Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:43:54.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activity, adsorption, mobility, and field persistence of pyrithiobac in three soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vassiliki G. Veletza ,
Nikolaos S. Kaloumenos ,
Antonios N. Papantoniou ,
Stratos G. Kadis  and
Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos
Vassiliki G. Veletza
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Nikolaos S. Kaloumenos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Antonios N. Papantoniou
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Stratos G. Kadis
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Petri dish bioassays, based on root response of corn grown in soil and perlite, were used to study the activity, adsorption, and leaching of pyrithiobac in a clay, loam, and a clay loam soils containing 2.3, 1.4, and 1.3% organic matter, respectively. Both bioassays indicated that activity of pyrithiobac (reduction of corn root length) increased with increasing herbicide concentration, but in a nonlinear manner, particularly at higher concentrations. Activity of pyrithiobac was similar in clay loam and loam soils, but was lower in clay soil. Adsorption distribution coefficients (K d) for the clay, loam, and clay loam soils were 0.56, 0.10, and 0.24, respectively. Pyrithiobac leached through all three soils, and biologically available herbicide was detected below 30 cm in all soils; however, the amount leached through the clay soil was lower than that leached through the other two soils. Field persistence of pyrithiobac applied preplant incorporated (PPI), preemergence (PRE), or postemergence (POST) at 68, 102, or 136 g ha−1 was similar in loam and clay loam soils, but was more persistent in clay soil. Pyrithiobac applied POST in clay and loam soils was more persistent than that applied PPI or PRE; however, in clay soil field persistence of POST pyrithiobac was similar with that applied PPI or PRE. Biologically available residues were not detected in 0- to 10-cm soil depth 120 d after any herbicide treatment applied either PPI or PRE in all soils, but this was not the case for pyrithiobac applied POST in the loam soil. Adsorption of pyrithiobac was very low in all three soils, and this was the reason for its increased mobility even below 30-cm depth in all soils. The field persistence of pyrithiobac was generally less than one growing season. However, some pyrithiobac may have moved deeper in the soil and could be harmful to rotational crops after plowing or through capillary movement upward.

Keywords

Pyrithiobaccorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer Costanza’cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 474’, ‘Hazera Vered’, ‘Deltapine Vulcano’Herbicide application timingcotton herbicideherbicide leaching
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 212 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, R. L., Snipes, E. C., and Crowder, S. H. 1997. Fruiting response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to pyrithiobac. Weed Technol 11:59–63.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1993. Staple® Herbicide, Technical Information. Wilmington, DE: E. I. Dupont de Nemours. 4 p.Google Scholar
Baldwin, G. B., Panter, D. M., Seay, R. E., Corkern, C. B., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Responses of selected cotton varieties to Staple (pyrithiobac) applications. Page 765 in Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A. eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences; New Orleans, LA; January 6–10, 1992. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.Google Scholar
Basham, G., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci 35:576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskaran, S. and Kennedy, I. R. 1999. Sorption and desorption kinetics of diuron, fluometuron, prometryn, and pyrithiobac sodium in soils. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 34:943–963.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. F., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. Pages 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D. eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Dekker.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci 37:815–819.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci 34:788–793.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. A., Hayes, M. R., and Mueller, T. C. 1996. Environment affects cotton and velvetleaf response to pyrithiobac. Weed Sci 44:241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultgren, R. P., Hudson, R. J., and Sims, G. K. 2002. Effects of soil pH and soil water content on prosulfuron dissipation. J. Agric. Food Chem 50:3236–3243.Google Scholar
Hurst, H. R. 1998. Ivyleaf morninglory (Ipomoea hederifolia L. Jacq.) and slender amaranth (Amaranthus viridus L.) control in BXN cotton. Pages 852–854 in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference; San Diego, CA; January 5–9, 1998. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.Google Scholar
James, T. K., Holland, P. T., Rahman, A., and Lu, Y. R. 1999. Degradation of the sulfonylurea herbicides chlorsulfuron and triasulfuron in a high-organic-matter volcanic soil. Weed Res 39:137–147.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. H., Jordan, D. L., Johnson, W. G., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, imazethapyr and DPX-PE350 injury to succeeding crops. Weed Technol 7:641–644.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993a. Influence of application variables on efficacy of postemergence application of DPX-PE350. Weed Technol 7:619–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Johnson, D. H., Johnson, W. G., Kendig, J. A., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1993b. Carryover of DPX-PE350 to grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and soybean (Glycine max) on two Arkansas soils. Weed Technol 7:645–649.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed Sci 37:712–718.Google Scholar
Matocha, C. J. and Hossner, L. R. 1998. Pyrithiobac sorption on reference sorbents and soils. J. Agric. Food Chem 46:4435–4440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matocha, C. J. and Hossner, L. R. 1999. Mobility of the herbicide pyrithiobac through intact soil columns. J. Agric. Food Chem 47:1755–1759.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. H., Crowder, S. H., and Williams, C. S. 1992. Staple—a new cotton herbicide from Dupont. Page 1318 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A. eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences; Nashville, TN; January 6–10, 1992. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R. E., Mattice, J. D., Lavy, T. L., and Frans, R. E. 1986. Residual fluometuron levels in three Arkansas soils under continuous cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) production. Weed Sci 34:122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, D. L. and Mallipadi, N. M. 1991. Mechanisms of selectivity of imidazolinones. Pages 91–102 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L. eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Shankle, M. W., Hayes, R. M., Reich, V. H., and Mueller, T. C. 1996. MSMA and pyrithiobac effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development, yield, and quality. Weed Sci 44:137–142.Google Scholar
Thirunarayanan, K., Zimdahl, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci 33:558–563.Google Scholar
Weber, J. B., Wilkerson, G. G., and Linker, H. M. et al. 2000. A proposal to standardize soil/solution herbicide distribution coefficients. Weed Sci 48:75–88.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Shaw, D. R. 1996. Carryover potential of pyrithiobac to rotational crops on a Mississippi black belt region clay soil. Weed Technol 10:140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Shaw, D. R. 1997. Effect of application timing on pyrithiobac persistence. Weed Sci 45:179–182.Google Scholar