Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:53:36.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application Timing and Corn (Zea mays) Residue Effects on Weed Control from Metribuzin plus Metolachlor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Fritz K. Koppatschek ,
Rex A. Liebl  and
Fred W. Slife
Fritz K. Koppatschek
Affiliation:
Emeritus, Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Rex A. Liebl
Affiliation:
Emeritus, Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Fred W. Slife
Affiliation:
Emeritus, Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and laboratory studies were conducted in 1985 and 1986 to determine the effect of herbicide application timing and level of corn residue on metribuzin plus metolachlor for weed control in soybean. Herbicides were applied early preplant (35 days before planting), sequentially (early preplant and preemergence), or preemergence. Giant foxtail control was better with sequential application than early preplant herbicide application in both years. Control of velvetleaf, smooth pigweed, and jimsonweed was independent of application timing, except in 1986, when jimsonweed control was less from herbicides applied early preplant compared to sequentially. Metribuzin reaching the soil was less when applied to high levels of corn residue compared to low residue levels. However, corn residue level had no effect on weed control.

Keywords

Corn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3377′soybean, Glycine max L. Merr. ‘Wells’giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herm. ♯3 SETFAvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. ♯ ABUTHsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. ♯ AMACHjimsonweed, Datura stramonium L. ♯ DATSTmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onemetolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) acetamideDegradationABUTHAMACHDATSTSETFA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , May 1989 , pp. 345 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:164–168.Google Scholar
2. Burrows, W. C. and Larson, W. E. 1961. Effect of amount of mulch on soil temperature and early growth of corn. Agron. J. 53:19–22.Google Scholar
3. Coble, H. D. and Schrader, J. W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Connell, J. T. and Derting, C. W. 1973. Glyphosate performance on johnsongrass and associated weed species in no-till soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:51–58.Google Scholar
5. Crosson, P. 1982. Conservation Tillage and Conventional Tillage: A Comparative Assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency Project Summary. EPA-600/S3-82-027.Google Scholar
6. Erbach, D. C. and Lovely, W. G. 1975. Effect of plant residue on herbicide performance in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 23:512–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ghadiri, H., Shea, P. J., and Wicks, G. A. 1984. Interception and retention of atrazine by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble. Weed Sci. 32:24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Johnson, C. W. and Coble, H. D. 1986. Effects of three weed residues on weed and crop growth. Weed Sci. 34:403–408.Google Scholar
9. Jordan, L. S., Day, B. E., and Clerx, W. A. 1964. Photodecomposition of triazines. Weeds. 12:5–6.Google Scholar
10. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27: 520–526.Google Scholar
11. Lowder, S. W. and Weber, J. B. 1979. Atrazine retention by crop residues in reduced tillage systems. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:24–27.Google Scholar
12. Roskamp, G. 1983. Fall and early spring herbicide applications for giant foxtail [Seteria faberi (Herm.)] control in no-till soybeans. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 3.Google Scholar
13. Steinsick, T. W., Oliver, L. R., and Collins, F. C. 1982. Allelopathic potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw on selected weed species. Weed Sci. 32:293–298.Google Scholar
14. Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293–298.Google Scholar
15. Wicks, G. A. 1985. Early application of herbicides for no-till sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in wheat (Triticum aestivum) stubble. Weed Sci. 33:713–716.Google Scholar
16. Wilkens, D. E., Douglas, C. L. Jr., Rasmussen, P. E., and Haasch, D. A. 1983. Tillage influences on residue incorporation and soil moisture. Am. Soc. Agric. Engineers. Paper No. 83–1026.Google Scholar