to a fetal pathologic condition. Neonatal mortality did not show significant differences between groups. This finding is consistent with the concept that the neonatal mortality in growth-restricted twins is mainly related to preterm delivery, rather than to an inherent problem with the IUGR twin fetus or neonate, as is similar in growth-restricted or not preterm fetuses.

As in this study, several papers report lower RDS rates among SGA infants (Cifuentes et al., Reference Cifuentes, Bronstein, Phibbs, Phibbs, Schmitt and Carlo2002; Gluck & Kulovich, Reference Gluck and Kulovich1973; Horbar et al., Reference Horbar, Badger, Carpenter, Fanaroff, Kilpatrick, LaCorte and Soll2002; Procianoy et al., Reference Procianoy, Garcia-Prats, Adams, Silvers and Rudolph1980). One possible explanation that has been proposed for these phenomena is that the fetus reacts to distress, increasing the glucocorticoid production, which could enhance lung maturation (Cock et al., Reference Cock, Albuquerque, Joyce, Hooper and Harding2001; Laatikainen et al., Reference Laatikainen, Raisanen and Salminen1988; Perelman et al., Reference Perelman, Farrell, Engle and Kemnitz1985). In our data, the RDS rate of the IUGR group was significantly lower than normal growth twins, despite maternal steroid therapy being similar in both groups. Thus, we can conclude from these findings that IUGR confers a protective effect on lung maturation.

The rate of hyperbilirubinemia and jaundice was similar in the IUGR twins and the normal growth group. It has been hypothesized that delayed liver maturation caused by IUGR might contribute to an increased risk of this condition (Flecknell et al., Reference Flecknell, Wootton, John and Royston1981), and a recent study found an increased rate of hyperbilirubinemia in IUGR twins (Haimovich et al., Reference Haimovich, Ascher-Landsberg, Azem, Mandel, Mimouni and Many2011), but these results have not been confirmed in this study.

Reduced oxygen and nutrients supply leads to hypoglycemia, hypocalcaemia, thrombocytopenia, and polycythemia, among others, and has been recognized as a condition associated with IUGR (Haram et al., Reference Haram, Svendsen and Myking2007; Kramer et al., Reference Kramer, Olivier, McLean, Willis and Usher1990). Meanwhile, pre-mature babies are at an increased risk of anemia and hypoglycemia (Haimovich et al., Reference Haimovich, Ascher-Landsberg, Azem, Mandel, Mimouni and Many2011). No difference between the groups in the incidence of any metabolic or hematological disorders analyzed was identified. So we conclude that they are only related to prematurity and are not associated with IUGR in twins.

Twins are known to have a higher incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders compared with singletons (Kragt et al., Reference Kragt, Huisjes and Touwen1985), and premature birth, growth retardation, and birth asphyxia are important antecedents of these problems (Ghai & Vidyasagar, Reference Ghai and Vidyasagar1988). Numerous experimental studies in animals have shown that early undernutrition influences future cognition (Morgane et al., Reference Morgane, Austin-LaFrance, Bronzino, Tonkiss, Díaz-Cintra, Cintra, Kemper and Galler1993), and several investigations (Hawdon et al., Reference Hawdon, Hey, Kolvin and Fundudis1990; Hutton et al., Reference Hutton, Pharoah, Cooke and Stevenson1997; Robertson et al., Reference Robertson, Etches and Kyle1990) raise the hypothesis that infants who suffer growth restriction during the prenatal period, and hence are likely to be deprived of an optimal supply of nutritional substrates, are at risk of impaired neural and cognitive development. In our findings, the incidence of neurologic sequelae in the IUGR group was fourfold that of normal growth twins (p < .05). IVH increases with prematurity and, when significant (grade 3 or 4), can result in major neurologic impairments (Vohr et al., Reference Vohr, Coll, Flanagan and Oh1992); however, in this study, groups were not different in the incidence of this condition.

We also analyzed the presence of any significant diagnosis/morbidity in our study population. We found that 55.1% of IUGR twins had any morbidity, compared with 45.6% in normal growth fetuses. There were no significant differences between two groups. These figures are consistent with other investigators (Fraser et al., Reference Fraser, Picard, Picard and Leiberman1994; Ghai & Vidyasagar, Reference Ghai and Vidyasagar1988; Ho & Wu, Reference Ho and Wu1975) and point out that IUGR itself did not seem to be associated with overall neonatal morbidity.

Our study is limited by the size of the groups. Despite a size calculation being carried out, certain outcomes were relatively rare, and the study was underpowered enough to analyze meaningful differences between groups for these outcomes. However, we were able to evaluate the clinically important neonatal morbidity or perinatal death. On the contrary, data may be generalizable only to a similar clinical institution, that is, a tertiary care center that cares for high-risk and preterm fetuses and neonates.

In summary, this study provides data for better understanding of the effect of IUGR on morbidity and mortality rates in preterm twins. Understanding the effect of growth restriction on neonatal performance is of considerable value in terms of obstetric and neonatal decision-making processes, as well as for parental consultation. The importance of our results is that they attempt to establish the impact of growth restriction on perinatal outcome in preterm twins. We have shown that adverse perinatal outcomes of preterm twins complicated with IUGR are represented by a higher stillbirth rate, and this stresses the importance of antenatal recognition. However, once born alive, neonatal outcomes seem to be associated only with gestational age at birth, except for a protective effect on lung maturation and a higher incidence of long-term neurologic sequelae.

References

Alexander, G. R., Kogan, M., Martin, J., & Papiernik, E. (1998). What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 41, 114125.Google Scholar
Amaru, R. C., Bush, M. C., Berkowitz, R. L., Lapinski, R. H., & Gaddipati, S. (2004). Is discordant growth in twins an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 103, 7176.Google Scholar
Baker, E. R., Beach, M. L., Craigo, S. D., Harvey-Wilkes, K. B., & D'Alton, M. E. (1997). A comparison of neonatal outcomes of age-matched, growth-restricted twins and growth-restricted singletons. American Journal of Perinatology, 14, 499502.Google Scholar
Bleker, O. P., Breur, W., & Huidekoper, B. L. (1979). A study of birth weight, placental weight and mortality of twins as compared to singletons. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 86, 111118.Google Scholar
Blickstein, I., & Keith, L. G. (2004). Neonatal mortality rates among growth-discordant twins, classified according to the birth weight of the smaller twin. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 190, 170174.Google Scholar
Blondel, B., Kogan, M. D., Alexander, G. R., Dattani, N., Kramer, M. S., Macfarlane, A., & Wen, S. W. (2002). The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight: An international study. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 13231330.Google Scholar
Bryan, E. M. (1986). The intrauterine hazards of twins. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 61, 10441045.Google Scholar
Buekens, P., & Wilcox, A. (1993). Why do small twins have a lower mortality rate than small singletons? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 168, 937941.Google Scholar
Cifuentes, J., Bronstein, J., Phibbs, C. S., Phibbs, R. H., Schmitt, S. K., & Carlo, W. A. (2002). Mortality in low birth weight infants according to level of neonatal care at hospital of birth. Pediatrics, 109, 745751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cock, M. L., Albuquerque, C. A., Joyce, B. J., Hooper, S. B., & Harding, R. (2001). Effects of intrauterine growth restriction on lung liquid dynamics and lung development in fetal sheep. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 184, 209216.Google Scholar
Demissie, K., Anath, C. V., Martin, J., Hanley, M. L., Macdorman, M. F., & Rhoads, G. (2002). Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in the United States: The role of intrapair birth weight discordance. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 100, 474480.Google Scholar
Flecknell, P. A., Wootton, R., John, M., & Royston, J. P. (1981). Pathological features of intra-uterine growth retardation in the piglet: Differential effects on organ weights. Diagnostic Histopathology, 4, 295298.Google Scholar
Fraser, D., Picard, R., Picard, E., & Leiberman, J. R. (1994). Birth weight discordance, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal outcomes in twins. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 39, 504508.Google Scholar
Ghai, V., & Vidyasagar, D. (1988). Morbidity and mortality factors in twins. An epidemiologic approach. Clinics in Perinatology, 15, 123140.Google Scholar
Gluck, L., & Kulovich, M. V. (1973). Lecithin/sphingomyelin ratios in amniotic fluid in normal and abnormal pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 115, 539546.Google Scholar
Grobman, W. A., & Peaceman, A. M. (1998). What are the rates and mechanisms of first and second trimester pregnancy loss in twins? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 41, 3645.Google Scholar
Haimovich, Y., Ascher-Landsberg, J., Azem, F., Mandel, D., Mimouni, F. B., & Many, A. (2011). Neonatal outcome of preterm discordant twins. Journal of Perinatology Medicine, 39, 317322.Google Scholar
Haram, K., Svendsen, E., & Myking, O. (2007). Growth restriction: Etiology, maternal and neonatal outcome. A review. Current Women's Health Review, 3, 145160.Google Scholar
Hawdon, J. M., Hey, E., Kolvin, I., & Fundudis, T. (1990). Born too small: Is outcome still affected? Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 32, 943953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawrylyshyn, P. A., Barkin, M., Bernstein, A., & Papsin, F. R. (1982). Twin pregnancies: A continuing perinatal challenge. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 59, 463466.Google Scholar
Ho, S. K., & Wu, P. Y. (1975). Perinatal factors and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 122, 979987.Google Scholar
Horbar, J. D., Badger, G. J., Carpenter, J. H., Fanaroff, A. A., Kilpatrick, S., LaCorte, M., . . . Soll, R. F. (2002). Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991–1999. Pediatrics, 110, 143151.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. L., Pharoah, P. O. D., Cooke, R. W. I., & Stevenson, R. C. (1997). Differential effects of preterm birth and small gestational age on cognitive and motor development. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition, 76, F75F81.Google Scholar
Kiely, J. L. (1990). The epidemiology of perinatal mortality in multiple births. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 66, 618637.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, S. J., Jackson, R., & Croughan-Minihane, M. S. (1996). Perinatal mortality in twins and singletons matched for gestational age at delivery at > or = 30 weeks. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 174, 6671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kragt, H., Huisjes, H. J., & Touwen, B. C. (1985). Neurological morbidity in newborn twins. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 19, 7579.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S., Olivier, M., McLean, F. H., Willis, D. M., & Usher, R. H. (1990). Impact of intrauterine growth retardation and body proportionality on fetal and neonatal outcome. Pediatrics, 86, 707713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laatikainen, T. J., Raisanen, I. J., & Salminen, K. R. (1988). Corticotrophin releasing hormone in amniotic fluid during gestation and labor and in relation to fetal lung maturation. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 59, 891895.Google Scholar
McCarthy, B. J., Sachs, B. P., Layde, P. M., Burton, A., Terry, J. S., & Rochat, R. (1981). The epidemiology of neonatal death in twins. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 141, 252256.Google Scholar
McIntire, D. D., Bloom, S. L., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (1999). Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. The New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 12341238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgane, P. J., Austin-LaFrance, R., Bronzino, J., Tonkiss, J., Díaz-Cintra, S., Cintra, L., Kemper, T., & Galler, J. R. (1993). Prenatal malnutrition and development of the brain. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 17, 91128.Google Scholar
Muhlhausler, B. S., Hancock, S. N., Bloomfield, F. H., & Harding, R. (2011). Are twins growth restricted? Pediatrics Research, 70, 117122.Google Scholar
Perelman, R. H., Farrell, P M., Engle, M. J., & Kemnitz, J. W. (1985). Development aspects of lung lipids. Annual Review of Physiology, 47, 803822.Google Scholar
Procianoy, R. S., Garcia-Prats, J. A., Adams, J. M., Silvers, A., & Rudolph, A. J. (1980). Hyaline membrane disease and intraventricular haemorrhage in small for gestational age infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 55, 502505.Google Scholar
Robertson, C. M. T., Etches, P. C., & Kyle, J. M. (1990). Eight-year school performance and growth of preterm, small for gestational age infants: A comparative study with subjects matched for birthweight or for gestational age. Journal of Pediatrics, 116, 1926.Google Scholar
Spellacy, W. N., Handler, A., & Ferre, C. D. (1990). A case–control study of 1253 twin pregnancies from a 1982–1987 perinatal data base. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 75, 168171.Google Scholar
Tyson, J. E., Kennedy, K., Broyles, S., & Rosenfeld, C. R. (1995). The small for gestational age infant: Accelerated or delayed pulmonary maturation? Increased or decreased survival? Pediatrics, 95, 534538.Google Scholar
Vohr, B., Coll, C. G., Flanagan, P., & Oh, W. (1992). Effects of intraventricular hemorrhage and socioeconomic status on perceptual, cognitive, and neurologic status of low birth weight infants at 5 years of age. Journal of Pediatrics, 121, 280285.Google Scholar
Voigt, M., Schneider, K. T., & Jährig, K. (1996). Analysis of a 1992 birth sample in Germany. 1: New percentile values of the body weight of newborn infants. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 56, 550558.Google Scholar
Williams, R. L., Creasy, R. K., Cunningham, G. C., Hawes, W. E., Norris, F. D., & Tashiro, M. (1982). Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 59, 624632.Google Scholar
Yinon, Y., Mazkereth, R., Rosentzweig, N., Jarus-Hakak, A., Schiff, E., & Simchen, M. (2005). Growth restriction as a determinant of outcome in preterm discordant twins. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105, 8084.Google Scholar
Figure 0

TABLE 1 Maternal and Delivery Data

Figure 1

TABLE 2 Perinatal Mortality

Figure 2

TABLE 3 Neonatal Morbidity

Figure 3

TABLE 4 Neurologic Sequelae