Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:12:34.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, Translocation, and Exudation of Glyphosate, Fosamine, and Amitrole in Field Horsetail (Equisetum arvense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David Coupland  and
Dwight V. Peabody
David Coupland
Affiliation:
Washington State Univ., Northwestern Washington Res. and Ext. Unit, Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Dwight V. Peabody
Affiliation:
Washington State Univ., Northwestern Washington Res. and Ext. Unit, Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The absorption, translocation, and exudation of 14C-glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine], 14C-fosamine [ethyl hydrogen (aminocarbonyl)phosphonate] and 14C-amitrole (3-amino-s-triazole) in field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) were examined in glasshouse experiments. Amitrole was absorbed much more readily than either fosamine or glyphosate, and although the initial translocation of amitrole was faster, eventually more 14C was recovered from the underground parts of plants treated with 14C-glyphosate and fosamine. Radioactivity from all three compounds was translocated to areas of meristematic activity such as shoot and rhizome apices and rhizome nodes. The amounts of radioactivity recovered from the roots and rhizomes were small in relation to the amounts applied. Root exudation and guttation could account for some loss of herbicide from the plant. Radioactivity from 14C-amitrole, in particular, was present in relatively large amounts in guttation fluid.

Keywords

GuttationN-(phosphonomethyl) glycine3-amino-s-triazoleethyl hydrogen (aminocarbonyl) phosphonate
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 5 , September 1981 , pp. 556 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Caseley, J. C. 1972. The effect of environmental factors on the performance of glyphosate against Agropyron repens . Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 2:641–647.Google Scholar
2. Coupland, D. and Caseley, J. C. 1979. Presence of 14C activity in root exudates and guttation fluid from Agropyron repens treated with 14C-labelled glyphosate. New Phytol. 83:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Davison, J. G. 1972. The response of 21 perennial weed species to glyphosate. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 1:11–16.Google Scholar
4. Goatley, J. L. and Lewis, R. W. 1966. Composition of guttation fluid from rye, wheat and barley seedlings. Plant Physiol. 41:373–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Godbout, E. 1960. Weed control in field peas with chemicals. Res. Rep. Nat. Weed Comm. East. Sect. 1 p.Google Scholar
6. Hernandez, T. J., Hudson, W. H., and Gonzales, F. E. 1975. A progress report of Krenite brush control agent. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:261–263.Google Scholar
7. Klepper, B. and Kaufman, M. R. 1966. Removal of salt from xylem sap by leaves and stems of guttating plants. Plant Physiol. 41:1743–1747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Laurin, R. 1961. New herbicides for forage and pasture crops. Proc. West. Can. Weed Control Conf. pp 25–28.Google Scholar
9. Linder, P. J., Mitchell, J. W., and Freeman, G. D. 1964. Persistence and translocation of exogenous regulating compounds that exude from roots. J. Agric. Food Chem. 12:473–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Massini, P. 1958. Uptake and translocation of 3-amino- and 3-hydroxy-1,2,4-triazole in plants. Acta. Bot. Neerl. 7:524–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McDougall, B. M. 1970. Movement of 14C-photosynthate into the roots of wheat seedlings and exudation of 14C from intact roots. New Phytol. 69:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Neihuss, M. H. and Roediger, K. J. 1974. Ammonium ethyl carbamoyl-phosphonate, a new plant growth regulator for the control of undesirable brushwood species. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 3:1015–1022.Google Scholar
13. Rodrigues, T. J. and Worsham, A. D. 1980. Exudation of glyphosate from treated vegetation and its implication of increasing yields of no-till corn and soybeans. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 92.Google Scholar
14. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Takematsu, T., Monnai, M., and Takeuchi, Y. 1978. Studies on the regulation of perennial weeds and shrubs by dormancy-deepening substances. Bull. Coll. Agric. Utsunomiya Univ., 10:77–86. Coll. Agric., Utsunomiya Univ., Japan.Google Scholar
16. Wagner, V., and Bandeen, J. D. 1978. Horsetail control in corn. Res. Rep. Expert Committee on Weeds. Eastern Canada. p. 314.Google Scholar
17. Wagner, V., and Bandeen, J. D. 1978. Regrowth study of horsetail. Res. Rep. Expert Committee on Weeds. Eastern Canada. p. 315.Google Scholar
18. Weigel, R. C. Jr., and Riggleman, J. D. 1978. Krenite (ammonium ethyl carbamoyl phosphonate). Brush control agent – Status of research and development. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 87.Google Scholar
19. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A. S. 1958. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using 14 C-labelled compounds. Hilgardia 28:161–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar