Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:51:46.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PHYSIOGNOMIC DISCOURSE AND THE TRIALS OF CROSS-CLASS SYMPATHY IN MARY BARTON

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Christie Harner
Christie Harner*
Affiliation:
Newcastle University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“The judge, the jury, the avenger of blood, the prisoner, the witnesses – all were gathered together within one building” (306; ch. 32): at the melodramatic acme of Elizabeth Gaskell's 1848 Mary Barton, the reader's energies have similarly converged upon Jem Wilson's trial for the murder of Harry Carson. Yet despite the narrative significance of the courtroom testimonies, once Jem has pled not guilty, the narrator unexpectedly mutes the prosecutor's opening speech and substitutes instead what seems to be a lowbrow debate about the defendant's physical appearance. The first speaker insists that any justly accused man will have “some expression of [his] crimes” in his face, and observing Jem's “low, resolute brow” and “white compressed lips,” he comments that he has “seldom seen one with such marks of Cain on his countenance as the man at the bar” (309; ch. 32). The second observer disagrees, asserting that Jem's forehead is not so low as it might initially seem and is in fact rather square, “which some people say is a good sign” (309; ch. 32). He asserts that he is “no physiognomist” and proposes instead that Jem's agitated and depressed visage is less the sign of a depraved character than the result of inner turmoil and a bad haircut.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 705 - 724
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Argyros, Ellen. “Without Any Check of Proud Reserve”: Sympathy and its Limits in George Eliot's Novels. New York: Peter Lang, 1999.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. “Emily's Ghost: The Cultural Politics of Victorian Fiction, Folklore, and Photography.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 25.3 (Spring 1992): 245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Fiction in the Age of Photography: The Legacy of British Realism. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Baldridge, Cates. The Dialogics of Dissent in the English Novel. Hanover: Middlebury College P & UP of New England, 1994.Google Scholar
Bennett, Charles. London People: Sketched From Life. London: Smith, 1863.Google Scholar
Bulwer, Edward, Lytton, Lord. “On the Want of Sympathy.”Miscellaneous Prose Works, Vol. 2. London: Bentley, 1868. 105–11.Google Scholar
Carson, James C. L.The Fundamental Principles of Phrenology are the Only Principles Capable of Being Reconciled with the Immateriality and Immorality of the Soul. London: Houlston and Wright, 1868.Google Scholar
Chapple, John. Elizabeth Gaskell: The Early Years. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1997.Google Scholar
“The Demeanor of Murderers.” Household Words 14 June 1856: 505–07.Google Scholar
Disraeli, Benjamin. Sybil; Or, The Two Nations. Ed. Smith, Sheila M.. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Endersby, Jim. “Sympathetic Science: Charles Darwin, Joseph Hooker, and the Passions of Victorian Naturalists.” Victorian Studies 51.2 (Winter 2009): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. The Condition of the Working Class in England. Ed. McLellan, David. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, Jeanne. “The Heroine of Irregular Features: Physiognomy and Conventions of Heroine Description.” Victorian Studies 24.3 (Spring 1981): 325–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Frawley, Maria H. “Elizabeth Gaskell's Ethnographic Imagination in The Life of Charlotte Brontë.” Biography 21.2 (Spring 1998): 175–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryckstedt, Monica Correa. Elizabeth Gaskell's Mary Barton and Ruth: A Challenge to Christian England. Stockholm: Upsala, 1982.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. The Industrial Reformation of English Fiction: Social Discourse and Narrative Form, 1832–1867. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Ganz, Margaret. Elizabeth Gaskell: The Artist in Conflict. New York: Twayne, 1969.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. The Letters of Mrs. Gaskell. Ed. Chapple, J. A. V. and Polland, Arthur. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. Mary Barton. Ed. Foster, Shirley. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. “The Squire's Story.” Gothic Tales. Ed. Kranzler, Laura. London: Penguin, 2000.Google Scholar
Gillray, James. DOUBLÛRES of Characters; or Striking Resemblances in Physiognomy. 1798. Yale University, New Haven. About Faces: Physiognomy in Nineteenth Century Britain. Sharrona Pearl. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2010. 88.Google Scholar
Grant, Reverend Brewin, Ed. Discussion on Phrenology; Between Charles Donovan, Esq. (The Eminent Phrenologist from London), and The Reverend Brewin Grant, B.A. (of Highbury Chapel, Birmingham), Held in the New Odd Fellows's Hall, Temple Street, Birmingham, on the Evenings of December 10th, 12th, 17th, and 19th, 1849. London: B. L. Green, 1849.Google Scholar
Gravil, Richard. “Negotiating Mary Barton.” Master Narratives: Tellers and Telling in the English Novel. Ed. Gravil, Richard. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001. 126–47.Google Scholar
Harrison, Mary-Catherine. “How Narrative Relationships Overcome Empathic Bias: Elizabeth Gaskell's Empathy across Social Difference.” Poetics Today 32.2 (Summer 2011): 255–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechter, Michael. Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, 1536–1966. Berkeley: U of California P, 1975.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Audrey. Scenes of Sympathy: Identity and Representation in Victorian Fiction. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Ruth Y. Reclaiming Myths of Power: Women Writers and the Victorian Spiritual Crisis. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Kay-Shuttleworth, James Phillips. The Moral and Physical Condition of the Working Classes Employed in the Cotton Manufacture in Manchester. London: Frank Cass, 1970.Google Scholar
Kent, Raymond A. A History of British Empirical Sociology. Aldershot: Gower: 1981.Google Scholar
The King James Bible. Cambridge Edition: 1769. King James Bible Online. Web. 12 Sept. 2014.Google Scholar
Knezevic, Borislav. “An Ethnology of the Provincial: The Social Geography of Gentility in Elizabeth Gaskell's Cranford.” Victorian Studies 41.3 (1998): 405–27.Google Scholar
Lane, Christopher. Hatred and Civility: The Antisocial Life in Victorian England. New York: Columbia UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Lavater, Johann Caspar. Essays on Physiognomy: Designed to Promote the Knowledge and the Love of Mankind. 7th ed. Trans. Thomas Holcroft. London: William Tegg, 1850.Google Scholar
Lucas, John. “Mrs. Gaskell and Brotherhood.” Tradition and Tolerance in Nineteenth-Century Fiction: Critical essays on some English and American novels. Ed. Howard, David, Lucas, John, and Goode, John. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966. 141–205.Google Scholar
Rev. of Mary Barton. Westminster Review 51.1 (April 1849): 48–63.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “The Mind and Character of Jeremy Bentham.” Hard Times. Ed. Kaplan, Fred. New York: Norton, 2001. 338–40.Google Scholar
Millard, Kay. “The Religion of Elizabeth Gaskell.” Gaskell Society Journal 15 (2001): 1–13.Google Scholar
Pearl, Sharrona. About Faces: Physiognomy in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Pittock, Malcolm. “Cranford and Cruelty: An Interpretation.” Cambridge Quarterly 38.2 (2009): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, J. W.Outlines of a New System of Physiognomy. Illustrated by Numerous Engravings Indicating the Location of the Signs of the Different Mental Faculties. London: Webb, 1852.Google Scholar
Schor, Hilary M. “Show-Trials: Character, Conviction and the Law in Victorian Fiction.” Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 11.2 (Winter 1999): 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, George. “Alphabet of Phrenology.” 2nd ed. London: W. J. Golbourn, 1860.Google Scholar
Smiles, Samuel. Self-Help. 1859. New York: American Book Company, 1904.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. Theory of Moral Sentiments; To which is Added a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages. London: George Bell, 1875.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan. Fact and Feeling: Baconian Science and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, Sheila M. “Blue Books and Victorian Novelists.” Review of English Studies. New Series 21.81 (February 1970): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sponza, Lucio. Italian Immigrants in Nineteenth Century Britain: Realities and Images. Leicester: Leicester UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Staniland, S. Anti-Phrenology. An Epitome of Two Lectures Given Before the Members of the Fareham Literary Institution. Fareham: A. Nicholson, 1839.Google Scholar
Starr, Elizabeth. “‘A Great Engine for Good’: The Industry of Fiction in Elizabeth Gaskell's Mary Barton and North and South.” Studies in the Novel 32.4 (Winter 2002): 385–402.Google Scholar
Stewart, J.. Colloquies Imaginary Conversations Between a Phrenologist and the Shade of Dugald Stewart. London: Parbury, 1838.Google Scholar
Thompson, Reverend Sir Henry and Engledue, W. C.. Phrenological Controversy. Correspondence Between the Reverend Sir Henry Thompson and W. C. Engledue. Portsmouth: W. Harrison, 1839.Google Scholar
Turner, Henry. Phrenology: Its Evidences and Inferences. With Criticisms upon Mr. Grant's Recent Lectures. London: G. J. Holyoake, 1858.Google Scholar
Végsö, Roland. “Mary Barton and the Dissembled Dialogue.” Journal of Narrative Theory 33.2 (Summer 2003): 163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Samuel R. How to Read Character: A New Illustrated Hand-Book of Phrenology and Physiognomy for Students and Examiners. New York: Samuel R. Wells, 1870.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael. “Elizabeth Gaskell and Unitarianism.” Gaskell Society Journal 6 (1992): 25–41.Google Scholar
Woodrow, Ross. “Lavater and the Drawing Manual.” Physiognomy in Profile: Lavater's Impact on European Culture. Ed. Percival, Melissa and Tytler, Graeme. Wilmington: U of Delaware P, 2005.Google Scholar
Woolnoth, Thomas. Facts and Faces: Or the Mutual Connection Between Linear and Mental Portraiture Morally Considered, and Pictorially Illustrated By a Series of Twenty-Four Graphic Heads Of All the Dispositions of the Mind; with a Dissertation on Personal Beauty, Showing What it is, and What is Mistaken for it, By a Comprehensive View of Constructive, Ornamental, and Expressive Beauty, and their Relative Importance to Each Other: Also, an Essay on Complexion of Character. London: Thomas Woolnoth, 1852.Google Scholar
Wyatt, John. “The Inoffensive Philanthropist: The Way of Humility in North and South.” Gaskell Society Journal 20 (2006): 102–14.Google Scholar
Zemka, Sue. “Brief Encounters: Street Scenes in Gaskell's Manchester.” ELH 76.3 (Fall 2009): 793–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar