Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:36:50.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild oat (Avena fatua) seed production in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) is affected by the interaction of wild oat density and herbicide rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael J. Wille ,
Donald C. Thill  and
William J. Price
Michael J. Wille
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
William J. Price
Affiliation:
Statistical Programs, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The efficacy of current wild oat herbicides and their high cost have resulted in use rates that are less than those recommended. While acceptable weed control may be attained at less cost, this practice does not consider the potential for increased wild oat seed production. The objective of this experiment was to determine the interaction of wild oat density and reduced imazamethabenz rates on wild oat seed production in spring barley. As wild oat densities increased from 8 to 1,100 plants m−2, wild oat seed production increased from 180 to 9,950 seed m−2 without herbicide, and from 0 to 2,810 seed m−2 using 0.53 kg ai ha−1 imazamethabenz. This general pattern was modeled using a cumulative logistic function. Estimates from this model indicated that < 1 wild oat seed m−2 was produced at population densities of ≤ 20 plants at any imazamethabenz rate. Imazamethabenz rates of 0.26 kg ha−1 or greater at wild oat densities of less than approximately 190 plants m−2 did not result in wild oat seed production above the initial population density. As wild oat density increased, however, imazamethabenz rates below 0.40 kg ha−1 resulted in substantially greater wild oat seed production compared to the recommended rate.

Keywords

Imazamethabenzwild oat, Avena fatua L. AVEFAspring barley, Hordeum vulgare L., ‘Baronesse.’Imazamethabenz-methylimidazolinoneseedbankseed rainAVEFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , June 1998 , pp. 336 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Banting, J. D. 1966a. Studies on the persistence of Avena fatua . Can. J. Plant Sci. 46: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, J. D. 1966b. Factors affecting the persistence of Avena fatua . Can. J. Plant Sci. 46: 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 19: 505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J. and Sparrow, D. H. 1996. A comparison of methods to predict weed seedling populations from the soil seedbank. Weed Sci. 44: 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1970. Seed production by Avena fatua populations in various crops. Proc. 10th Br. Weed Control Conf. 1: 7–11.Google Scholar
Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1972. Germination periodicity, plant survival and seed production in populations of Avena fatua L. growing in spring barley. Proc. 11th Br. Weed Control conf. 1:218-225.Google Scholar
Chao, J. F., Hsiao, A. I., and Quick, W. A. 1993. Effects of Imazamethabenz on the main shoot growth and tillering of wild oat (Avena fatua L.). J. Plant Growth Regul. 12: 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R. D., Weaver, S. E., Martin, T. D., Blair, A. M., and Wilson, J. 1991. Dynamics of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and winter cereals. Weed Res. 31: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. M., Thill, D. C., Tapia, L., Shaffi, B., and Lish, J. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) density affect spring barley grain yield. Weed Technol. 5: 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, D. F., ed. 1970. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook. No. 29. Association of Official Seed Analysts. 62 p.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Avena fatua L. and other members of the “wild oat” group. Pages 105–113 in World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Idaho State Climate Services. 1997. Idaho State Climate Database. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho College of Agriculture, [a computer database].Google Scholar
Jordan, N. 1996. Weed prevention: Priority research for alternative weed management. J. Prod. Agric. 9: 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahler, R. L. and Guy, S. 1992. North Idaho Fertilizer Guide: Spring Barley. Cooperative Extension Service CIS 920. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho College of Agriculture. 4 p.Google Scholar
McBeath, D. K., Dew, D. A., and Friesen, H. A. 1970. Competition between barley and wild oats as affected by nitrogen, barban and time of seeding. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50: 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1990. Influence of burial depth on wild oat (Avena fatua) seed longevity. Weed Technol. 4: 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishita, D. W. and Thill, D. C. 1988a. Factors of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference on spring barley (Hordium vulgare) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 36: 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishita, D. W. and Thill, D. C. 1988b. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) growth and development in monoculture and mixed culture. Weed Sci. 36: 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishita, D. W. and Thill, D. C. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) interference in a greenhouse experiment. Weed Sci. 39: 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, L. A. and Gealy, D. R. 1983. Growth characteristics of wild oat (Avena fatua) in the Pacific Northwest. Weed Sci. 31: 226–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. 1977. Wild oats: global doom. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 30: 21–32.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33: 498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1990. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 956 p.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. P. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds. 27. Avena fatua L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Maxwell, B. D., and Harris, J. D. 1997. Influence of application timing on the efficacy of reduced rate post emergence herbicides for wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Technol. 11: 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Murphy, S. D. 1996. Weed science beyond the weeds: the role of integrated weed management (IWM) in agroecosystem health. Weed Sci. 44: 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5: 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thill, D. C., Bechinski, E., Morishita, D., Barton, D., Campbell, J., and Dobbins, R. 1995. WildOat for Windows. Version 1.0. Univ. Idaho Coll. Agric. Software Development Group 116: 51.Google Scholar
Thurston, J. M. 1951. Some experiments and field observations on the germination of wild oat (Avena fatua and Avena ludoviciana) seed in the soil and emergence of seedlings. Ann. Appl. Biol. 38: 812–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, J. M. 1961. The effect of depth of burying and frequency of cultivation of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and Avena ludoviciana dur.). Weed Res. 1: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingley, D. C. 1961. Longevity of seed of wild oats, winter rye, and wheat in cultivated soil. Weed Res. 9: 609–611.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Schweizer, E. E., Lybecker, D. W., and Westra, P. 1996. Integrated weed management systems for irrigated corn (Zea mays) production in Colorado—a case study. Weed Sci. 44: 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. J. 1985. Effect of seed age and cultivation on seedling emergence and seed decline of Avena fatua L. in winter barley. Weed Res. 25: 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. J., Cousens, R., and Wright, K. J. 1990. The response of spring barley and winter wheat to Avena fatua population density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 116: 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. J. and Cussans, G. W. 1975. A study of the population dynamics of Avena fatua L. as influenced by straw burning, seed shedding and cultivations. Weed Res. 15: 249–258.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J., Cussans, G. W., and Ayres, P. 1974. The effect of triallate and barban on the control of Avena fatua in spring barley on the yield of barley and the presence of A. fatua seed in the harvested grain. Proc. 12th Br. Weed Control Conf. 1:25–32.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. and Phipps, J. A. 1985. A long term experiment on tillage, rotation and herbicide use for the control of fatua in cereals. 1985 Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 2: 693–700.Google Scholar