Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:02:51.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-glufosinate in Xanthium strumarium, Commelina difusa, and Ipomoea purpurea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Francisco Skora Neto ,
Harold D. Coble  and
Frederick T. Corbin
Francisco Skora Neto
Affiliation:
IAPAR—Instituto Agronomico do Parana, Caixa Postal 129, 84001-970-Ponta Grossa-PR, Brazil
Frederick T. Corbin
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Crop Science Department, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The absorption, translocation, and metabolism of glufosinate were investigated in three differentially susceptible weeds, Xanthium strumarium (most susceptible), Ipomoea purpurea (intermediate susceptibility), and Commelina diffusa (least susceptible). Xanthium strumarium absorbed about three times more 14C-glufosinate than Ipomoea purpurea and about six times more 14C-glufosinate than Commelina diffusa. Translocation of the applied herbicide out of the treated leaf was low. No evidence of glufosinate metabolism, either in the treated leaves or roots, was found when the extracts were separated by HPLC.

Keywords

GlufosinateXanthium strumarium L. XANST, common cockleburCommelina diffusa Burm. f. COMDI, spreading dayflowerIpomoea purpurea (L.) Roth. PHBPU, tall morninggloryHerbicidesHPLCCOMDIPHBPUXANST
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 171 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beriault, J. N. and Devine, M. D. 1998. Translocation of glufosinate and acetyl-glufosinate in susceptible and resistant Brassica napus plants. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38:51.Google Scholar
Dröge, W., Broer, I., and Pühler, A. 1992. Transgenic plants containing the phosphinothricin-N-acetyl-transferase gene metabolize the herbicide L-phosphinothricin (glufosinate) differently from untransformed plants. Planta 187:142–151.Google Scholar
Dröge-Laser, W., Siemeling, U., Pühler, A., and Broer, I. 1994. The metabolites of the herbicide L-phosphinothricin (glufosinate). Plant Physiol. 105:159–166.Google Scholar
Haas, P. and Müller, F. 1987. Behaviour of glufosinate-ammonium in weeds. Pages 1075–1082 in Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference—Weeds.Google Scholar
Komossa, D. and Sandermann, H. 1992. Plant metabolism of herbicides with C-P bonds: phosphinothricin. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 43:95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, P. J. and Ridley, S. M. 1989. Glutamine synthetase and its inhibition. Pages 137–170 In Dodge, A. D., ed. Herbicides and Plant Metabolism. Cambridge: University Press, Society of Experimental Biology Seminar Series 38.Google Scholar
Mersey, B. G., Hall, J. C., Anderson, D. M., and Swanton, C. J. 1990. Factors affecting the herbicidal activity of glufosinate-ammonium: absorption, translocation, and metabolism in barley and green foxtail. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:90–98.Google Scholar
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M. H. 1989. Applied linear regression models. 2nd ed. R. D. Irwin. pp. 549–571.Google Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A. 1983. Nonlinear regression modeling. A unified practical approach. Marcel Dekker. (Statistics, textbooks and monographs. Volume 48). pp. 143–149.Google Scholar
Ridley, S. M. and McNally, S. F. 1985. Effects of phosphinothricin on the isoenzymes of glutamine synthetase isolated from plant species which exhibit varying degrees of susceptibility to the herbicide. Plant Sci. 39:31–36.Google Scholar
Skora Neto, F. and Coble, H. D. 1998. Differential tolerance of selected weed species to glufosinate. , North Carolina State University, Department of Crop Science. Pages 18–48 In Skora Neto, F., ed. Efficacy of Glufosinate on Selected Weed Species and Factors Contributing to its Differential Herbicidal Activity. Chapter 1. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Spak, D. R. 1996. Mode of action of the herbicide glufosinate. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:80.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Wax, L. M., Simmons, F. W., and Phillips, W. H. II. 1977. Glufosinate efficacy on annual weeds is influenced by rate and growth stage. Weed Technol. 11:484–488.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate on four weed species. Weed Sci. 45:378–381.Google Scholar