Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T22:56:34.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FALLIBLE INFALLIBILITY? GLADSTONE'S ANTI-VATICAN PAMPHLETS IN THE LIGHT OF MILL'S ON LIBERTY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Geoffrey Scarre
Geoffrey Scarre*
Affiliation:
Durham University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When W. E. Gladstone published in November 1874 his spirited pamphlet The Vatican Decrees in their Bearing on Civil Allegiance: A Political Expostulation, he seems to have taken many people by surprise. In its issue of the 21st of that month, Punch printed a cartoon, “An Unexpected Cut” (Figure 1) which portrayed the “Hawarden woodcutter” laying an axe to the stout trunk of a tree labelled “Papal Infallibility,” under the bemused gaze of Mr Punch. To the latter's remark “We didn't expect to find you cutting at that tree, you know,” the ex-Prime Minister dourly retorts: “All right, Mr Punch! I choose my own Trees, and my own Time!” In Gladstone's view, the time was ripe to take a stand against the recent pretensions of the Roman Catholic Church, under the leadership of its aging pontiff Pius IX, to exercise an absolute and unchallengeable authority over the consciences and actions of Catholics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 223 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Acton, John Emerich Edward Dalberg (Lord). “The Vatican Council.” The History of Freedom and Other Essays. Ed. Figgis, J. N. and Laurence, R. V.. London: Macmillan, 1907. 492–550.Google Scholar
Altholz, Josef L. “Gladstone and the Vatican Decrees.” Historian 25 (1963): 312–24.Google Scholar
Altholz, Josef L. “The Vatican Decrees Controversy, 1874–1875.” Catholic Historical Review 57 (1972): 593–605.Google Scholar
Bebbington, D. W.The Mind of Gladstone: Religion, Homer, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Bentley, James. Ritualism and Politics in Victorian Britain. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph. The Analogy of Religion, Natural and Revealed, to the Constitution and Course of Nature. London: J. M. Dent, 1906.Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph. Butler's Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel. Ed. Figgis, T. A.. London: SPCK, 1970.Google Scholar
Crosby, Travis L.The Two Mr Gladstones: A Study in Psychology and History. New Haven: Yale UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, Robert. “The Church of England and the First Vatican Council.” Journal of Religious History 27 (2003): 29–46.Google Scholar
Gladstone, W. E.Correspondence on Church and Religion of William Ewart Gladstone. 2 vols. Ed. Lathbury, D. C.. London: John Murray, 1910.Google Scholar
Gladstone, W. E.. The Political Correspondence of Mr Gladstone and Lord Granville. 2 vols. Ed. Ramm, Agatha. Camden Third Series, vols. 81–82. London: Royal Historical Society, 1952.Google Scholar
Gladstone, W. E.. “Ritual and Ritualism.” Contemporary Review 24 (1874): 663–81.Google Scholar
Gladstone, W. E.. Studies Subsidiary to the Works of Bishop Butler. Oxford: Clarendon, 1896.Google Scholar
Gladstone, W. E.. The Vatican Decrees in their Bearing on Civil Allegiance: a Political Expostulation. London: John Murray, 1874.Google Scholar
Gladstone, W. E.. Vaticanism: an Answer to Reproofs and Replies, in Rome and the Newest Fashions in Religion. Three Tracts: The Vatican Decrees – Vaticanism – Speeches of the Pope. London: John Murray, 1875. 1–130.Google Scholar
Gladstone, W. E.et al. “What Some Churchmen Think about Disestablishment.” London: Society for the Liberation of Religion from State-Patronage and Control, 1869.Google Scholar
Haworth, Alan. “On Mill, Infallibility, and Freedom of Expression.” Res Publica 13 (2007): 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. On Liberty and Liberalism: the Case of John Stuart Mill. New York: Knopf, 1974.Google Scholar
Matthew, H. C. G.Gladstone, 1809–1874. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “Guizot's Lectures on European Civilization.” Essays on French History and Historians. Collected Works. Vol. 20. Ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto: Toronto UP, 1985. 367–93.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Newspaper Writings December 1822-July 1831. Collected Works. Vol. 22. Ed. Robson, A. P. and Robson, J. M.. Toronto: Toronto UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty, in Essays on Politics and Society. Collected Works. Vol. 18. Ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto: Toronto UP, 1977. 213–310.Google Scholar
Morley, John. The Life of William Ewart Gladstone. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1907.Google Scholar
Newman, John Henry. “A Letter Addressed to the Duke of Norfolk on Occasion of Mr Gladstone's Recent Expostulation.” London: Pickering, 1875.Google Scholar
Parry, J. H.Democracy and Religion: Gladstone and the Liberal Party, 1867–1875. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence. Butler. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.Google Scholar
Price, Peter. “John Henry Newman and Papal Infallibility.” Pacifica 24 (2011): 58–79.Google Scholar
Schiefen, Richard J. “Vaticanism in England, 1874–1875.” CCHA Report 29 (1962): 9–24.Google Scholar
Smith, G. B.The Life of the Right Honourable William Ewart Gladstone. 2 vols. London: Cassell, 1882.Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman P., ed. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. Vol. 2, Trent to Vatican II. London: Sheed & Ward, 1990.Google Scholar
Turner, Piers Norris. “Authority, Progress, and the ‘Assumption of Infallibility.’” Journal of the History of Ideas 51 (2013): 93–117.Google Scholar
Von Arx, Jeffrey P. “Interpreting the Council: Archbishop Manning and the Vatican Decrees Controversy.” Recusant History 26 (2002): 229–42.Google Scholar
Yates, Nigel. Anglican Ritualism in Victorian Britain, 1830–1910. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar