Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:41:15.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Romance: Genre and Materia Medica in Late-Victorian Drug Fiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2019

Extract

Despite Macfie's vivid assertion, studies of Victorian medicine and literature have not paid special attention to the pharmaceutical field, perhaps because of its messy associations with trade or inferiority to more respected healing practices. After all, it is Doctor Lydgate's refusal to prescribe the expected drugs in Middlemarch that proves his commitment to evidence-based Parisian medicine. As I aim to demonstrate, however, pharmacy and its products have a distinct and two-edged history in late-Victorian England. Medical writers increasingly assert the scientific authority and physiological promise of pharmacology. At the same time, they begin to show interest in the romance of drugs: their origins in alchemy and the occult, harvesting in the furthest outreaches of empire, and, at home, display in the magical space of the chemist's shop. This productive tension between medicinal drugs as stuff of ancient mystery and sign of medical progress informs their depiction in the transforming drug narratives of Robert Louis Stevenson's Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886), Arthur Machen's “Novel of the White Powder” (1895), and Rudyard Kipling's “Wireless” (1902). Bringing romance and drugs together invites readers to think about their respective claims to invigorate, transport, even remake the self.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks the curator and librarians at the F. C. Wood Institute of the History of Medicine at the College of Physicians of Philadelphia for their expertise and support in the form of a Wood Institute Travel Grant. She also extends deepest thanks to Natalie Mera Ford and Jeffrey Roessner for their valuable feedback on earlier drafts.

References

Works Cited

Allen, Stafford, and Sons. The Romance of Empire Drugs. London: Stafford Allen, 1933.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stuart. “From ‘Bespoke’ to ‘Off-the-Peg’: Community Pharmacists and the Retailing of Medicines in Great Britain, 1900–1970.” In From Physic to Pharmacology: Five Hundred Years of British Drug Retailing, edited by Curth, Louise Hill, 105–42. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Arnold, Frederick. “The Romance of Medicine.” London Society 12 (1867): 228–40.Google Scholar
Bacon, Gertrude. “How We Get Our Drugs.” Good Words 42 (1901): 272–36.Google Scholar
Barrie, J. M. Sentimental Tommy. London: Cassell, 1896.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. The Rustle of Language. Translated by Howard, Richard. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Besant, Walter. “The Art of Fiction.” In The Nineteenth-Century Novel: A Critical Reader, edited by Regan, Stephen, 6167. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Betts, John, and Ho, Sue. “‘Martindale’: From Abrus to Zotarolimus—130 Years of Pharmacy Knowledge.” The Pharmaceutical Journal 291 (2013), www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/news/martindale-from-abrus-to-zotarolimus-130-years-of-pharmacy-knowledge/11123426 (accessed October 21, 2018).Google Scholar
Boon, Marcus. The Road of Excess: A History of Writers on Drugs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
British Pharmacopoeia: Published under the Direction of the General Council of Medical Education and Registration of the United Kingdom. London: Spottiswoode, 1864.Google Scholar
Brown, Bill. “Thing Theory.” Critical Inquiry 28, no. 1 (2001): 122.Google Scholar
Burrow, Merrick. “The Imperial Souvenir: Things and Masculinities in H. Rider Haggard's King Solomon's Mines and Allan Quatermain.” Journal of Victorian Culture 18, no. 1 (2013): 7292.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. The Woman in White. 1859. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Crofts, H. Baptiste. “The Relation of Drugs to Medicine.” British Quarterly Review 78 (1883): 129.Google Scholar
Curth, Louise. From Physick to Pharmacology: Five Hundred Years of British Drug Retailing. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Daly, Nicholas. Modernism, Romance, and the Fin-de-siècle: Popular Fiction and British Culture, 1880–1914. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Defalque, R. J., and Wright, Amos J. III. “The Mysterious Chloric Ether: From Dutch Liquid to Chloroform.” Bulletin of Anesthesia History 16, no. 4 (1998): 1213.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Plato's Pharmacy.” In Dissemination, translated by Barbara Johnson, 65171. London: Athlone Press, 1981.Google Scholar
De Vos, Paula. “European Materia Medica in Historical Texts: Longevity of a Tradition and Implications for Future Use.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 132, no. 1 (2010): 144.Google Scholar
Dillingham, William B.Eavesdropping on Eternity: Kipling's ‘Wireless.’” English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 55, no. 2 (2012): 131–54.Google Scholar
Driscoll, Lawrence. Reconsidering Drugs: Mapping Victorian and Modern Drug Discourses. New York: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar
Dury, Richard, ed. The Annotated Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Milan: Guerini Studio, 1993.Google Scholar
Fielding, Heather. “Kipling's Wireless Impressionism: Telecommunication and Narration in Early Modernism.” MFS Modern Fiction Studies 61, no. 1 (2015): 2446.Google Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. The Ideas in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Haggard, H. Rider. “About Fiction.” Contemporary Review 51 (1887): 172–80.Google Scholar
Herbert, Thomas. The Law on Adulteration, Being the Sale of Food and Drugs Acts, 1875 and 1879. London: Knight, 1884.Google Scholar
Hughes, Winifred. The Maniac in the Cellar: The Sensation Novel of the 1860s. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry. “The Connection of the Biological Sciences with Medicine.” Transactions of the International Medical Congress 1 (1881): 91101.Google Scholar
James, Henry. Partial Portraits. New York: Macmillan, 1899.Google Scholar
Kipling, Rudyard. “Wireless.” In Traffics and Discoveries, 239–68. New York: Scribner's, 1904.Google Scholar
Lang, Andrew. “Realism and Romance.” Contemporary Review (July–December 1887): 683–93.Google Scholar
Lenson, David. On Drugs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Lovecraft, H. P. Supernatural Horror in Literature, edited by Bleiler, E. F.. New York: Dover, 1973.Google Scholar
Macfie, Ronald Campbell. The Romance of Medicine. London: Cassell, 1907.Google Scholar
Machen, Arthur. Hieroglyphics. London: Grant Richards, 1902.Google Scholar
Machen, Arthur. “Novel of the White Powder.” In The Three Imposters and Other Stories, edited by Joshi, S. T., 1:196212. Hayward: Chaosium, 2007.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Morrell. “Is Medicine a Progressive Science?Fortnightly Review 39 (1886): 845–54.Google Scholar
Markovits, Stefanie. “Form Things: Looking at Genre through Victorian Diamonds.” Victorian Studies 52, no. 4 (2010): 591619.Google Scholar
Martindale, William, and Westcott, William Wynn. The Extra Pharmacopoeia of Unofficial Drugs. London: H. K. Lewis, 1883.Google Scholar
Norquay, Glenda, ed. R L Stevenson on Fiction: An Anthology of Literary and Critical Essays. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Osler, William. Aequanimitas: With Other Addresses to Medical Students, Nurses and Practitioners of Medicine. Philadelphia: Blakiston's, 1904.Google Scholar
Osler, William. Osler's “A Way of Life” and Other Addresses, with Commentary and Annotations, edited by Hinohara, Shigeaki and Niki, Hisea. Durham: Duke University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Plotz, John. “Can the Sofa Speak? A Look at Thing Theory.” Criticism 47, no. 1 (2005): 109–18.Google Scholar
Plotz, John. “Nowhere and Everywhere: The End of Portability in William Morris's Romances.” In Portable Property: Victorian Culture on the Move, 144–69. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Reed, Thomas L. The Transforming Draught: Jekyll and Hyde, Robert Louis Stevenson and the Victorian Alcohol Debate. Jefferson: McFarland, 2006.Google Scholar
Ronell, Avital. Crack Wars: Literature, Addiction, Mania. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Rothfield, Lawrence. Vital Signs: Medical Realism in Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Saintsbury, George. “The Present State of the Novel.” Fortnightly Review (September 1887): 410–17.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Mark. Bodies and Machines. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Steib, Ernst W., and Sonnedecker, Glenn. “The Professions and the Problem.” In Drug Adulteration: Detection and Control in Nineteenth-Century Britain, 143–59. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis. “A Gossip on Romance.” In Norquay, R L Stevenson on Fiction, 5164.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis. “A Humble Remonstrance.” In Norquay, R L Stevenson on Fiction, 8091.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. 1886. Peterborough: Broadview, 2005.Google Scholar
Tallis, Nigel, and Foster, Kate Arnold. Pharmacy History: A Pictorial Record. London: Pharmaceutical Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charles John Samuel. The Lure and Romance of Alchemy. London: Harrap, 1932.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charles John Samuel. The Mystery and Romance of Alchemy and Pharmacy. London: Scientific Press, 1897.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charles John Samuel. Poison Romances and Poison Mysteries. London: Routledge, 1904.Google Scholar
Tompkins, J. M. S. The Art of Rudyard Kipling. 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Vaninskaya, Anna. “The Late-Victorian Romance Revival: A Generic Excursus.” English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 51, no. 1 (2008): 5779.Google Scholar
Williams, M. Kellen. “‘Down with the Door, Poole’: Designating Deviance in Stevenson's Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.” English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 39, no. 4 (1996): 412–29.Google Scholar
Zieger, Susan. Inventing the Addict: Drugs, Race, and Sexuality in Nineteenth-Century British and American Literature. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2008.Google Scholar