Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:56:16.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reputation and responsibility in medieval English towns: civic concerns with the regulation of trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2012

CATHERINE CASSON
CATHERINE CASSON*
Affiliation:
School of History and Cultures, Arts Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK, and Winton Institute for Monetary History, Ashmolean Museum, University of Oxford, Beaumont Street, Oxford, OX1 2PH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article examines how the civic authorities of six English towns responded to competition from new markets, regional fairs, informal trade and each other during the period 1250–1400. It argues that the civic authorities adopted an aggressive strategy based on developing a good reputation for their town, in order to show that the town was well governed and that its merchants and artisans maintained high standards of quality. This article focuses upon how a credible reputation was developed through the creation and enforcement of market regulation, and examines its appeal to citizens, foreign merchants and the crown and nobility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , August 2012 , pp. 387 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 J. Davis, ‘The representation, regulation and behaviour of petty traders in late medieval England’, unpublished University of Cambridge Ph.D. thesis, 2001, 162; Dyer, C., ‘The consumer and the market in the later middle ages’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 42 (1989), 312, 320–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lee, J.S., ‘The functions and fortunes of English small towns at the close of the middle ages: evidence from John Leland's Itinerary’, Urban History, 37 (2010), 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 For more detail see Rexroth, F., Deviance and Power in Late Medieval London (Cambridge, 2007), 304Google Scholar; Swanson, H., Medieval Artisans: An Urban Class in Late Medieval England (Oxford, 1989), 114–16, 120–3Google Scholar.

3 H. Carrel, ‘Civic government and identity in the provincial towns of late medieval England, c. 1370 to c. 1500’, unpublished University of Cambridge Ph.D. thesis, 2007, 4, 192.

4 Barron, C.M., London in the Later Middle Ages: Government and People 1200–1500 (Oxford, 2004), 18–22, 53–6, 58–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barron, C. and Davies, M. (eds.), The Religious Houses of London and Middlesex (London, 2007), 7Google Scholar; Rawcliffe, Carole, ‘Sickness and health’, in Rawcliffe, C and Wilson, R (eds.), Medieval Norwich (London, 2004), 309–13Google Scholar.

5 Greif, A., ‘Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: evidence on the Maghribi traders’, Journal of Economic History, 49 (1989), 857–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Milgrom, P.R., North, D.C. and Weingast, B.R., ‘The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the Champagne fairs’, Economics and Politics, 2 (1990), 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Barron, London, 59.

7 Ibid., 32–3.

8 Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 31–2; Bridbury, A.R., ‘Markets and freedom in the middle ages’, in Anderson, B.L. and Latham, A.J.H. (eds.), The Market in History (London, 1986), 108–9Google Scholar.

9 For a useful survey of this period see Britnell, R.H., The Commercialisation of English Society 1000–1500 (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar.

10 Miller, E. and Hatcher, J., Medieval England: Towns, Commerce and Crafts (Harlow, 1995), 264–79Google Scholar.

11 Masschaele, J., ‘Market rights in thirteenth-century England’, English Historical Review, 107 (1992), 78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dyer, C., ‘The hidden trade of the middle ages: evidence from the West Midlands’, Journal of Historical Geography, 18 (1992), 141–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Epstein, S.R., ‘Regional fairs, institutional innovation, and economic growth in late medieval Europe’, Economic History Review, 47 (1994), 459–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Dyer, ‘Hidden trade’, 141–57.

13 Britnell, Commercialisation, 155–66.

14 Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 137.

15 Barron, London, 32–3; Britnell, Commercialisation, 176.

16 Masschaele, ‘Market rights’, 78–89; Salzman, L.F., ‘The legal status of markets’, Cambridge Historical Journal, 2 (1928), 205–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Kowaleski, M., Local Markets and Regional Trade in Medieval Exeter (Cambridge, 1995), 179Google Scholar.

18 Britnell, Commercialisation, 93.

19 Davis, J., Medieval Market Morality: Life, Law and Ethics in the English Marketplace, 1200–1500 (Cambridge, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 31–2, 177.

21 Dyer, ‘The consumer’, 325.

22 Kowaleski, Local Markets, 179; Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 177; Barron, London, 22, 39.

23 Swanson, Medieval Artisans, 114–16, 120–3; Barron, London, 199–234.

24 Nightingale, P., A Medieval Mercantile Community: The Grocers’ Company and the Politics and Trade of London, 1000–1485 (New Haven, 1995), 562CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barron, London, 228–33.

25 Carrel, ‘Civic government and identity’, 74; Jongman, W. and Dekker, R., ‘Public intervention in the food supply in pre-industrial Europe’, in Halstead, P. and O'Shea, J. (eds.), Bad Year Economics: Cultural Responses to Risk and Uncertainty (Cambridge, 1989), 114–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Liddy, C.D., War, Politics and Finance in Late Medieval English Towns: Bristol, York and the Crown, 1350–1400 (Woodbridge, 2005), 213–15Google Scholar; Barron, London, 18–24.

27 For individual studies of the six towns, see: Williams, G.A., Medieval London: From Commune to Capital (London, 1963)Google Scholar; Barron, London; Rawcliffe and Wilson (eds.), Medieval Norwich; A. Saul, ‘Great Yarmouth in the fourteenth century: a study in trade, politics and society’, unpublished University of Oxford, Ph.D. thesis, 1975; Britnell, R.H., Growth and Decline in Colchester, 1300–1525 (Cambridge, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bateson, M. (ed.), Records of the Borough of Leicester Being a Series of Extracts from the Archives of the Corporation of Leicester, vols. I–II (Cambridge, 1899–1901)Google Scholar; Foulds, T., ‘The medieval town’, in Beckett, J.V. et al. (eds.), A Centenary History of Nottingham (Manchester, 1997), 56–71Google Scholar; Hewitt, E.M., ‘Industries’, in Page, W. (ed.), The Victoria History of the County of Nottingham, vol. II (London, 1910), 319–67Google Scholar.

28 S. Letters, Online Gazetteer of Markets and Fairs in England Wales to 1516, http:/cmh/gaz/gazweb2.html, accessed 10 Jul. 2009.

29 Dyer, A., ‘Ranking lists of English medieval towns’, in Palliser, D.M. (ed.), The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, vol. I (Cambridge, 2000), 755–77Google Scholar. Towns that were wealthier than Nottingham, Leicester and Colchester, including York, lacked appropriate surviving records for the period.

30 See notes to Table 1.

31 Miller and Hatcher, Towns, 309.

32 A helpful description of changes in administrative developments over time is provided in J. Campbell, ‘Power and authority 600–1300’, in Palliser (ed.), Cambridge Urban History, 51–78; S.H. Rigby and E. Ewan, ‘Government, power and authority 1300–1540’, in ibid., 291–312.

33 Miller and Hatcher, Towns, 285.

34 Ibid., 285.

35 Tait, J., The Medieval English Borough: Studies on its Origins and Constitutional History (Manchester, 1999), 184Google Scholar; Jewell, H.M., English Local Administration in the Middle Ages (Newton Abbot, 1972), 54Google Scholar.

36 Jewell, English Local Administration, 55; Miller and Hatcher, Towns, 294–5.

37 Miller and Hatcher, Towns, 307–8.

38 Keene, D., ‘Metropolitan comparisons: London as a city-state’, Historical Research, 77 (2004), 474CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Foulds, ‘The medieval town’, 67.

39 Erskine, A.M., ‘Political and administrative history, 1066–1509’, in McKinley, R.A. (ed.), The Victoria History of the County of Leicester, vol. IV (London, 1958), 14–16Google Scholar.

40 Seabourne, G., Royal Regulation of Loans and Sales in Medieval England: Monkish Superstition and Civil Tyranny (Woodbridge, 2003), 80–2Google Scholar.

41 Saul, ‘Great Yarmouth’, 6, 10, 15; Hudson, W., The Leet Jurisdiction of the City of Norwich (London, 1891), xxiiGoogle Scholar; Cooper, J. and Elrington, C.R., ‘Medieval Colchester borough government’, in Cooper, J. and Elrington, C.R. (eds.), A History of the County of Essex, vol. IX (London, 1994), 48–57Google Scholar.

42 Saul, ‘Great Yarmouth’, 6, 10, 15; Hudson, Leet Jurisdiction, xxii; Cooper and Elrington, ‘Medieval Colchester borough government’, 48–57.

43 Bennett, J.M., Ale, Beer and Brewsters in England: Women's Work in a Changing World (Oxford, 1996), 162–3Google Scholar.

44 For detailed analysis of the backgrounds of all defendants and plaintiffs, see C. Casson, ‘A comparative study of prosecutions for forgery in trade and manufacturing in six English towns, 1250–1400’, unpublished University of York Ph.D. thesis, 2009, vol. I, 264–84; ibid., vol. II, 77–148. Those prosecutions that are associated with revenue-raising from fines tend to relate to a single commodity or to offenders from a particular social background, see Bennett, Ale, 162–3; Britnell, Growth and Decline, 89–90.

45 Connor, R.D., The Weights and Measures of England (London, 1987), 90, 96, 130, 150, 328Google Scholar; Statutes of the Realm (Statutes), vol. I, 140, ibid., vol. II, 61–8.

46 Some of these dishonest trading practices have been examined in Kowaleski, Local Markets, 189–90; Rexroth, Deviance and Power, 310–11. However, these have not provided a comparative geographical and chronological examination of prosecutions. Hiatt, A., The Making of Medieval Forgeries: False Documents in Fifteenth-Century England (London, 2004), does not examine civic court records and looks at a different type of dishonest practiceGoogle Scholar.

47 Thomas, A.H. (ed.), Calendar of the Plea and Memoranda Rolls of the City of London 1323–64, vol. I (London, 1926), 21Google Scholar; Riley, H.T. (ed.), Memorials of London and London Life in the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries (London, 1868), 135, 319Google Scholar. Excluded from this article are forgeries of coins or royal seals which were treasonable offences heard in the royal courts.

48 In London, few records survive from the wardmotes, and no prosecutions for dishonest trading appear in the surviving records. Records from the court of aldermen survive but do not contain prosecutions. In Norwich, one inquisition before the bailiffs survives, with no prosecutions for dishonest trading. No further records survive from the bailiffs’ court, the upper council or the lower council. In Colchester, records survive from the council but contain no prosecutions for dishonest trading. In Great Yarmouth, Leicester and Nottingham, records survive from the fair court, but these do not contain prosecutions for dishonest trading. No records survive from Great Yarmouth's council of 24, Leicester's common council or Nottingham's informal council.

49 For more details see Casson, ‘Prosecutions for forgery in trade and manufacturing’, vol. II, 24–34.

50 In Norwich and Colchester, these regulations were usually recorded in separate books of custom rather than within the court rolls, and so those books were also consulted. Statutes, vols. I–II.

51 Dyer, C., Standards of Living in the Later Middle Ages: Social Change in England c. 1200–1520 (Cambridge, 1989), 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Riley (ed.), Memorials, 135.

53 Sharpe, R.R. (ed.), Calendar of Letter-Books Preserved among the Archives of the Corporation of the City of London at the Guildhall Letter-book C c. 1291–1309 (London, 1901), 157–8Google Scholar.

54 Galloway, J.A., Keene, D. and Murphy, M., ‘Fuelling the city: production and distribution of firewood and fuel in London's region, 1290–1400’, Economic History Review, 49 (1996), 454CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Riley (ed.) Memorials, 335–6, 446; Thomas, A.H. (ed.), Calendar of the Plea and Memoranda Rolls of the City of London 1364–81, vol. II (London, 1926), 221–2Google Scholar; Sharpe, R.R. (ed.), Calendar of Letter-Books Preserved among the Archives of the Corporation of the City of London at the Guildhall Letter-Book H c. 1375–1399 (London, 1907), 72–3, 181, 184–5, 192, 215Google Scholar.

55 Galloway, Keene and Murphy, ‘Fuelling the city’, 447.

56 Thomas (ed.), Plea and Memoranda Rolls, vol. II, 221–2.

57 The outcome for the servant is not recorded.

58 Zupko, R.E., British Weights and Measures: A History from Antiquity to the Seventeenth Century (Madison, 1977), 62Google Scholar; Thomas (ed.), Plea and Memoranda Rolls, vol. II, 186, 189–90.

59 Galloway, Keene and Murphy, ‘Fuelling the city’, 447.

60 Riley (ed.), Memorials, 335–6.

61 Excluded from this definition were attacks on guild officials in cases that did not mention any of the other features.

62 Cases involving sinecures were only included if they met one or more of the above criteria.

63 Leniency did not include cases where the defendant was not guilty or where they were excused from a punishment because they did not brew or because their goods were found to be accurate in weight or quality during an inspection.

64 70 cases indicated only a single concern, 30 cases 2 concerns, and 9 cases indicated 3.

65 Bateson (ed.), Leicester, vol. I, 105; Norfolk Record Office (NRO)/NCR Case 5b/5 fol. 4r.

66 Riley (ed.) Memorials, 397–9.

67 For example Thomas (ed.), Plea and Memoranda Rolls, vol. I, 242–3.

68 Bateson (ed.), Leicester, vol. I, 68–9, 77.

69 Ibid.

70 Ibid., 278–9, 292–3.

71 Riley (ed.) Memorials, 118.

72 Ibid.

73 Barron, London, 23–4.

74 Rosenthal, J.T., ‘The assizes of weights and measures in medieval England’, Western Political Quarterly, 17 (1964), 420–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Johnson, J.H., ‘The king's wardrobe and household’, in Morris, W.A. et al. (eds.), The English Government at Work, vol. I (Cambridge, MA, 1940), 245–7Google Scholar; Connor, Weights, 325.

76 Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 125.

77 In Leicester, the references to the marshal are likely to encompass both the marshal, who appointed the assayer of measures, and the clerk of the market, who carried out the inspection. Bateson (ed.), Leicester, vol. I, 222–3, 237.

78 Ibid., 223.

79 Ibid., 238.

80 Riley (ed.) Memorials, 486–7.

81 Thomas, A.H. (ed.), Calendar of the Plea and Memoranda Rolls of the City of London 1381–1412, vol. III (London, 1932), 21Google Scholar.

82 Riley (ed.) Memorials, 424, 427–8.

83 Ramsay, N., ‘Forgery and the rise of the London scriveners’ company’, in Myers, R. and Harris, M. (eds.), Fakes and Frauds: Varieties of Deception in Print and Manuscript (2nd edn, Winchester and Delaware, 1996), 100Google Scholar.

84 Riley (ed.) Memorials, 527–9.

85 Ibid.

86 Carrel, ‘Civic government and identity’, 73; Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 298; Rosser, G., ‘Going to the fraternity feast: commensality and social relations in late medieval England’, Journal of British Studies, 33 (1994), 436–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark, E., ‘Social welfare and mutual aid in the medieval countryside’, Journal of British Studies, 33 (1994), 381–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lacey, Helen, The Royal Pardon: Access to Mercy in Fourteenth-Century England (Woodbridge, 2009), 2, 180Google Scholar.

87 Lacey, The Royal Pardon, 2, 180.

88 Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 298.

89 NRO/NCR Case 5b/2 fol. 3r.

90 Bateson (ed.) Leicester, vol. I, 105.

91 Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 247, 298.

92 Riley (ed.) Memorials, 397–9.

93 Ibid., 446.

94 Thomas (ed.), Plea and Memoranda Rolls, vol. I, 95.

95 B. Dobson, ‘General survey 1300–1540’, in Palliser (ed.), Cambridge Urban History, 275.

96 Britnell, Commercialisation, 164, 170.

97 Davis, ‘Petty traders’, 137, 162; Barron, London, 16–18, 22, 39–40, 60–1, 87–9.