Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:03:27.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Low Doses of Metamitron and Glyphosate on Growth and Chlorophyll Content of Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David H. Ketel
David H. Ketel*
Affiliation:
DLO Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility (AB-DLO). P.O. Box 14. 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common lambsquarters was treated with metamitron (M) and glyphosate (G) to investigate chlorophyll content as a single, biological parameter for indicating sub-lethal-treated weeds. In three different greenhouse experiments the herbicides were applied at dose rates of 1/8, 1/4 and 1/2 times the M-recommended dose rate (= 0.7 kg ai ha−1), and 1/16, 1/8, and 1/4 times the G-recommended dose rate (= 1.44 kg ai ha−1), respectively. Three weeks after herbicide application the chlorophyll content in leaves of plants treated with 1/2 M was lower than the control. At the same time the chlorophyll content in leaves of plants treated with 1/8 and 1/4 M was higher than the control. The chlorophyll content in the leaves of plants treated with 1/16 and 1/8 G was also higher than the control, but the chlorophyll content in the leaves of plants treated with 1/4 G was equal to the control. A dose of 1/2 M killed 30% of available plants within 29 d, but most of the plants were still alive after 29 d when 1/4 M, 1/8 M, 1/4 G, 1/8 G and 1/16 G had been used. The fresh weight of the biomass reflected the fitness of the plants observed with time and was related to chlorophyll content. The dry weight of the biomass, however, was probably related to the typical action of metamitron and glyphosate. Measurements with a remote sensing technique supported the measurement of chlorophyll with a spectrophotometer confirming a significant discrepancy with time between a herbicide's affect on chlorophyll content and on plant growth. Because differences in chlorophyll content may have caused differences in the progress of plant degradation in sub-lethal- and lethal-treated plants, it is concluded that the chlorophyll content can be used as a single, biological parameter for indicating sub-lethal dose rates of metamitron and glyphosate.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineMetamitron, 4-amino-3-methyl-6-phenyl-1,2,4-triazin-5 (4H)-onecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album (L.)Leaf arealight reflectance
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andrieu, B., Baret, F., Schellberg, J., and Rinderle, U. 1988. Estimation de spectres de feuilles a partir de mesures dans des bandes spectrales larges. Proc. 4-ème Coll. Int. Signatures Spectrales d'Objects en Télédétection, Aussois, Janvrier.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1981. Triazines, Pages 328–374 in Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S., eds. Mode of Action of Herbicides. John Wiley & sons, New York.Google Scholar
3. Breeze, V. G. 1988. Methods to investigate sub-lethal effects of herbicides on plant species. Pages 255–264 in Greaves, M. P., Smith, B. D. and Greig-Smith, P. W., eds. Field Methods for the Study of Environmental Effects of Pesticides, Brit. Crop Prot. Council Monograph 40, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
4. Canal Villanueva, M. J., Fernandez Muniz, B., and Sanchez Tames, R. 1985. Effects of glyphosate on growth and the chlorophyll and carotenoid levels of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 4: 653–664.Google Scholar
5. Clevers, J. G. P. W. 1989. The application of a weighted infra-red vegetation index for estimating leaf area index by correcting for soil moisture. Rem. Sens. Environ. 29: 25–37.Google Scholar
6. Cole, D. J. 1985. Mode of action of glyphosate—a literature analysis. Pages 48–74 in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Butterworths London.Google Scholar
7. Comai, L., and Stalker, D. 1986. Mechanism of action of herbicides and their molecular manipulation. Oxf Surv Plant & Cell Biol 3: 166–195.Google Scholar
8. Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Secondary physiological effects of herbicides. Pages 1–16 and 333–355 in Physiology of Herbicide Action. P T R Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.Google Scholar
9. Fedtke, C. 1973. Effects of the herbicide methabenzthiazuron on the physiology of wheat plants. Pestic. Sci. 4: 653–664.Google Scholar
10. Fedtke, C. 1974. Changed physiology in wheat plants treated with the herbicide methabenzthiazuron. Die Naturwissenschaften 6: 272–273.Google Scholar
11. Fedtke, C. 1979. Physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max) plants to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 27: 192–195.Google Scholar
12. Fedtke, C. 1981. Nitrogen metabolism in photosynthetically inhibited plants. Pages 260–265 in Bothe, H. and Trebst, A., eds. Biology of Inorganic Nitrogen and Sulfur. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
13. Garcia, R., Kanemasu, E. T., Blad, B. L., Bauer, A., Hatfield, J. L., Major, D. J., Reginato, R. J., and Hubbard, K. G. 1988. Interception and use efficiency of light in winter wheat under different nitrogen regimes. Agric. For. Meteorol. 44: 175–186.Google Scholar
14. Geiger, D. R., and Bestman, H. D. 1990. Self limitation of herbicide mobility by phytotoxic action. Weed Sci. 38: 324–329.Google Scholar
15. Gouglas, J. A., and Geiger, D. R. 1984. Carbon partitioning and herbicide transport in glyphosate-treated sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 32: 546–551.Google Scholar
16. Horler, D. N. H., Dockray, M., and Berber, J. 1983. The red edge of plant reflectance. Int. J. Remote Sens. 4: 273.Google Scholar
17. Inskeep, W. P., and Bloom, P. R. 1985. Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N,N-Dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiol. 77: 483–485.Google Scholar
18. Ketel, D. H., Pikaar, P. J. J. and Lotz, L. A. P. 1995. Adjusting metribuzin dose rate to weed development by using the herbicide parameter. Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Symp. on Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. Cordoba. Spain. In press.Google Scholar
19. Kidd, H., and James, D. R. 1991. Metribuzin. Page A0280 in Kidd, H. and James, D. R., eds. The Agronomical Handbook (3rd edition). Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
20. Oorschot, J. L. van, P., and van Leeuwen, P. H. 1979. Recovery from inhibition of photosynthesis by metamitron in various plant species. Weed Res. 19: 63–67.Google Scholar
21. Schellberg, J. 1990. Die Spektrale Reflexion von Weizen—ein Beitrag zur Zustandbeschreibung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturpflanzen bestände durch Fernerkundung. Inaugural-Dissertation Hohen Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn. 160 pp.Google Scholar
22. Steiner, A. A. 1968. Soilless culture. Pages 324–341 in Proc. 6th Colloquium of the International Potash Institue, Berne.Google Scholar
23. Streibig, J. C. 1992. Quantitative assessment of herbicide phytotoxicity with dilution assay. . Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University Copenhagen. Department of Agricultural Science. 98 pp.Google Scholar
24. Uenk, D., Bouman, B.A.M., and Kasteren, H.W.J. 1992. Reflectiemetingen aan landbouwgewassen (Measurements of Reflection at Crops). Publikatie 156. CABO-DLO, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 56 pp.Google Scholar