Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:43:35.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A tale of two cities – infant mortality and cause of infant death, Dublin, 1864–1910

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

CIARA BREATHNACH  and
BRIAN GURRIN
CIARA BREATHNACH
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
BRIAN GURRIN
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article uses data extracted from General Register Office mortality registers to map the localization of infant mortality in Dublin city from 1864 to 1910. It traces how late nineteenth-century social inequalities were deeply rooted in the city's history. In order to contextualize the high infant mortality rates, we draw on a range of approaches to provide an overarching view of the causes of the public health problems cities like Dublin experienced.

Type
Dyos Prize winner 2017
Information
Urban History , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , November 2017 , pp. 647 - 677
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For instance, McKeown, T., The Rise of Modern Population (London, 1976)Google Scholar.

2 Supplement to the Fifty-fifth Annual Report of the Registrar-General of Births, Deaths, and Marriages in England, Part I, 1895 [C 7769] (ARRG); Loudon, I., Death in Childbirth: An International Study of Maternal Care and Infant Mortality, 1800–1950 (Oxford, 1992), 492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Mein Smith, P. and Frost, L., ‘Suburbia and infant death in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Adelaide’, Urban History, 21 (1994), 251–72 at 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Woods, R.I., Watterson, P.A. and Woodward, J.H., ‘The causes of rapid infant mortality decline in England and Wales, 1861–1921’, Population Studies, 42 (1988), 343–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

5 Loudon, Death in Childbirth, 19–26.

6 Forty-seventh ARRG, 1910, xl.

7 Grimshaw, T.W., ‘Child mortality in Dublin’, Journal of Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, 9 (1889), 8 Google Scholar.

8 Public Health and Social Conditions. Statistical Memoranda and Charts Prepared in the Local Government Board relating to Public Health and Social Conditions, 1909 [Cd 4671], 15–16.

9 Luckin, B. and Mooney, G., ‘Urban history and historical epidemiology: the case of London, 1860–1920’, Urban History, 24 (1997), 37–55 at 38, 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Hubbard, W., ‘The urban penalty: towns and mortality in nineteenth-century Norway’, Continuity and Change, 15 (2000), 331–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 M.E. Daly, Dublin, the Deposed Capital: A Social and Economic History, 1860–1914 (Cork, 1984; reprint 2011), 246; Dickson, D., Dublin: The Making of a Capital City (Dublin, 2014), 417–20Google Scholar.

12 Woods, Watterson and Woodward, ‘The causes of rapid infant mortality decline’, 343–66.

13 The full text of this oft-cited quote is ‘Does a fellow good a bit of a holiday. I feel a ton better since I landed again in dear dirty Dublin. . .’, ‘A little cloud’, in James Joyce, Dubliners(Dublin, 2012), 81–96 at 86.

14 Sheridan-Quantz, E., ‘The multi-centred metropolis: the social topography of eighteenth-century Dublin’, in Clark, P. and Gillespie, R. (eds.), Two Capitals: London and Dublin, 1500–1840 (London, 2001), 265–95 at 269–70Google Scholar.

15 Casey, C., Dublin: The City within the Grand and Royal Canals and the Circular Road with the Phoenix Park (New Haven, 2005), 44 Google Scholar.

16 R. Goodbody, Dublin, part III: 1756–1847, Irish Historic Towns Atlas, no. 26 (Dublin, 2014), 2.

17 McKeown, J. and Hurley, L., ‘Infrastructure’, Art and Architecture of Ireland, vol. IV: Architecture 1600–2000 (Dublin, 2015), 141–50 at 148Google Scholar.

18 Warburton, J., Whitelaw, J. and Walsh, R., History of the City of Dublin, 2 vols. (London, 1818), vol. I, p. 233 Google Scholar.

19 3 Geo III c. 36 (1763), 17 & 18 Geo III c. 10 and 19, 20 Geo III c. 50, an act for further enforcing a due execution of the laws relative to turnpike roads in this kingdom (1779–80). For a thorough discussion, see Gráda, D. Ó, ‘The rocky road to Dublin: transport modes and urban growth in the Georgian age, with particular reference to the turnpike roads’, Studia Hibernica, 22/3 (1982/83), 128–48Google Scholar at 137. See also Goodbody, Dublin, 8, 32, 39.

20 39 & 40 Geo. 3 c. 67.

21 Jackson, A., ‘Ireland, the union, and the empire, 1800–1960’, in Kenny, K. (ed.), Ireland and the British Empire (Oxford, 2004), 123–53 at 124Google Scholar.

22 Geary, F. and Stark, T., ‘Examining Ireland's post-famine economic growth performance’, Economic Journal, 112 (2002), 919–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 McDowell, R.B., ‘Dublin and Belfast – a comparison’, in McDowell, R.B. (ed.), Social Life in Ireland: 1800–1845 (Dublin, 1957), 13–27 Google Scholar; O'Brien, J.V., Dear, Dirty Dublin: A City in Distress, 1899–1916 (Berkeley, 1982), 11 Google Scholar; Laughlin, J., ‘Politics and society, 1800–1960’, in Kennedy, L. and Ollerenshaw, P. (eds.), Ulster since 1600: Politics, Economy, and Society (Oxford, 2013), 228–44Google Scholar.

24 Dickson, Dublin, 320.

25 Ibid ., 327–9.

26 O'Brien, Dear, Dirty Dublin, 12; Daly, Dublin, 118.

27 Dickson, Dublin, 346–7.

28 Casey, Dublin, 119–20.

29 Legal Status Regulations regarding the status of the city of Dublin and adjoining Liberties issued in 1759 (33 Geo. II c. 16). City Liberty, 1760 (Roque County). County of the city of Dublin 1837 (Mun. Boundary repts, 61). County of the city of Dublin, borough, consisting of mayor, aldermen and burgesses established under Municipal Corporations (Ireland) Act in 1840 (3 & 4 Vict. c. 108), see Goodbody, Dublin, 9.

30 Census of Ireland for the Year 1861 [2865], 4.

31 The municipal area alters over time. The Census of Ireland for the Year 1861. Part III, 1863 [3204-II], 54 (1868 north and 1940 south). Several acts outlined Dublin Corporation's remit, the modern metropolitan areas was defined in Municipal Corporations (Ireland) Act, 1840, 3 & 4 Vic. c. 108.

32 Census of Ireland for the Year 1861 [2865], 8.

33 Report of the committee appointed by the Local Government Board for Ireland to inquire into the public health of the city of Dublin, 1900 [Cd 243] [Cd 244] 2 (hereafter Dublin report, 1900).

34 Dickson, Dublin, 372, notes how ‘in 1864. . .no fewer than 120 stationary steam engines [were] at work in factories and workshops across the city’.

35 Municipal Boundaries Commission (Ireland). Part II, 1881 [C 2827], 9.

36 Ibid., 10.

37 61 & 62 Vic. c. 37, Local Government (Ireland) Act, 1898.

38 Dickson, Dublin, 342–4.

39 Report of the royal commissioners appointed to inquire into the sewerage and drainage of the city of Dublin, 1880 [C 2605], 27.

40 M. Corcoran, ‘Water, sanitation and electricity’, in Art and Architecture of Ireland, vol. IV, 164–6 at 165.

41 Dickson, Dublin, 344.

42 Gráda, C. Ó, Jewish Ireland in the Age of Joyce: A Socioeconomic History (Princeton, 2006), 42–3Google Scholar.

43 Hanna, E., Modern Dublin: Urban Change and the Irish Past, 1957–1973 (Oxford, 2013), 27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Dickson, Dublin, 421. This renewed interest followed the collapse of two tenement houses on Church Street where seven people died.

45 C. Breathnach and B. Gurrin, ‘Maternal mortality in Dublin, 1864-1905’, forthcoming article.

46 Crossman, V., Poverty and the Poor Law in Ireland (Liverpool, 2013), 33 Google Scholar.

47 Public Health (Ireland) Act, 1878 (41 & 42 Vict. c. 52), sect. 191; Public Health (Ireland) Amendment Act, 1879 (42 & 43 Vict. c. 57), sect. 7.

48 Seventeenth ARRG, 1880, 58; Twenty-seventh ARRG, 1890, 70; Twenty-ninth ARRG, 1892, 72.

49 www.who.int/whosis/whostat2006InfantAndUnder5MortalityRate.pdf, accessed 17 Feb. 2015.

50 Old Age Pensions Act, 1908 (8 Edw. 7), C 40; C. Ó Gráda, ‘The greatest benefit of all: old age pensions in Ireland’, Past and Present, 175 (2002), 124–61.

51 Verrière, J., La population de I'Irlande (Paris, 1979), 331–44Google Scholar. The authors are grateful to Ruth Stokes for professional translation; errors are of course our own.

52 Public Health (Ireland) Act, 1878 (41 & 42 Vict. c. 52), sect. 191.

53 Report of the royal commissioners appointed to inquire into the sewerage and drainage of the city of Dublin, 1880 [C 2605], 32.

54 If Grimshaw's 9% underestimation for Dublin is accepted as a guide to readjust for underestimation, then this would raise national figures for infant mortality for the period 1864–1913 to 114.5 for males, 96.5 for females and 105.8 for all children.

55 Dean, G. and Mulvihill, C.J., ‘The registration of births and deaths in Ireland’, Journal of the Irish Medical Association, 65 (1972), 101–5Google ScholarPubMed at 102.

56 Of 1,099 burials from 1966 to 1969, 86.3% were registered and certified, 6.2% were registered but not certified and 7.5% were neither registered nor certified. Ibid., 103. Dean, G. and McLoughlin, H., ‘The registration and certification of deaths in the West of Ireland’, Irish Medical Journal, 73 (1980), 269–70Google ScholarPubMed at 270. The 1980 follow-up study of deaths occurring in 1974–77 included 25 parishes and 12 from the previous study. Of 1,867 deaths, 92.1% were registered and certified, 1.8% were registered but not certified and 6.1% were neither registered nor certified. Similar demographics applied, underreporting was mainly in deaths of elderly people living with elderly relatives. A further study conducted by Connolly et al. took all burials in 1992 for the county of Mayo and found that the problem of underregistration persisted. Like Dean and Mulvihill, it recommended that it be incumbent on undertakers to ensure deaths were registered. See Connolly, J.F., Cullen, A., Scott, J. and Smithwick, D., ‘Non-registration of deaths as a source of error in mortality data in the Irish Republic’, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 16 (1999), 16–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Loudon, Death in Childbirth, 495.

58 Gráda, C. Ó, ‘Infant and child mortality in Dublin a century ago’, in Preston, M.H. and hÓgartaigh, M. Ó (eds.), Gender and Medicine in Ireland, 1700–1950 (New York, 2012), 49–68 Google Scholar.

59 Floud, R., Fogel, R.W., Harris, B. and Hong, Sok Chul, The Changing Body: Health, Nutrition, and Human Development in the Western World since 1700 (Cambridge, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, G., ‘Captain of All these Men of Death’: The History of Tuberculosis in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Ireland (Amsterdam, 2001), 32 Google ScholarPubMed; Preston, S.H. and Haines, M.R., Fatal Years: Child Mortality in Late Nineteenth-Century America (Princeton, 1991), 6 Google Scholar.

60 First ARRG, 1864, 7; A Statistical Nosology Comprising the Causes of Death Classified and Alphabetically Arranged, with Notes and Observations (Dublin, 1864), iii.

61 Risse, G.B., ‘Cause of death as a historical problem’, Continuity and Change, 12 (1997), 175–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Feinstein, C. and Thomas, M., Making History Count: A Primer in Quantitative Methods for Historians (Cambridge, 2002), 454–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Drevenstedt, G.L. et al., ‘The rise and fall of excess male infant mortality’, Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (2008), 5016–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

64 Dublin report, 1900, 6.

65 Luckin and Mooney, ‘Urban history’, 47.

66 Thirteenth Report of Board of Superintendence of Dublin Hospital, HC 1872 [C 488], xxxii, 6.

67 Rotunda Hospitals for Poor Lying-in Women and for the treatment of diseases peculiar to women, for year ended 31 Mar. 1881, Dublin 1881, 8.

68 Freeman's Journal, 31 May 1881.

69 Ibid., 18 Jan. 1894.

70 Ibid., 26 Oct. 1900.

71 Ibid., 6 Oct. 1904.

72 Irish Times, 17 Aug. 1905.

73 Seventh Annual Report of the Registrar General of Births, Deaths, and Marriages, in England, 1846 [727], xx.

74 GRO dataset.

75 Preston and Haines, Fatal Years, 6.

76 GRO records, NC3, Q2 1901, National Archives of Ireland NAI/Coroners Court/Dublin 1901 (owing to a confidentially agreement with the GRO we are not permitted to give a more detailed reference).

77 The Nomenclature of Diseases (London, 1906), 311.

78 Preston and Haines, Fatal Years, 6.

79 Statistical Nosology, 12.

80 Ibid ., 21.

81 Jones, ‘Captain of All these Men of Death’, 68.

82 1,652 (54.4%) of these 3,038 deaths were certified. However, only 329 (44.5%) of the 740 deaths in 1870 and 676 (47.5%) of the 1,422 deaths in 1880 were certified, compared with 648 (74%) of the 876 deaths in 1890.

83 Porter, R., The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity (New York, 1997)Google Scholar; Cullen, F., Cleansing Rural Dublin: Public Health and Housing Initiatives in the South Dublin Poor Law Union, 1880–1920 (Dublin, 2001), 12–34 Google Scholar.

84 Morgan, N., ‘Infant mortality, flies and horses in later-nineteenth-century towns: a case study of Preston’, Continuity and Change, 17 (2002), 97–132 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Dublin Report, 1900, 10.

85 National Archives of Ireland BG/79/2/1–2 SDU Death register.

86 MacManus, R., Dublin 1910–1940: Shaping the City and Suburbs (Dublin, 2002), 141, 220, 300Google Scholar.

87 Dickson, Dublin, 417–26. See also Prunty, J., Dublin Slums, 1800–1925: A Study in Urban Geography (Dublin, 1998), 99–101 Google Scholar.

88 Ó Gráda, ‘Infant and child mortality in Dublin’.

89 Mein Smith and Frost, ‘Suburbia and infant death’, 251–72; Ó Gráda, ‘Infant and child mortality’, 49–68.