Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:10:53.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inspiring Capital? Deconstructing myths and reconstructing urban environments, Edinburgh, 1860–2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2013

REBECCA MADGIN
Affiliation:
Centre for Urban History, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7QR, UK
RICHARD RODGER
Affiliation:
Centre for Urban History, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7QR, UK

Abstract:

‘Inspiring Capital’ is the sign that confronts visitors and residents alike at the boundaries of the Edinburgh administrative area. It is a consciously ambiguous message of self-promotion: the logo proclaims the dual standing of the city of Edinburgh as a European capital city and a city of international capital. The article uses a long-run approach to explore how, by inventing and nurturing a myth about Edinburgh as a non-industrial city, councillors and planners privileged the ancient and historical character of the city and so conditioned policies associated with urban renewal and land use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Scotsman, 21 May 1886, 4g. We are grateful to G.W. Smith for bringing this account to our notice.

2 Tseng was sufficiently well known to be included as number 156 in Punch's Fancy Portraits. He was depicted with a dove perched on his finger, sitting on a bull terrier. Punch, 85, 6 Oct. 1883, 166.

3 Scotsman, 25 May 1886, 5bc.

4 See Monclus, J., International Exhibitions and Urbanism (Aldershot, 2009)Google Scholar, for an overview of this development.

5 Edinburgh City Archives, SL35/25, Abstracts of Accounts (1893) and SL35/29 (1897).

6 Cockburn, H., Journal of Henry Cockburn; Being a Continuation of the Memorials of his Time 1831–1854, vol. I (Edinburgh, 1874)Google Scholar, entry for 2 Apr. 1835, 85. Henry Cockburn was an advocate, a judge in the Court of Session, solicitor-general for Scotland, and a prominent Scottish Whig who drafted the First Reform Bill for Scotland.

7 Cockburn, H., ‘Letter to the lord provost on the ways of spoiling the beauty of Edinburgh’, North British Review, 12 (1850), 283308Google Scholar.

8 Gifford, J.et al. , The Buildings of Scotland: Edinburgh (Harmondsworth, 1988 edn), 87–8, 106Google Scholar.

9 Stevenson, R.L., Edinburgh: Picturesque Notes (Edinburgh, 1879), 59Google Scholar. Lord Rosebery's copy can be consulted in the National Library of Scotland.

10 Morris, R.J., ‘The capitalist, the professor and the soldier: the re-making of Edinburgh Castle, 1850–1900’, Planning Perspectives, 22 (2007), 5578CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Trevor-Roper, H., ‘The invention of tradition in Scotland’, in Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds.), The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, 1983), 1542Google Scholar.

12 Manchester Guardian, 17 May 1886, 5e; Scotsman, 22 May 1886, 8g, 27 May 1886 4g. In Glasgow, Tseng's visit included the Dub's and Co. Locomotive Works, St Rollox Engine Works, Morrison and Mason's Stoneworks, the Clyde Locomotive Works, the Steel Company of Scotland's Newton Works, J. and G. Thomson's Clydebank shipbuilding yard.

13 The phrase comes from Vaughan, Robert's pamphlet An Age of Great Cities (London, 1843)Google Scholar.

14 Utton, M.A., ‘Some features of the early merger movements in British manufacturing industry’, Business History, 14 (1972), 5160CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hannah, L., ‘Mergers in manufacturing industry, 1880–1919’, Oxford Economic Papers, 26 (1974), 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Phillipson, N.T., ‘Lawyers, landowners and the civic leadership of post-Union Scotland’, Juridical Review, 21 (1976), 97120Google Scholar.

16 For details of military, religious, scientific societies and educational organizations located in Edinburgh, see listings in the annual Edinburgh and Leith Post Office Directories.

17 Best, G.F.A., Mid-Victorian Britain (London, 1971), 49Google Scholar.

18 Munn, C.W., ‘The emergence of Edinburgh as a financial centre’, in Cummings, A.J.G. and Devine, T. (eds.), Industry, Business and Society in Scotland since 1700: Essays Presented to John Butt (Edinburgh, 1996), 127Google Scholar.

19 Simon, C.J. and Nardinelli, C., ‘The talk of the town: human capital, information and the growth of English cities 1861–1961’, Explorations in Economic History, 33 (1996), 384413CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Report of the Committee of the Working Classes of Edinburgh on the Present Overcrowded and Uncomfortable State of their Dwelling Houses (Edinburgh, 1860), 20.

21 Reeder, D. and Rodger, R., ‘Industrialisation and the city economy’, in Daunton, M.J. (ed.), Cambridge Urban History of Britain, vol. III: 1840–1950 (Cambridge, 2000), 566Google Scholar. Edinburgh headed a league table of professional employment in over 20 British towns and cities for 1861 to 1951.

22 Groome, F.H. (ed.), Ordnance Gazetteer of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1885), 517Google Scholar.

23 Gray, R.Q., The Labour Aristocracy in Victorian Edinburgh (Oxford, 1976), 21Google Scholar; Rodger, R., ‘Landscapes of capital: industry and the built environment in Edinburgh 1750–1920’, in Edwards, B. and Jenkins, P. (eds.), Edinburgh: The Making of a Capital City (Edinburgh, 2005), 92Google Scholar.

24 Smith, A., A Summer in Skye (London, 1865)Google Scholar. The comment on millionaires was first made in 1859 in the Eclectic Review.

25 Gray, The Labour Aristocracy, 18.

26 Lee, C.H., ‘Modern economic growth and structural change in Scotland: the service sector reconsidered’, Scottish Economic and Social History, 3 (1983), 115–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Rodger, R., ‘Employment, wages and poverty in the Scottish cities 1841–1914’, in Gordon, G. (ed.), Perspectives of the Scottish City (Aberdeen, 1985), 2563Google Scholar.

28 PP 1913 LXXX, Census of Scotland, 1911, Tables D, E, 10–11.

29 Smith, D., Conflict and Compromise: Class Formation in English Society, 1830–1914: A Comparative Study of Birmingham and Sheffield (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Reeder and Rodger, ‘Industrialisation and the city economy’, Table 4.

30 Geddes, P., ‘New Town competition plans’, Architectural Review, 20 (1910), 557Google Scholar. For an overview of Geddes, see Rubin, N.H., ‘The changing appreciation of Patrick Geddes: a case study in planning history’, Planning Perspectives, 24 (2009), 349–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Johnson, J. and Rosenburg, L., Renewing Old Edinburgh: The Enduring Legacy of Patrick Geddes (Edinburgh, 2010)Google Scholar.

31 Geddes, ‘New Town competition plans’, 557.

32 T. and W. McDowall, New Guide to Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1849), 10Google Scholar. See also Heiton, J., The Castes of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1861), 281–2Google Scholar.

33 Geddes, ‘New Town competition plans’, 557.

34 See Littlejohn, H.D., Report on the Sanitary Condition of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1865), 47Google Scholar, for a district level survey of ‘manufacturies and trades’. See also www.scottishprintarchive.org/info.php?id=27&page=5.

35 Booth, C., Labour and Life of the People, vol. I: East London (London, 1889)Google Scholar. Geddes’ maps of disease and poverty were represented in blue in his Municipal Report: Edinburgh as a Site for Factories and Industrial Works (Edinburgh, 1908).

36 Geddes, ‘New Town competition plans’, 562.

37 Bremner, D., The Industries of Scotland: Their Rise, Progress and Present Condition (Edinburgh, 1869), 438Google Scholar. For an extended listing of Edinburgh manufacturing, see Edinburgh and Leith Post Office Directories, continuous years at www.nls.uk/family-history/directories/post-office/index.cfm?place=Edinburgh.

38 The Company of the Merchants of the City of Edinburgh, Report of a Special Committee on the Development of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1919), 8.

39 Milnes, N., A Study of Industrial Edinburgh and the Surrounding Area 1923–1934 (London, 1936), 4Google Scholar. The data was based on Census of Production information on insured workers compiled by the Board of Trade in 1930–31.

40 This figure of 50.5% for insured industrial workers in 1931 is close to the census figure of 50.7% male workers employed in industry in 1951 (Table 1). Female workers in industry, however, were appreciably lower, and this and other variations are probably the result of lower levels of national insurance registration in certain industries.

41 Milnes, Industrial Edinburgh, 7.

42 Scotsman, 25 Oct. 1923, 8b, ‘Dalry Ward – the industrial development of the city’.

43 Stephenson, T. (ed.), Industrial Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1921), 9Google Scholar.

44 The Company of the Merchants of the City of Edinburgh, Report, 32.

45 See Reeder and Rodger, ‘Industrialisation and the city economy’, 572–85, for an elaboration of this point.

46 Clyde, J.L., Whitson, T.B. and Pollock, J.D., The Future of Edinburgh: Report of the Advisory Committee on City Development (Edinburgh, 1943), 18Google Scholar; J.L. Clyde was a Unionist politician, judge and subsequently MP for Edinburgh North and lord advocate; the other members of the committee were the lord provost, Sir T.B. Whitson and Dr J.D. Pollock.

47 For a summary of the main proposals of the Clyde Report see Stevenson, D.A., ‘The future of Edinburgh’, Scottish Geographical Journal, 60 (1944), 1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 O'Carroll, A., ‘Tenements to bungalows: class and the growth of home ownership before World War II’, Urban History, 24 (1997), 225–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glendinning, M. and Watters, D. (eds.), Homebuilders: MacTaggart and Mickel and the Scottish Housebuilding Industry (Edinburgh, 1999), 3984, 277–9Google Scholar.

49 Abercrombie, P. and Plumstead, D., A Civic Survey and Plan for the City and Royal Burgh of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1949), 47Google Scholar.

50 Stevenson, ‘The future of Edinburgh’, 20.

51 Johnson and Rosenburg, Renewing Old Edinburgh, 114–26.

52 Abercrombie and Plumstead, A Civic Survey, 47. The significance of vertical and horizontal amalgamations in pharmaceuticals, stationery and packaging, grain-milling and rubber in the period 1950 to 1965 is noted in Keir, D. (ed.), The Third Statistical Account of Scotland: The City of Edinburgh (Glasgow, 1966), 632–42Google Scholar.

53 Abercrombie and Plumstead, A Civic Survey, 1.

54 Clyde, Whitson and Pollock, The Future of Edinburgh, 5.

55 Such as the threat posed by a roundabout seen as a potential threat at the gateway to the New Town at Randolph Crescent.

56 Abercrombie and Plumstead, A Civic Survey, 53.

57 Larkham, P.J., ‘The place of urban conservation in the UK Reconstruction Plans of 1942–52’, Planning Perspectives, 18 (2003), 295324CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mort, F., ‘Fantasies of metropolitan life: planning London in the 1940s’, Journal of British Studies, 43 (2004), 120–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Garside, P.L., ‘The significance of post-war London reconstruction plans for East End industry’, Planning Perspectives, 12 (1997), 1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 City and Royal Burgh of Edinburgh, Development Plan, Written Statement (As Modified) (Edinburgh, Jun. 1957)Google Scholar; City and Royal Burgh of Edinburgh, Development Plan 1965 Review, Written Statement, (Edinburgh, Mar. 1966)Google Scholar.

59 Development Plan 1965 Review, 5.

60 Hunt, N.C. and Nicholls, H.A., Edinburgh's Economy: Present and Future Prospects (Edinburgh, Edinburgh Corporation, 1968), 2Google Scholar.

61 Abercrombie and Plumstead, A Civic Survey, 47.

62 Hunt and Nicholls, Edinburgh's Economy, 60.

63 Within the Development Areas there was an investment grant available that amounted to £40 per £100 as opposed to £20 in Edinburgh.

64 The Regional Employment Premium bonus was £1.50 per week per man, 75p per week per woman and 47p half per week for girls.

65 Hewitson, T.T., Edinburgh's Economy, 1966–71: A Study of Recent Economic Trends Completed by the Town Planning Department-Research Section (Edinburgh, 1972)Google Scholar.

66 Hunt and Nicholls, Edinburgh's Economy, 17.

67 Development Plan 1965 Review, 33.

68 Hewitson, Edinburgh's Economy, 1966–71, 23.

69 City and Royal Burgh of Edinburgh, Tollcross Comprehensive Development Area, Survey Report (Edinburgh, Aug. 1966), 14Google Scholar.

70 Development Plan 1965 Review, 5.

71 For the Scottish act see www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1969/30/pdfs/ukpga_19690030_en.pdf. See Cullingworth, J.B. and Nadin, V., Town and Country Planning, 14th edn (London, 2006)Google Scholar, for the general background to the introduction of the local plan system in England and Wales in 1968, and also see www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/72/contents/enacted.

72 These years refer to the dates of the final written statements.

73 Edinburgh District Council, Gorgie–Dalry Local Plan Written Statement (Edinburgh, 1980), point 1.7Google Scholar.

74 Ibid., point 2.13. The Development Plan 1957 also noted the limited existence of sites capable of redevelopment for industrial purposes.

75 Edinburgh District Council, Gorgie–Dalry Local Plan Discussion Paper (Edinburgh, 1978), 1Google Scholar.

76 Edinburgh District Council, Tollcross Local Plan, Written Statement, Sep. 1982, 10.

77 Ibid., 4.

78 The City of Edinburgh Council, City of Edinburgh Local Plan (Edinburgh, 1997), point 4.14Google Scholar.

79 Ibid., point 4.13.

80 Hunt and Nicholls, Edinburgh's Economy, 6.

81 Hewitson, Edinburgh's Economy, 1966–71, 3.

82 Turok, I. and Edge, N., The Jobs Gap in Britain's Cities: Employment Loss and Labour Market Consequences (Bristol, 1999), 43Google Scholar.

83 Office for National Statistics data.

84 Interview with Edinburgh Planning Officer A, Sep. 2010.

85 Edinburgh District Council, Edinburgh Economic Development and Estates (Edinburgh, 1991), 13Google Scholar.

86 City of Edinburgh Local Plan, 38.

87 Turok and Edge, The Jobs Gap in Britain's Cities, 44.

88 Ibid., 44.

89 Hewitson, Edinburgh's Economy, 1966–71, 18.

90 Ashworth, G.J., and Voogd, H., Selling the City: Marketing Approaches in Public Sector Urban Planning (London, 1990), 77Google Scholar.

91 Strath, B. (ed.), Myth, Memory and the Construction of Community: Historical Patterns in Europe and Beyond (Brussels, 2000), 25Google Scholar.

92 Morris, R.J., ‘In search of twentieth-century Edinburgh’, Book of the Old Edinburgh Club, 8 (2010), 1326 at 20Google Scholar.

93 City Development Department, City of Edinburgh Council (Research Section), Economic Activity in Edinburgh, An Analysis of the 2001 Census Economic Activity Data (Edinburgh, 2005), point 11.4Google Scholar

94 D.M. McHugh, ‘Remaking the Victorian county town: Lincoln and Bedford’, University of Leicester Ph.D. thesis, 2002.

95 Hulme, T., ‘Urban governance and civic responsibility: interwar council housing in Buxton’, Midland History, 35 (2010), 237–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar, especially, 240; Hayes, N., ‘Civic perceptions: housing and local decision-making in English cities in the 1920s’, Urban History, 27 (2000), 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 Lloyd, P.E. and Mason, L.M., ‘Manufacturing industry in the inner-city: a case study of Greater Manchester’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 3 (1977), 69Google Scholar; Madgin, R., ‘Reconceptualising the historic urban environment: conservation and regeneration in Castlefield, Manchester, 1960–2009’, Planning Perspectives, 25 (2010), 2948CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

97 Kearns, G. and Philo, C. (eds.), Selling Places: The City as Cultural Capital, Past and Present (Oxford, 1993)Google Scholar; Gold, J.R. and Ward, S.V. (eds.), Place Promotion: The Use of Publicity and Marketing to Sell Towns and Regions (Chichester, 1994)Google Scholar.

98 S. Townsend, Planning is limiting economic growth in Cambridge’, Planning, 21 Apr. 2011. For more detail, see the report: SQW, Cambridge Cluster at 50, The Cambridge Economy Retrospect and Prospect, Final Report to EEDA and partners, Mar. 2011.

99 Cambridge Cluster at 50, 33.

100 Cohen, S.S. and Zysman, J., Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of the Post-Industrial Economy (New York, 1987)Google Scholar.