Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:23:01.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Watering Frequency, Drought, and Glyphosate on Growth of Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Armando A. Dall'Armellina  and
Robert L. Zimdahl
Armando A. Dall'Armellina
Affiliation:
Instituto de Desarrollo del Valle Inferior del Rio Negro, IDEVI, 8500-Viedma, Rio Negro, Argentina
Robert L. Zimdahl
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Weed Sci., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine effects of watering frequency, drought stress, and a combination of watering frequency and glyphosate on growth of field bindweed. Watering daily, twice weekly, or weekly to field capacity affected field bindweed grown from seed differently than plants grown from root runner segments. Shoot and root dry matter of plants grown from seed increased when plants were watered frequently but dry matter allocated to root runners did not change when plants were watered less frequently. Plants grown from root runner segments increased their shoot and root runner dry matter when watered frequently, but root dry matter was not affected by watering frequency. Plants grown from seed had highest regrowth when watered weekly and plants grown from root runner segments had higher regrowth when watered daily. Drought reduced survival rate and dry matter of surviving plants. Frequency of watering and whether plants began from seeds or root runner segments influenced glyphosate action on field bindweed. No regrowth was observed 6 months after 1.5 kg ai/ha of glyphosate was applied to plants that had been grown for 8 weeks under three different watering frequencies.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinefield bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis L. ♯3 CONARPerennial weedsCONAR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , May 1989 , pp. 314 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1972. Field bindweed: Getting to the root of the problem. Elanco Products Co. Google Scholar
2. Ahmadi, M. S., Haderlie, L. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Effect of growth stage and water stress on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control and on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 28:277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Boot, R., Raynol, D. J., and Grimes, J. P. 1986. A comparative study of the influence of drought stress on flowering in Urtica dioca and U. urens . J. Ecol. 74:485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bourque, D. P. and Naylor, A. W. 1971. Large effects of small water deficits on chlorophyll accumulation and ribonucleic acid synthesis in etiolated leaves of jack bean [Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC.]. Plant Physiol. 47:591–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Chandrasena, J.P.N.R. and Sagar, G. R. 1986. Some factors affecting the performance of fluazifop-butyl against Elymus repens (L.) Gould. (=Agropyron repens) (L.) Beauv. Weed Res. 26:139–148.Google Scholar
6. Chase, R. L. and Appleby, A. P. 1979. Effects of humidity and moisture stress on glyphosate control of Cyperus rotundus L. Weed Res. 19:241–246.Google Scholar
7. Farris, M. A. 1984. Leaf size and shape variation with drought stress in Rumex acetocella L. (Polygonaceae). American Midland Naturalist 111:358–363.Google Scholar
8. Foreman, M. H. and Field, R. J. 1986. Drought induced tolerance to diclofop methyl in cultivated oat. Proc. N.Z. Weed and Pest Control Conf. 39:267–271.Google Scholar
9. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the Plants of Colorado. Sage Press, Chicago, IL. 666 pp.Google Scholar
10. Hart, C. E. 1967. Effect of moisture supply upon translocation and storage of 14-C in sugarcane. Plant Physiol. 42:338–346.Google Scholar
11. Hsiao, T. C. 1973. Plant response to water stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24:519–523.Google Scholar
12. Ishimine, J., Miyazato, K., and Matsumoto, S. 1985. Physiological characteristics of weeds of sugarcane fields in the Ryukya Islands. 4. Effects of soil moisture on growth and seed production of Paspalum urvillei Steud. Weed Res. Japan 30:151–154.Google Scholar
13. Kramer, P. J. 1983. Water Relations of Plants. Academic Press, New York. 474 pp.Google Scholar
14. Lauridson, T. C., Wilson, R. G. and Haderlie, L. C. 1983. Effect of moisture stress on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 31:674–680.Google Scholar
15. Meeusen, R. M., Lorey, S. M. and Yih, R. J. 1983. Effects of environmental factors on the herbicidal activity of acifluorfen. Aspects Appl. Biol. 4:253–263.Google Scholar
16. Meyer, J. L. 1978. The influence of environment on growth and control of field bindweed. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:141–142.Google Scholar
17. Patterson, D. T. 1986. Comparative ecophysiology of weeds and crops. Chap. 4 in Weed Physiology, Duke, S. O., ed. Vol. I. Reproduction and Ecophysiology. CRC Press, Florida.Google Scholar
18. Peters, D. B. 1965. Water availability. Chap. 19 in Methods of Soil Analysis, Black, C. A., ed., Part 1. Pages 279–285. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
19. Rashed, M. H. and Haderlie, L. C. 1980. The relationship between anatomical and physiological aspects of field bindweed under water stress conditions. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 35:26.Google Scholar
20. Rosser, S. W., Witt, W. W., and Olson, G. L. 1983. The effect of moisture stress on johnsongrass control with fluazifop. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:356.Google Scholar
21. Rosenthal, S. S. 1983. Field bindweed in California: Extent and cost of infestation. Calif. Agric. 37:16–18.Google Scholar
22. Rozilyn, N.A.M.H. and van der Werf, D. C. 1986. Effect of drought during different stages in the life cycle on the growth and biomass allocation of two Aria species. J. Ecol. 74:507–523.Google Scholar
23. Sung, F.J.M. and Krieg, D. R. 1979. Relative sensitivity of photosynthetic assimilation and translocation of 14C to water stress. Plant Physiol. 64:852–858.Google Scholar
24. Weerakoon, W. L. and Lovett, J. V. 1986. Studies of Saliva reflexa Hornem. IV. Effects of watering frequency, drought, and nutrient supply on growth and development. Weed Res. 26:277–282.Google Scholar
25. Wiese, A. F. and Vandiver, C. W. 1970. Soil moisture effects on competitive ability of weeds. Weed Sci. 18:518–519.Google Scholar
26. Wiese, A. F. and Rea, H. E. 1962. Factors affecting the toxicity of phenoxy herbicides to field bindweed. Weeds 10:58–61.Google Scholar