Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:38:21.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial vision of the cat: Variation with eccentricity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Tatiana Pasternak  and
Kris Horn
Tatiana Pasternak
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester
Kris Horn
Affiliation:
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined the grating acuity and contrast sensitivity of cats whose eye position was monitored with a scleral search-coil technique. During each trial, the cat was required to maintain fixation on a laser spot and respond to the presence or the absence of a grating by pressing a right or left pedal. With this procedure, acuity was measured along the horizontal and vertical meridian over a range of eccentricities in the nasal, temporal, superior, and inferior retina. In addition, contrast sensitivity for stationary and drifting gratings was measured for the temporal retina along the horizontal meridian. Acuity in area centralis reached about 3.5 cycle\deg and declined by 0.5 octaves at 4 deg and by about 1.3 octaves at 16-deg eccentricity in the nasal retina. The acuity was higher in the nasal than temporal retina. At all eccentricities, spatial resolution exceeded the resolution limit derived from Y (alpha)-cell properties. Contrast sensitivity also decreased as the eccentricity increased when the target size was held constant. The slope of sensitivity-eccentricity function was relatively shallow for a low spatial frequency (0.30 cycle\deg) with sensitivity decreasing by a factor of 1.5–2 at 8-deg eccentricity. The slope of the sensitivity falloff for high spatial-frequency gratings (1.2 cycle\deg) was steeper, with a 5–10-fold difference in sensitivity between 0 and 8 deg. By varying the target size, we determined that the summation area in the cat is about a factor of 3 smaller in area centralis than a 16-deg eccentricity. When the size of the centrally and peripherally viewed targets was scaled relative to visual acuity, the sensitivity was constant across the visual field.

Keywords

Contrast sensitivityVisual acuityRetinal eccentricityCatRetinal ganglion cells
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , February 1991 , pp. 151 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, R. & Bellhorn, R.W. (1978). Visual acuity in cats with central retinal lesions. Vision Research 18, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogartz, R.S. (1968). A least-squares method for fitting intersecting line segments to a set of data points. Psychological Bulletin 70, 749–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonds, A.B. (1974). Optical quality of the living cat eye. Journal of Physiology 243, 777–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleland, B.G., Harding, T.H. & Tulunay-Keesey, U. (1979). Visual resolution and receptive-field size: Examination of two kinds of cat retinal ganglion cell. Science 205, 1015–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derrington, A. M. & Lennie, P. (1982). The influence of temporal frequency and adaptation level on receptive-field organization of retinal ganglion cells in cat. Journal of Physiology 333, 343–366.Google Scholar
Enroth-Cugell, C., Hertz, B.G. & Lennie, P. (1977). Cone signals in the cat's retina. Journal of Physiology 269, 273–296.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A.F. & Robinson, D.A. (1966). A method for measuring horizontal and vertical eye movement chronically in the monkey. Journal of Applied Physiology 21, 1068–1070.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. & Mouat, G.S.V. (1985). The relationship between feline pupil size and luminance. Experimental Brain Research 59, 485–490.Google Scholar
Hilz, R. & Cavonius, C.R. (1974). Functional organization of the peripheral retina: Sensitivity to periodic stimuli. Vision Research 14, 1333–1337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, E.R. & Hess, R.F. (1978). The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research 18, 369–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, A. (1975). A quantitative analysis of the cat retinal ganglion cell topography. Journal of Comparative Neuroscience 163, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, A. (1981). Cat retina and the sampling theorem: The relation of transient and sustained brisk-unit cutoff frequency to alpha- and beta-mode cell density. Experimental Brain Research 42, 196–202.Google Scholar
Judge, S.J., Richmond, B.J. & Chu, F.C. (1980). Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurements of eye position: An improved method. Vision Research 20, 535–538.Google Scholar
Koenderink, J.J., Bouman, M.A., Mesquita, A.E.B. & Slappendel, S. (1978). Perimetry of contrast-detection thresholds of moving spatial sine-wave patterns, III: The target extent as a sensitivity- controlling parameter. Journal of The Optical Society of America A 68, 854–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merigan, W.H. & Katz, L.M. (1990). Spatial resolution across the macaque retina. Vision Research 30, 985–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasternak, T. & Merigan, W.H. (1981). The luminance dependence of spatial vision in the cat. Vision Research 21, 1333–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasternak, T., Merigan, W.H., Flood, D.O. & Zehl, D. (1983). The role of area centralis in the spatial vision of the cat. Vision Research 23, 1409–1416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peichl, L. & Wassle, H. (1979). Size, scatter, and coverage of ganglion cell receptive-field centers in the cat retina. Journal of Physiology 291, 117–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pointer, J.S. & Hess, R. F. (1989). The contrast-sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial-frequency range. Vision Research 29, 1133–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remmel, R.S. (1984). An inexpensive eye-movement monitor using the scieral search-coil technique. IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering BME-31, 388–390.Google Scholar
Robson, J. G. & Enroth-Cugell, C. (1978). Light distribution in the cats' retinal image. Vision Research 18, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robson, J.G. & Graham, N. (1981). Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research 21, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, M.H. & Stone, J. (1980). The interpretation of variation in the classification of nerve cells. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution 17, 123–151.Google Scholar
Sparks, D.L. & Sides, J.P. (1974). Brain-stem unit activity related to horizontal eye movements occurring during visual tracking. Brain Research 77, 320–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, R.H., Reid, M. & Lacy, P.L. (1973). The distribution of rods and cones in the retina of the cat (Felis domesticus). Journal of Comparative Neurology 148, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, J. (1978). The number and distribution of ganglion cells in the cat's retina. Journal of Comparative Neuroscience 180, 753–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, J. (1983). Parallel Processing in the Visual System. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Troy, J.B. (1987). Do Y geniculate neurons have greater contrast sensitivity than X geniculate neurons at all visual-field locations? Vision Research 27, 1733–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tusa, R.J., Palmer, L.A. & Rosenquist, A.C. (1978). The retinotopic organization of area 17 (striate cortex) in the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology 177, 213–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virsu, V. & Rovamo, J. (1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research 37, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassle, H., Boycott, B.B. & Illing, R.B. (1981). Morphology and mosaic of ON- and OFF-beta cells in the cat retina and some functional considerations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 212, 177–195.Google Scholar
Wassle, H., Grunert, U., Rohrenbeck, J. & Boycott, B.B. (1989). Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina. Nature 341, 643–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, J.G. & Barlow, H.B. (1975). The size and shape of the pupil in lightly anesthetized cats as a function of luminance. Vision Research 15, 1363–1365.Google Scholar
Wong, R.O.L. & Hughes, A. (1988). Development of visual resolution in the cat retina. Neuroscience Letters (Suppl.) 30, S141.Google Scholar
Wright, M.J. & Johnston, A. (1983). Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual-field locus. Vision Research 23, 983–989.Google Scholar