Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:38:43.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Weed Seeds to Ethylene and Related Hydrocarbons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. B. Taylorson
R. B. Taylorson*
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed. Admin., Fed. Res., Beltsville, MD 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Germination of seeds of 10 grass and 33 broadleaved weed species was examined for response to ethylene. Germination was promoted in nine species, inhibited in two, and not affected in the remainder. Of the species promoted, common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), and several Amaranths, including redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), were affected most. Transformation of phytochrome to the active form (Pfr) gave interactions that ranged from none to syntergistic with the applied ethylene. In subsequent tests seeds of purslane, redroot pigweed, and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.), a species not responsive to ethylene, were examined for germination response to 14 low molecular weight hydrocarbon gases other than ethylene. Some stimulation by the olefins propylene and propadiene was found for purslane and pigweed. Propionaldehyde and butyraldehyde were slightly stimulatory to purslane only.

Keywords

Phytochromegerminationolefin
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 7 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abeles, F. B. 1973. Ethylene in plant biology. Academic Press, New York. 302 pp.Google Scholar
2. Eplee, R. E. 1975. Ethylene: Witchweed seed germination stimulant. Weed Sci. 23:433–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Jansen, L. L. 1972. Extent and cost of weed control with herbicides and evaluation of important weeds. 1968. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D. C. ARS-H-1, 227 pp.Google Scholar
4. Olatoye, S. T. and Hall, M. A. 1973. Interaction of ethylene and light on dormant weed seeds. Pages 233–249 in Heydecker, W., ed. Seed Ecology. Pennsylvania State Univ. Press, Univeristy Park. 578 pp.Google Scholar
5. Smith, K. A. and Russell, R. S. 1969. Occurrence of ethylene and its significance in anaerobic soil. Nature 222:769–771.Google Scholar
6. Smith, K. A. and Dowdell, R. J. 1973. Gas chromatographic analysis of the soil atmosphere: Automatic analysis of gas samples for O2, N2, AR, CO2 N2O, and C1—C4 hydrocarbons. J. Chromat. Sci. 11:655–658.Google Scholar
7. Taylorson, R. B. and Hendricks, S. B. 1969. Action of phytochrome during prechilling of Amaranthus retroflexus L. Seeds. Plant Physiol. 44:821–825.Google Scholar
8. Taylorson, R. B. and Hendricks, S. B. 1976. Interactions of phytochrome and exogenous gibberellic acid on germination of Lamium amplexicaule L. seeds. Planta 132:65–70.Google Scholar
9. Toole, V. K. 1973. Effects of light, temperature and their interactions on the germination of seeds. Seed Sci. and Technol. 1:339–396.Google Scholar