Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:24:41.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption and Translocation of MON 0818 Adjuvant in Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stewart L. Sherrick ,
Harvey A. Holt  and
F. Dan Hess
Stewart L. Sherrick
Affiliation:
Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Harvey A. Holt
Affiliation:
Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
F. Dan Hess
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Path., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To develop an understanding of how adjuvants might enhance glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] activity, absorption and translocation of a polyethoxylated tallow amine amphoteric surfactant (MON 0818) were examined in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L. # CONAR). Scanning electron microscopy did not reveal any physical disruption of the epicuticular waxes from spray applications of MON 0818, an oxysorbic (20 POE) (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate) surfactant, or glyphosate. Radioactive MON 0818 absorption was rapid during the first 6 h. Maximum absorption (84%) occurred by 24 h after application. Less than 3% of the applied radioactivity was recovered from the epicuticular wax of treated leaves. Movement of radioactivity away from the treated area was limited predominantly to movement within the treated leaf. Altering light intensity or humidity in which the plants developed before treatment did not influence MON 0818 absorption.

Keywords

GlyphosatesurfactantpenetrationuptakeCONAR
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , November 1986 , pp. 817 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, N. H. and Girling, J. 1983. The absorption of surfactants into wheat. Pestic. Sci. 14:399–404.Google Scholar
2. Bukovac, M. J. 1976. Herbicide entry into plants. Pages 335–364 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicidies: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology, Vol. 1. 2d ed. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
3. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:174–177.Google Scholar
4. Currier, H. B. and Dybing, C. D. 1959. Foliar penetration of herbicides – review and present status. Weeds 7:195–213.Google Scholar
5. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circular No. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
6. Hull, H. M., Davis, D. G., and Stolzenberg, G. E. 1982. Action of adjuvants on plant surfaces. Pages 26–67 in Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
7. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kuzych, I. J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1983. Alteration of epicuticular wax structure by surfactants. Micron and Microsc. Acta 14:279–280.Google Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. 1963. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of foliar sprays of diuron. Weeds 11:265–269.Google Scholar
10. McWhorter, C. G., Jordan, T. N., and Wills, G. D. 1980. Translocation of 14C-glyphosate in soybeans (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 28:113–118.Google Scholar
11. Norris, R. F. 1982. Action and fate of adjuvants in plants. Pages 68–83 in Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
12. Norris, R. F. and Bukovac, M. J. 1972. Influence of cuticular waxes on penetration of pear leaf cuticle by 1-napthaleneacetic acid. Pestic. Sci. 3:705–708.Google Scholar
13. O'Sipow, L. S. 1972. Surface Chemistry – Theory and Industrial Applications. Robert E. Krieger Pub. Co., Huntington, NY Page 473.Google Scholar
14. Parr, J. F. and Norman, A. G. 1965. Considerations in the use of surfactants in plant systems: A review. Bot. Gaz. 126:86–96.Google Scholar
15. Richard, E. P. Jr. and Slife, F. W. 1979. In vivo and in vitro characterization of the foliar entry of glyphosate in hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum). Weed Sci. 27:426–433.Google Scholar
16. St. John, J. B., Bartells, P. G., and Hilton, J. L. 1974. Surfactant effects on isolated plant cells. Weed Sci. 22:233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Schönherr, J. and Bukovac, M. J. 1973. Ion exchange properties of isolated tomato fruit cuticular membrane: Exchange capacity nature of fixed charges and cation selectivity. Planta 109:73–93.Google Scholar
18. Sherrick, S. L., Holt, H. A., and Hess, F. D. 1986. Effects of adjuvants and environment during plant development on glyphosate absorption and translocation in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 34:811–816.Google Scholar
19. Singh, M., Orsenigo, J. R., and Shah, D. O. 1984. Surface tension and contact angle of herbicide solutions affected by surfactants. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61:596–599.Google Scholar
20. Smith, L. W. and Foy, C. L. 1966. Penetration and distribution studies in bean, cotton, and barley from foliar and root applications of Tween 20-C14, fatty acid and oxyethylene labeled. J. Agric. Food Chem. 14:117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, mobility, and microbial degradation of glyphosate in the soil. Weed Sci. 23:229–234.Google Scholar
22. Stolzenberg, G. E., Olson, P. A., Zaylskie, R. G., and Mansager, E. R. 1982. Behavior and fate of ethoxylated alkylphenol nonionic surfactant in barley plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30: 637–644.Google Scholar
23. Sutton, D. L. and Foy, C. L. 1971. Effect of diquat and several surfactants on membrane permeability in red beet root tissue. Bot. Gaz. 132:299–304.Google Scholar
24. Towne, C. A., Bartels, P. G., and Hilton, J. L. 1978. Interaction of surfactant and herbicide treatments on single cells of leaves. Weed Sci. 26:182–188.Google Scholar
25. Whitehouse, P., Holloway, P. J., and Casely, J. C. 1982. The epicuticular wax of wild oats in relation to foliar entry of the herbicides diclofop-methyl and difenzoquat. Pages 315–330 in Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E., eds. The Plant Cuticle. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
26. Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1977. Glyphosate toxicity to common milkweed and hemp dogbane as influenced by surfactants. Weed Sci. 25:275–287.Google Scholar
27. Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557–566.Google Scholar
28. Yamada, Y., Rasmussen, H. P., Bukovac, M. J., and Wittwer, S. H. 1966. Binding sites of inorganic ions and urea on isolated cuticular membrane surfaces. Am. J. Bot. 53:170–172.Google Scholar