Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:42:21.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tebuthiuron Effects on Artemisia Spp. and Associated Grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas D. Whitson
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Sci., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Harold P. Alley
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Sci., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

Abstract

Tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea} was evaluated on three Wyoming soil types for control of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.), silver sagebrush (Artemisia cana Pursh.), and phytotoxic effects on associated vegetation. Big sagebrush was controlled with tebuthiuron at application rates of 0.6 to 1.1 kg ai/ha, whereas silver sagebrush was not completely controlled. Prairie junegrass [Koeleria pyramidata (Cam.) Beauv.], western wheatgrass (Agropyron smithii Rydb. ♯3 AGRSM), needleandthread (Stipa comata Trin. ♯ STDCO), and green needlegrass (Stipa viritdula Trin. ♯ STOVI) were not significantly reduced with tebuthiuron up to 1.1 kg ai/ha. Blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis H.B.K. ♯ BOBGR), downy brome (Bromus tectorum L. ♯ BROTE), plains pricklypear (Opuntia polyacantha Haw. ♯ OPUPO), and broom snakeweed [Gutierrezia sarothrae (Pursh.) Britt. and Rugsby, ♯ GUESA] were tolerant to tebuthiuron at rates up to 1.1 kg ai/ha.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alley, H. P. 1965. Big sagebrush control. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 354R. University of Wyoming. 16 pp.Google Scholar
2. Beetle, A. A. 1960. A study of sagebrush. Wyo. Agri. Exp. Sta. Bull. 368. 83 pp.Google Scholar
3. Bjerregaard, R. S., Keaton, J. A., McNeill, K. E., and Warner, L. C. 1978. Rangeland brush and weed control with tebuthiuron. Proc. First Int. Rangeland Congress of the Soc. for Range Mgmt. 1:654656.Google Scholar
4. Carter, J. F. 1962. Pages 90101. Sec. V, Study of Pasture Flora. Pastures and Range Research Techniques. Cornell Univ. Press. p. 90101.Google Scholar
5. Hatzios, K. K., Penner, D., and Bell, D. 1980. Inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport in isolated spinach chloroplasts by two 1,3,4-thiadiazol derivatives. Plant Physiol. 65:319321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Klauzer, J. C. and Arnold, W. E. 1975. Efficacy of tebuthiuron for control of Artemisia tridentata in native range. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 30:44.Google Scholar
7. Meadors, C. H. and Fisher, C. E. 1977. Practices showing promise for two years but not fully recommended. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 30:167.Google Scholar
8. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1980. Hexazinone and other herbicides on Texas woody plants. Weed Sci. 28:358362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Miller, R. F., Findley, R. R., and Alderfer-Findley, J. 1980. Changes in mountain big sagebrush habitat types following spray release. J. Range Mgmt. 33:278281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Pechanec, J. F., Plummer, A. P., Robertson, J. H., and Hull, A. C. Jr. 1965. Sagebrush control on rangelands. U.S. Govt. Printing Off. 44 pp.Google Scholar
11. U.S. Bureau of Land Management. 1964. The Taylor Grazing Act. U.S. Government Printing Office. 13 pp.Google Scholar
12. Wattenbarger, D. W., Belles, W. S., and Lee, G. A. 1979. The control of big sagebrush on central Idaho rangeland. Proc. Western Soc. Weed Sci. p. 77.Google Scholar
13. Whitson, T. D. and Alley, H. P. 1982. Effects of tebuthiuron on range species complex and forage production. Proc. Western Soc. Weed Sci. p. 3941.Google Scholar
14. Wilson, D. G., Eaton, B. J., and Kurtz, W. L. 1978. Tolerance of several forage grasses to tebuthiuron. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 31:195.Google Scholar