Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:51:27.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Glyphosate-resistant and Conventional Soybean Grafted Plants to Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2018

Yin Chen ,
Linjian Jiang  and
Douglas Doohan
Yin Chen
Affiliation:
Weed Scientist, Noposion Agrochemicals Co., Ltd (NPS), BaoAn District, ShenZheng, People’s Republic of China
Linjian Jiang
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Haidian Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Douglas Doohan*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, U.S.A.
*
*Author for correspondence: Douglas Doohan, Department of Horticulture & Crop Science, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691. (Email: doohan.1@osu.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Grafting is a common technique used to impart desirable traits to a plant’s scion. Herbicide resistant rootstocks have the potential to confer non–genetically modified (non-GM) scions with herbicide tolerance while mitigating some societal concerns regarding GM crops and food. We examined the impacts of soybean cultivar and growth stage and environmental temperature on transference of glyphosate tolerance to conventional (CN) soybean scions when grafted to glyphosate-resistant (RR) rootstocks. Small CN/RR (scion/rootstock) plants (3-leaf stage) and medium-sized plants (6-leaf stage) were injured more than large plants (10-leaf stage) 34 d after treatment (DAT) with 0.84 and 1.68 kg ae ha−1 glyphosate. All CN/CN combinations died, and RR/RR were uninjured. The cultivar of the scion had a greater effect on glyphosate tolerance than the cultivar of the rootstock. CN scions 352 and 5418 were more tolerant than CN scion 5388 across all RR rootstocks 35 DAT when treated with 0.84 kg ha−1 glyphosate. CN/RR construct 5388/9392 was more sensitive to temperature compared with 352/9392. Less leaf regrowth of 5388/9392 was observed under the warmer temperature. Our experiments demonstrated that grafting imparted robust glyphosate tolerance across different plant sizes, environmental temperatures, and scion/rootstock cultivars.

Keywords

Dean E. RiechersUniversity of IllinoisGlyphosate tolerancegraftingsoybean cultivarsoybean growth stagetemperature
Type
Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 433 - 438
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, S, Tanpipat, S, Swarbrick, J Boersma, M (1998) Influence of environmental factors on glyphosate efficacy. Weed Res 38:129–138 Google Scholar
Association of American Pesticide Control Officials (2017) Dicamba. https://aapco.org/2015/07/02/dicamba. Accessed: August 28, 2017Google Scholar
Bhatti, MA, Kassim, A Parker, R (1997) Wine grape (Vitis vinifera) response to fall exposure of simulated drift from selected herbicides. Weed Technol 11:532–536 Google Scholar
Board, JE Kahlon, CS (2011) Soybean yield formation: what controls it and how it can be improved. Pages 1–36 in El-Shemy HA, ed. Soybean Physiology and Biochemistry. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech Google Scholar
Boutin, C, Strandberg, B, Carpenter, D, Mathiassen, SK Thomas, PJ (2014) Herbicide impact on non-target plant reproduction: what are the toxicological and ecological implications? Environ Pollut 185:295–306 Google Scholar
Cedergreen, N, Streibig, JC, Kudsk, P, Mathiassen, SK Duke, SO (2007) The occurrence of hormesis in plants and algae. Dose–Response 5:150–162 Google Scholar
Cole, DJ (1983) The effects of environmental factors on the metabolism of herbicides in plants. Aspect Appl Biol 4:245–252 Google Scholar
Colquhoun, JB, Heider, DJ Rittmeyer, RA (2017) Seed potato growth and yield as affected by mother plant exposure to herbicides. Weed Sci 31:136–147 Google Scholar
Cruz-Hipolito, H, Osuna, MD, Heredia, A, Ruiz-Santaella, JP De Prado, R (2009) Nontarget mechanisms involved in glyphosate tolerance found in Canavalia ensiformis plants. J Agric Food Chem 57:4844–4848 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, AR, Perkins-Veazie, P, Sakata, Y, López-Galarza, S, Maroto, JV, Lee, SG, Campos, JF, Garcia-Abellán, JO, Egea, MI, Fernández-Garcia, N Cohen, R (2008) Cucurbit grafting. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:50–74 Google Scholar
Egan, JF, Barlow, KM Mortensen, DA (2014) A meta-analysis on the effects of 2,4-D and dicamba drift on soybean and cotton. Weed Sci 62:193–206 Google Scholar
[EPA] Environmental Protection Agency (2017) Crop Damage Complaints Related to Dicamba Herbicides Raising Concerns. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-07/documents/fifra-dicambacomplianceadvisory-201708.pdf. Accessed: August 24, 2017Google Scholar
Everitt, JD Keeling, JW (2009) Cotton growth and yield response to simulated 2,4-D and dicamba drift. Weed Technol. 23:503–506 Google Scholar
Flores, FB, Sanchez-Bel, P, Estan, MT, Martinez-Rodriguez, MM, Moyano, E, Morales, B, Campos, JF, Garcia-Abellán, JO, Egea, MI, Fernández-Garcia, N Romojaro, F (2010) The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Sci Hortic 125:211–217 Google Scholar
Gilardi, G, Colla, P, Pugliese, M, Baudino, M, Gullino, ML Garibaldi, A (2014) Control of Colletotrichum coccodes on tomato by grafting and soil amendments. J Phytopathol 162:116–123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giotis, C, Theodoropoulou, A, Cooper, J, Hodgson, R, Shotton, P, Shiel, R, Eyre, M, Wilcockson, S, Markellou, E, Liopa-Tsakalidis, A Volakakis, N (2012) Effect of variety choice, resistant rootstocks and chitin soil amendments on soil-borne diseases in soil-based, protected tomato production systems. Eur J Plant Pathol 134:605–617 Google Scholar
Haroldsen, V, Szczerba, MW, Aktas, H, Lopez, J, Odias, MJ, Chi-Ham, CL, Labavitch, J, Bennett, AB Powell, AL (2012) Mobility of transgenic nucleic acids and proteins within grafted rootstocks for agricultural improvement. Front Plant Sci 3:39 Google Scholar
Jiang, L, Xu, X, Li, Z Doohan, D (2012) Grafting imparts glyphosate resistance in soybean. Weed Technol 27:412–416 Google Scholar
Kruger, GR, Johnson, WG, Doohan, DJ Weller, SC (2012) Dose response of glyphosate and dicamba on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) injury. Weed Technol 26:256–260 Google Scholar
Kubota, C, McClure, MA, Kokalis-Burelle, N, Bausher, MG Rosskopf, EN (2008) Vegetable grafting: history, use, and current technology status in North America. HortScience 43:1664–1669 Google Scholar
Lassiter, BR, Burke, IC, Thomas, WE, Pline-Srnić, WA, Jordan, DL, Wilcut, JW Wilkerson, GG (2007) Yield and physiological response of peanut to glyphosate drift. Weed Technol 21:954–960 Google Scholar
Lee, SJ, Mehler, L, Beckman, J, Diebolt-Brown, B, Prado, J, Lackovic, M., Waltz, J, Mulay, P, Schwartz, A, Mitchell, Y Moraga-McHaley, S (2011) Acute pesticide illnesses associated with off-target pesticide drift from agricultural applications: 11 States, 1998–2006. Environ Health Perspect 119:1162–1169 Google Scholar
Ling, N, Song, Y, Raza, W, Huang, Q, Guo, S Shen, Q (2015) The response of root-associated bacterial community to the grafting of watermelon. Plant Soil 391:253–264 Google Scholar
Lusser, M, Parisi, C, Plan, D Rodríguez-Cerezo, E (2011) New plant breeding techniques: state-of-the-art and prospects for commercial development. Seville, Spain: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission. doi: 10.2791/54761 Google Scholar
Marinov-Serafimov, P (2009) A preliminary study of soybean genotype responses to glyphosate. Pestic Fitomed 24:211–219 Google Scholar
Martinson, KB, Durgan, BR, Gunsolus, JL Sothern, RB (2005) Time of day of application effect on glyphosate and glufosinate efficacy. Crop Manage 4(1): 1–7 Google Scholar
McNaughton, KE, Sikkema, PH Robinson, DE (2012) Response of processing tomato to simulated glyphosate drift followed by in-crop metribuzin application. Weed Technol 26:757–762 Google Scholar
Mohr, K, Sellers, BA Smeda, RJ (2007) Application time of day influences glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technol 21:7–13 Google Scholar
Mortensen, DA, Egan, JF, Maxwell, BD, Ryan, MR Smith, RG (2012) Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience 62:75–84 Google Scholar
Mudge, K, Janick, J, Scofield, S Goldschmidt, EE (2009) A history of grafting. Hortic Rev 35:437 Google Scholar
Myers, JP, Antoniou, MN, Blumberg, B, Carroll, L, Colborn, T, Everett, LG, Hansen, M, Landrigan, PJ, Lanphear, BP, Mesnage, R Vandenberg, LN (2016) Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environ Health 15:19 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Burgos, NR Oliver, LR (2001) Differences in weed tolerance to glyphosate involve different mechanisms 1. Weed Technol 15:725–731 Google Scholar
Peterson, RK Hulting, AG (2004) A comparative ecological risk assessment for herbicides used on spring wheat: the effect of glyphosate when used within a glyphosate-tolerant wheat system. Weed Sci 52:834–844 Google Scholar
Pline, WA, Wu, J Hatzios, KK (1999) Effects of temperature and chemical additives on the response of transgenic herbicide-resistant soybeans to glufosinate and glyphosate applications. Pest Biochem Physiol 65:119–131 Google Scholar
Schwarz, D, Rouphael, Y, Colla, G Venema, JH (2010) Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Sci Hortic 127:162–171 Google Scholar
Schweizer, EE May, MJ (1993) Weeds and weeds control. Pages 485–519 in Cooke DA, Scott RK, eds. The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. London: Chapman & Hall Google Scholar
Stewart, CL, Nurse, RE Sikkema, PH (2009) Time of day impacts postemergence weed control in corn. Weed Technol 23:346–355 Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture (2013) 2012 Agricultural Chemical Use Survey—Soybeans. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. p 2 Google Scholar
Waltz, AL, Martin, AR, Roeth, FW Lindquist, JL (2004) Glyphosate efficacy on velvetleaf varies with application time of day 1. Weed Technol 18:931–939 Google Scholar
Wolf, TM, Grover, R, Wallace, K, Shewchuk, SR Maybank, J (1993) Effect of protective shields on drift and deposition characteristics of field sprayers. Can J Plant Sci 73:1261–1273 Google Scholar
Zhou, GF, Peng, SA, Liu, YZ, Wei, QJ, Han, J Islam, MZ (2014) The physiological and nutritional responses of seven different citrus rootstock seedlings to boron deficiency. Trees 28:295–307 Google Scholar