Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:08:57.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Assay for the Determination of Triazine Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. H. Ahrens ,
C. J. Arntzen  and
E. W. Stoller
W. H. Ahrens
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agron. Dep., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
C. J. Arntzen
Affiliation:
Formerly Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Dep. Bot., Univ. of Illinois; now Director, Michigan State Univ., Dep. Energy, Plant Res. Lab., East Lansing, MI 48824
E. W. Stoller
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agron. Dep., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A procedure is described for the rapid analysis of leaf samples to determine triazine resistance. The technique uses a commercially available fluorometer and is based upon the fact that photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides increase chlorophyll fluorescence (because of dissipation of absorbed radiant energy in the absence of useful photochemistry). Resistant and susceptible biotypes of six weed species were assayed. Fluorescence of susceptible leaf sections increased dramatically over a 1- to 3-h exposure to atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine], but resistant leaf sections showed no fluorescence increase. Substantial fluorescence increases of both resistant and susceptible leaf sections were induced by diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea]. In the absence of herbicides, fluorescence was higher in resistant than in susceptible leaf sections, suggesting that the resistant biotypes are less efficient photosynthetically. Fluorescence analysis was used to characterize atrazine inhibition of photosynthesis in leaf sections of three crop species. Differences in atrazine-induced fluorescence between crop lines were relatively small and were not well correlated with atrazine tolerance. The fluorometer is a convenient device for monitoring photosynthesis inhibition, however, and could be useful in detecting plants having resistance to photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides.

Keywords

Photosynthesisfluorometerchloroplastsatrazineherbicides
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , May 1981 , pp. 316 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1970. Influence of soybean seed size on response to atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:162–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Arntzen, C. J., Ditto, C. L., and Brewer, P. E. 1979. Chloroplast membrane alterations in triazine-resistant Amaranthus retroflexus biotypes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:278–282.Google Scholar
3. Arntzen, C. J., Watson, J. L., and Steinback, K. E. 1979. Analysis of physiological changes in newly-discovered herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 34:101–105.Google Scholar
4. Bandeen, J. D. and McLaren, R. D. 1976. Resistance of Chenopodium album to triazine herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:411–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bowes, J., Crofts, A. R., and Arntzen, C. J. 1980. Redox reactions on the reducing side of photosystem II in chloroplasts with altered herbicide binding properties. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 200:303–308.Google Scholar
6. Brewer, P. E., Arntzen, C. J., and Slife, F. W. 1979. Effects of atrazine, cyanazine, and procyazine on the photochemical reactions of isolated chloroplasts. Weed Sci. 27:300–308.Google Scholar
7. Conard, S. G. and Radosevich, S. R. 1979. Ecological fitness of Senecio vulgaris and Amaranthus retroflexus biotypes susceptible or resistant to atrazine. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:171–177.Google Scholar
8. Ducret, J. M. and Gasquez, J. 1978. Observation de la fluorescence sur feuille entiere et mise en evidence de la resistance chloroplastique a l'atrazine chez Chenopodium album L. et Poa annua L. Chemosphere 8:691–696.Google Scholar
9. Duysens, L. N. M. and Sweers, H. E. 1963. Mechanism of two photochemical reactions in algae as studied by means of fluorescence. Pages 353–372 in Ashida, J., ed. Studies on Microalgae and Photosynthetic Bacteria. Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
10. Govindjee, and Papageorgiou, C. 1971. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: fluorescence transients. Pages 1–46 in Giese, A. C., ed. Photophysiology, Vol. 6. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
11. Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1978. The paucity of plants evolving genetic resistance to herbicides: possible reasons and implications. J. Theor. Biol. 75:349–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Kautsky, H. and Hirsch, A. 1931. Neue Versuche zur Kohlensäureassimilation. Naturwissenschaften 19:964.Google Scholar
13. Melcarek, P. K. and Brown, G. N. 1975. In vivo chlorophyll fluorescence monitoring with solid state photosensors. Physiol. Plant. 35:147–151.Google Scholar
14. Melcarek, P. K. and Brown, G. N. 1977. The effects of chilling stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 18:1099–1107.Google Scholar
15. Melcarek, P. K., Cernohlavek, L. G., and Brown, G. N. 1977. A solid-state device for the simultaneous measurement of prompt and delayed chlorophyll fluorescence induction transients in leaves. Anal. Biochem. 82:473–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Pfister, K. and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. The mode of action of photosystem II-specific inhibitors in herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. Z. Naturforsch. 34C:996–1009.Google Scholar
17. Radosevich, S. R., Steinback, K. E., and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. Effects of photosystem II inhibitors on thylakoid membranes of two common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) biotypes. Weed Sci. 27:216–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Schreiber, U., Groberman, L., and Vidaver, W. 1975. Portable, solid-state fluorometer for the measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence induction in plants. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 46:538–542.Google Scholar
19. Schreiber, U., Fink, R., and Vidaver, W. 1977. Fluorescence induction in whole leaves: differentiation between the two leaf sides and adaptation to different light regimes. Planta 133:121–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Shimabukuro, R. H. 1967. Atrazine metabolism and herbicidal selectivity. Plant Physiol. 42:1269–1276.Google Scholar
21. Shimabukuro, R. H. and Swanson, H. R. 1969. Atrazine metabolism, selectivity, and mode of action. J. Agric. Food Chem. 17: 199–205.Google Scholar
22. Smillie, R. M. 1979. Coloured components of chloroplast membranes as intrinsic membrane probes for monitoring the development of heat injury in intact tissues. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6: 121–133.Google Scholar
23. Souza-Machado, V., Arntzen, C. J., Bandeen, J. D., and Stephenson, G. R. 1978. Comparative triazine effects upon system II photochemistry in chloroplasts of two common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes. Weed Sci. 26:318–322.Google Scholar
24. Souza-Machado, V., Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Jensen, K. I. N. 1977. Differential atrazine interference with the Hill reaction of isolated chloroplasts from Chenopodium album L. biotypes. Weed Res. 17:407–413.Google Scholar