Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:18:53.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law, Equity, and Conscience in Victorian England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Simon Petch
Simon Petch
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is concerned with the Judicature Acts of 1873 and 18751 and the controversy surrounding them. The administrative reform of the Judicature was less obviously controversial than some other Victorian reformist legislation, such as the Factory Act, or the Married Women's Property Act, but legal debate about the Judicature Acts brings the law into dialogue with moral debates in the broader arena of Victorian culture. As a response to a crisis of authority in the country's legal institutions, this debate was one significant manifestation of the general conflict between authority and individualism that pervades Victorian discourse. The key terms of the legal debate were law, conscience, and equity, underwritten by the vague but powerful concepts of justice and natural law, and throughout the debate the relationships between legal usage and other forms of language were persistently questioned. The terms were also tested, and the questions asked, in such central literary texts as Daniel Deronda, Idylls of the King, and The Ring and the Book, and in the writings of such culturally central figures as Charles Darwin and Frederick Denison Maurice.

Type
Works in Progress
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 123 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

This paper is for Roslyn Jolly, the shaping spirit of whose critical intelligence is, to me, everywhere apparent in it. I am grateful to her, and to Warwick Slinn, of Massey University, for constructive comments on a draft of the paper, and I thank Justice L. J. Priestley, of the New South Wales Court of Appeal, and Professor James Boyd White, of the University of Michigan, for directing me to relevant legal material.

1. 36 & 37 Vict. c.66.

2. Josiah, Smith, A Manual of Equity Jurisprudence (London: Stevens and Norton, 1845), 3.Google Scholar

3. This account of the rise of Chancery follows George, Spence, The Equitable Jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery. Volume 1. Comprising the Rise, Progress, and Final Establishment of the Modern Jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery (London: Stevens and Norton, 1846)Google Scholar. Spence has the authority of contemporaneity, but his history did not go unchallenged, and details of other contemporary accounts referred to in this paper are given in the notes. The extensive modern literature on Equity from which Spence's account should be supplemented includes the following: Hanbury, Harold Greville, Essays in Equity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934)Google Scholar; Hanbury, , Modern Equity, ed. Martin, Jill E. (14th edition, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1993)Google Scholar; Meagher, R. P., Gummow, W. M. C. and Lehane, J. R. F., Equity, Doctrines and Remedies (3rd edition, Sydney: Butterworth, 1992)Google Scholar; Newman, Ralph A., ed., Equity in the World's Legal Systems: A Comparative Study (Brussels: Etablissements Emile Bruylant, 1973)Google Scholar; and Perell, Paul M., The Fusion of Law and Equity (Toronto: Butterworth, 1990).Google Scholar

4. Spence, 710.

5. See Endicott, Timothy A. O., “The Conscience of the King: Christopher St. German and Thomas More and the Development of English Equity,” University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 47 (1989): 549–70Google Scholar; and Knafla, Louis A., “Conscience in the English Common Law Tradition,” University of Toronto Law Journal 26 (1976): 1–16.Google Scholar

6. Spence, 417. The case was Cook v. Fountain (1676).

7. Ashburner, Walter, Principles of Equity (London: Butterworth, 1902), 51.Google Scholar

8. Ashburner, , Principles of Equity, 51.Google Scholar

9. Spence, , 326.Google Scholar

10. Spence, , 410; see also 327.Google Scholar

11. Lewis, W. D., “Some Popular Errors Concerning Law,” Papers Read Before the Juridical Society 1855–58 (London: Stevens and Norton, 1858): 555–94; 585.Google Scholar

12. Selden's words are quoted here from Lewis, 579–580. Spence also quotes Selden, 413–14.

13. Lewis, , 582–83.Google Scholar

14. Best, W. M., “The Common Law of England; with an Examination of Some False Principles of Law Reform,” Papers Read Before the Juridical Society 1855–1858 (London: Stevens and Norton, 1858): 399–434; 400.Google Scholar

15. Best, 411.

16. Spence, , 413.Google Scholar

17. Spence, , 435–36. Spence's second volume (1849) is almost entirely devoted to Trusts.Google Scholar

18. The relationship between the principles of Equity and the institution of Chancery in Bleak House is perceptively discussed by Dolin, Kieran, “Bleak House: Chancery versus Equity,” in The Happy Couple: Law and Literature, ed. Turner, J. Neville and Williams, Pamela (Sydney: Federation Press, 1994): 71–80.Google Scholar

19. Dolin, Kieran, “Chancery Reform,” The Law Times, vol. 12 (20 01, 1849): 360.Google Scholar

20. Thornton, W. T., “Equity Reform,” Westminster Review 53 (1850): 100–15; 101.Google Scholar

21. Parkes, Joseph, A History of the Court of Chancery (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, 1828), 459.Google Scholar

22. Pound, Roscoe, “The Decadence of Equity,” Columbia Law Review 5 (1905): 20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; 25. Pound was addressing the Nebraska State Bar Association, but his general comments are based on the development of the law in Victorian England, and Lord Eldon is his bete noire.

23. Pound, 20.

24. Eliot, George, Daniel Deronda (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967), 455.Google Scholar

25. Maurice, F. D., The Conscience. Lectures on Casuistry (1868; 3rd edition, London: Macmillan, 1883), 76Google Scholar. At this time Maurice was Professor of Casuistry and Moral Philosophy at Cambridge, and this lecture was the fourth in a series of nine.

26. Hemming, G. W., Thoughts on the Proposed Fusion of Law and Equity (London: Macmillan, 1873)Google Scholar. This pamphlet consists of a series of articles originally published in the Saturday Review.

27. Hemming, , 24.Google Scholar

28. Hemming, , 17.Google Scholar

29. Hemming, , 15, 23.Google Scholar

30. Hemming, , 18.Google Scholar

31. Wilson, Arthur, Equity and the Judicature Bill (London: Henry S. King & Co., 1873), 32Google Scholar.Wilson's pamphlet consists of a series of articles originally published in the Solicitors' Journal.

32. Wilson, , 8Google Scholar, where Wilson is perhaps playing Kingsley to Hemming's Newman.

33. Wilson, , 35–36.Google Scholar

34. Wilson, , 32.Google Scholar

35. Wilson, “Ought the Judicature Bill to Pass?” The Law Magazine and Law Review, vol. 2 [new series] (1873): 534–41; 537–38.Google Scholar

36. Lewis, , ‘Some Popular Errors Concerning Law,’ 579 (see n. 11 above).Google Scholar

37. Maurice, F. D., “On the Moral Distinction Between Law and Equity,” Papers Read Before the Juridical Society 1855–58 (London: Stevens and Norton, 1858): 313–30.Google Scholar

38. For a brief contextual analysis of Blackstone's ideas on Equity, which are beyond the scope of this paper, see Lieberman, David, The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39. Maurice, , 328.Google Scholar

40. Maurice, , 319.Google Scholar

41. Maurice, , 325.Google Scholar

42. Maurice, , 323 (his emphasis).Google Scholar

43. Maurice, , 324.Google Scholar

44. Maurice, , 323 (his emphasis).Google Scholar

45. For an account of Bentham's critique of natural law, see Lieberman, David, The Province of Legislation Determined, 224–32.Google Scholar

46. Lieberman, David, “Schools of Jurisprudence,” London Quarterly Review 40 (1873): 1–43; 34Google Scholar. One of the six books reviewed in this article was Lorimer, James, The Institutes of Law: a Treatise of the Principles of Jurisprudence as Determined by Nature (1872).Google Scholar

47. “Schools of Jurisprudence,” 5.

48. “Schools of Jurisprudence,” 35.

49. “Schools of Jurisprudence,” 15.

50. “Schools of Jurisprudence,” 24.

51. Moyle, J. B., The Institutes of Justinian (1883; 3rd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1889), 4.Google Scholar

52. Maurice, , “On the Moral Distinction Between Law and Equity,” 319.Google Scholar

53. Browning, Robert, The Ring and the Book (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1981), VIII. 531–40.Google Scholar

54. “Schools of Jurisprudence,” 15.

55. Tennyson, , In Memoriam (1850), lvi: 15.Google Scholar

56. Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871; rpt. with an Introduction by John Tyler Bonner and Robert M. May, Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57. Darwin, , The Descent of Man, 71–72.Google Scholar

58. Darwin, , The Descent of Man, 98.Google Scholar

59. Darwin, , The Descent of Man, 73.Google Scholar

60. Dawkins, W. B., “Darwin on the Descent of Man,” Edinburgh Review, 134 (1871): 195–235; 195–96.Google Scholar

61. Cobbe, Frances Power, Darwinism in Morals and Other Essays (London: Williams and Norgate, 1872), 11.Google Scholar

62. Darwin, , The Descent of Man, 101.Google Scholar

63. “Guinevere,” 11. 365–75.

64. Darwin, , The Descent of Man, 91.Google Scholar

65. “Guinevere,” 11. 375–97; Tennyson calls this loss of conscious control a “trance” (1.398), always a strong word in his poetry.

66. “Guinevere,” 11. 464–68.

67. “Guinevere,” 1. 664.

68. Maurice, , “On the Moral Distinction Between Law and Equity,” 329.Google Scholar

69. Maurice, , “On the Moral Distinction Between Law and Equity,” 330.Google Scholar

70. “The Passing of Arthur,” 11. 402–06. This poem is an expansion of the “Morte d'Arthur,” written shortly after the death of Tennyson's intimate friend Arthur Hallam in 1833.

71. The Chancery Amendment Acts of 1852 and 1858 conferred some common law powers on Chancery, and the Common Law Procedure Acts of 1852 and 1854 enabled the common law courts to exercise certain equitable powers. Concise details of this and other relevant legislation are given by Potter, Harold, An Introduction to the History of Equity and its Courts (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1931)Google Scholar. For a Victorian account, see Cookson, Montague, “The New Judicature,” The Fortnightly Review 19[new series] (1876): 277–94.Google Scholar

72. Dicey, A. V., Lectures on the Relation Between Law and Public Opinion in England During the Nineteenth Century (1905; 2nd edition, London: Macmillan, 1914), 209.Google Scholar

73. Hemming, G. W., “The Judicial Investigation of Truth,” The Quarterly Review 138 (1875): 229–65; 253.Google Scholar

74. On the maxims of Equity generally see Pound, Roscoe, “On Certain Maxims of Equity,” in Cambridge Legal Essays (Cambridge: Heffer, 1926): 259–77Google Scholar; on this maxim, 268–69.

75. Maitland, F. W., Equity: A Course of Lectures, 1909, ed. Chaytor, A. H. and Whittaker, W. J.; 2nd edition, rev. John Brunyate (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1936), 17, 19.Google Scholar

76. Maine, Henry, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (1861: rpt. New York: Dorset Press, 1986)Google Scholar. The second and third chapters of this book, “Law of Nature and Equity” and “The Modern History of the Law of Nature,” kept the connection between Equity and the Law of Nature alive in the mid-Victorian period, however much Maine may have disliked the “Law of Nature” as an ahistorical category.

77. Chute, Chaloner William, Equity under the Judicature Act, or the Relation of Equity to Common Law (London: Butterworth, 1874), 22.Google Scholar

78. “Competition of Law and Equity,” Solicitors' Journal vol. 2 (22 May, 1858), 597–98.

79. Hemming, , Thoughts on the Fusion of Law and Equity, 23–24.Google Scholar

80. Hemming, , Thoughts on the Fusion of Law and Equity, 10.Google Scholar

81. Chute, , Equity under the Judicature Act, 3.Google Scholar

82. Chute, , Equity under the Judicature Act, 19.Google Scholar

83. Ashburner, , Principles of Equity, 23 (see n. 7 above).Google Scholar

84. Daniel Deronda, 814.

85. Acton, Lord, “George Eliot's Life,’” The Nineteenth Century 17 (1885): 464–85; 467.Google Scholar