Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:12:53.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Flat Heroine: Flat Character and Agency in Miss Marjoribanks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2019

Hope Rogers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critics of Miss Marjoribanks are divided about whether Margaret Oliphant's eponymous heroine's performance of social conventions, particularly those pertaining to gender roles, is consciously subversive or an unreflective embodiment of those conventions. This scholarship implicitly equates agency with critical detachment: if Lucilla does not critique the conventions she uses and the constructions of gender they reflect, she must lack the capacity to think strategically about her desires, a capacity necessary for agency. It's true that Lucilla is neither critical nor detached. Oliphant characterizes her as fully invested in social norms and as lacking the psychological depth that typically marks agential characters. In fact, I argue that Lucilla is a flat character and that Lucilla's flatness is precisely what makes her excel as an agent. Lucilla's nigh-emotionless thinking, combined with her ruling qualities of good sense and self-satisfaction, promotes agency. Untrammeled by mixed feelings or self-doubt, she has nothing to do but rationally calculate how best to achieve her interests. Reconsidering Lucilla's agency in light of her flatness thus allows us both to value that agency as Oliphant portrays it and to understand how characters can have agency at all.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , Winter 2019 , pp. 691 - 721
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anderson, Amanda. The Way We Argue Now. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane. Emma. 1815. Edited by Parrish, Stephen M.. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.Google Scholar
Brogden, Elizabeth. “Isabel Archer and the Burdens of Centrality.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 50, no. 2 (2017): 255–77.Google Scholar
Caine, Barbara. Victorian Feminists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Colby, Vineta, and Colby, Robert A.. The Equivocal Virtue: Mrs. Oliphant and the Victorian Literary Market Place. Hamden: Archon, 1966.Google Scholar
DiBattista, Maria. Novel Characters: A Genealogy. Malden: Wiley Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Daniel Deronda. 1876. Edited by Handley, Graham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch. 1871–72. Edited by Carroll, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Escobedo, Andrew. “Allegorical Agency and the Sins of Angels.” ELH 75, no. 4 (2008): 787–818.Google Scholar
Figlerowicz, Marta. Flat Protagonists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Angus. Allegory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. Aspects of the Novel. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1927.Google Scholar
François, Anne-Lise. Open Secrets: The Literature of Uncounted Experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Frow, John. Character and Person. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Holubetz, Margarete. “The Triumph of the Gifted Woman: The Comic Manipulation of Cliché in Mrs. Oliphant's Miss Marjoribanks.” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego (1984): 41–56.Google Scholar
Homans, Margaret. Royal Representations: Queen Victoria and British Culture, 1837–1876. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Jay, Elisabeth. Introduction to Miss Marjoribanks, by Oliphant, Margaret, xi–xxxv. New York: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
Jay, Elisabeth. Mrs Oliphant: “A Fiction to Herself.” Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Langbauer, Laurie. “Absolute Commonplaces: Oliphant's Theory of Autobiography.” In Margaret Oliphant: Critical Essays on a Gentle Subversive, edited by Trela, D. J., 124–34. London: Associated University Presses, 1995.Google Scholar
Langland, Elizabeth. Nobody's Angels: Middle-Class Women and Domestic Ideology in Victorian Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Leavis, Q. D. “Mrs Oliphant: Miss Marjoribanks (Introduction).” In Collected Essays, edited by Singh, G., 3:135–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Levine, George. “Reading Margaret Oliphant.” Journal of Victorian Culture 19, no. 2 (2014): 232–46.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre. The Economy of Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Macpherson, Sandra. Harm's Way: Tragic Responsibility and the Novel Form. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Michie, Elsie B. The Vulgar Question of Money. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women. Orchard Park: Broadview, 2000.Google Scholar
Moe, Melina. “Charlotte and Elizabeth: Multiple Modernities in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice.” ELH 83, no. 4 (2016): 1075–1103.Google Scholar
Mouton, Michelle. “Margaret Oliphant and John Stuart Mill: Disinterested Politicians and the 1865 General Election.” Dickens Studies Annual 35 (2005): 209–39.Google Scholar
O'Mealy, Joseph H. “Mrs. Oliphant, Miss Marjoribanks, and the Victorian Canon.” Victorian Newsletter 82 (1992): 44–49.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. The Doctor's Family. 1863. Project Gutenberg, 2009, www.gutenberg.org/files/29890/29890-h/29890-h.htm.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. Miss Marjoribanks. 1866. Edited by Jay, Elisabeth. New York: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
Peterson, Linda. “The Female Bildungsroman: Tradition and Subversion in Oliphant's Fiction.” In Margaret Oliphant: Critical Essays on a Gentle Subversive, edited by Trela, D. J., 66–89. London: Associated University Presses, 1995.Google Scholar
Robinson, Amy J. “An ‘original and unlooked for ending’? Irony, the Marriage Plot, and the Antifeminism Debate in Oliphant's Miss Marjoribanks.” In Antifeminism and the Victorian Novel, edited by Wagner, Tamara, 159–76. Amherst: Cambria Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Rubik, Margarete. The Novels of Mrs. Oliphant. New York: Peter Lang, 1994.Google Scholar
Sanders, Valerie. Eve's Renegades. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sanders, Valerie. “Mrs Oliphant and Emotion.” Women's Writing 6, no. 2 (1999): 181–89.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Talia. Romance's Rival. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Schaub, Melissa. “Queen of the Air or Constitutional Monarch? Idealism, Irony, and Narrative Power in Miss Marjoribanks.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 55, no. 2 (2000): 195–225.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Patricia. Women and Fiction. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1979.Google Scholar
Sturrock, June. “Emma in the 1860s: Austen, Yonge, Oliphant, Eliot.” Women's Writing 17, no. 2 (2010): 324–42.Google Scholar
Tange, Andrea Kaston. “Redesigning Femininity: Miss Marjoribanks's Drawing-Room of Opportunity.” Victorian Literature and Culture 36, no. 1 (2008): 163–86.Google Scholar
Terry, R. C. Victorian Popular Fiction, 1860–80. London: Macmillan, 1983.Google Scholar
Woloch, Alex. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar