Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Demb, Jonathan B.
Haarsma, Loren
Freed, Michael A.
and
Sterling, Peter
1999.
Functional Circuitry of the Retinal Ganglion Cell's Nonlinear Receptive Field.
The Journal of Neuroscience,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 22,
p.
9756.
Dakin, Steven C
and
Mareschal, Isabelle
2000.
Sensitivity to contrast modulation depends on carrier spatial frequency and orientation.
Vision Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
311.
Dumoulin, Serge O.
Baker, Curtis L.
and
Hess, Robert F.
2001.
Centrifugal bias for second-order but not first-order motion.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 9,
p.
2179.
Lu, Zhong-Lin
and
Sperling, George
2001.
Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 9,
p.
2331.
Chubb, Charles
Olzak, Lynn
and
Derrington, Andrew
2001.
Second-order processes in vision: introduction.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 9,
p.
2175.
Baker, Curtis L.
and
Mareschal, Isabelle
2001.
Vision: From Neurons to Cognition.
Vol. 134,
Issue. ,
p.
171.
Graham, Norma
and
Wolfson, S. Sabina
2001.
A note about preferred orientations at the first and second stages of complex (second-order) texture channels.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 9,
p.
2273.
Wong, Erwin H.
Levi, Dennis M.
and
McGraw, Paul V.
2001.
Is second-order spatial loss in amblyopia explained by the loss of first-order spatial input?.
Vision Research,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 23,
p.
2951.
Demb, Jonathan B
Zaghloul, Kareem
and
Sterling, Peter
2001.
Cellular Basis for the Response to Second-Order Motion Cues in Y Retinal Ganglion Cells.
Neuron,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 4,
p.
711.
Tse, Peter Ulric
and
Logothetis, Nikos K.
2002.
The duration of 3-D form analysis in transformational apparent motion.
Perception & Psychophysics,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 2,
p.
244.
Bertone, Armando
and
Faubert, Jocelyn
2003.
How is complex second-order motion processed?.
Vision Research,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 25,
p.
2591.
Ellemberg, D.
Lavoie, K.
Lewis, T.L.
Maurer, D.
Lepore, F.
and
Guillemot, J.-P.
2003.
Longer VEP latencies and slower reaction times to the onset of second-order motion than to the onset of first-order motion.
Vision Research,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 6,
p.
651.
Ellemberg, Dave
Allen, Harriet A
and
Hess, Robert F
2004.
Investigating local network interactions underlying first- and second-order processing.
Vision Research,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 15,
p.
1787.
Ellemberg, D.
Lewis, T.L.
Dirks, M.
Maurer, D.
Ledgeway, T.
Guillemot, J.-P.
and
Lepore, F.
2004.
Putting order into the development of sensitivity to global motion.
Vision Research,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 20,
p.
2403.
Johnson, Aaron P.
and
Baker, Curtis L.
2004.
First- and second-order information in natural images: a filter-based approach to image statistics.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 6,
p.
913.
LEDGEWAY, TIMOTHY
ZHAN, CHANG'AN
JOHNSON, AARON P.
SONG, YUNING
and
BAKER, CURTIS L.
2005.
The direction-selective contrast response of area 18 neurons is different for first- and second-order motion.
Visual Neuroscience,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
Ellemberg, D.
Lewis, T.L.
Defina, N.
Maurer, D.
Brent, H.P.
Guillemot, J-P.
and
Lepore, F.
2005.
Greater losses in sensitivity to second-order local motion than to first-order local motion after early visual deprivation in humans.
Vision Research,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 22,
p.
2877.
MacKay, T.L.
Jakobson, L.S.
Ellemberg, D.
Lewis, T.L.
Maurer, D.
and
Casiro, O.
2005.
Deficits in the processing of local and global motion in very low birthweight children.
Neuropsychologia,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 12,
p.
1738.
Wong, Erwin H.
and
Levi, Dennis M.
2005.
Second-order spatial summation in amblyopia.
Vision Research,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 21,
p.
2799.
Hariharan, Srividhya
Levi, Dennis M.
and
Klein, Stanley A.
2005.
“Crowding” in normal and amblyopic vision assessed with Gaussian and Gabor C’s.
Vision Research,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 5,
p.
617.