Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:03:21.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploratory data analysis to identify factors influencing spatial distributions of weed seed banks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

L. Wiles  and
M. Brodahl
M. Brodahl
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Water Management Research Unit, Fort Collins, CO 80526
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparing distributions among fields, species, and management practices will help us understand the spatial dynamics of weed seed banks, but analyzing observational data requires nontraditional statistical methods. We used cluster analysis and classification and regression tree analysis (CART) to investigate factors that influence spatial distributions of seed banks. CART is a method for developing predictive models, but it is also used to explain variation in a response variable from a set of possible explanatory variables. With cluster analysis, we identified patterns of variation with direction of the distance over which seed bank density was correlated (range of spatial dependence) with single-species seed banks in corn. Then we predicted patterns of the seed banks with CART using field and species characteristics and seed bank density as explanatory variables. Patterns differed by magnitude of variation in the range of spatial dependence (strength of anisotropy) and direction of the maximum range. Density and type of irrigation explained the most variation in pattern. Long ranges were associated with large seed banks and stronger anisotropy with furrow than center pivot irrigation. Pattern was also explained by seed size and longevity, characteristics for natural dispersal, species, soil texture, and whether the weed was a grass or broadleaf. Significance of these factors depended on density or type of irrigation, and some patterns were predicted for more than one combination of factors. Dispersal was identified as a primary process of spatial dynamics and pattern varied for seed spread by tillage, wind, or natural dispersal. However, demographic characteristics and density were more important in this research than in previous research. Impact of these factors may have been clearer because interactions were modeled. Lack of data will be the greatest obstacle to using comparative studies and CART to understand the spatial dynamics of weed seed banks.

Keywords

Corn, Zea mays L.Classification and regression tree analysisseed bank dynamicsspatial dynamicsanisotropyspatial dependencegeostatisticsspatial correlationcorrelogramsseed dispersalseed longevityirrigation
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 936 - 947
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ambrosio, L., Dorado, J., and Del Monte, J. P. 1997. Assessment of the sample size to estimate the weed seedbank in soil. Weed Res 37:129–137.Google Scholar
Audsley, E. and Beaulah, S. A. 1996. Combining weed maps to produce a treatment for patch spraying. Asp. Appl. Biol 46:111–117.Google Scholar
Benoit, D. L., Kenkel, N. C., and Cavers, P. B. 1989. Factors influencing the precision of soil seed bank estimates. Can. J. Bot 67:2833–2840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigwood, D. W. and Inouye, D. W. 1988. Spatial pattern analysis of seed banks: an improved method and optimized sampling. Ecology 69:497–507.Google Scholar
Burgess, T. M., Webster, R., and McBratney, A. B. 1981. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. IV. Sampling strategy. J. Soil Sci 32:643–699.Google Scholar
Burrough, P. A. 1991. Sampling designs for quantifying map unit composition. Pages 89–125 in Mausbach, M. J. and Wilding, L. P. eds. Spatial Variabilities of Soils and Landforms SSSA Special Publication No. 28. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Johnson, G. A., and Sparrow, D. H. 1997. The nature and consequence of weed spatial distribution. Weed Sci 45:364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J., Sparrow, D. H., and McCoy, E. 1996. Spatial relationships between seedbank and seedling populations of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and annual grasses. Weed Sci 44:298–308.Google Scholar
Chauvel, B., Gasquez, J., and Darmency, H. 1989. Changes of weed seed bank parameters according to species, time and environment. Weed Res 29:213–220.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A. and Pregibon, D. 1992. Tree-based models. Pages 377–420 in Chambers, J. M. and Hastie, T. J. eds. Statistical Models in S. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks.Google Scholar
Colbach, N., Forcella, F., and Johnson, G. A. 2000. Spatial and temporal stability of weed populations over five years. Weed Sci 48:366–377.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 217–242.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Woolcock, J. L. 1997. Spatial dynamics of weeds: an overview. Pages 613–618 in Proceedings of the 1997 Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds.Google Scholar
Dale, M. R. T. 2000. Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Dastgheib, F. 1989. Relative importance of crop seed, manure and irrigation water as sources of weed infestations. Weed Res 29:113–116.Google Scholar
De'ath, G. and Fabricus, K. E. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 8:3178–3192.Google Scholar
Dessaint, F., Barralis, G., Caixinhas, M. L., Mayor, J-P., Recasens, J., and Zanin, G. 1996. Precision of soil seed bank sampling: how many cores? Weed Res 36:143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessaint, F., Chadoeuf, R., and Barralis, G. 1991. Spatial pattern analysis of weed seeds in the cultivated soil seed bank. J. Appl. Ecol 28:721–730.Google Scholar
Deutsch, C. V. and Journel, A. G. 1998. GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
Dieleman, J. A., Mortensen, D. A., and Young, L. J. 1999. Predicting within-field weed species occurrence based on field-site attributes. Pages 517–528 in Stafford, J. V. ed. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture; Odense, Denmark. London: SCI.Google Scholar
Dobbertin, M. and Biging, G. S. 1997. Using the non-parametric classifier CART to model forest tree mortality. Forest Sci 44:507–516.Google Scholar
Flatman, G. T., Englund, E. J., and Yfanis, A. A. 1988. Geostatistical approaches to the design of sampling regimes. Pages 73–84 in Keith, L. H. ed. Principles of Environmental Sampling. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Ford, E. D. and Renshaw, E. 1984. The interpretation of process from pattern using two dimensional spectral analysis: modelling single species pattern in vegetation. Vegetation 56:113–123.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M. and Roush, M. L. 1993. Searching for solutions to weed problems: do we study competition or dispersal? BioScience 43:104–109.Google Scholar
Gotway, C. A., Ferguson, R. B., and Hergert, G. W. 1996. The effects of mapping and scale on variable-rate fertilizer recommendations for corn. Pages 321–330 in Robert, P. C., Rust, R. H., and Larson, W. E. eds. Precision Agriculture. Minneapolis, MN: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Grundy, A. C., Mead, A., and Burston, S. 1999. Modelling the effect of cultivation on seed movement with application to the prediction of weed seedling emergence. J. Appl. Ecol 36:663–678.Google Scholar
Hallahan, M. and Rosenthal, R. 2000. Interpreting and reporting results. Pages 125–131 in Tinsley, H.E.A. and Brown, S. D. eds. Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
Halstead, S. J. and Gross, K. L. 1990. Geostatistical analysis of the weed seed bank. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc 45:123–124.Google Scholar
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 453–459.Google Scholar
Hausler, A. and Nordmeyer, H. 1999. Characterizing spatial and temporal dynamics of weed seedling populations. Pages 463–472 in Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture; Odense, Denmark. London: SCI.Google Scholar
Heisel, T., Christensen, S., and Walter, A. M. 1999. Whole-field experiments with site-specific weed management. Pages 759–768 in Stafford, J. V. ed. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture; Odense, Denmark. London: SCI.Google Scholar
Howard, C. L., Mortimer, A. M., Gould, P., Putwain, P. D., Cousens, R., and Cussans, G. W. 1991. The dispersal of weeds: seed movement in arable agriculture. Pages 821–828 in 1991 Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. Volume 5.Google Scholar
Isaaks, E. H. and Srivastava, R. M. 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 140–182, 369– 399.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A., Cardina, J., and Mortensen, D. A. 1997. Site-specific weed management: current and future directions. Pages 131–147 in Robert, P. C., Rust, R. H., and Larson, W. E. eds. Site-specific Management for Agricultural Systems. Minneapolis, MN: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Jones, N. E. 1998. The number of soil cores required to accurately estimate the seed bank on arable land. Asp. Appl. Biol 51:1–8.Google Scholar
Kelley, A. D. and Bruns, V. F. 1975. Dissemination of weed seeds by irrigation water. Weed Sci 23:486–493.Google Scholar
Marshall, E. J. P. 1989. Distribution patterns of plants associated with arable field edges. J. Appl. Ecol 26:247–257.Google Scholar
Mead, A., Grundy, A. C., and Burston, S. 1998. Predicting the movement of seeds following cultivation. Asp. Appl. Bio 51:91–94.Google Scholar
Mortensen, D. A., Johnson, G. A., and Young, L. J. 1993. Weed distribution in agricultural fields. Page I/NR13–124 in Robert, P. C., Rust, R. H., and Larson, W. E. eds. Proceeding of Soil Specific Crop Management. Madison, WI: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Nordmeyer, H., Hausler, A., and Niemann, P. 1997. Patchy weed control as an approach in precision farming. Pages 307–314 in Stafford, J. V. ed. Precision Agriculture '97. Oxford, U.K.: Bios Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. A. 1999. Exploring soil spatial variation geostatistically. Pages 463–472 in Stafford, J. V. ed. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture; Odense, Denmark. London: SCI.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. A., Frogbrook, Z., Webster, R., and Dawson, C. J. 1997. A rational strategy for determining the number of cores for bulked soil samples. Pages 155–162 in Stafford, J. V. ed. Precision Agriculture '97. Oxford, U.K.: Bios Scientific.Google Scholar
Paice, M. E. R., Day, W., Rew, L. J., and Howard, A. 1998. A stochastic simulation model for evaluating the concept of patch spraying. Weed Res 38:373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rew, L. J. and Cousens, R. D. 2001. Spatial distribution of weeds in arable crops: are current sampling and analytical methods appropriate? Weed Res 41:1–18.Google Scholar
Rew, L. J. and Cussans, G. W. 1995. Patch ecology and dynamics: how much do we know?. Pages 1059–1068 in Proceedings of the 1995 Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds.Google Scholar
Rew, L. J. and Cussans, G. W. 1997. Horizontal movement of seeds following tine and plough cultivation: implications for spatial dynamics of weed infestations. Weed Res 37:247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, R. R., Mulla, D. J., Journel, A. G., and Franz, E. H. 1992. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol. Monogr 62:277–314.Google Scholar
[SAGE2001] Spatial and Geostatistical Environment for Variography. 1999. User's Guide. San Mateo, CA: Isaaks. Pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6, 3rd ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. pp. 283–357.Google Scholar
Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. 1999. Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, A. M., Heisel, T., and Christensen, S. 1997. Shotcuts in weed mapping. Pages 777–784 in Stafford, J. V. ed. Precision Agriculture '97. Oxford, U.K.: Bios Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Weisz, R., Fleischer, S., and Smilowitz, Z. 1995. Site-specific integrated pest management for high value crops: sample units for map generation using the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) as a model system. J. Econ. Entom 88:1069–1080.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J., Barlin, D. H., Schweizer, E. E., Duke, H. R., and Whitt, D. E. 1996. A new soil sampler and elutriator for collecting and extracting weed seeds from soil. Weed Technol 10:35–41.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J. and Schweizer, E. E. 2002. Spatial dependence of weed seed banks and strategies for sampling. Weed Sci 50:595–606.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. and Brain, P. 1991. Long-term stability of distribution of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. within cereal fields. Weed Res 31:367–373.Google Scholar