Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:35:00.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Aspects of Glyphosate Action in Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. E. Abu-Irmaileh  and
L. S. Jordan
B. E. Abu-Irmaileh
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Califnornia, Riverside, CA 92521
L. S. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Califnornia, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research was conducted to determine effects of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] on the chlorophyll and carotenoid and on the catalase specific activity in purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). The isopropylamine salt of glyphosate caused chlorosis to appear on the center leaves of plants maintained under lighted conditions after treatment. Glyphosate-induced chlorosis was delayed by darkness but occurred when treated plants were placed in the light. Glyphosate caused significant reducations in the chlorophyll and carotenoids content of purple nutsedge leaves. Based on levels in untreated plants, carotenoid content was reduced more rapidly than chlorophyll in glyphosate-treated plants. The catalase specific activity was reduced by glyphosate to about 70% of the level in untreated plants. Interrelationships among the effects of glyphosate on the carotenoid and chlorophyll content and catalase activity were not determined but possible interactions are discussed.

Keywords

Chlorophyllcarotenoidscatalaselightherbicide
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 6 , November 1978 , pp. 700 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatured Cited

1. Abu-Irmaileh, B. E. 1977. Some effects of glyphosate on purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Proc. California Weed Control Conf. 29:34–41.Google Scholar
2. Appleman, D. 1952. Catalase-chlorophyll relationship in barley seedlings. Plant Physiol. 27:613–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Ashton, F. M., Gifford, E. M. Jr., and Bisalputra, T. 1963. Structural changes in Phaseolus vulgaris induced by atrazine. I. Histological changes. II. Effects on the fine structure of chloroplasts. Bot. Gaz. 124:329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Baird, D. D., Upchurch, R. P., Homesley, W. B., and Franz, J. E. 1971. Introduction of a new broad spectrum post emergence herbicide class with utility for herbaceous perennial weed control. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 26:64–68.Google Scholar
5. Beers, R. F. Jr. and Sizer, I. W. 1952. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J. Biol. Chem. 195.133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Bickoff, E. M., Livingston, A. L., and Van Atta, G. R. 1952. Rapid determination of carotene in alfalfa. J. Assoc. Off. Agric. Chem. 35:826–828.Google Scholar
7. Davies, B. H. 1965. Analysis of carotenoid pigments. Pages 489–532 in Goodwin, T. W., ed. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
8. Davis, H. E. and Fawcett, R. S. 1977. Effects of several environmental factors on glyphoate activity in quackgrass [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.] and alfalfa. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 10.Google Scholar
9. Holden, M. 1965. Chlorophylls. Pages 461–488 in Goodwin, T. W., ed. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
10. Holm, L. N. 1969. Weed problems in developing countries. Weed Sci. 17:113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Krinksy, N. J. 1966. The role of carotenoid pigments as protective agents against photosensitized oxidations in chloroplasts. Pages 423–430 in Goodwin, T. W., ed. Biochemistry of Chloroplasts. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
12. Loomis, W. D. 1966. Removal of phenolic compounds during the isolation of plant enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 13:555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. S., and Randall, R. J. 1951. Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Mackinney, G. 1938. Some absorption spectra of leaf extracts. Plant Physiol. 13:123–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. McWhorter, C. G. 1974. Effect of the environment on the toxicity of glyphosate to soybeans and johnsongrass. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 118.Google Scholar
16. Nelson, D. P. and Kieson, L. A. 1972. Enthalpy of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by catalase at 25 C (with molar extinction coefficients of H2O2 solutions in the UV). Anal. Biochem. 49:474–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Stanger, E. C. Jr. and Appleby, A. P. 1972. A proposed mechanism for diuron-induced phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 20:357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sweetser, P. B. and Todd, C. W. 1961. The effect of monuron on oxygen liberation in photosynthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 51:504–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Upchurch, R. P. and Baird, D. D. 1972. Herbicidal action of Mon-0563 as influenced by light and soil. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 25:41–44.Google Scholar
20. Wallihan, E. F. 1973. Portable reflectance meter for estimating chlorophyll concentrations in leaves. Agron. J. 75:659–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wills, G. D. 1974. Effect of temperature, relative humidity, soil moisture and surfactant on the toxicity of glyphosate to cotton and purple nutsedge. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 119.Google Scholar
22. Zandstra, B. H., Teo, C. K., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1974. Response of purple nutsedge to repeated applications of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 22:230–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar