Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:15:24.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REPRESENTING ANIMAL MINDS IN EARLY ANIMAL AUTOBIOGRAPHY: CHARLOTTE TUCKER'S THE RAMBLES OF A RAT AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY NATURAL HISTORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Julie A. Smith
Julie A. Smith*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Whitewater (Retired)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Animal autobiography – a first-person fictional narrative in which an animal tells its own story – emerged in the late eighteenth century as the first attempt to represent animal minds in extended narrative form. Authors of this genre were anxious to create accurate, believable animal characters, even as they afforded them human language and a habit of critical commentary. To do this, they wrote in sync with scientific understandings of animals as set out in books of natural history. A few authors are explicit about their debt to natural history, and their comments point to a broad but intended compatibility between the ideas of animal minds in animal autobiography and those in the popularized scientific discourse of the day.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 725 - 744
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Allen, David. E.The Naturalist in Britain: a Social History. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Armbruster, Karla. “What Do We Want from Talking Animals? Reflections on Literary Representations of Animal Voices and Minds.” Ed. DeMello, Margo. 17–34.Google Scholar
Ashworth, William. B. Jr. “Emblematic Natural History of the Renaissance.” Cultures of Natural History. Ed. Jardine, N., Secord, J. A., and Spary, E. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 17–37.Google Scholar
Barber, Lynn. The Heyday of Natural History, 1820–1870. Garden City: Doubleday, 1980.Google Scholar
Beauties of Natural History; Or, Elements of Zoography. London: Richardson and Urquhart, 1777. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 23 March 2007.Google Scholar
Bingley, W.Animal Biography or Popular Zoology Comprising Authentic Anecdotes of the Economy, Habits of Life, Instincts, and Sagacity, of the Animal Creation, . . . . 4th ed. London: F. C. and J. Rivington, 1813.Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob. “The Historical Animal Mind: ‘Sagacity’ in Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Experiencing Animal Minds: An Anthology of Animal-Human Encounters. Ed. Smith, Julie A. and Mitchell, Robert W.. New York: Columbia UP, 2012. 65–78.Google Scholar
Bridson, Gavin. The History of Natural History: an Annotated Bibliography. 2nd ed. London: Linnean Society of London, 2008.Google Scholar
Buss, H. M. “‘Bios’ in Women's Autobiography.” A/B:Auto/biography 10.1 (Spring 1995): 114–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerini, Jane. “Remains of the Day: Early Victorians in the Field.” Victorian Science in Context. Ed. Bernard, Lightman. Chicago: U Chicago P, 1997. 354–77.Google Scholar
Colombat, Jacqueline. “Mission Impossible: Animal Autobiography.” Cahiers Victoriens and Édourdiens 39 (April 1994): 37–49.Google Scholar
Copeland, Marion. “‘Straight from the Horse's Mouth’: Equine Memoirs and Autobiographies.” Ed. DeMello, Margo. 179–91.Google Scholar
Cosslett, Tess. Talking Animals in British Children's Fiction, 1786–1914. Burlington: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
CuvierGeorges, baron Georges, baron. The Animal Kingdom, Arranged According to Its Organization; Forming a Natural History of Animals, and an Introduction to Comparative Anatomy. 1863. New York: Kraus Reprint, 1969.Google Scholar
DeMello, Margo. Speaking for Animals: Animal Autobiographical Writing. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Drouin, Jean-Marc, and Bernadette, Bensaude-Vincent. “Nature for the People.” Cultures of Natural History. Ed. Jardine, N., Secord, J. A., and Spary, E. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 408–25.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, Rodney Stenning. “Animal Consciousness from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century.” Dalhousie Review 71.3 (1991): 269–90.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira. Animal Advocacy and Englishwomen, 1780–1900: Patriots, Nation, and Empire. Ann Arbor: U Michigan P, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flegel, Monica. “Mistresses as Masters: Voicing Female Power Through the Subject Animal in Two Nineteenth-Century Animal Autobiographies.” Ed. DeMello, Margo. 89–101.Google Scholar
Fudge, Erica. Brutal Reasoning: Animals, Rationality, and Humanity in Early Modern England. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giberne, Agnes. A Lady of England: the Life and Letters of Charlotte Maria Tucker. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1895.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Oliver. An History of the Earth, and Animated Nature. Vol. 1. London: J. Nourse, 1774. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 25 March 2007.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Samuel G. The World and Its Inhabitants by the Author of Peter Parley's Tales. Boston: Bradbury, Soden, 1845.Google Scholar
Gossman, Jeffrey Lionel. “Anecdote and History.” History and Theory 42.2 (May 2003): 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Natalie Corinne. “Horse Talk: Horses and Human(e) Discourses.” Ed. DeMello, Margo. 207–29.Google Scholar
Jardine, N., Secord, J. A., and Spary, E. C., eds. Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Jesse, Edward. Gleanings in Natural History. 3rd ed. London: J. Murray, 1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon-Jones, Christine. Kindred Brutes: Animals in Romantic Period Writing. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2001.Google Scholar
Lightman, Bernard. “‘The Voices of Nature’: Popularizing Victorian Science.” Ed. Lightman, Bernard. 187–211.Google Scholar
Lightman, Bernard, ed. Victorian Science in Context. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangum, Teresa. “Dog Years, Human Fears.” Representing Animals. Ed. Nigel, Rothfels. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2002. 35–47.Google Scholar
Memoirs of Dick, the Little Poney, Supposed to Be Written by Himself. London: J. Walker, 1800. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 7 July 2008.Google Scholar
Merrill, Lynn L. The Romance of Victorian Natural History. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Merz, John T. A History of European Scientific Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Vol. 1. Gloucester: Peter Smith, 1946.Google Scholar
Miller Gordon, L. “The Fowls of Heaven and the Fate of the Earth: Assessing the Early Modern Revolution in Natural History.” Worldviews 9.1 (2005): 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, Anne. “The Power of Testimony: the Speaking Animal's Plea for Understanding in a Selection of Eighteenth-Century British Poetry.” Ed. DeMello, Margo. 163–77.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Robert. W., Thompson, Nicholas S., and Lyn Miles, H., eds. Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals. Albany: SUNY, 1997.Google Scholar
Morse, Deborah, D., and Danahay, Martin A., eds. “Introduction.” Victorian Animal Dreams: Representations of Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007. 1–12.Google Scholar
Oerlemans Onno, D. “‘The Meanest Thing That Feels’: Anthropomorphizing Animals in Romanticism.” Mosaic 27.1 (March 1994): 1–32.Google Scholar
Pennant, Thomas. British Zoology. Vol. 1. London: B. White, 1768. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 23 March 2007.Google Scholar
Perkins, David. Romanticism and Animal Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Samuel. F. Jr. John Locke and Children's Books in Eighteenth-Century England. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1981.Google Scholar
“Rats.” Quarterly Review 101.201 (Jan. and April 1857): 123–41.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet. (2000). “Animal Consciousness: Some Historical Perspective.” American Zoology 40.6 (2000): 847–52.Google Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet. “Animal Pleasures: Popular Zoology in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century England.” Harvard Library Bulletin 33.3 (Summer 1985): 239–79.Google Scholar
Ritvo, Harriet. “Learning from Animals: Natural History for Children in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” Children's Literature 13.1 (1985): 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Cannon. “Victorian Beetlemania.” Victorian Science in Context. Ed. Bernard, Lightman. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997. 35–51.Google Scholar
Sewell, Anna. Black Beauty. Ed. and Intro. Peter Hollendale. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Smith, Julie A. “Resisting Metaphor: John Hawkes's Sweet William: A Memoir of Old Horse.” Papers on Language and Literature 38.4 (2002): 13–428.Google Scholar
Smith, Julie A. “Sensory Experience as Consciousness in Literary Representations of Animal Minds.” Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art, Literature, Philosophy and Popular Culture. Ed. Pollock, Mary S and Rainwater, Catherine. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2005. 231–46.Google Scholar
Swainson, William. On the Habits and Instincts of Animals. London: Longman, et al., 1840.Google Scholar
Swainson, William. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural History. London: Longman, et al., 1834.Google Scholar
Trimmer, Sarah. An Easy Introduction to the Knowledge of Nature, and Reading the Holy Scriptures. . . London: J. Dodsley, 1780. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 3 Sept. 2008.Google Scholar
Trimmer, Sarah. Fabulous Histories. Dublin: William Porter, 1794. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 7 Sept. 2008.Google Scholar
Tucker, Charlotte. The Rambles of a Rat. London: T. Nelson, 1857.Google Scholar
Wood, Rev. John G. The Common Objects of the Country. London: Routledge, 1858.Google Scholar
Wood, Rev. John G. The Illustrated Natural History. London: Routledge, 1853.Google Scholar