Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:02:21.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computer image analysis and classification of giant ragweed seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Yusako Sako
Affiliation:
Computer Information Sciences Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Tim Daoust
Affiliation:
Computer Information Sciences Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Kikuo Fujimura
Affiliation:
Computer Information Sciences Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
S. Kent Harrison
Affiliation:
Horticulture and Crop Science Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Miller B. McDonald
Affiliation:
Horticulture and Crop Science Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210

Abstract

Giant ragweed exhibits a high degree of polymorphism among individual plants in seed size, shape, spininess, and color. These features may play an important role in giant ragweed seed survival and predation avoidance; however, they are difficult to evaluate because of lack of quantification methods. A computer imaging technique was developed for describing and classifying giant ragweed seeds using digital images of the seed top and side views. Seed samples collected from 20 different giant ragweed plants (classes) were mounted and digitally scanned. Quantitative features were extracted from the seed images, including color, width, height, area, and seed perimeter. A polygon (convex hull) of the seed image based on the seed outline was constructed, from which spininess indices were developed. Fisher's linear discriminant with normalized nearest neighbor classification was used to classify randomly selected images of individual seeds according to class (maternal origin), using the extracted features as a database. The best classification rate achieved was 99%, with 138 out of 140 seeds correctly matched using data from both the top and side views. Seed features were easily extracted and varied from 1.2- to 4.5-fold among classes. Area and perimeter measurements varied least within classes but varied most among classes, suggesting that these features discriminate effectively among seeds from different plants in giant ragweed. Convex hull area : seed area ratio, using the seed top view images, was the best index of seed spininess, aligning well with visual assessment and providing greatest discrimination among classes. This experiment shows that in the case of giant ragweed, seeds from different plants are distinguishable in an objective and quantitative manner. This imaging technique can be applied to identification of seeds from different species and to studies on variable seed morphology within a species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abul-Fatih, H. A. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1979. The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. II. Germination, emergence, growth and survival. New Phytol. 83:817827.Google Scholar
Belhumeur, J. P., Hespanha, J. P., and Kriegman, D. J. 1997. Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19:711720.Google Scholar
Brown, M. L. and Brown, R. G. 1984. Herbaceous Plants of Maryland. College Park, MD: University of Maryland. pp. 987989.Google Scholar
Conrad, R., inventor; Ball Horticultural Company, assignee. 1997 Aug 19. Method and Apparatus for Assessing the Quality of a Seed Lot. U.S. Pat. 5,659,623.Google Scholar
DeBerg, M., van Kreveld, M., Overmars, M., and Schwarzkopf, O. 1997. Computational Geometry—Algorithms and Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 23.Google Scholar
Duda, R. O. and Hart, P. E. 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 24.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, R. and Woods, R. 1992. Digital Image Processing. 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing. pp. 484486.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. K., Regnier, E. E., Schmoll, J. T., and Webb, J. 2001. Competition and fecundity of Ambrosia trifida in Zea mays . Weed Sci. 49:224229.Google Scholar
McNertney, D., inventor; Paradigm Research Corporation, assignee. 1999 Feb 2. System and Method for Measuring Seedlot Vigor. U.S. Pat. 5,864,984.Google Scholar
Regnier, E. E., Harrison, S. K., and Schmoll, J. T. 2000. Seed losses in giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 40:99.Google Scholar
Travis, A. J. and Draper, S. R. 1985. A computer based system for the recognition of seed shape. Seed Sci. Technol. 13:813820.Google Scholar
Turk, M. and Pentland, A. 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 3:7196.Google Scholar