Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:31:22.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topological disorder in peripheral vision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Robert F. Hess  and
Jim McCarthy
Robert F. Hess
Affiliation:
McGill Vision Research Unit, Department of OphthalmologyMcGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Jim McCarthy
Affiliation:
McGill Vision Research Unit, Department of OphthalmologyMcGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most striking properties of the mammalian visual system is that it is only the central part of the visual field, the fovea, where vision is most acute. The superiority of the fovea is particularly evident in tasks requiring accurate spatial localization. It is currently thought that peripheral spatial uncertainty is a simple consequence of the decreased sampling grain of the peripheral field. We show that the topological fidelity of the afferent projection declines with eccentricity away from the fovea and that it is this rather than the sampling grain that underlies the poorer performance of the periphery in tasks involving spatial localization. The combination of normal sampling and a disordered topology results in the periphery having good sensitivity for detection but poor sensitivity for object recognition.

Keywords

Neural mappingTopologyPeripheral field
Type
Short Communications
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , September 1994 , pp. 1033 - 1036
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahumada, A.J. Jr. (1991). Learning receptor positions. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, eds., Landy, M. and Movshon, J.A., pp. 23–34. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, S.J. & Hess, R.F. (1990). Post-receptoral undersampling in normal human peripheral vision. Vision Research 30, 1507–1515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, S.J., Mullen, K.T. & Hess, R.F. (1991). Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: Limits imposed by optical and retinal factors. Journal of Physiology (London) 442, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, R.F. & Field, D.J. (1993). Is the increased spatial uncertainty in the normal periphery due to spatial undersampling or uncalibrated disarray? Vision Research 33, 2663–2670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, R.F. & Watt, R.J. (1990). Regional distribution of the mechanisms that underlie spatial localization. Vision Research 30, 1021–1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, S.A., Casson, E. & Carney, T. (1990). Vernier acuity as line and dipole detection. Vision Research 30, 1703–1719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levi, D.M., Klein, S.A. & Aitsebaomo, P. (1985). Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Research 25, 963–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maloney, L.T. & Ahumada, A.J. (1989). Learning by assertion: Two methods for calibrating a linear visual system. Neural Computation 1, 392–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovamo, J., Virsu, V., Laurinen, P. & Hyvarinen, L. (1982). Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in peripheral vision. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 23, 666–670.Google ScholarPubMed
Watt, R.J. (1984). Towards a general theory for the visual acuities of shape and spatial arrangement. Vision Research 24, 1377–1386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westheimer, G. (1982). The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field. Vision Research 22, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed