Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:35:33.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, Translocation, and Foliar Activity of Clopyralid and Chlorsulfuron in Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) and Perennial Sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Malcolm D. Devine  and
William H. Vanden Born
Malcolm D. Devine
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB., Canada T6G 2P5
William H. Vanden Born
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB., Canada T6G 2P5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both 14C-clopyralid (3,6-dichloropicolinic acid) and 14C-chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzensulfonamide} were readily absorbed by Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. ♯ CIRAR] leaves, with 99 and 75%, respectively, of the applied doses absorbed 144 h after application. Absorbed 14C-clopyralid was rapidly exported from the treated leaves, whereas 14C-chlorsulfuron was translocated much more slowly. After 144 h, 29% of the applied 14C-clopyralid and 5% of the applied 14C-chlorsulfuron were recovered in the roots and developing root buds of Canada thistle plants. Smaller amounts of the two herbicides were absorbed and translocated in perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis L. ♯ SONAR) than in Canada thistle. More 14C-clopyralid than 14C-chlorsulfuron was absorbed and translocated out of treated leaves of perennial sowthistle, but equal amounts, 3 to 4% of the applied doses, were recovered in the roots and root buds 144 h after application. Foliar applications of clopyralid, followed by removal of the treated shoot 24, 72, or 144 h after application, markedly reduced shoot regrowth in both Canada thistle and perennial sowthistle. Similar treatment with chlorsulfuron did not prevent shoot regrowth in either species.

Keywords

CIRARSONAR
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , July 1985 , pp. 524 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arny, A. C. 1932. Variations in the organic reserves in underground parts of five perennial weeds from late April to November. Minn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 84. 28 pp.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W. and Mayeux, H. S. 1980. Effectiveness and distribution of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 28:666–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chang, F. Y. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1971. Translocation and metabolism of dicamba in Tartary buckwheat. Weed Sci. 19: 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Devine, M. D., Bestman, H. D., Hall, C., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1984. Leaf wash techniques for estimation of foliar absorption of herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:418–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Donald, W. W. 1984. Chlorsulfuron effects on shoot growth and root buds of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 32:42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Field, R. J. and Phung, H. T. 1980. The preferential accumulation of picloram at sites of active growth in gorse (Ulex europaeus L.). Weed Res. 20:177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Frankton, C. and Mulligan, G. A. 1970. Weeds of Canada. Can. Dep. Agric. Publ. 948. Ottawa. 217 pp.Google Scholar
8. Fykse, H. 1974. Untersuchungen uber Sonchus arvensis L. I. Translokation von C-14-markierten Assimilaten. Weed Res. 14:305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Fykse, H. 1975. Untersuchungen uber Sonchus arvensis L. II. Translokation von 14C-MCPA unter verschiedenen Bedingungen. Weed Res. 15:165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Haagsma, T. 1975. Dowco 290 herbicide – a coming new selective herbicide. Down Earth 30:1–2.Google Scholar
11. Hakansson, S. 1969. Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. I. Development and growth, and the response to burial and defoliation in different developmental stages. Lantbrukshogsk. Ann. 35:989–1030.Google Scholar
12. Hakansson, S. and Wallgren, B. 1972. Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. III. The development from reproductive roots cut into different lengths and planted at different depths, with and without competition from barley. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 2:15–26.Google Scholar
13. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
14. Hurtt, W. and Foy, C. L. 1965. Some factors influencing the excretion of foliarly-applied dicamba and picloram from roots of Black Valentine beans. Plant Physiol. 40:S48.Google Scholar
15. Levitt, G., Ploeg, H. L., Weigel, R. C., and Fitzgerald, D. J. 1981. 2-chloro-N-[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl] benzenesulfonamide, a new herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:416–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:1033–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. O'Donovan, J. T. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1981. A microauto-radiographic study of 14C-labeled picloram distribution in soybean following root uptake. Can. J. Bot. 59:1928–1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. O'Sullivan, P. A. 1982. Response of various broad-leaved weeds, and tolerance of cereals, to soil and foliar applications of DPX-4189. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. O'Sullivan, P. A., Kossatz, V. C., Weiss, G. M., and Dew, D. A. 1982. An approach to estimating yield loss of barley due to Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:725–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1982. Selective control of Canada thistle in rapeseed with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:989–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1984. Absorption and translocation of 14C-3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Weed Res. 24:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Peschken, D. P., Hunter, J. H., and Thomas, A. G. 1980. Damage in dollars caused by Canada thistle in wheat in Saskatchewan. Proc. Can. Thistle Symp. Regina, SK. Pages 37–43.Google Scholar
23. Peschken, D. P., Thomas, A. G., and Wise, R. F. 1983. Loss in yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus, B. campestris) caused by perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis) in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Weed Sci. 31:740–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Reed, C. F. 1970. Selected weeds of the United States. Agric. Handb. No. 366. USDA, Washington, DC. 463 pp.Google Scholar
25. Sharma, M. P., Chang, F. Y., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1971. Penetration and translocation of picloram in Canada thistle. Weed Sci. 19:349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchison, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar