Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:48:15.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Octopamine modulates photoreceptor function in the Limulus lateral eye

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

George H. Renninger ,
Robert Schimmel  and
Claudia A. Farrell
George H. Renninger
Affiliation:
Biophysics Interdepartmental Group, Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Robert Schimmel
Affiliation:
Biophysics Interdepartmental Group, Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Claudia A. Farrell
Affiliation:
Biophysics Interdepartmental Group, Department of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Activity at night in efferent nerve fibers from a central circadian clock produces changes in photoreceptor function in the lateral compound eye of Limulus: the response to light is increased; membrane potential fluctuations (bumps) occurring in the dark are suppressed; and the duration of bumps occurring both in the dark and under dim illumination is increased (Barlow et al., 1977; Kaplan & Barlow, 1980; Barlow, 1983; Barlow et al., 1985, 1987). Efferent nerve terminals release octopamine when activated (Battelle et al., 1982; Battelle & Evans, 1984, 1986); exogenous octopamine in vitro produces some of the changes resulting from efferent nerve activity in vivo (Kass et al., 1988).

We report here that the increase in both on-transient and steady-state response to light induced by octopamine in the lateral eye in vitro are concentration dependent with threshold at or below 100 nM, saturation at or above 100 µM, and half-maximal increase in the range 1–10 µM. Octopamine also reduces bump activity in the dark in a concentration-dependent way. Unlike the increase in light response, the dependence of this effect on octopamine concentration is extremely variable from specimen to specimen. The effects of exogenous octopamine on light response and bump activity can sometimes be reversed by removing octopamine from the medium bathing the in vitro preparation. Octopamine also increases bump duration, apparently in a concentration-dependent manner. We have not succeeded in reversing this increase in bump duration.

The concentration dependence of changes in photoreceptor response described here agrees qualitatively with the dependence of cAMP levels on octopamine in Limulus photoreceptors (Kaupp et al., 1982), lending further support to the idea that cAMP acts as a second messenger in the circadian control of photoreceptor function. Our results also suggest that the changes induced in the transient and steady-state response to light by both efferent nerve activity and exogenous octopamine have a common origin, which may differ from that responsible for the modulation of bump activity.

Keywords

Circadian changeEfferent nerve activityLight responseLimulusOctopaminePhotoreceptor functionQuantum bumps
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , August 1989 , pp. 83 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adolph, A.R. (1964). Spontaneous slow potential fluctuations in the Limulus photoreceptor. Journal of General Physiology 48, 297–322.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1983). Circadian rhythms in the Limulus visual system. Journal of Neuroscience 3, 856–870.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Bolanowski, S.J. Jr, & Brachman, M.L. (1977). Efferent optic nerve fibers mediate circadian rhythms in the Limulus eye. Science 197, 86–89.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr & Kaplan, E. (1977). Properties of visual cells in the lateral eye of Limulus in situ: intracellular recordings. Journal of General Physiology 69, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Kaplan, E., Renninger, G.H. & Saito, T. (1985). Efferent control of circadian rhythms in the Limulus lateral eye. Neuroscience Research (Suppl.) 2, S65–S78.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.B. Jr, Kaplan, E., Renninger, G.H. & Saito, T. (1987). Circadian rhythms in Limulus photoreceptors, I: Intracellular studies. Journal of General Physiology 89, 353–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Battelle, B-A. (1980). Neurotransmitter candidates in the visual system of Limulus polyphemus: synthesis and distribution of octopamine. Vision Research 20, 911–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Battelle, B-A. & Evans, J. (1984). Octopamine release from centrifugal fibers of the Limulus peripheral visual system. Journal of Neurochemistry 42, 71–79.Google Scholar
Battelle, B-A. & Evans, J.A. (1986). Veratridine-stimulated release of amine conjugates from centrifugal fibers in the Limulus peripheral visual system. Journal of Neurochemistry 46, 1464–1472.Google Scholar
Battelle, B-A., Evans, J.A. & Chamberlain, S.C. (1982). Efferent fibers to Limulus eyes synthesize and release octopamine. Science 216, 1250–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, D.S. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1978). Limulus ventral eye: physiological properties of photoreceptor cells in organ culture medium. Journal of General Physiology 72, 539–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calman, B.G. & Chamberlain, S.C. (1982). Distinct lobes of Limulus ventral photoreceptors, II: Structure and ultrastructure. Journal of General Physiology 80, 839–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calman, B.G., Chamberlain, S.C., Lehman, H.K. & Barlow, R.B. Jr. (1987). Interaction of efferent activity and humoral factors in controlling the structure of the retina of Limulus polyphemus. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 13, 137.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, S.C. & Barlow, R.B. Jr. (1977). Morphological correlates of efferent circadian activity and light adaptation in the Limulus lateral eye. Biological Bulletin 153, 418–419.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, S.C. & Barlow, R.B. Jr. (1987). Control of structural rhythms in the lateral eye of Limulus: interactions of natural lighting and circadian efferent activity. Journal of Neuroscience 7, 2135–2144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, S.C., Lehman, H.K., Schuyler, P.R., Vadasz, A., Calman, B.G. & Barlow, R.B. Jr. (1987). Efferent activity and circulating hormones: dual roles in controlling the structure and photomechanical movements of the Limulus lateral eye. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 28(3), 186.Google Scholar
Clark, A.W., Millechia, R. & Mauro, A. (1969). The ventral photoreceptor cells of Limulus, I: The microanatomy. Journal of General Physiology 54, 289–309.Google Scholar
David, J.-C. & Coulon, J.-F. (1985). Octopamine in invertebrates and vertebrates. A review. Progress in Neurobiology 24, 141–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, F.A. Jr., Knight, B.W. & Toyoda, J. (1968). Voltage noise in Limulus visual cells. Science 160, 88–90.Google Scholar
Dowling, J.E. (1968). Discrete potentials in the dark-adapted eye of Limulus. Nature 217, 28–31.Google Scholar
Evans, J.A., Chamberlain, S.C. & Battelle, B-A. (1983). Autoradio-graphic localization of newly synthesized octopamine to retinal efferents in the Limulus visual system. Journal of Comparative Neurology 219, 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P.D. (1981). Multiple receptor types for octopamine in the locust. Journal of Physiology (London) 318, 99–122.Google Scholar
Evans, P.D. (1984). A modulatory octopaminergic neurone increases cyclic nucleotide levels in locust skeletal muscle. Journal of Physiology (London) 348, 307–324.Google Scholar
Fahrenbach, W.H. (1981). The morphology of the horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) visual system, VII: Innervation of photoreceptor neurons by neurosecretory efferents. Cell and Tissue Research 216, 655–659.Google Scholar
Fuortes, M.G.F. & Yeandle, S. (1964). Probability of occurrence of discrete potential waves in the eye of Limulus. Journal of General Physiology 47, 443–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, E. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1980). Circadian clock in Limulus brain increases response and decreases noise of retinal photoreceptors. Nature 286, 393–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, E., Barlow, R.B. Jr, & Renninger, G.H. (1986). The circadian clock in the Limulus brain modifies the electrical properties of the photoreceptor membrane. Biological Bulletin 171, 340.Google Scholar
Kass, L. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1984). Efferent neurotransmission of circadian rhythms in Limulus lateral eye, I: Octopamine-induced changes in retinal sensitivity. Journal of Neuroscience 4, 908–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, L. & Renninger, G.H. (1988). Circadian change in function of Limulus ventral photoreceptors. Visual Neuroscience 1, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kass, L., Hartline, P.H. & Adolph, A.R. (1983 a). Presynaptic uptake blockade hypothesis for LSD action at the lateral inhibitory synapse in Limulus. Journal of General Physiology 82, 245–267.Google Scholar
Kass, L., Eisele, L.E. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1983 b). Circadian clock in the excised Limulus brain transmits efferent activity to all eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 24(3), 218.Google Scholar
Kass, L., Pelletier, J., Renninger, G.H. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1983 c). cAMP: a possible intracellular transmitter of circadian rhythms in Limulus photoreceptors. Biological Bulletin 164, 378.Google Scholar
Kass, L., Pelletier, J., Renninger, G.H. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1988). Efferent neurotransmission of circadian rhythms in Limulus lateral eye; II: Intracellular recordings in vitro. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 164, 95–106.Google Scholar
Kaupp, U.B., Malbon, C.C., Battelle, B-A. & Brown, J.E. (1982). Octopamine stimulated rise of cAMP in Limulus ventral photoreceptors. Vision Research 22, 1503–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, B.W., Toyoda, J.-I. & Dodge, F.A. Jr, (1970). A quantitative description of the dynamics in the eye of Limulus. Journal of General Physiology 56, 421–437.Google Scholar
Lisman, J.E., Fain, G.L. & O'Day, P.M. (1982). Voltage-dependent conductances in Limulus ventral photoreceptors. Journal of General Physiology 79, 187–209.Google Scholar
O'day, P.M., Lisman, J.E. & Goldring, M. (1982). Functional significance of voltage-dependent conductances in Limulus ventral photoreceptors. Journal of General Physiology 79, 211–232.Google Scholar
Orchard, I. (1982). Octopamine in insects: neurotransmitter, neurohormone, and neuromodulator. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 659–669.Google Scholar
Pelletier, J.L., Kass, L., Renninger, G.H. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1984). cAMP and octopamine partially mimic a circadian clock's effect on Limulus photoreceptors. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 25(3), 288.Google Scholar
Renninger, G.H., Kaplan, E. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1984). A circadian clock increases the gain of photoreceptor cells of the Limulus lateral eye. Biological Bulletin 167, 532.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., Lehman, H.K. & Barlow, R.B. Jr, (1987). Efferent neurotransmitters mediate differential effects in the Limulus lateral eye. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 28(3), 186.Google Scholar
Yeandle, S. (1958). Electrophysiology of the visual system (Discussion). American Journal of Ophthalmology 46, 82.Google Scholar