Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:09:50.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Oaks (Quercus spp.) and Associated Woody Species on Rangeland with Tebuthiuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. J. Scifres ,
J. W. Stuth  and
R. W. Bovey
C. J. Scifres
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. and Res. Agron., U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed. Admin., Agric. Res., Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
J. W. Stuth
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. and Res. Agron., U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed. Admin., Agric. Res., Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
R. W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. and Res. Agron., U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed. Admin., Agric. Res., Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aerial applications of 20% tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N-dimethylurea} pellets at 2.2 kg/ha (ai) in the spring effectively controlled post oak (Quercus stellata Wangenh.), blackjack oak (Q. marilandica Muenchh.), water oak (Q. nigra L.), yaupon (Ilex vomitoria Ait.), winged elm (Ulmus alata Michx.), downy hawthorn (Crataegus mollis Scheele), gum bumelia [Bumelia lanuginosa (Michx.) Pers.], and willow baccharis (Baccharis salicina Torr. & Gray) in the Post Oak Savannah of Texas. Tree huckleberry (Vaccinium arboreum Marsh.), black hickory (Carya texana Buckl.), honeylocust (Gleditsia triachanthos L.) and cedar elm (Ulmus crassifolia Nutt.) were partially controlled by 2.2 kg/ha of tebuthiuron. Canopies of buckbrush (Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Moench), southern dewberry (Rubus trivialis Michx.), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana L.), and persimmon (Diospyros virginiana L.) were reduced for about two growing seasons after which the woody species recovered. American beautyberry appeared to increase in abundance by the third growing season after control of the other woody species. Honey mesquite [Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. var. glandulosa (Torr.) Cockerell], eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.), and Texas persimmon (Diospyros texana Scheele) were not controlled by tebuthiuron at 2.2 or 4.4 kg/ha, and saw greenbrier (Similax bona-nox L.) and peppervine [Ampelopsis arborea (L.) Koehne] apparently increased following application of tebuthiuron.

Keywords

Symphoricarpus orbiculatusJuniperus virginianaProsopis julifloraUlmus alataIlex vomitoria
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , May 1981 , pp. 270 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Meyer, R. E., Flynt, T. O., and Riley, T. E. 1972. Control of yaupon and associated species. Weed Sci. 20:246–249.Google Scholar
2. Cottam, G. and Curtis, J. T. 1956. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–460.Google Scholar
3. Darrow, R. A. and McCully, W. G. 1959. Brush control and range improvement in the post oak-blackjack oak area of Texas. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 942. 16 pp.Google Scholar
4. Gould, F. W. 1975. Texas Plants. A checklist and ecological summary. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. MP-585 (Rev.). 121 pp.Google Scholar
5. Haas, R. H. and Watson, R. L. 1968. Post oak and mixed hardwood control using 2,4,5-T and picloram. Pages 47–50 (PR-2599) in Brush Research in Texas. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Cons. Prog. Rep. 2583–2609.Google Scholar
6. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1979. Control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) and Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:280–284.Google Scholar
7. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1980. Control of live oak (Quercus virginiana) and understory vegetation with soil applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 28:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Meyer, R. E., Bovey, R. W., and Baur, J. R. 1978. Control of an oak (Quercus) complex with herbicide granules. Weed Sci. 26: 444–453.Google Scholar
9. Milford, M. H. 1975. Introduction to Soils and Soil Science. Laboratory Exercises. Pages 11–18. Kendall and Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.Google Scholar
10. Mortensen, J. L. 1965. Partial extraction of organic matter. Pages 1401–1407 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis (Part II). Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
11. Mutz, J. L., Scifres, C. J., Mohr, W. C., and Drawe, D. L. 1979. Control of willow baccharis and spiny aster with pelleted herbicides. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. B-1194. 12 pp.Google Scholar
12. Peech, M. 1965. Hydrogen-ion activity. Pages 920–921 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. (Part II). Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
13. Scifres, C. J. 1980. Brush Management. Principles and Practices for Texas and the Southwest. Texas A&M Univ. Press. 360 pp.Google Scholar
14. Scifres, C. J. and Haas, R. H. 1974. Vegetation changes in a post oak savannah following woody plant control. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. MP-1136:12 pp.Google Scholar
15. Scifres, C. J. and Mutz, J. L. 1978. Herbaceous vegetation changes following applications of tebuthiuron for brush control. J. Range Manage. 31:375–378.Google Scholar
16. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Hamilton, W. T. 1979. Control of mixed brush with tebuthiuron. J. Range Manage. 32:155–158.Google Scholar
17. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co. 481 pp.Google Scholar
18. Stritzke, J. F. 1976. Selective removal of brush by grid placement of herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:255 (Abstr.) Google Scholar