Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T19:00:04.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitive and Allelopathic Effects of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen M. Irons  and
Orvin C. Burnside
Stephen M. Irons
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Orvin C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the field, soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Amsoy 71′] required 4 to 6 weeks free of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) competition for maximum yield. Competition studies suggested that more than one type of interference was involved when sunflowers grew with soybeans. In greenhouse studies, soybean height, fresh weight, and dry weight were significantly reduced at certain sunflower and soybean densities and levels of competition. Sunflower height was not reduced by any level of competition, but sunflower fresh and dry weights were reduced with high sunflower and soybean populations. Two percent (w/w) or greater amounts of ground, mature sunflower leaves mixed into the soil reduced emergence and growth of soybeans, sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘G-625 GBR′], and sunflower. A mixture of powdered stems and branches of sunflower also reduced growth of the three species, although it was not as phytotoxic as ground leaves. Sunflower roots apparently released exudates into the nutrient solution and soil. Sunflower root exudates inhibited sunflower emergence, and reduced sorghum, soybean, and sunflower height, fresh weight, and dry weight.

Keywords

Glycine maxSorghum bicolorgrowth inhibitiongrowth reductioninterferenceroot exudates
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , July 1982 , pp. 372 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abdul-Wahab, A. S. and Rice, E. L. 1967. Plant inhibition by johnsongrass and its possible significance in old-field succession. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 94:486–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Armstrong, G. M., Rohrbaugh, L. M., Rice, E. L., and Wender, S. H. 1970. The effect of nitrogen deficiency on the concentration of caffeoylquinic acids and scopolin in tobacco. Phytochemistry 9:945–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bell, D. T. and Koeppe, D. E. 1972. Noncompetitive effects of giant foxtail on the growth of corn. Agron. J. 64:321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Coble, H. D. and Ritter, R. L. 1978. Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 26:556–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Donald, C. M. 1958. The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9:421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Drost, D. C. and Doll, J. D. 1980. The allelopathic effect of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) on corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 28:229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Eaton, B. J., Feltner, K. C., and Russ, O. G. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1975. Effect of early competition on growth of common milkweed. Weed Sci. 23:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Frank, P. A. and Dechoretz, N. 1980. Allelopathy in dwarf spike-rush (Eleocharis coloradoensis). Weed Sci. 28:499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hamilton, K. C. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1955. Effects of rhizomes of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) and shading on seedling development of weedy species. Ecology 36:304–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Lehman, R. H. and Rice, E. L. 1972. Effect of deficiencies of nitrogen, potassium, and sulfur on chlorogenic acids and scopolin in sunflower. Am. Midl. Nat. 87:71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Menges, R. M. 1978. Role of USDA-ARS IR-4 representative. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:182–184.Google Scholar
16. Muller, C. H. 1966. The role of chemical inhibition (allelopathy) in vegetational composition. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 93:332–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Neill, R. L. and Rice, E. L. 1971. Possible role of Ambrosia psilostachya on pattern and succession in old-fields. Am. Midl. Nat. 86:344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Parenti, R. L. and Rice, E. L. 1969. Inhibitional effects of Digitaria sanguinalis and possible role in old-field succession. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 96:70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Schreiber, M. M. 1967. A technique for studing weed competition in forage legume establishment. Weeds 15:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Stachon, W. J. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Allelopathic activity of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Colorado. Weed Sci. 28:83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Staniforth, D. W. and Weber, C. R. 1966. Effects of annual weeds on growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Steenhagen, D. A. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1979. Allelopathy of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 27:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Stowe, L. G. and Osborn, A. 1980. The influence of nitrogen and phosphorus levels on the phytotoxicity of phenolic compounds. Can. J. Bot. 58:1149–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14:49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wilson, R. E. and Rice, E. L. 1968. Allelopathy as expressed by Helianthus annuus and its role in old-field succession. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 95:432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar