Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:47:35.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light-induced retinal degeneration in rdgB (retinal degeneration B) mutant of Drosophila: Electrophysiological and morphological manifestations of degeneration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Chaim T. Rubinstein ,
Shoshana Bar-Nachum ,
Zvi Selinger  and
Baruch Minke
Chaim T. Rubinstein
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Shoshana Bar-Nachum
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Zvi Selinger
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Chemistry, The Hebrew Unversity of Jerusalem, Israel
Baruch Minke
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantitative light and electron microscopy was used to monitor the extent of retinal degeneration as a function of age and temperature in the white-eyed rdgBKS222 mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Parallel measurements of the electroretinogram (ERG) of the degenerating retina reveal a new phenomenon – the appearance of spike potentials following illumination with bright light. These spikes, which do not appear in the normal fly retina, have a relatively long duration (20–50 ms), regenerative properties, and a rate of occurrence which increases with increasing light intensity. The spikes differed from the light response in being more susceptible to CO2 and to cuts in the eye. The spikes completely disappeared at low extracellular Ca2+ levels which did not reduce the amplitude of the light response. The spike potentials become triphasic when the recording electrode is advanced to the level of the basement membrane. This suggests that the spike potentials originate from the photoreceptor axons as a result of synchronous opening of voltage-dependent channels in a large number of photoreceptor cells. The occurrence of spike potentials during the process of degeneration was studied. Two phases can be distinguished: (1) Spike potentials appear in retinae of 2–3-day-old flies which display few morphological signs of degeneration. The frequency of appearance of spike potentials decreases in retinae of 14–16-day-old flies which show extensive degeneration of the R1–6 photoreceptor cells but no degeneration of the central R7,8 cells. (2) Spike potentials appear more frequently again in flies of 22–24 d of age. This is probably a consequence of degeneration of the remaining R7,8 photoreceptor cells. Temperature and the light-dark cycle had a critical effect on degeneration. Eight-day-old mutants raised at 19°C in a normal light-dark cycle showed only little degeneration. Eight-day-old mutants raised at 24°C showed only a slight degeneration when raised in the dark. However, the degree of degeneration was greatly enhanced in the mutants raised at 24°C under a light-dark cycle regime.

The combined electrophysiological and morphological study of the degeneration, as a function of age and temperature, revealed that (1) the degeneration process takes place even in darkness, but at a slow rate, while light greatly accelerates the degeneration. (2) The degeneration is negligible at 19°C, even during light, in the first week after eclosion. (3) The appearance of spike potentials at an early stage of the degeneration suggests that changes in the plasma membrane of the photoreceptor cells manifest at an initial stage of the degeneration process.

Keywords

Drosophilia mutantRetinal degenerationrdgBKS222Spike potentials
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 2 , Issue 6 , June 1989 , pp. 529 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alawi, A.A., Jennings, V., Grossfield, J. & Pak, W.L. (1972). Phototransduction mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. In The Visual System: Neurophysiology, Biophysics, and Their Clinical Applications, ed. Arden, G.B., pp. 1–21. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Barash, S., Suss, E., Stavenga, D.G., Rubinstein, C.R., Selinger, Z. & Minke, B. (1988). Light reduces the excitation efficiency in the nss mutant of the sheep blowfly Lucilia. Journal of General Physiology 92, 307–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, R.W. Jr & Kaplan, E. (1977). Properties of visual cells in the lateral eye of Limulus in situ: intracellular recordings. Journal of General Physiology 69, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumann, R. (1968). Slow and spike potentials recorded from retinula cells of the honey-bee drone in response to light. Journal of General Physiology 52, 855–875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coles, J.A. & Tsacopoulos, M. (1979). Potassium activity in photo-receptors, glia cells, and extracellular space in the drone retina: changes during photostimulation. Journal of Physiology 290, 525–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitracos, S.A. & Tsacopoulos, M. (1985). The recovery from a transient inhibition of the oxidative metabolism of the photorecep-tors of the drone (Apis mellifera Ô). Journal of Experimental Biology 119, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschini, N. & Kirschfeld, K. (1971). Etude optique in vivo des element photorecepteurs dans loeil compose de Drosophila. Kyber-netik 8, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, R.C. (1985). Functional organization of the fly retina. In Progress Sensory Physiology, Vol. 5, ed. Ottoson, D., pp. 1–79. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, W.A. & Stark, W.S. (1977). Hereditary retinal degeneration in Drosophila melanogaster. A mutant defect associated with the phototransduction process. Journal of General Physiology 69, 261–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hotta, Y. & Benzer, S. (1970). Genetic dissection of the Drosophila nervous system by means of mosaics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 67, 1156–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisman, J.E. & Brown, J.E. (1975). Effects of intracellular injection of calcium buffers on light-adaptation in Limulus ventral photore-ceptors. Journal of General Physiology 66, 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minke, B. (1982). Light-induced reduction in excitation efficiency in the trp mutant of Drosophila. Journal of General Physiology 79, 361–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubinstein, C.T., Bar-Nachum, S., Selinger, Z. & Minke, B. (1989). Chemically induced retinal degeneration in the rdgB (retinal degeneration B) mutant of Drosophilia. Visual Neuroscience 2, 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, S.R. (1975). Retinal resistance barriers and electrical lateral inhibition. Nature 255, 480–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, W.S. & Carlson, S.D. (1982). Ultrastructural pathology of the compound eye and optic neuropile of the retinal degeneration mutant (w rdgBKS222 Drosophila melanogaster). Cell Tissue Research 225, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, W.S., Chen, D.-M., Johnson, M.A. & Frayer, K.L. (1983). The rdgB gene in Drosophila: retinal degeneration in several mutant alleles and inhibition of degeneration by norpA. Journal of Insect Physiology 29, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, W.S. & Sapp, R. (1987). Ultrastructure of the retina of Drosophila melanogaster: the mutant ora (outer rhabdomeres absent) and its inhibition of degeneration in rdgB (retinal degeneration). Journal of Neurogenetics 4, 227–240.Google ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, R.S. & Pak, W.L. (1980). Heterogenic components of a fast electrical potential in Drosophila compound eye and their relation to visual pigment photoconversion. Journal of General Physiology 75, 353–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed