Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:23:32.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of Mesotrione and Atrazine in Two Weed Species with Different Mechanisms for Atrazine Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew J. Woodyard ,
Josie A. Hugie  and
Dean E. Riechers
Andrew J. Woodyard
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Josie A. Hugie
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Dean E. Riechers*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: riechers@illinois.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The joint activity of mesotrione and atrazine can display synergistic effects on the control of both triazine-sensitive and site-of-action-based triazine-resistant (TR) broadleaf weeds. The first objective of this study was to evaluate a PRE application of atrazine followed by a POST application of mesotrione for potential interactions in both site-of-action-based TR redroot pigweed and metabolism-based atrazine-resistant (AR) velvetleaf. Results from these sequential experiments demonstrated that synergism was detected in reducing biomass of the TR redroot pigweed but not in the AR velvetleaf with metabolism-based resistance. The second objective was to evaluate the joint activity of mesotrione and atrazine in a tank-mix application in the AR velvetleaf biotype. Greenhouse studies with the AR biotype indicated that synergism resulted from a tank mix with a constant mesotrione rate of 3.2 g ai ha−1 in mixture with atrazine ranging from 126 to 13,440 g ai ha−1. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging also revealed a synergistic interaction on the AR biotype when 3.2 g ha−1 of mesotrione was applied with 126 g ha−1 of atrazine beginning 36 h after treatment and persisting through 72 h.

Keywords

Atrazinemesotrioneredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti M. ABUTH.Glutathione S-transferasesHPPD inhibitorPhotosystem II inhibitorherbicide synergy
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , August 2009 , pp. 369 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abendroth, J. A., Martin, A. R., and Roeth, F. W. 2006. Plant response to combinations of mesotrione and photosystem II inhibitors. Weed Technol. 20:267–274.Google Scholar
Aldea, M., Frank, T. D., and DeLucia, E. H. 2006. A method for quantitative analysis of spatially variable physiological processes across leaf surfaces. Photosynth. Res. 90:161–172.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. P. and Gronwald, J. W. 1991. Atrazine resistance in a velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) biotype due to enhanced glutathione-S-transferase activity. Plant Physiol. 96:104–109.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. N. and Gronwald, J. W. 1987. Noncytoplasmic inheritance of atrazine tolerance in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 35:496–498.Google Scholar
Armel, G. R., Rardon, P. L., McCormick, M. C., and Ferry, N. M. 2007. Differential response of several carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitors in mixture with atrazine. Weed Technol. 21:947–953.Google Scholar
Baker, N. R. 2008. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:89–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbagallo, R. P., Oxborough, K., Pallett, K. E., and Baker, N. R. 2003. Rapid, noninvasive screening for perturbations of metabolism and plant growth using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol. 132:485–493.Google Scholar
Bollman, S. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 2006. Weed response to mesotrione and atrazine applied alone and in combination preemergence. Weed Technol. 20:903–907.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds. 15:20–22.Google Scholar
Cole, D., Pallett, K., and Rodgers, M. 2000. Discovering new modes of action for herbicides and the impact of genomics. Pestic. Outlook. 11:223–229.Google Scholar
Cummins, I., Cole, D. J., and Edwards, R. 1999. A role for glutathione transferases functioning as glutathione peroxidases in resistance to multiple herbicides in black-grass. Plant J. 18:285–292.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Preston, C. 2000. The molecular basis of herbicide resistance. Pages 72–104. In Cobb, A. H. and Kirkwood, R. C. Herbicides and Their Mechanisms of Action. Sheffield, U.K. Sheffield Academic.Google Scholar
Flint, J. L., Cornelius, P. L., and Barrett, M. 1988. Analyzing herbicide interactions: a statistical treatment of Colby's method. Weed Technol. 2:304–309.Google Scholar
Fuerst, E. P., Arntzen, C. J., Pfister, K., and Penner, D. 1986. Herbicide cross-resistance in triazine-resistant biotypes of four species. Weed Sci. 34:344–353.Google Scholar
Fuerst, E. P. and Norman, M. A. 1991. Interactions of herbicides with photosynthetic electron transport. Weed Sci. 39:458–464.Google Scholar
Gowing, D. P. 1960. Comments on tests of herbicide mixtures. Weeds. 8:379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. A., Balke, N. E., and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1996. Increased glutathione conjugation of atrazine confers resistance in a Wisconsin velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) biotype. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 55:157–171.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Balke, N. E. 1995a. Productivity and intraspecific competitive ability of a velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) biotype resistant to atrazine. Weed Sci. 43:619–626.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Balke, N. E. 1995b. Absence of herbicide cross-resistance in two atrazine-resistant velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) biotypes. Weed Sci. 43:352–357.Google Scholar
Green, J. M., Jensen, J. E., and Streibig, J. C. 1997. Defining and characterizing synergism and antagonism for xenobiotic mixtures. Pages 263–274. In Hatzios, K. K. Regulation of Enzymatic Systems Detoxifying Xenobiotics in Plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidi, L., Mori, S., Degl'Innocenti, E., and Pecchia, S. 2007. Effects of ozone exposure or fungal pathogen on white lupin leaves as determined by imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 45:851–857.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2008. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: September 19, 2008.Google Scholar
Hess, F. D. 2000. Light-dependent herbicides: an overview. Weed Sci. 48:160–170.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, J. and McIntosh, L. 1983. Molecular basis of herbicide resistance in Amaranthus hybridus. Science. 222:1340–1349.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S., Powles, S. B., and Holtum, J. A. M. 1993. Mechanisms and agronomic aspects of herbicide resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:203–209.Google Scholar
Horvath, D. P., Llewellyn, D., and Clay, S. A. 2007. Heterologous hybridization of cotton microarrays with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) reveals physiological responses due to corn competition. Weed Sci. 55:546–557.Google Scholar
Hugie, J. A. 2008. Understanding the interaction of mesotrione and atrazine in redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Ph.D. dissertation. Champaign, IL University of Illinois. 131 p.Google Scholar
Hugie, J. A., Bollero, G. A., Tranel, P. J., and Riechers, D. E. 2008. Defining the rate requirements for synergism between mesotrione and atrazine in redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 56:265–270.Google Scholar
Jachetta, J. J. and Radosevich, S. R. 1981. Enhanced degradation of atrazine by corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 29:37–44.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. L. W. and Chapman, P. F. 1995. The design and analysis of mixture experiments to meet different objectives: a practical summary. Aspects Appl. Biol. 41:51–59.Google Scholar
Kreuz, K., Tommasini, R., and Martinoia, E. 1996. Old enzymes for a new job: herbicide detoxification in plants. Plant Physiol. 111:349–353.Google Scholar
McCurdy, J. D., McElroy, J. S., Kopsell, D. A., Sams, C. E., and Sorochan, J. C. 2008. Effects of mesotrione on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) carotenoid concentrations under varying environmental conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56:9133–9139.Google Scholar
Miller, G., Shulaev, V., and Mittler, R. 2008. Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress. Physiol. Plant. 133:481–489.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Bartlett, D. W., Fraser, T. E. M., Hawkes, T. R., Holt, D. C., Townson, J. K., and Wichert, R. A. 2001. Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest. Manag. Sci. 57:120–128.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole: I. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62:113–124.Google Scholar
[R] R Development Core Team 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
[SAS] SAS Institute, Inc 2004. SAS/STAT® 9.1 User's Guide. Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc. 5136 p.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America. 458 p.Google Scholar
Streibig, J. C., Kudsk, P., and Jensen, J. E. 1998. A general joint action model for herbicide mixtures. Pestic. Sci. 53:21–28.Google Scholar
Sutton, P., Richards, C., Buren, L., and Glasgow, L. 2002. Activity of mesotrione on resistant weeds in maize. Pest Manag. Sci. 58:981–984.Google Scholar
Triantaphylidès, C. and Havaux, M. 2009. Singlet oxygen in plants: production, detoxification and signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 14:219–228.Google Scholar