Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:11:15.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Effect on Difenzoquat Phytotoxicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Adam Dobranski
Affiliation:
Exchange Sci., Res. Inst., Skierniewic, Poland

Abstract

The phytotoxicity of difenzoquat (1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenyl-1H-pyrazolium) applied to the three-leaf stages of hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Waldron’ and ‘Era’), barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Beacon’) and wild oat (Avena fatua L. ♯ AVEFA) grown under constant, fluctuating, or alternating day-night temperatures was determined in controlled environment chambers. Difenzoquat injury to wild oat and Era wheat was greater at a constant 20 or 30 than at 10 C; however, injury to Waldron wheat was similar at 10, 20, and 30 C. Difenzoquat caused only slight injury to barley, and injury was similar at all temperatures. In Era wheat, selectivity of difenzoquat for wild oat was maximum with a 10-C night temperature in an otherwise 30-C-temperature environment; in Beacon barley selectivity was maximum with 3 or more days of 20- or 30-C posttreatment temperature; and in Waldron wheat selectivity was not adequate at any of the temperatures studied.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aaberg, D. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1978. Wheat and wild oat response to difenzoquat. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:3643.Google Scholar
2. Chow, P. N. P. 1978. Selectivity and site of action in relation to field performance of diclofop. Weed Sci. 26:352358.Google Scholar
3. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., and Mulder, C. E. G. 1977. Difenzoquat (Avenge) a new herbicide for wild oat control. N.D. Farm Res. 35:(2)1921.Google Scholar
4. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1978. Difenzoquat for wild oat (Avena fatua L.) control. Weed Sci. 26:571576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., Dobranzski, A., and Pudelko, J. 1978. Temperature effect on barban phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 26:132134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., and Pacholak, E. 1981. MSMA for weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 29:3337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Nalewaja, J. D., Adamczewski, K. A., Garcia-Torres, L., Pacholak, E., and Miller, S. D. 1976. Factors affecting HOE-23408 phytotoxicity. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:132134.Google Scholar
8. Neidermeyer, R. W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1974. Barban selectivity for wild oat in wheat. Weed Sci. 22:476480.Google Scholar
9. Ostlie, B. 1963. Pages 201206 in Statistics in Research. 2nd. ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
10. Shafer, N. E. 1974. Difenzoquat a new post-emergence wild oat herbicide for wheat and barley. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 12:831839.Google Scholar
11. Sharma, M. P., Vanden Born, W. H., Friesen, H. A., and McBeath, D. K. 1976. Penetration, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-difenzoquat in wild oat and barley. Weed Sci. 24:379384.Google Scholar
12. Thurston, J. M. and Phillipson, A. 1976. Distribution. Pages 1964 in Jones, D. P., ed. Wild Oats in World Agriculture. Ag. Res. Counc. London.Google Scholar
13. Winfield, R. J. 1974. Trials for the control of wild oats (Avena spp.) in wheat and barley and on crop tolerance in wheat. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 12:875882.Google Scholar
14. Winfield, R. J. and Calidicott, J. J. B. 1975. Difenzoquat (1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenyl-1H pyrazolium methyl sulfate) a selective herbicide for the control of wild oats (Avena spp.) in wheat and barley. Pestic. Sci. 6:297303.Google Scholar