Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:05:16.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Honey Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) and Macartney Rose (Rosa bracteata) with Soil-Applied Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. E. Meyer  and
R. W. Bovey
R. E. Meyer
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Dep. Range Sci., Tex. A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
R. W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Dep. Range Sci., Tex. A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seven herbicides were applied to the soil surface or subsurface for control of honey mesquite [Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. var. glandulosa (Torr.) Cockerell] and Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata Wendl.). Liquid formulations were applied in bands about 1 cm wide, 1.2 m or more apart, and granule or sphere formulations were applied on the soil surface either broadcast or in rows 1.2 m or more apart. On honey mesquite, karbutilate [tert-butylcarbamic acid ester with 3(m-hydroxy-phenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] and tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea} were the most effective herbicides with subsurface spray injections being generally more effective than surface applications. On honey mesquite, differences among row spacing treatments with liquid, granule, or sphere formulations of karbutilate were generally either small or insignificant. Roller chopping reduced the honey mesquite canopy but did not influence the percentage of plants killed by karbutilate at rates of 4.5 kg/ha and below. Bromacil (5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil), diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), prometon [2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-methoxy-s-triazine], and 2,3,6-TBA (2,3,6-trichlorobenzoic acid) generally were ineffective as soil treatments for controlling honey mesquite. Of all the herbicides evaluated on Macartney rose, only picloram at 4.5 kg/ha and tebuthiuron at 2.2 and 4.5 kg/ha, as soil treatments, killed a significant number of plants.

Keywords

Bromacildiuronkarbutilatepicloramprometontebuthiuron
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 280 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., Flynt, T. O., Meyer, R. E., Baur, J. R., and Riley, T. E. 1976. Subsurface herbicide applicator for brush control. J. Range Manage. 29:338–341.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1978. Control of huisache with soil applied herbicides. J. Range Manage. 31:179–182.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Baur, J. R., Diaz-Colon, J. D., Dowler, C. C., and Lehman, S. K. 1969. Granule herbicides for woody plant control. Weed Sci. 17:538–541.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Meyer, R. E., Flynt, T. O., and Riley, T. E. 1972. Control of yaupon and associated species. Weed Sci. 20:246–249.Google Scholar
5. Fisher, C. E., Meadors, C. H., and Behrens, Richard. 1956. Some factors that influence the effectiveness of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid in killing mesquite. Weed Sci. 4:139–147.Google Scholar
6. Fisher, C. E., Meadors, C. H., Behrens, Richard, Robison, E. D., Marion, P. T., and Morton, H. L. 1959. Control of mesquite on grazing lands. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 935. 24 pp.Google Scholar
7. Flynt, T. O., Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., Riley, T. E., and Baur, J. R. 1976. Granular herbicide applicator for brush control. J. Range Manage. 29:435–437.Google Scholar
8. Gordon, R. A. and Scifres, C. J. 1977. Burning for improvement of Macartney rose-infested coastal prairie. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1183.15 pp.Google Scholar
9. Gould, F. W. 1975. The grasses of Texas. Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station, TX. 653 pp.Google Scholar
10. Haas, R. H., Lehman, S. K., and Morton, H. L. 1970. Influence of mowing and spraying dates on herbicidal control of Macartney rose. Weed Sci. 18:33–37.Google Scholar
11. Hoffman, G. O. 1971. Practical use of Tordon 225 mixture herbicide on Texas rangelands. Down Earth 27(2):17–21.Google Scholar
12. Hoffman, G. O., Haas, R. H., and Jeter, B. E. 1964. Macartney rose control in Texas. Texas Agric. Ext. Serv. Misc. Publ. 745. 12 pp.Google Scholar
13. Meyer, R. E., Bovey, R. W., and Baur, J. R. 1978. Control of an oak complex with herbicide granules. Weed Sci. 26:444–453.Google Scholar
14. Meyer, R. E., Bovey, R. W., Riley, T. E., and Flynt, T. O. 1976. Seasonal response of Macartney rose and huisache to herbicides. J. Range Manage. 29:157–160.Google Scholar
15. Meyer, R. E. and Riley, T. E. 1969. Influence of picloram granules and sprays on whitebrush. Weed Sci. 17:293–295.Google Scholar
16. Peevy, F. A. 1973. Bromacil and picloram under southern upland hardwoods. Weed Sci. 21:54–56.Google Scholar
17. Robison, E. D. 1967. Response of mesquite to 2,4,5-T, picloram, and 2,4,5-T/picloram combinations. Abstr., Proc. South. Weed Conf. 20:199.Google Scholar
18. Scifres, C. J. 1975. Fall application of herbicides improves Macartney rose-infested coastal prairie rangelands. J. Range Manage. 28:483–486.Google Scholar
19. Scifres, C. J. 1975. Systems for improving Macartney rose-infested coastal prairie rangeland. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Publ. 1125. 12 pp.Google Scholar
20. Scifres, C. J. and Hoffman, G. O. 1972. Comparative susceptibility of honey mesqutie to dicamba and 2,4,5-T. J. Range Manage. 25:143–145.Google Scholar
21. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Hamilton, W. T. 1978. Control of mixed brush with tebuthiuron. J. Range Manage. (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Meadors, C. H. 1978. Response of range vegetation to grid placement and aerial application of karbutilate. Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
23. Scifres, C. J. and Polk, D. B. Jr. 1974. Vegetation response following spraying a light infestation of honey mesquite. J. Range Manage. 27:462–465.Google Scholar
24. Smith, H. N. and Rechenthin, C. A. 1974. Grassland Restoration. Part I. The Texas brush problem. U.S. Dep. Agric. Soil Conserv. Serv. 4—19114. 49 pp.Google Scholar
25. Sosebee, R. E., Dahl, B. E., and Goen, J. P. 1973. Factors affecting mesquite control with Tordon 225. J. Range Manage. 26:369–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Stritzke, J. F. 1976. Selective removal of brush by grid placement of herbicides. Abstr., Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:255.Google Scholar