Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:14:10.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X- and Y-mediated current sources in areas 17 and 18 of cat visual cortex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

David Ferster
David Ferster
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

X- and Y-mediated input to areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex was studied using current-source-density analysis of field potentials evoked by stimulation of the optic nerves. A cuff-shaped electrode was used for stimulation so that Y axons, by virtue of their larger diameters, would have lower electrical thresholds than X axons. The effect in each cortical area of activating Y axons alone could therefore be determined by low-&litude stimulation of the optic nerves. Current-source densities were calculated by two separate methods. (1) In five experiments, field potentials were measured sequentially at different cortical depths with a single tungsten electrode. Current densities were then calculated by computer. (2) In two experiments, current densities were derived in real time from field potentials recorded simultaneously from three sites with a multi-electrode probe. The calculation was performed by an analog circuit specially designed for this purpose. This method has several advantages over the standard, single-electrode method. At stimulus strengths sufficient to activate the majority of Y axons in the optic nerves, but subthreshold to most X axons, the field potentials evoked in area 17 changed little from layer to layer. When the current-source-density analysis was applied to these potentials, no significant sources or sinks were detectable. Only when the stimulus strength was raised to the point that both X and Y axons were activated by the stimulus were any current sources or sinks detected in area 17. The currents were similar in time course and laminar pattern to those recorded after stimulation of the optic chiasm. In area 18, large sources and sinks were evoked by stimulation of Y axons alone. These currents changed little when the stimulus strength was increased to activate X axons as well. Area 18, therefore, in contrast to area 17, seems to be dominated by Y input and receives little X input. These results support the conclusions of the accompanying paper in which synaptic potentials were recorded intracellularly from cortical neutrons. The intracellular experiments failed to show substantial Y input to area 17. The projections of X and Y axons may therefore be much more highly segregated into areas 17 and 18 than previously thought. Alternatively, the nature of the Y input to area 17 may be very different from that to area 18 in that it cannot be easily detected with intracellular or current-source-density techniques.

Keywords

Visual cortexX cellsY cellsCurrent-source-density analysis
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , February 1990 , pp. 135 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, P.O. & McLeod, J.G. (1954). Nature of potentials associated with synaptic transmission in lateral geniculate nucleus of cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 17, 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. & Martens, W. (1981). Critical bands in cat spatial vision. Journal of Physiology (London) 314, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, C. & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology (London) 203, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, D.B. & Wieniawa-Narkiewizc, E. (1986). The distributin of ON- and OFF-centre X- and Y-like cells in the A layers of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Physiology (London) 375, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullier, J. & Henry, G.H. (1979). Neural path taken by afferent streams in striate cortex of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 42, 1264–1270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
C&bell, F.W. & Robson, J. (1998). Applicaitons of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology (London) 197, 551–566.Google Scholar
Cleland, B.G., Dubin, M.W. & Levick, W.R. (1971). Sustained and transient neurones in the cat's retina and lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Physiology (London) 217, 473–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derrington, A.M. & Fuchs, A.F. (1979). Spatial and temporal properties of X and Y cells in the cat laterla geniculate necleus. Jounral of Physiology (London) 293, 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferster, D. (1981). A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 311, 623–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferster, D. (1990). X- and Y-mediated synaptic potentials in areas 17 and 18 of cat visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience 4, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, J.A. & Nicholson, C. (1974). Experimental optimization of current-source-density technique for anuran cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology 38, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, T.F., & Martin, K.A.C. & Whitteridge, D. (1985). Innervation of cat visual areas 17 and 18 by physiologyically idenitified X- and Y-type thalamic afferrents, I: Arborizaiton patterns and quantitative distribution of postsynaptic elements. Journal of Comparative Neurology 242, 263–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, M.J. & Lin, C.-S., Stanford, L.R. & Sherman, S.M. (1981). Morphology of functionally indentified neurons in the lateral geniculate nucles of the cat. Journal of Neurophysioloy 46, 80–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisert, E.E.J. (1980). Cortical projections of the lateral geniculate nuclues in the cat. Jounral of Comparative Nerology 190, 793–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, C.D. & Wiesel, T.N. (1979). Morphology and intracortical projections of functionally characterzied neurons in the cat visual cortex. Nature 280, 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillery, R.W. (1966). A study fo Golgi preparations from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the adult cat. Journal of comparative Neurology 128, 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstein, S. & Shapley, R.M. (1976). Qunantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. Journal of Physiology (London) 262, 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, K.P. & Stone, J. (1971). Conduction velocity of afferents to cat visual cortex: a correlation with cortical receptive-field properties. Brain Research 32, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1965). Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 28, 229–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, A.L., Sur, M., Uhlrich, D.J. & Sherman, S.M. (1985 a). Projection patterns of individual X-and Y-cell axons from the laterl geniculate nucleus to cortica area 17 in the cat. Journal of compative Neurology 233, 159–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, A.L., Sur, M., Uhlrich, D.J. & Sherman, S.M. (1985 b). Termination pattersn of individual X- and Y-cell axons in the visual cortex of the cat: projections to area 18, to the 17/18 border region, and to both areas 17 and 18. Jounral of Comparative Neurology 233, 190–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, A.L. & Weller, R.E. (1988). Structural correlates of functionally distinct X cells in the lateral geniculate nucles of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 268, 448–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagadeesh, B. & Ferster, D. (1988). X- and Y-like receptive-field properties in cat areas 17 and 18. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 14, 899.Google Scholar
LeVay, S. & Ferster, D. (1977). Relay cell classes in the lateral geniculate nucleus and the effects of visual deprivation. Journal of Comparative Neurology 172, 563–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leventhal, A.G. & Hirsch, H.V.B. (1978). Receptive-field properties of neurons of different laminae of visual cortex of the cat. Journal Neurophysiology 41, 948–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindström, S. & Wrobel, A. (1984). Separate inhibitory pathways ot X and Y pricipal cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Neuroscience Letters (Suppl.) 18, 234S.Google Scholar
Martin, K.A.C. & Whitteridge, D. (1984). Form, function and intracortical projections of spiny neurones in the striate visual cortex of the cat. Jounral of Physiology (London) 353, 463–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastronarde, D. (1987). Two classes of single-input X cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus, I: Receptive-field properties and classification of cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 357–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitzdorf, U. & Singer, W. (1977). Laminar segregation of afferents to lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: an analysis of current source density. Jounral of Neurophysiology 40, 1227–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzdorf, U. & Singer, W. (1978). Prominent excitatory pathways in the cat visual cortex (A 17 and 18): a current-source-density analysis of electircally evoked potentials. Experimental Brain Research 33, 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movshon, J.A., Thompson, I.D. & Tolhurst, D.J. (1978). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 283, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicoll, R.A. & Alger, B.E. (1979). Presynaptic inhibition: transmitter and ionic mechanisms. Internatinal Review of Neurobiology 21, 217–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasternak, T., Horn, K. & Maunsell, J.H.R. (1989). Lesions of area 18 in the cat abolish sensitivity to drifting, low spatial-frequency targets. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 30, 426.Google Scholar
Peng, Y. & Frank, E. (1989). Activation of GABAB receptors causes presynaptic inhibtion at synapses between muscle spindle afferents and motoneurons in the spinal cord of bullfrogs. Journal of Neuroscience 9, 1502–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollen, D.A. & Ronner, S.F. (1975). Periodic excitability changes across the receptive fields of complex cells in the striate and parastriate cortex of the cat. Journal of Physiology (London) 245, 667–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prohaska, O., Olcaytug, F., Womastek, K. & Petsche, H. (1977). A multi-electrode for intractortical recordings produced by thin-film technology. Electroencephalogy and Clicincal Neurophysilogy 42, 421–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, R. & Victor, J. (1986). Hyperacuity in cat retinal ganglion cells. Science 231, 999–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, W., Tretter, F. & Cynader, M. (1975). Organization of cat striate cortex: a correlation of receptive-field properties with afferent and efferent connections. Journal of Neurophysiology 38, 1080–1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skranides, W., Wässle, H. & Peichl, L. (1978). Are field potentials an appropirate method for demonstrating connections in the brain. Experimental Neurology 60, 509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, H. & Hochstein, S. (1985). Simple- and complex-cell response dependences on stimulation parameters. Journal of Neurophysiology 53, 1244–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, K. (1983). Cross-correlation analysis of geniculostriate neuronal relationships in cats. Journal of Neurophysiology 49, 1303–1318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thalluri, J. & Henry, G.H. (1989). Neurons of the striate cortex driven transsynaptically by electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus. Vision Research 29, 1319–1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolhurst, D.J. & Thompson, I.D. (1981). On the variety of spatial-frequency selectivities shown by neurons in area 17 of the cat. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 213, 183–199.Google ScholarPubMed
Troy, J.B. (1983). Spatial contrast sensitivities of X and Y type neurones in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Physiology (London) 344, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troy, J.B. (1987). Do Y geniculate neurons have greater contrast sensitivity than X geniculate neurons at all visual field locations. Vision Research 27, 1733–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, H.R. & Bergen, J.R. (1979). A four-mechanism model for threshold spatial vision. Vision Research 19, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed