Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:09:46.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some implications of chaos theory for the genetic analysis of human development and variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Lindon J Eaves
Affiliation:
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavior Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Katherine M Kirk*
Affiliation:
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. kathE@qimr.edu.au
Nicholas G Martin
Affiliation:
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Robert J Russell
Affiliation:
Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, Berkeley, California, USA.
*
*Correspondence: Dr KM Kirk, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Post Office, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane QLD 4029, Australia. Tel: + 61 7 3362 0272; Fax: + 61 7 3362 0101;

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Non-linear epigenetic processes are a potential underlying source of phenotypic differences in development. Simulation studies of twin pairs using simple non-linear development models characterised by chaotic or near-chaotic behavior are presented. The effect of chaotic processes on correlations is to lower them from their initial values, but high initial correlations are affected much less by chaotic and near-chaotic processes than intermediate correlations. Therefore, we would predict that traits affected by chaotic processes would have high MZ and low DZ twin correlations and this is reminiscent of certain traits such as EEG spectra. However the much more frequent observation of MZ correlations close to twice their DZ counterparts would suggest that the role of chaos in development is quite limited.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999