Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:16:53.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trends in Dizygotic and Monozygotic Spontaneous Twin Births During the Period 2007–2017 in Lombardy, Northern Italy: A Population-Based Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2022

Giovanna Esposito*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Michela Dalmartello
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Matteo Franchi
Affiliation:
Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
Paola Agnese Mauri
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Sonia Cipriani
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Giovanni Corrao
Affiliation:
Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy
Fabio Parazzini
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Giovanna Esposito, Email: giovanna.esposito@unimi.it

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the estimated frequency of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) spontaneous twins in Lombardy during the period 2007−2017. This is a population-based study using the regional healthcare utilization databases of the Lombardy Region. The total number of spontaneous twin deliveries, in separate strata of like and unlike sex, was obtained. Moreover, estimates of DZ and MZ twin births were calculated using Weinberg’s method. The standardized rates (SRs), adjusted for maternal age, of DZ and MZ twin births were computed according to calendar period. The twinning rates were calculated among strata of parity and maternal age. Finally, DZ:MZ ratio was calculated. Among the 734,278 spontaneous deliveries, 9176 (12.5 out of 1000 births) couples of twins were identified. In the three periods considered (i.e. 2007−2010, 2011−2014 and 2015−2017), no trend in the SRs of MZ twins was observed, respectively 0.41 (95% CI [0.40, 0.43]), 0.43 (95% CI [0.42, 0.45]) and 0.43 (95% CI[0.42, 0.45]). Differently, a slightly decreasing trend was observed in DZ twins SRs, respectively 0.87 (95% CI [0.84, 0.89]), 0.81 (95% CI [0.79, 0.83]), and 0.78 (95% CI [0.76, 0.80]). As concerns parity and maternal age, the rate of DZ twin births was consistently higher in nulliparae women aged 35 years or more. In our cohort, despite the increase of maternal age, a decline of spontaneous twin births emerged, especially due to the downward trend of DZ twins.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Society for Twin Studies

The natural twinning rate among young mothers and the ratio of dizygotic (DZ) to monozygotic (MZ) twins have been suggested to be reliable monitors of a population’s fertility and its reproductive health (James, Reference James1998; Tong, Reference Tong2000; Tong et al., Reference Tong, Caddy and Short1997; Tong & Short, Reference Tong and Short1998). Mothers of DZ twins have been alleged to be more fertile in comparison to women who achieve singleton pregnancies, in particular, due to the established association between a long waiting time to pregnancy and a reduced probability of DZ twins (Basso et al., Reference Basso, Christensen and Olsen2004; Ferrari et al., Reference Ferrari, Cooney, Vexler, Liu and Buck Louis2007; Hoekstra, Willemsen et al., Reference Hoekstra, Willemsen, van Beijsterveldt, Montgomery and Boomsma2008; Zhu et al., Reference Zhu, Basso, Obel, Christensen and Olsen2007). Regarding male fertility, there is evidence that a better semen quality is related to a higher spontaneous DZ twinning rate (Asklund et al., Reference Asklund, Jensen, Jorgensen, Tabor, Sperling and Skakkebaek2007). Thus, the analysis of trends of twin pregnancies acquires a relevant interest in order to investigate population fertility. In addition, multiple gestations represent a health issue due to their increased risk of preterm birth, restricted intrauterine growth, birth defects, cerebral palsy, and perinatal mortality and morbidity in comparison to the singleton ones.

A good assessment of the trends in multiple births has been proposed up to the years 1990−2000 for selected countries, although no updated evidence is available for the last years. In high-income countries, the frequency of twin pregnancies began to decline at the beginning of the 1900s and continued until the late 1970s. In Italy, as well as in most Western countries, the cultural conditions and the new role of women in the society modified reproductive strategies (Astolfi et al., Reference Astolfi, Ulizzi and Zonta2003). During the last 40 years, the twinning rate has displayed a reversal of tendency (Dawson et al., Reference Dawson, Tinker, Jamieson, Hobbs, Rasmussen and Reefhuis2015; Eriksson & Fellman, Reference Eriksson and Fellman2007). This upward trend was mainly due to the spreading use of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) (Dawson et al., Reference Dawson, Tinker, Jamieson, Hobbs, Rasmussen and Reefhuis2015; Fuster et al., Reference Fuster, Zuluaga, Colantonio and de Blas2008). In Italy during the last century, despite the overall increasing trend, a constant decline of spontaneous twins, mainly of DZ ones, was observed until the late 1980s (Parazzini et al., Reference Parazzini, Mezzanotte, Tozzi, Bocciolone and Acerboni1989; Parazzini et al., Reference Parazzini, Restelli, Moroni and Crosignani1994; Parazzini et al., Reference Parazzini, Tozzi, Mezzanotte, Bocciolone, La Vecchia, Fedele and Benzi1991). Similar trends for spontaneous twin births were documented from other countries (James, Reference James1986). The rate of spontaneous twinning became stable during the last decades of the 20th century (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Hey, Whiteman, O’Donnell, Willis and Barlow2000). For example, an analysis on twinning rates in Denmark showed that the decline in natural twinning has ended and suggested an increase in natural twinning rates in the early years of this century (Eriksson & Fellman, Reference Eriksson and Fellman2007). Moreover, a Belgian study (Derom et al., Reference Derom, Gielen, Peeters, Frijns and Zeegers2011), conducted during the period 1969−2009, after allowing for ART and age, observed a stable natural DZ twinning rate.

Spontaneous MZ twin rates were generally unchanged over time (Parazzini et al., Reference Parazzini, Tozzi, Mezzanotte, Bocciolone, La Vecchia, Fedele and Benzi1991), but few data are available from different countries and, in particular, with reference to the last decades (Eriksson & Fellman, Reference Eriksson and Fellman2007; Otta et al., Reference Otta, Fernandes, Acquaviva, Lucci, Kiehl, Varella, Segal and Valentova2016).

In this article, we analyzed the estimated frequency of spontaneously conceived MZ and DZ twins in the Lombardy Region, Northern Italy, during the period 2007−2017.

Materials and Methods

Cohort Selection

We retrieved data from the regional healthcare utilization databases of the Lombardy Region, including an archive of residents who received National Health Service (NHS) assistance, which reported demographic and administrative data, the standard form used to register all discharges from public or private hospitals (scheda di dimissione ospedaliera [SDO]), and the specific form filled out by midwifes at delivery (Certificato di assistenza al parto [CedAP]) reporting information about maternal characteristics, pregnancy and delivery. A deterministic record linkage between databases through a unique identification code included in all databases allowed the identification of large and unselected birth cohorts. A more exhaustive explanation of methodology and databases is reported elsewhere (Parazzini et al., Reference Parazzini, Cipriani, Bulfoni, Bulfoni, Frigerio, Somigliana and Mosca2015).

We included all the deliveries that occurred in Lombardy between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. Out of these, we excluded (1) deliveries that did not match to a SDO related to childbirth, (2) deliveries of women not beneficiaries of NHS and not resident in Lombardy, (3) deliveries of women aged less than 13 or more than 55, (4) deliveries that did not reach 22 to 42 weeks of gestation, (5) deliveries in which the infant could not be linked to the mother because of a missing identification code, (6) deliveries with missing values on at least one of this information: mode of conception (i.e. spontaneous and assisted) or vitality status, (7) deliveries after ART, (8) triplets or quadruplets, and (9) deliveries with missing values on the information concerning the sex of at least one newborn.

Statistical Analysis

The total number of spontaneous twin deliveries, in separate strata of like and unlike sex, was obtained. In addition, the estimated number of DZ and MZ twin births was calculated using Weinberg’s method (Weinberg, Reference Weinberg1901). According to this rule, the total number of DZ twin pregnancies is twice the number of twin pregnancies with unlike-sex twin sets. The number of MZ twin sets is the difference between the number of like and unlike-sex twin sets. The method is based on the following assumptions: (1) the sex ratio in DZ twins is 0.5 and (2) the sexes of DZ twins are determined independently and with the same probability in all parents; thus, there should, on average, be equal numbers of like-sexed and unlike-sexed DZ twins.

At all stages of the analysis, the unit of the study was the delivery.

The total twin delivery rates, separately for MZ and DZ, were calculated by dividing the estimated number of twins by the total number of deliveries according to maternal age and calendar period. Four maternal age groups were considered (i.e. <30, 30−34, 35−39, ≥40), and the study period was divided into three intervals (i.e. 2007−2010, 2011−2014 and 2015−2017). In order to take into account the potential confounding effect of age of mothers, standardized rates (SRs) were calculated through a direct method of standardization. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each rate were calculated.

MZ and DZ rates were estimated also according to parity (two categories: nulliparae and multiparae) and maternal age (two categories: <35 and ≥35). Nulliparity was defined as having no previous delivery. Finally, the DZ:MZ ratio was calculated.

Ethical Approval

Analysis of an administrative, anonymous database does not require ethical approval in Italy. All data retrieved from the mentioned databases were anonymous.

Results

A total of 913,726 deliveries that occurred in Lombardy from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017, were identified from the CedAP database. We subsequently excluded (1) 7685 records because they did not match a SDO related to childbirth, (2) 143,788 records of women not resident in Lombardy, (3) 839 records because the mother was younger than 13 years or older than 55 years, (4) 2891 records because the gestational age was too short (<22 weeks) or too long (>42 weeks), (5) 458 records because the infant could not be linked to the mother because of a missing identification code, (6) 3353 records because of missing values on mode of conception (i.e. spontaneous and assisted) or vitality status, (7) 20,208 records referred to deliveries after ART (8) 124 triplets or quadruplets, and (9) 102 records because of a lack of information concerning the sex of at least one newborn. Thus, we obtained a final study cohort including 734,278 deliveries.

Overall, during the study period, 9176 (12.5 out of 1000 births) spontaneous twin deliveries were recorded.

The distribution of maternal characteristics of singleton and twin births is provided in Supplementary material (Table S1). Twin deliveries were more frequent among nulliparae (p < .0001) and women aged more than 35 years (p < .0001). Mean age at delivery was respectively 33.2 ± 4.9 among women who conceived twins and 32.6 ± 5.1 among those who had singleton pregnancies (p value <.0001), and the proportion of women aged more than 35 years increased from 33.8% in 2007 to 37.3% in 2017 (p < .0001).

Figure 1 shows the trend of twinning rates according to calendar year. A fluctuant trend with a tendency of decreasing of a borderline statistical significance emerged (p value for trend = 0.06).

Fig. 1. Trend of twinning rates according to calendar year.

In the three periods considered (i.e. 2007−2010, 2011−2014, 2015−2017), the SRs adjusted for age of MZ twins were respectively 0.41 (95% CI [0.40, 0.43]), 0.43 (95% CI [0.42, 0.45]) and 0.43 (95% CI [0.42, 0.45]). No significant differences were observed. Otherwise, a slightly decreasing trend was observed in DZ twins’ SRs, being in the three periods respectively 0.87 (95% CI [0.84, 0.89]), 0.81 (95% CI [0.79, 0.83]) and 0.78 (95% CI [0.76, 0.80]); see Table 1.

Table 1. Twinning rates according to zygosity, maternal age and calendar period

Note:

a Estimated number according to Weinberg’s method.

b SR, standardized rate.

The trends were similar when we calculated the rates according to maternal age and parity (Figure 2). Table 2 provides twinning rates according to zygosity, parity, and maternal age. While the DZ twinning rate was higher among nulliparae women aged 35 years or more (1.28 per 100 births, 95% CI [1.21, 1.35]), MZ twinning rate was higher among younger nulliparae women (0.51 per 100 births, 95% CI [0.48, 0.54]). When we took into account only parity regardless of maternal age, no material differences were found in both DZ and MZ twinning rates.

Fig. 2. Trend of dizygotic twinning rates according to maternal age and parity.

Table 2. Twinning rates according to zygosity, parity and maternal age

Note:

a Estimated number according to Weinberg’s method.

The DZ:MZ ratio according to calendar year (represented in Figure 3) rose from 1.7 in 2007 to 2.4 in 2008 and then described a fluctuant trend, declining to 1.5 in 2017.

Fig. 3. Dizygotic (DZ):monozygotic (MZ) ratio according to calendar year.

Discussion

This population-based analysis of temporal trends of twin deliveries among natural conceptions suggested that in the Lombardy Region of Northern Italy, the frequency of spontaneous twins was not steady over the period 2007−2017, describing a fluctuant decline. As the MZ twinning rate was stable in our cohort, this trend was substantially due to a decreasing trend of DZ twins.

Available data from different countries on the trends in natural twinning rates are scanty and partially inconsistent, especially with reference to the last decades.

As MZ twinning generally occurred at a constant rate of 4 per 1000 maternities around the world (Tong et al., Reference Tong, Caddy and Short1997), the fluctuation in twinning rate has been generally considered the result of the variation in DZ rates.

Twinning rates vary considerably across time and place. To our knowledge, the longest available historical descriptions regarding the changes in the twinning rates are from the Nordic countries (Eriksson, Reference Eriksson1962; Eriksson et al., Reference Eriksson, Eskola and Fellman1976; Eriksson & Fellman, Reference Eriksson and Fellman1973), starting from the middle of the 18th century in Sweden and from the middle of the 19th century in Finland and Denmark. The Danish twinning rate increased strongly at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, peaking around the 1920s at a rate of 16.6 per 1000 births; then, from the 1930s, a continuously falling trend was observed until the second half of the 1970s. Similar downward and upward trends were observed in most of the high-income countries, even if twinning rates varied across different areas; for example in the USA, the decline started much earlier, around 1900 (Jeanneret & Macmahon, Reference Jeanneret and Macmahon1962). In Italy, an extensive analysis (Parisi & Caperna, Reference Parisi and Caperna1981, Reference Parisi and Caperna1982) of vital statistics regarding the period 1868−1979 confirmed that a decline in twinning rate began from the 1920s, and it was reported that in the most industrialized regions, such as Lombardy and Piemonte, the decline started early and had been continuous since 1870. Among high-income countries, the proportion of twin births declined to a minimum in 1970s and 1980s and began to increase again by the second half of 1980s until the first years of the new millennium (data retrieved by published figure) (Hoekstra, Zhao et al., Reference Hoekstra, Zhao, Lambalk, Willemsen, Martin, Boomsma and Montgomery2008). In Western European countries, twinning rates rose from 9−11 per 1000 births in the 1970s to 15−18 per 1000 births in 2001 (MacFarlane & Blondel, Reference MacFarlane and Blondel2005). In the USA, the number of twin births has increased from 18.9 per 1000 births in 1980 to 33.2 per 1000 births in 2009 (Kogan et al., Reference Kogan, Alexander, Kotelchuck, MacDorman, Buekens, Martin and Papiernik2000; Martin et al., Reference Martin, Hamilton and Osterman2012; Martin et al., Reference Martin, Hamilton, Ventura, Osterman, Kirmeyer, Mathews and Wilson2011). Similar temporal increases in the rate of twinning have been documented in other industrialized countries, such as Australia, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Singapore, and Japan (Imaizumi, Reference Imaizumi1997).

The international variation in twinning rate was previously synthesized into three groups: low (twinning rate of 2−7 per 1000 births), intermediate (9−20 per 1000 births), and high prevalence (over 20 per 1000 births). The low prevalence group included East Asia, the intermediate prevalence group included the rest of Asia, North Africa, America, Oceania, and Europe, and the high prevalence group included countries from Africa (Little, Reference Little1988). Also within the same continent, twinning rates have been reported to be considerably different. In Europe at the beginning of century, the incidence of twinning rates decreased from north to south, being lower in Luxembourg and Portugal and higher in Nordic countries (Astolfi et al., Reference Astolfi, Ulizzi and Zonta2003; Hall, Reference Hall2003).

A wide range of aspects is involved in the variability of twinning rates over the time period. At first, the study of changes in twin maternities should be contextualized in their historical context. Genetic and environmental factors, including urbanization and industrialization, play a role of paramount importance in the fluctuation of twinning rate across countries, and several biological factors (e.g. gonadotrophin levels and sperm count) are related to intra-population variability. In the literature, no exhaustive interpretations of the role of all components and their interactions are available, especially regarding the more recent findings.

Researchers have explained the incremental rate of twinning in the 1980s occurred with the large diffusion of fertility treatments in these years (Fauser et al., Reference Fauser, Devroey and Macklon2005; Hoekstra, Zhao et al., Reference Hoekstra, Zhao, Lambalk, Willemsen, Martin, Boomsma and Montgomery2008; Martin et al., Reference Martin, Hamilton, Sutton, Ventura, Menacker and Munson2005). A study conducted in Italy in 1950−1996 found that the twinning rate in 1996 did not reach the rate of the 1950s before the decline, supporting that the spontaneous twinning had not yet recovered from the dip of the late 1970s and the rise in twin births was due to the spread of ART, at least for older mothers (Astolfi et al., Reference Astolfi, Ulizzi and Zonta2003). However, Lambalk et al. (Reference Lambalk, Schats, Bleker, Elfering-Stinkens and Orlebeke2004) showed that the increase in opposite-sex twins in the period 1995−2002 was mainly caused by natural conception and not by ART. Along this line, Faisel et al. (Reference Faisel, Majoko, Shebl and Lindsay2008) analyzed the twinning rates in Cardiff and Vale of the Glamorgan area of South Wales during the period 1965 to 2004 and reported a continuous and gradual increase of twinning rate from 10.0 per 1000 spontaneous pregnancies in 1980−1984 to 13.3 per 1000 in 2000−2004 (p value <.0001). Another study, conducted in Norway in the same period, reported a constant increasing frequency of twins among natural conception, the rate being around 10 per 1000 births in 1967 and 15 per 1000 in 2001 (Tandberg et al., Reference Tandberg, Bjorge, Bordahl and Skjaerven2007). No evidence regarding the natural twinning rate was found in later years as more recent studies have focused on the role of ART. One study conducted in North Europe (i.e. Norway, Denmark and Sweden) observed a decline in the twinning rate from the early 2000s (data estimated by published figures) and suggested that the improved treatment fertility techniques may avoid multiple pregnancies (Fellman, Reference Fellman2016). Instead, in South America from 2000 to 2014, the twinning rate increased from about 8.5 per 1000 pregnancies to 10.2 per 1000 in Brazil (Otta et al., Reference Otta, Fernandes, Acquaviva, Lucci, Kiehl, Varella, Segal and Valentova2016) and 12.9 in Uruguay (Gomez et al., Reference Gomez, Sosa, Corte and Otta2019), where probably the access to the fertility procedures had widened in recent years.

Nowadays, the greater urbanization and cultural changes in society may have had an impact on the decline of the twinning rate in the last years. In an Italian study conducted in the 1980s, it was suggested that an urban, sedentary lifestyle could increase the risk of spontaneous abortions among twin pregnancies (Parisi & Caperna, Reference Parisi and Caperna1981). Along this line, women living in rural areas seemed to have a stronger genetic disposition for twinning and better physical conditions to carry twin pregnancies in comparison to women living in urbanized areas (Eriksson et al., Reference Eriksson, Abbott, Kostense and Fellman1995). In addition, the attitude of Italian women, and in general of women of high-income countries, toward family and work has undergone profound changes, such as the achievement of higher qualifications and the desire for a satisfactory job position, leading to new reproductive strategies, including a delayed first childbirth and the reduction of family size.

When searching for possible etiological factors leading to twin births, the association between maternal age and parity has been known for a long time (Bonnelykke, Reference Bonnelykke1990).

In the literature, a positive association between natural DZ twinning and advancing maternal age was found (Abel & Kruger, Reference Abel and Kruger2012; Beemsterboer et al., Reference Beemsterboer, Homburg, Gorter, Schats, Hompes and Lambalk2006; Bonnelykke, Reference Bonnelykke1990; Bortolus et al., Reference Bortolus, Parazzini, Chatenoud, Benzi, Bianchi and Marini1999; Derom et al., Reference Derom, Gielen, Peeters, Frijns and Zeegers2011; Hoekstra, Zhao et al., Reference Hoekstra, Zhao, Lambalk, Willemsen, Martin, Boomsma and Montgomery2008; Tandberg et al., Reference Tandberg, Bjorge, Bordahl and Skjaerven2007). A hormonal reason underlying this relation was established: under equal ovarian feedback conditions, older mothers experience hyperstimulation by endogenous follicle-stimulating hormones due to neuroendocrine, hypothalamic or pituitary mechanisms (Lambalk et al., Reference Lambalk, Boomsma, De Boer, De Koning, Schoute, Popp-Snijders and Schoemaker1998). According to a study that aimed to quantify the contribution of advancing maternal age to the increase in multiple pregnancies, in England and Wales, France and the USA, one fourth to one-third of the increase in twin or triplet pregnancies was attributable to the advanced maternal age (Blondel & Kaminski, Reference Blondel and Kaminski2002). If monitoring the natural DZ twinning rate is a good marker of fecundity, a paradox emerges: the advancing maternal age results in both decreased fecundity and increased DZ twin pregnancies. However, Derom et al. (Reference Derom, Gielen, Peeters, Frijns and Zeegers2011) observed that when adjusted for the nonspontaneous conceiving and the maternal age at birth, the observed increase in the natural DZ twinning rate disappeared and a constant time trend remained, indicating a stable population fecundity regardless of the advancing maternal age. Moreover, according to Beemsterboer et al. (Reference Beemsterboer, Homburg, Gorter, Schats, Hompes and Lambalk2006), there is a greater probability of poliovulation in fertile women of advanced age. Our results were consistent with previous evidence: the higher DZ twinning rates were observed among older mothers (aged more than 35 years), and the MZ twinning rate was almost stable across classes of maternal age and dramatically declined in women aged 40 years or more. In addition, despite the proportion of women aged over 35 years that increased from 2007 to 2017, a decreasing trend in DZ twins emerged when the rate was standardized.

According to parity, evidence is dated and controversial (Bonnelykke, Reference Bonnelykke1990). We did not observe significant differences in the distribution of twin pregnancies according to parity. This may suggest that parity is not a direct determinant of twins. However, when we related parity to maternal age, we registered a consistently higher DZ twinning rate among nulliparae women aged 35 years or more and a higher MZ twinning rate among younger nulliparae women.

Several other factors were associated with the risk of natural (mainly DZ) twin pregnancies, such as pollution (Obi-Osius et al., Reference Obi-Osius, Misselwitz, Karmaus and Witten2004), smoking (Hoekstra et al., Reference Hoekstra, Willemsen, van Beijsterveldt, Lambalk, Montgomery and Boomsma2010; Parazzini et al., Reference Parazzini, Chatenoud, Benzi, Di Cintio, Dal Pino, Tozzi and Fedele1996; Smits & Monden, Reference Smits and Monden2011), folic acid supplementation (Kallen, Reference Kallen2004; Muggli & Halliday, Reference Muggli and Halliday2007), or use of oral contraceptives (Hoekstra, Zhao et al., Reference Hoekstra, Zhao, Lambalk, Willemsen, Martin, Boomsma and Montgomery2008). The temporal trends in these factors may change over the years and influence the twinning rates.

Also, biological factors should be considered. Spontaneous DZ twinning reflects the presence of the following conditions: a double ovulation and a successful fertilization of two ova (Lazar et al., Reference Lazar, Hemon and Berger1978). A positive association between DZ twinning and shorter waiting time to pregnancy, as a marker of couple fecundity, was found (Basso et al., Reference Basso, Christensen and Olsen2004; Ferrari et al., Reference Ferrari, Cooney, Vexler, Liu and Buck Louis2007; Hoekstra, Willemsen et al., Reference Hoekstra, Willemsen, van Beijsterveldt, Montgomery and Boomsma2008; Zhu et al., Reference Zhu, Basso, Obel, Christensen and Olsen2007). Regarding male fecundity, there is evidence that a better semen quality is related to higher spontaneous DZ twinning rate (Asklund et al., Reference Asklund, Jensen, Jorgensen, Tabor, Sperling and Skakkebaek2007). Other authors (Richiardi et al., Reference Richiardi, Akre, Montgomery, Lambe, Kvist and Ekbom2004) reported fewer twins among men who subsequently developed testicular cancer, which is associated with subfertility.

Thus, as the DZ twinning rates among young women have been suggested to be associated with the fertility of a population (James, Reference James1998; Tong, Reference Tong2000; Tong et al., Reference Tong, Caddy and Short1997; Tong & Short, Reference Tong and Short1998), the decreasing tendency in the number of twins and in the DZ:MZ ratio may reflect the fact that Italy is characterized by very low fertility rates compared to the rest of Europe and the USA. For example, the average number of children of an Italian woman is lower than that of a Swedish, American or French one; in 2017, the respective total fertility rates were 1.32, 1.78, 1.80 and 1.90 (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat; https://www.istat.it/; https://www.statista.com/).

Some weaknesses of our study warrant consideration. As the information about zygosity was not available, we estimated the number of DZ or MZ twin births using Weinberg’s method. This may cause a substantial amount of misclassification of like-sexed DZ twins into the group of MZ twins. Anyway, the validity of the method has been critically scrutinized and has been considered robust and reliable in its estimation of MZ twins (Fellman & Eriksson, Reference Fellman and Eriksson2006).

Among the strengths of this analysis, we have to consider the large sample size and the population-based design. In this perspective, we have included only deliveries of women residing in Lombardy in order to consider a well-defined population.

In conclusion, despite the increasing mean maternal age, a downward trend of twinning among natural conception emerged in Italy during the decade 2007−2017. Monitoring the trends in naturally conceived twin births may be useful to identify trends in fertility across different countries.

Supplementary Material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2022.19

Financial Support

This work was supported by a research grant from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (‘PRIN’ 2017, project 2017728JPK). The grant provides financial support for the analysis of data.

Conflict of Interest

Giovanni Corrao received research support from the European Community (EC), the Italian Agency of Drugs (AIFA) and the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR). He took part in a variety of projects that were funded by pharmaceutical companies (i.e. Novartis, GSK, Roche, AMGEN and BMS). He also received honoraria as a member of the advisory board to Roche. The other authors declare no potential conflict of interests.

References

Abel, E. L., & Kruger, M. L. (2012). Maternal and paternal age and twinning in the United States, 2004–2008. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 40, 237239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asklund, C., Jensen, T. K., Jorgensen, N., Tabor, A., Sperling, L., & Skakkebaek, N. E. (2007). Twin pregnancy possibly associated with high semen quality. Human Reproduction, 22, 751755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astolfi, P., Ulizzi, L., & Zonta, L. A. (2003). Changes in twinning rate: Italy 1950–1996. Human Reproduction, 18, 207211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basso, O., Christensen, K., & Olsen, J. (2004). Fecundity and twinning. A study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Human Reproduction, 19, 22222226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beemsterboer, S. N., Homburg, R., Gorter, N. A., Schats, R., Hompes, P. G., & Lambalk, C. B. (2006). The paradox of declining fertility but increasing twinning rates with advancing maternal age. Human Reproduction, 21, 15311532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blondel, B., & Kaminski, M. (2002). Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Seminars in Perinatology, 26, 239249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonnelykke, B. (1990). Maternal age and parity as predictors of human twinning. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Roma), 39, 329334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bortolus, R., Parazzini, F., Chatenoud, L., Benzi, G., Bianchi, M. M., & Marini, A. (1999). The epidemiology of multiple births. Human Reproduction, 5, 179187.Google ScholarPubMed
Dawson, A. L., Tinker, S. C., Jamieson, D. J., Hobbs, C. A., Rasmussen, S. A., Reefhuis, J., & National Birth Defects Prevention Study. (2015). Epidemiology of twinning in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997 to 2007. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 103, 8599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derom, C., Gielen, M., Peeters, H., Frijns, J. P., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). Time trends in the natural dizygotic twinning rate. Human Reproduction, 26, 22472252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, A. W. (1962). Variations in the human twinning rate. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Roma), 12, 242250.Google Scholar
Eriksson, A. W., Abbott, C., Kostense, P. J., & Fellman, J. O. (1995). Secular changes of twinning rates in Nordic populations. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Roma), 44, 141162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, A. W., Eskola, M. R., & Fellman, J. O. (1976). Retrospective studies on the twinning rate in Scandinavia. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Roma), 25, 2935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, A. W., & Fellman, J. (1973). Differences in the twinning trends between Finns and Swedes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 25, 141151.Google ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, A. W., & Fellman, J. (2007). Temporal trends in the rates of multiple maternities in England and Wales. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 626632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faisel, H., Majoko, F., Shebl, F., & Lindsay, P. (2008). Twin pregnancies in Cardiff and Vale of Glamorgan over four decades: natural twinning is on the increase. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 139, 164168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fauser, B. C., Devroey, P., & Macklon, N. S. (2005). Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet, 365, 18071816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fellman, J. (2016). Temporal and spatial variations in the twinning rate in Norway. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 19, 359366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fellman, J., & Eriksson, A. W. (2006). Weinberg’s differential rule reconsidered. Human Biology, 78, 253275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, R. M., Cooney, M. A., Vexler, A., Liu, A., & Buck Louis, G. M. (2007). Time to pregnancy and multiple births. Human Reproduction, 22, 407413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuster, V., Zuluaga, P., Colantonio, S., & de Blas, C. (2008). Factors associated with recent increase of multiple births in Spain. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11, 7076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomez, N., Sosa, A., Corte, S., & Otta, E. (2019). Twinning rates in Uruguay between 1999 and 2015: association with socioeconomic and demographic factors. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 22, 5661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. G. (2003). Twinning. Lancet, 362, 735743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, C., Willemsen, G., van Beijsterveldt, C. E., Lambalk, C. B., Montgomery, G. W., & Boomsma, D. I. (2010). Body composition, smoking, and spontaneous dizygotic twinning. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 885893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, C., Willemsen, G., van Beijsterveldt, T. C., Montgomery, G. W., & Boomsma, D. I. (2008). Familial twinning and fertility in Dutch mothers of twins. American Journal of Medical Genetics – Part A, 146A, 31473156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, C., Zhao, Z. Z., Lambalk, C. B., Willemsen, G., Martin, N. G., Boomsma, D. I., & Montgomery, G. W. (2008). Dizygotic twinning. Human Reproduction Update, 14, 3747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imaizumi, Y. (1997). Trends of twinning rates in ten countries, 1972–1996. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Roma), 46, 209218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. H. (1986). Recent secular trends in dizygotic twinning rates in Europe. Journal of Biosocial Science, 18, 497504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. H. (1998). The use of twinning rates as a reproductive health monitor in England and Wales 1988–1996. Human Reproduction, 13, 35773578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeanneret, O., & Macmahon, B. (1962). Secular changes in rates of multiple births in the United States. American Journal of Human Genetics, 14, 410425.Google ScholarPubMed
Kallen, B. (2004). Use of folic acid supplementation and risk for dizygotic twinning. Early Human Development, 80, 143151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogan, M. D., Alexander, G. R., Kotelchuck, M., MacDorman, M. F., Buekens, P., Martin, J. A., & Papiernik, E. (2000). Trends in twin birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981–1997. JAMA, 284, 335341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambalk, C. B., Boomsma, D. I., De Boer, L., De Koning, C. H., Schoute, E., Popp-Snijders, C., & Schoemaker, J. (1998). Increased levels and pulsatility of follicle-stimulating hormone in mothers of hereditary dizygotic twins. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 83, 481486.Google ScholarPubMed
Lambalk, C. B., Schats, R., Bleker, O. P., Elfering-Stinkens, P. M., & Orlebeke, J. F. (2004). Multiple pregnancies: epidemiology and management. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 148, 448450.Google ScholarPubMed
Lazar, P., Hemon, D., & Berger, C. (1978). Twinning rate and reproduction failures. Progress in Clinical Biological Research, 24 Pt B, 125132.Google ScholarPubMed
Little, J. (1988). Descriptive epidemiology. In I. MacGillivray, D. M. Campbell, & B. Thompson (Eds.), Twinning and twins (pp. 37–66). John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, A., & Blondel, B. (2005). Demographic trends in Western European countries. CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., & Osterman, M. J. (2012). Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS Data Brief, 80, 18.Google Scholar
Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., & Munson, M. L. (2005). Births: final data for 2003. National Vital Statistics Reports, 54, 1116.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Osterman, M. J., Kirmeyer, S., Mathews, T. J., & Wilson, E. C. (2011). Births: final data for 2009. National Vital Statistics Reports, 60, 170.Google ScholarPubMed
Muggli, E. E., & Halliday, J. L. (2007). Folic acid and risk of twinning: a systematic review of the recent literature, July 1994 to July 2006. Medical Journal of Australia, 186, 243248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, M. F., Hey, K., Whiteman, D., O’Donnell, M., Willis, B., & Barlow, D. (2000). Is the natural twinning rate now stable? Journal of Biosocial Science, 32, 279281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obi-Osius, N., Misselwitz, B., Karmaus, W., & Witten, J. (2004). Twin frequency and industrial pollution in different regions of Hesse, Germany. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61, 482487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otta, E., Fernandes, E. S., Acquaviva, T. G., Lucci, T. K., Kiehl, L. C., Varella, M. A., Segal, N., & Valentova, J. V. (2016). Twinning and multiple birth rates according to maternal age in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil: 2003–2014. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 19, 679686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parazzini, F., Chatenoud, L., Benzi, G., Di Cintio, E., Dal Pino, D., Tozzi, L., & Fedele, L. (1996). Coffee and alcohol intake, smoking and risk of multiple pregnancy. Human Reproduction, 11, 23062309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parazzini, F., Cipriani, S., Bulfoni, G., Bulfoni, C., Frigerio, A., Somigliana, E., & Mosca, F. (2015). The risk of birth defects after assisted reproduction. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32, 379385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parazzini, F., Mezzanotte, G., Tozzi, L., Bocciolone, L., & Acerboni, S. (1989). Frequency of multiple pregnancies in various Italian regions: 1955–1983. Annali di Ostetricia, Ginecologia, Medicina Perinatale, 110, 305322.Google ScholarPubMed
Parazzini, F., Restelli, S., Moroni, S., & Crosignani, P. G. (1994). Trend in legitimate and illegitimate multiple births. Human Reproduction, 9, 17841785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parazzini, F., Tozzi, L., Mezzanotte, G., Bocciolone, L., La Vecchia, C., Fedele, L., & Benzi, G. (1991). Trends in multiple births in Italy: 1955–1983. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 98, 535539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parisi, P., & Caperna, G. (1981). The changing incidence of twinning: one century of Italian statistics. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, 69A, 3548.Google ScholarPubMed
Parisi, P., & Caperna, G. (1982). Twinning rates, fertility, and industrialization: a secular study. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, 103 Pt A, 375394.Google ScholarPubMed
Richiardi, L., Akre, O., Montgomery, S. M., Lambe, M., Kvist, U., & Ekbom, A. (2004). Fecundity and twinning rates as measures of fertility before diagnosis of germ-cell testicular cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 145147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, J., & Monden, C. (2011). Twinning across the developing world. PLoS One, 6, e25239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tandberg, A., Bjorge, T., Bordahl, P. E., & Skjaerven, R. (2007). Increasing twinning rates in Norway, 1967–2004: the influence of maternal age and assisted reproductive technology (ART). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86, 833839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, S. (2000). Dizygotic to monozygotic twinning ratio at The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne 1947–1997, compared with Australian national twinning incidence. Twin Research, 3, 1216.Google ScholarPubMed
Tong, S., Caddy, D., & Short, R. V. (1997). Use of dizygotic to monozygotic twinning ratio as a measure of fertility. Lancet, 349, 843845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, S., & Short, R. V. (1998). Dizygotic twinning as a measure of human fertility. Human Reproduction, 13, 9598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberg, W. (1901). Beitrage zur physiologie und pathologie der mehrlingsgeburten beim Menschen. Pflugers Archiv für Gesamte Pysiologie, 88, 346350. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01657695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J. L., Basso, O., Obel, C., Christensen, K., Olsen, J., & Danish National Birth Cohort. (2007). Infertility, infertility treatment and twinning: the Danish National Birth Cohort. Human Reproduction, 22, 10861090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Trend of twinning rates according to calendar year.

Figure 1

Table 1. Twinning rates according to zygosity, maternal age and calendar period

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Trend of dizygotic twinning rates according to maternal age and parity.

Figure 3

Table 2. Twinning rates according to zygosity, parity and maternal age

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Dizygotic (DZ):monozygotic (MZ) ratio according to calendar year.

Supplementary material: PDF

Esposito et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Esposito et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 553.8 KB