Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:01:37.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological basis for the differential tolerance of Glycine max to sulfentrazone during seed germination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Zhaohu Li ,
Glenn R. Wehtje  and
Robert H. Walker
Zhaohu Li
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Soils Department, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, AL 36849
Glenn R. Wehtje
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Soils Department, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glycine max cultivars exhibit differential tolerance to soil-applied sulfentrazone. The intent of this study was to determine the physiological basis for this differential tolerance by evaluating sulfentrazone absorption and metabolism during the earliest stages of G. max development (i.e., germinating seeds, and germinal seedlings). Imbibed seeds (24 h) of the sulfentrazone-tolerant cultivar ‘Stonewall’ absorbed 37% less sulfentrazone than the sulfentrazone-sensitive cultivar ‘Asgrow 6785’. Similarly, germinal seedlings (i.e., 60 h from start of imbibition) of the sulfentrazone-tolerant cultivars Stonewall and ‘Pioneer 9593’ absorbed 22% less sulfentrazone than the sulfentrazone-sensitive cultivars Asgrow 6785 and ‘Carver’ when exposed to sulfentrazone-containing solution for either 24 or 48 h. The amount of root-absorbed 14C-sulfentrazone that was translocated into cotyledon or hypocotyl tissues did not exceed 11% of the amount absorbed and was similar for all four cultivars. Sulfentrazone metabolism by both imbibed seeds and by germinal seedlings was independent of cultivar. Increasing the sulfentrazone concentration in the seed imbibition solution and increasing the temperature resulted in greater seedling height reduction at 10 d in Asgrow 6758 than in Stonewall. Results indicate that differential absorption during the earliest stages of development is the basis for the differential response among G. max cultivars. Comparatively limited sulfentrazone absorption by Stonewall, as reflected in acceptable seedling injury, remained relatively consistent across the range of concentrations and temperatures evaluated.

Keywords

SulfentrazoneGlycine max (L.) Merr., soybeanImbibitionherbicide translocationherbicide metabolismimbibition temperature
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , June 2000 , pp. 281 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Dayan, F. E., Armstrong, B. M., and Weete, J. D. 1998. Inhibitory activity of sulfentrazone and its metabolic derivatives on soybean (Glycine max) protoporphyrinogen oxidase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:2024–2029.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., Duke, S. O., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Soybean cultivar (Glycine max) differences in response to sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45:634–641.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1996. Differential sensitivity to sulfentrazone by sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis). Weed Sci. 44:12–17.Google Scholar
Hancock, H. G. 1992. Weed spectrum of F6285 in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:49.Google Scholar
Li, Z., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., and Hancock, H. G. 1999. Use seedling growth parameters to classify soybean (Glycine max) cultivar sensitivity to sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 13:530–535.Google Scholar
Mangeot, B. L., Slife, F. E., and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Differential metabolism of metribuzin by two soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Sci. 27:267–269.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. E., Egli, D. B., and Thompson, L. Jr. 1972. Absorption of herbicides by soybean seeds and their influence on emergence and seedling growth. Weed Sci. 20:506–510.Google Scholar
Rieder, G., Buchholtz, K. P., and Kust, C. A. 1970. Uptake of herbicides by soybean seed. Weed Sci. 18:101–105.Google Scholar
Swantek, J. M., Sneller, C. H., and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Evaluation of soybean injury from sulfentrazone and inheritance of tolerance. Weed Sci. 46:271–277.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1990. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-clomazone in soybean (Glycine max) and three Amaranthus weed species. J. Plant Growth Regul. 9:127–132.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. S., Jordan, D. L., and Reynolds, D. B. 1996. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 10:762–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. H. 1994. F6285 applied postemergence in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:64.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H., Richburg, J. S., and Jones, R. E. 1992. F6285 efficacy as affected by rate and methods of application. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:51.Google Scholar