Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:07:46.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A 221-bp fragment of the mouse opsin promoter directs expression specifically to the rod photoreceptors of transgenic mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Alexander B. Quiambao ,
Neal S. Peachey ,
Nancy J. Mangini ,
Pal Röhlich ,
Joe G. Hollyfield  and
Muayyad R. Al-Ubaidi
Alexander B. Quiambao
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago
Neal S. Peachey
Affiliation:
Hines VA Hospital and Department of Neurology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Chicago
Nancy J. Mangini
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago
Pal Röhlich
Affiliation:
Department of Human Morphology and Developmental Biology, Laboratory I. of Electron Microscopy, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
Joe G. Hollyfield
Affiliation:
Research Institute FFb, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland
Muayyad R. Al-Ubaidi
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mutations in the human rod opsin gene have been shown to segregate with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP) and photoreceptor degeneration in transgenic mice. While these degenerations are characterized by the primary degeneration of rods, cones eventually die as well. To determine whether this subsequent cone degeneration is the result of expression of mutant rod opsin in the cones, the retinal cell-type specificity of a 221-bp fragment of the mouse rod opsin promoter was evaluated. Two transgenic mouse lines generated by injecting a fusion gene comprised of a 221-bp fragment of the mouse rod opsin promoter and the simian virus 40 large tumor antigen gene (Tag) were examined. The expression of Tag causes photoreceptor cell degeneration in members of both transgenic lines. However, the two lines differed with respect to the level of Tag expression and the rate and extent of photoreceptor cell degeneration. Immunocytochemical localization of opsin and Tag in surviving photoreceptor cells was determined and the results were confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Rod- and cone-mediated function was evaluated by electroretinography (ERG). In the higher Tag-expressing transgenic line only one row of nuclei remained in the outer nuclear layer at postnatal day (P) 150. While these nuclei showed no antigenicity for rod opsin or Tag, they did stain with an antibody that reacts with both rod and cone S-antigens (arrestins), indicating that these cells were surviving photoreceptor nuclei. Positive staining with peanut agglutinin, which uniquely decorates matrix domains surrounding cones in the normal retina, confirmed that the surviving photoreceptor nuclei were of cone origin. RT-PCR substantiated the results from immunostaining; amplification product was obtained using blue cone opsin transcripts but not from either Tag or rod opsin transcripts. The second transgenic mouse line exhibited a much slower photoreceptor cell death that was associated with low levels of Tag transgene transcript. At P120, ~50% of photoreceptors remained and an ~45% reduction in the rod ERG a-wave was observed. Cone-mediated ERGs, however, were normal. The results demonstrate the rod-specific expression of Tag as directed by the 221-bp fragment of the mouse rod opsin promoter and suggest that the cone degeneration in ADRP or transgenic mice associated with mutations in the rod opsin gene is a secondary effect of rod degeneration.

Keywords

Cone photoreceptorOpsin promoterRetinal degenerationT-antigenTransgenic mice
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , July 1997 , pp. 617 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Ubaidi, M.R., Pittler, S.J., Champagne, M.S., Triantafyllos, J.T., McGinnis, J.F. & Baehr, W. (1990). Mouse opsin: Gene structure and molecular basis of multiple transcripts. Journal of Biological Chemistry 265, 20563–20569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Ubaidi, M.R., Hollyfield, J.G., Overbeek, P.A. & baehr, w. (1992). Photoreceptor degeneration induced by the expression of simian virus 40 large tumor antigen in the retina of transgenic mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 89, 1194–1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Ubaidi, M.R., Hollyfield, J.G., Font, R.L. & Baehr, W. (1993 a). Retinal development under the influence of SV40 T-antigen in transgenic mice. In Retinal Degeneration: Clinical and Laboratory Application ed. Hollyfield, J.G., Anderson, R.E. & La Vail, M.M., pp. 243–250. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Ubaidi, M.R., Quiambao, A.B., Myers, K.M. & Hollyfield, J.G. (1993 b). Expression of an oncogene causes slowly progressing retinal degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Abstract) 34, 769.Google Scholar
Al-Ubaidi, M.R., Mangini, N.J., Quiambao, A.B., Myers, K.M., Abler, A., Cheng, C., Baehr, W., Tso, M.O.M., Butel, J.S. & Hollyfield, J.G. (1997). Unscheduled DNA replication precedes apoptosis of photoreceptor cells expressing SV40 T antigen. Experimental Eye Research 64, 573–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, J., Beller, B.O. & Sun, D. (1994). Identification of the human rhodopsin promoter: Transgenic mouse studies. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Abstract) 35, 1703.Google Scholar
Berson, E.L. (1993). Retinitis pigmentosa. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences 34, 1659–1676.Google ScholarPubMed
Bogenmann, E., Lochrie, M.A. & Simon, M.I. (1988). Cone cell-specific genes expressed in retinoblastoma. Science 240, 76–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J., Makino, C.L., Peachey, N.S., Baylor, D.A. & Simon, M.I. (1995). Mechanism of rhodopsin inactivation m vivo as revealed by COOH-terminal truncation mutant. Science 267, 374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DesJardin, L.E. & Hauswirth, W.H. (1996). Developmentally important DNA elements within the bovine opsin upstream region. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences 37, 154–165.Google ScholarPubMed
Di Polo, A. & Farber, D.B. (1995). Rod photoreceptor-specific gene expression in human retinoblastoma cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 92, 4016–4020.Google ScholarPubMed
Donoso, L.A., Gregerson, D.S., Smith, L., Robertson, S., Knospe, V., Vrabec, T. & Kaslow, C.M. (1990). S-antigen: Preparation and characterization of site specific monoclonal antibodies. Current Eye Research 9, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyson, N., Howley, P.M., Monger, K. & Harlow, E. (1989). The human papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein is able to bind to the retiniblastoma gene product. Science 243, 934–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, Y., Peachey, N.S., Ripps, H. & Naash, M.I. (1995). Functional abnormalities in transgenic mice expressing a mutant rhodopsin gene. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences 36, 62–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Gouras, P., Kjeldbye, H. & Zack, D.J. (1994). Reporter gene expression in cones in transgenic mice carrying bovine rhodopsin promoter/lacZ transgene. Visual Neuroscience 11, 1227–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasel, K.W. & Sutcliffe, J.G. (1990). Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA coding for mouse cyclophilin. Nucleic Acids Research 18, 4019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, P.C., Gaitan, A.E., Hao, Y., Petters, R.M. & Wong, F. (1993). Cellular interactions implicated in the mechanism of photoreceptor degeneration in transgenic mice expressing a mutant rhodopsin gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 90, 8484–8488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphries, P., Kenna, P. & Parrar, G.J. (1992). On the molecular genetics of retinitis pigmentosa. Science 256, 804–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphries, P. (1993). Hereditary retinopathies: Insight into a complex genetic aetiology. British Journal of Ophthalmology 77, 469–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, L.V., Blanks, J.C. & Hageman, G.S. (1989). Effects of retinal degenerations on the cone matrix sheath. In Inherited and Environmentally Induced Retinal Degenerations, ed. La Vail, M.M., Anderson, R.E. & Hollyfield, J.G., pp. 217–232. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
Lanford, R.E. & Butel, J.S. (1979). Antigenic relationship of SV40 early proteins to purified large T polypeptides. Virology 97, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lem, J., Applebury, M.L., Falk, J.D., Flannery, J.G. & Simon, M.I. (1991). Tissue-specific and developmental regulation of rod opsin chimeric genes in transgenic mice. Neuron 6, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lem, J., Flannery, J., Applebury, M., Farber, D.B. & Simon, M. (1992). Retinal degeneration is rescued in transgenic rd mice by expression of the cGMP phosphodiesterase β subunit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 89, 4422–4426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marx, J. (1993). How p53 suppresses cell growth. Science 262, 1644–1645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCall, M.A., Gregg, R.G., Merriman, K., Goto, Y., Peachey, N.S. & Stanford, L.R. (1996). Morphological and physiological consequences of the selective elimination of rod photoreceptors in transgenic mice. Experimental Eye Research 63, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morabito, M.A., Yu, X. & Barnstable, C.J. (1991). Characterization of developmentally regulated and retina-specific nuclear protein binding to a site in the upstream region of the rat opsin gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266, 9667–9672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naash, M.I., Al-Ubaidi, M.R., Hollyfield, J.G. & Baehr, W. (1993 a). Simulation of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa in transgenic mice. In Retinal Degeneration: Clinical and Laboratory Applications, ed. Hollyfield, J.G., Anderson, R.E. & La Vail, M.M., pp. 201–210. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naash, M.I., Hollyfield, J.G., Al-Ubaidi, M.R. & Baehr, W. (1993 b). Simulation of human autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa in transgenic mice expressing a mutated murine opsin gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 90, 5499–5503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nir, I. & Ransom, N. (1992). S-antigen in rods and cones of primate retina: Different labeling patterns are revealed with antibodies directed against specific domains in the molecule. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 40, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nork, T.M., Mangini, N.J. & Millecchia, L.L. (1993). Rods and cones contain antigenically distinctive S-antigens. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences 34, 2918–2925.Google ScholarPubMed
Olsson, J.E., Gordon, J.W., Pawlyk, B.S., Roof, D., Hayes, A., Molday, R.S., Mukai, S., Cowley, G.S., Berson, E.L. & Dryja, T.P. (1992). Transgenic mice with a rhodopsin mutation (Pro23His): A mouse model of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Neuron 9, 815–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peachey, N.S., Goto, Y., Al-Ubaidi, M.R. & Naash, M.I. (1993). Properties of the mouse cone-mediated electroretinogram during light adaptation. Neuroscience Letters 162, 9–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peachey, N.S., Goto, Y., Quiambao, A.B. & Al-Ubaidi, M.R. (1995). Functional consequences of oncogene-induced photoreceptor degeneration in transgenic mice. Visual Neuroscience 12, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raport, C.J., Lem, J., Makino, C., Chen, C.-K., Fitch, C.L., Hobson, A., Baylor, D., Simon, M.I. & Hurley, J.B. (1994). Downregulation of cGMP phosphodiesterase induced by expression of GTPase-deficient cone transducin in mouse rod photoreceptors. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences 35, 2932–2947.Google ScholarPubMed
Roof, D.J., Adamian, M. & Hayes, A. (1994). Rhodopsin accumulation at abnormal sites in retinas of mice with a human P23H rhodopsin transgene. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences 35, 4049–4062.Google ScholarPubMed
Shastry, B.S. (1994). Retinitis Pigmentosa and related disorders: Phenotype of rhodopsin and peripherin/rds mutations. American Journal of Medical Genetics 52, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sung, C.-H., Makino, C., Baylor, D. & Nathans, J. (1994). A rhodopsin gene mutation responsible for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa results in a protein that is defective in localization to the photoreceptor outer segment. Journal of Neuroscience 14, 5818–5833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szél, A., Takacs, L., Monostori, E., Diamantstein, T., Vigh-Teichmann, I. & Röhlich, P. (1986). Monoclonal antibody-recognizing cone visual pigment. Experimental Eye Research 43, 871–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szél, A., Röhlich, P., Caffe, A.R., Juliusson, B., Aguirre, G. & Van Veen, T. (1992). Unique topographic separation of two spectral classes of cones in the mouse retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 325, 327–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szél, A. & Röhlich, P. (1992). Two cone types of rat retina detected by anti-visual pigment antibodies. Experimental Eye Research 55, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tien, L., Rayborn, M.E. & Hollyfield, J.G. (1992). Characterization of the interphotoreceptor matrix surrounding rod photoreceptors in the human retina. Experimental Eye Research 55, 297–306.Google ScholarPubMed
Travis, G.H., Sutcliffe, J.G. & Bok, D. (1992). Complete rescue of photoreceptor dysplasia and degeneration in transgenic retinal degeneration slow (rds) mice. Neuron 9, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodford, B.J., Chen, J. & Simon, M.I. (1994). Expression of rhodopsin promoter transgene product in both rods and cones. Experimental Eye Research 58, 631–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zack, D.J., Bennett, J., Wang, Y., Davenport, C., Klaunberg, B., Gearhart, J. & Nathans, J. (1991). Unusual topography of bovine rhodopsin promoter-lacZ fusion gene expression in transgenic mouse retinas. Neuron 6, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed